AppleInsider AppleInsider Forums


Go Back   AppleInsider > Future Hardware
Register Members List New Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-05-2009, 09:29 AM   #1
AppleInsider
Kasper's Automated Slave
 
Join Date: Nov 1997
Posts: 6,151
Apple exploring intelligent universal battery technology

Apple may be working on more effective wireless battery management systems for personal electronic devices, with a Mac serving as the hub, according to newly discovered company filings.

A trio of patent requests published by the United States Patent and Trademark Office this week describe intelligent, universal, and rechargeable batteries that would be capable of powering a plethora of devices like cell phones, wireless keyboards and mice, speakers, mp3 players, PDAs, laptop computers, microphones, headphones, and headsets.

With a global shift towards portable computing, consumers are using more and more wireless devices interconnected through infrared, Bluetooth, and ultra-wide-band, the filings note.

"One problem often encountered by a user of a wireless personal area network is the constant need to re-charge or replace the batteries of the wireless devices," Apple wrote. "Not only is this inconvenient, but it can also decrease productivity. When a critical device such as a wireless mouse or wireless keyboard runs out of power, a user may have to wait until the device is charged ... to use the computer wirelessly again."

The patent applications go on to propose a system for battery management where the Mac takes a central role. Desktops and portables would have battery charging slots built in and serve as the host for the entire system.

Low batteries would send an alert to the host machine, leading it to inform the user which battery needs to be recharged or replaced, directing the user toward a specific charging slot for a compatible, charged battery. Alerts would be sent early enough so users can save settings or any other work before an imminent power shutoff, the filings note.

In locations where there are networked Macs, the system might recommend host machines in other floors, halls, groups or departments if they have fully charged compatible batteries in their slots.



Apple implies that the host computer would be capable of controlling the rate of charge to maximize overall battery life or maximize the energy charged. A detailed charging history, including number of charge cycles and how many were "fast" or "slow", could be accessed direct from the battery. The host system would also be capable of automatically initiating a reconditioning charge after a certain number of cycles to ensure optimum performance, the company said.



Each universal battery would include built-in circuitry to communicate with the device it's connected to before it ever begins to discharge. After an agreed amount of power is negotiated, the battery would provide power at the precise level needed.



By negotiating the minimum amount of power required by the device, battery life could be maximized, the filings explain. If negotiation fails or an accidental short occurs, a safety shutoff would automatically disconnect the battery core from the battery terminals, avoiding major damage or power drain.

When the time comes for the battery to finally be replaced, the host would direct the user to a website to place an order. As an incentive to return the old battery, users would be eligible to earn recycling credits.

Apple also describes retail store kiosks capable of vending replacements that could even automatically repair and return batteries to the customer.
AppleInsider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2009, 09:51 AM   #2
Trevowski
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 46
well this is something new!!!

Removable batteries


It would be very cool to see this happen. Although in the beggining we would sacrafice a little size to our devices (due to the mechonisms that allow the batteries to be put in and taken out). But eventually the size would come down again.

I see good things comming from this


TEXAS STORM
Splatterpb.com
Trevowski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2009, 10:02 AM   #3
DimMok
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 170
Now, if they can only explore "cut-n-paste" technology on the iphone.....
DimMok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2009, 10:04 AM   #4
mknopp
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 25
This seems an odd patent for a company that has moved more and more of its products to non-removable batteries. Honestly, what good does this do for anyone owning an iPod, iPhone, or 17" Macbook Pro? None of them have removable batteries which would work with this system.

Actually, now that I think about it. This is more likely a patent which was filed simply to make sure the idea never sees the light of day. Because, if this were to be built it would be a benefit to Apple's competition, which has removable batteries.

So, I hope people were not too enamored with this idea. I doubt it will ever be built until the patent expires.
mknopp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2009, 10:21 AM   #5
JupiterOne
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: South Florida
Posts: 1,006
Quote:
Originally Posted by AppleInsider View Post
...powering a plethora of devices...
What a great word. It's not used nearly enough.
JupiterOne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2009, 10:38 AM   #6
Virgil-TB2
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,415
Quote:
Originally Posted by mknopp View Post
This seems an odd patent for a company that has moved more and more of its products to non-removable batteries. Honestly, what good does this do for anyone owning an iPod, iPhone, or 17" Macbook Pro? None of them have removable batteries which would work with this system.

Actually, now that I think about it. This is more likely a patent which was filed simply to make sure the idea never sees the light of day. Because, if this were to be built it would be a benefit to Apple's competition, which has removable batteries.

So, I hope people were not too enamored with this idea. I doubt it will ever be built until the patent expires.
So many people comment in this pattern now.
  1. Apple comes up with interesting new idea
  2. First reaction is to bitch about unrelated problem
  3. Second reaction is to assume Apple has evil intentions
  4. Final assessment? "Apple is evil!" (FTW)


Couldn't it be that someone at Apple just came up with a good idea and had it patented because Apple encourages it's employees to, you know ... come up with good ideas that they can patent?
Virgil-TB2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2009, 10:43 AM   #7
mbmcavoy
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 64
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trevowski View Post
well this is something new!!!

Removable batteries
Interestingly, I read the opposite from the description. This is an enabler for non-removable batteries in more devices. Such a battery management system would enable a user to better plan ahead and ensure batteries have sufficient charge.

Frankly I believe Apple's non-removable battery use in iPods and iPhones is appropriate - I have never experienced any benefit from a removable cellphone battery, but have had extra hassle on several occasions. Also, the new MacBook Pro battery is interesting. Only once have I ever seen a laptop battery replaced in the field. (On another occasion, I looked into a replacement battery for an old laptop that was still useful, but it cost more than a replacement laptop!)

However, iPods/iPhones/computers have sufficient user interfaces to provide state-of-charge information to the user. What about a wireless keyboard or mouse, or a TV remote control? While it is a hassle, you just pop out the old AAA's, pop in a fresh set, and continue on.

Sure, you could use rechargeable batteries. But when the battery dies, you either need to have a second set ready charged to swap in (negating most of the benefits of a rechargeable), or you need to wait for it to charge, rendering the device unusable for a longer time. They also don't last as long as the copper-tops, so they cause more interruptions. Simply not acceptable solutions to most people.

Now, if those devices had a means to provide you with better state-of-charge information, you could use normal non-use times to charge them, so you never (well, less frequently) are caught with them dead. If this system worked well enough, it could eliminate the need to swap out batteries entirely.

Now I don't find the bulk of a mouse or remote control caused by the batteries and cover to be a problem, but a more imaginative designer than me might be able to come up with something cool. But a few less batteries per person in landfills is also a worthy goal.
mbmcavoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2009, 10:49 AM   #8
solipsism
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: The Ansible
Posts: 11,779
Quote:
Originally Posted by JupiterOne View Post
What a great word. It's not used nearly enough.
Do you have a plethora of piñatas?


Do your part to clean up AppleInsider forums: User CP » Edit Ignore List » Teckstud
solipsism is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2009, 11:13 AM   #9
Tokolosh
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 32
Quote:
Originally Posted by AppleInsider View Post
Apple may be working on more effective wireless battery management systems for personal electronic devices, with a Mac serving as the hub, according to newly discovered company filings.

Combine this with some of the wireless and dockless charging patents out there and Apple may be on the precipice of another breakthrough. It may be totally out there but if Apple could figure out proximity charging and a smart management system it would cut lots of wire clutter that we all would love to get rid of.


~Tokolosh

2002 eMac (still working like the day I bought it)
iPhone 3G and another for the wife
Aluminum MacBook
Thinking about a new iMac or two
Tokolosh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2009, 11:14 AM   #10
Wiggin
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 849
"When the time comes for the battery to finally be replaced, the host would direct the user to a website to place an order."

Let me guess, the BatteryStore? It will be a new section on the iTunes Store, right under AppStore for ordering replacement batteries. The iTunes application itself will also get a new heading after Music, Movies, Podcasts, etc, that will be Batteries. There you will be able to see a listing and get information on all of your batteries. Using iTunes sharing features, you'll also be able to see batteries and available charging slots on other computers in your network. And when you sync your iPod or iPhone, there will be a new tab after Contacts called Power where you can set battery and power saving preferences for your portable device.

iTunes already does more than just manage your tunes, so why not?
Wiggin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2009, 11:26 AM   #11
diskimage
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 80
This looks like it will take up too much space. As concerned as Apple is with making things smaller, I don't think this will ever find its way into their computers.


Addicted to a Mac since the Mac Plus
diskimage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2009, 11:27 AM   #12
kerryn
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 42
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tokolosh View Post
Combine this with some of the wireless and dockless charging patents out there and Apple may be on the precipice of another breakthrough. It may be totally out there but if Apple could figure out proximity charging and a smart management system it would cut lots of wire clutter that we all would love to get rid of.
This was my thought. If Apple could combine this with wireless recharging, then the battery could communicate with the mac to say I need recharging, and the mac can initiate the wireless charge to charge the device. I see two benefits here:

1) we cut down on a lot of cables, and
2) the wireless charger only switches on when a device says it needs charge, so we are not always pumping watts into the ether when there is no need. I seem to remember reading that wireless charging was only about 60% efficient so having only charging when necessary would save energy.
kerryn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2009, 11:49 AM   #13
teckstud
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 6,115
What's next- expandable Memory cards? Welcome to the real world Apple.


Once you go Mac, you never go back!
teckstud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2009, 11:59 AM   #14
zunx
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 373
SOLAR CELLS BUILT-IN THE DEVICE ENCLOSURE AND SCREEN. That is all needed!
zunx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2009, 12:10 PM   #15
talkshowonmute
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 46
Quote:
Originally Posted by DimMok View Post
Now, if they can only explore "cut-n-paste" technology on the iphone.....
you know im getting pretty annoyed of hearing about this copy and paste BULL SH*T I have a smartphone. not an iPhone. that DOESNT do copy and paste and its still a good smartphone and even though I use it to write professional emails for work and also to friends I use chat and do everything you expect to do with it and I never really complain or think dam if ONLY i had that cut and paste when im just as easily able to CUT (BACKSPACE) and paste (REWRITE) you lazy f**k.

Apple even without the CUT And paste makes awesome products so stop being negative pansy and just appriciate all the crazy cool stuff you already have that we so easily take for granted
talkshowonmute is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2009, 12:27 PM   #16
NOFEER
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: ASHLAND, KY
Posts: 1,818
Quote:
Originally Posted by talkshowonmute View Post
you know im getting pretty annoyed of hearing about this copy and paste BULL SH*T I have a smartphone. not an iPhone. that DOESNT do copy and paste and its still a good smartphone and even though I use it to write professional emails for work and also to friends I use chat and do everything you expect to do with it and I never really complain or think dam if ONLY i had that cut and paste when im just as easily able to CUT (BACKSPACE) and paste (REWRITE) you lazy f**k.

Apple even without the CUT And paste makes awesome products so stop being negative pansy and just appriciate all the crazy cool stuff you already have that we so easily take for granted
i bet your phone has voice dialing....that's my major issue with the iphone though cut and paste would be nice, c/p doesn't help me avoid an auto accident


I APPLE THEREFORE I AM
NOFEER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2009, 12:51 PM   #17
macFanDave
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 471
Quote:
Originally Posted by JupiterOne View Post
What a great word. It's not used nearly enough.
That's not what the "Myriad Lobby" would have you believe!

You wouldn't believe how serious the Obscure-Word-for-an-Indefinitely-Large-Amount Wars are, but while "myriad" and "plethora" are duking it out, "buttload" is leading by a large margin!
macFanDave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2009, 12:57 PM   #18
macFanDave
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 471
I'm glad Apple is getting into this.

I am hoping that this is the starting point of getting into home power management. I know there are things like X10 out there, but they are massive underachievers as far as I am concerned. It would be just perfect for Apple to take a technology that is essentially a failure in its current state and popularize it for the masses.

Personal computing was going nowhere fast until the Macintosh came along. And to show that it wasn't a fluke, Apple replicated that success with iPods and iPhones (and maybe in the future, Apple TV will be recognized as a game-changing product.)

Good luck to Apple on this one!
macFanDave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2009, 12:58 PM   #19
Lafe
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 222
Quote:
Originally Posted by macFanDave View Post
That's not what the "Myriad Lobby" would have you believe!

You wouldn't believe how serious the Obscure-Word-for-an-Indefinitely-Large-Amount Wars are, but while "myriad" and "plethora" are duking it out, "buttload" is leading by a large margin!
We can do better than that! Coin something new! There must be a plethiad of
new terms that you could come up with. Or maybe a plethiaload!


Journalism is publishing what someone doesn't want us to know; the rest is propaganda.
-Horacio Verbitsky (el perro), journalist (b. 1942)
Lafe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2009, 01:01 PM   #20
paxman
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 640
Quote:
Originally Posted by DimMok View Post
Now, if they can only explore "cut-n-paste" technology on the iphone.....
I just want cut and copy. Screw paste.

I would like to see battery chargers standardized. That way they can become an optional extra and we'd cut costs, save the environment and simplify our lives. I don't mind different designs just as long as whatever design charger I have it will charge every device I own.

Intelligent charging whether the batteries are removable or not sounds like a no-brainer, to me. Not sure about the real life practicality of 'battery slots' etc. but even if a device has a removable battery it would be easier to attach a universal cable for charging purposes. The concept of universal rechargeable batteries is indeed a novel idea coming from Apple.
paxman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2009, 01:44 PM   #21
ThePixelDoc
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 86
I may appear to be stupid, but: what can you do with only "cut and copy", if ya can't paste it somewhere. Why don't you just backspace or delete? Or was remark meant to be sarcasm? Sorry then that it flew over my lil' head(!)


Last edited by ThePixelDoc; 02-05-2009 at 01:45 PM.. Reason: spelling
ThePixelDoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2009, 01:51 PM   #22
ThePixelDoc
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 86
I see this tech as being sorely needed, and another "green" initiative from Apple.

Imagine if batteries were "required" sometime into the future by law, to be reusable, or at the very least, be rechargeable to their maximum cycles. This definitely would cut down on unnecessary refill and toxic waste. Never underestimate the people that are truly "linked in" or "in the loop".

Remember, Prez-O loves Macs and more than likely Steve-O too!
ThePixelDoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2009, 02:05 PM   #23
paxman
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 640
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThePixelDoc View Post
I may appear to be stupid, but: what can you do with only "cut and copy", if ya can't paste it somewhere. Why don't you just backspace or delete? Or was remark meant to be sarcasm? Sorry then that it flew over my lil' head(!)
Silly me... thinking about it all I really want is the ability to Copy. Who needs Cut & Paste?

No really, I just love copying stuff.
paxman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2009, 02:39 PM   #24
mknopp
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 25
Quote:
Originally Posted by Virgil-TB2 View Post
So many people comment in this pattern now.
  1. Apple comes up with interesting new idea
  2. First reaction is to bitch about unrelated problem
  3. Second reaction is to assume Apple has evil intentions
  4. Final assessment? "Apple is evil!" (FTW)


Couldn't it be that someone at Apple just came up with a good idea and had it patented because Apple encourages it's employees to, you know ... come up with good ideas that they can patent?
So many people comment in this pattern now.
  1. Poster comments on topic
  2. First reaction is to jump to conclusions
  3. Second reaction is to assume the poster has nefarious or prejudiced intent
  4. Final assessment? "Poster is evil!" (FTW)

I never said that it wasn't a good idea.

I never said that I was bitching about the non-removable batteries. I personally never exchange my battery on my laptop so I am all for making a larger non-removable one. I also see no need for a removable battery on the iPods, if you are listening to music they will last more than a day. The iPhone is debatable at this point as my wife's Instinct has terrible battery life, like the iPhone, and regularly carries an extra battery that she switches out in the middle of the day.

I never said that Apple was evil.

Here is what I said in very simple terms.
  1. Apple has a long history of moving their products to non-removable batteries. (Note that this is a fact not a judgment.)
  2. With this history in mind, I questioned what would be the purpose of Apple spending the resources to obtain this patent? (Note that it is not free to file and obtain a patent.)
  3. Keeping in mind that Apple is moving away from interchangeable batteries and still found it beneficial to spend the time and money required to file and try to obtain this patent, I concluded that the only obvious reason was to deny others the usage of the technology.
  4. Analyzing this hypothesis I concluded that this could be something that their competition might use against Apple's products in the future since interchangeable batteries are a difference in their feature set.
  5. Final assessment? "Apple made a sound business decision!" (FTW)

Please try to think about what a person is saying before posting. I like Apple very much, sure I think that they make some boneheaded moves, but I happily use several of their products.
mknopp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2009, 02:54 PM   #25
allblue
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Inside Out
Posts: 145
Quote:
Originally Posted by macFanDave View Post
That's not what the "Myriad Lobby" would have you believe!

You wouldn't believe how serious the Obscure-Word-for-an-Indefinitely-Large-Amount Wars are, but while "myriad" and "plethora" are duking it out, "buttload" is leading by a large margin!
It's 'shedload' this side of the pond (perhaps butts are bigger over there !)


Believe nothing, no matter where you heard it, not even if I have said it, if it does not agree with your own reason and your own common sense.
Buddha
allblue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2009, 03:47 PM   #26
SpamSandwich
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 8,453
Quote:
Originally Posted by macFanDave View Post
I'm glad Apple is getting into this.

I am hoping that this is the starting point of getting into home power management. I know there are things like X10 out there, but they are massive underachievers as far as I am concerned. It would be just perfect for Apple to take a technology that is essentially a failure in its current state and popularize it for the masses.

Personal computing was going nowhere fast until the Macintosh came along. And to show that it wasn't a fluke, Apple replicated that success with iPods and iPhones (and maybe in the future, Apple TV will be recognized as a game-changing product.)

Good luck to Apple on this one!
As I mentioned before, I agree Apple can now branch out into very sophisticated power and battery management applications and position themselves as a next gen company who can create systems for electronics, autos, homes.... and perhaps even bigger systems.


"The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield, and government to gain ground."
—Thomas Jefferson


Proud AAPL stock owner.
SpamSandwich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2009, 03:51 PM   #27
macFanDave
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 471
Quote:
Originally Posted by allblue View Post
It's 'shedload' this side of the pond (perhaps butts are bigger over there !)
The butts are getting huge over here! There's a bill in Congress to make Sir Mix-a-lot's "Baby's Got Back" our national anthem, you know, to boost our collective self-esteem in these trying times!"
macFanDave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2009, 03:53 PM   #28
macFanDave
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 471
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpamSandwich View Post
As I mentioned before, I agree Apple can now branch out into very sophisticated power and battery management applications and position themselves as a next gen company who can create systems for electronics, autos, homes.... and perhaps even bigger systems.
Who better to make the "Smart Grid" than the smartest company I know?
macFanDave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2009, 04:37 PM   #29
Haggar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 530
Quote:
Originally Posted by AppleInsider View Post
The patent applications go on to propose a system for battery management where the Mac takes a central role. Desktops and portables would have battery charging slots built in and serve as the host for the entire system.
Instead of putting slots in laptops just to charge a battery, how about making a battery slot which can also power the laptop? The obvious place would be the optical drive bay. Make it easy for users to slide out the DVD drive and slide in a second laptop battery, hard drive, or other accessory. This would also make it easy to add battery capacity to laptops with a fixed internal battery, such as the 17 inch MacBook Pro. The extra removable battery could fit in the space of the optical drive bay instead of some external battery pack dangling off the laptop. Since there are Mac users arguing that they don't need optical drives in laptops, I would expect them to fully support the idea of a modular drive bay in Mac laptops.


Last edited by Haggar; 02-05-2009 at 04:48 PM..
Haggar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2009, 05:18 PM   #30
melgross
Global Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: NYC
Posts: 19,612
Quote:
Originally Posted by mknopp View Post
This seems an odd patent for a company that has moved more and more of its products to non-removable batteries. Honestly, what good does this do for anyone owning an iPod, iPhone, or 17" Macbook Pro? None of them have removable batteries which would work with this system.

Actually, now that I think about it. This is more likely a patent which was filed simply to make sure the idea never sees the light of day. Because, if this were to be built it would be a benefit to Apple's competition, which has removable batteries.

So, I hope people were not too enamored with this idea. I doubt it will ever be built until the patent expires.
That's some pretty generalized negativity.

We don't know what Apple has in mind for future products. The problems this highlights may be the very reason why Apple has gone to built-in batteries in some cases.

It's possible that this might be part of a plan to reverse that strategy.

We don't know.


Last edited by melgross; 02-05-2009 at 05:28 PM.. Reason: spelling
melgross is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2009, 05:20 PM   #31
melgross
Global Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: NYC
Posts: 19,612
Quote:
Originally Posted by solipsism View Post
Do you have a plethora of piñatas?
That would result in a very messy floor!
melgross is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2009, 05:23 PM   #32
melgross
Global Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: NYC
Posts: 19,612
Quote:
Originally Posted by NOFEER View Post
i bet your phone has voice dialing....that's my major issue with the iphone though cut and paste would be nice, c/p doesn't help me avoid an auto accident
Voice dialing doesn't help you avoid an accident either, as using a phone in the car, hands-free or not, has been shown to result in as many accidents as being drunk.
melgross is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2009, 05:25 PM   #33
melgross
Global Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: NYC
Posts: 19,612
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThePixelDoc View Post
I may appear to be stupid, but: what can you do with only "cut and copy", if ya can't paste it somewhere. Why don't you just backspace or delete? Or was remark meant to be sarcasm? Sorry then that it flew over my lil' head(!)
Sarcasm as done here is only understood by those with over a hundred posts, so get to it!
melgross is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2009, 08:19 PM   #34
wizard69
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,481
Interesting patent for what would seem to be preexisting technology.

I'm not sure Apple has a leg to stand on here as power tools have been doing battery management for years. especially with the new tech batteries. There is nothing surprising about what has been suggested here. Even the warning systems mean little as state of charge monitoring has been done for years, the only difference here is that notification goes to other devices.


What I do see here, along with some of the other rumored features in OS/X is that Apple is getting ready for new product introductions. Likely these will be tablets but I'm honestly think that maybe Apple is about to realize some of the other things it has patented lately. Here I'm thinking of the iMac with the slide in tablet computer. I'm actually to the point where I'm thinking the iMac isn't being delayed because of chip selection issues or other rumored issues but rather because of this transition to a different class of machine.

Personally I'd like to have a MBP that provides for a slide in slot for the iPhone, actually an upgraded larger iPhone, that would provide for battery charging, automatic syncing and networking for the MBP. The idea with Syncing is to expand upon what is currently being synced to cover a wider arrangement of Apple apps. The problem right now with the iPhone is that syncing is just to limited. The slide in port for networking would obviously allow for access to some sort of 3G networking. The big advantage hear is the elimination of the Damn USB cord, which is very useful when a portable is actually being used as a portable.

dave
wizard69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2009, 12:12 AM   #35
iVlad
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Reston, VA
Posts: 367
wow

i love apple


iWant new iProduct
iVlad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2009, 12:57 AM   #36
melgross
Global Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: NYC
Posts: 19,612
Quote:
Originally Posted by MacOldTimer View Post
He was trying to make a point that it would be "safer" and every other phone since 2001 has had the "basic" feature.

Now please be the good Moderator and tell us that you don't use your phone in the car?
I'm the good moderator, and I don't drive.
melgross is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2009, 01:41 AM   #37
lastmiracle
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 5
Awww! And here I was hoping for a patent on wireless inductive charging!
lastmiracle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2009, 05:33 AM   #38
ivan.rnn01
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: France
Posts: 983
don't see...

...the enormous practical use. we'd just be destined to live in the world of beeps coming from every little pouch
reconditioning recharge calculation is interesting, though...
put solar chargers on cases or on the phone itself instead. not to ensure real life function, just to charge some tiny backup permitting one single emergency phone call... could solar chargers being efficient enough remain transparent at the same time


Last edited by ivan.rnn01; 02-06-2009 at 11:05 AM..
ivan.rnn01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2009, 01:16 PM   #39
w00master
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 59
Quote:
Originally Posted by talkshowonmute View Post
you know im getting pretty annoyed of hearing about this copy and paste BULL SH*T I have a smartphone. not an iPhone. that DOESNT do copy and paste and its still a good smartphone and even though I use it to write professional emails for work and also to friends I use chat and do everything you expect to do with it and I never really complain or think dam if ONLY i had that cut and paste when im just as easily able to CUT (BACKSPACE) and paste (REWRITE) you lazy f**k.

Apple even without the CUT And paste makes awesome products so stop being negative pansy and just appriciate all the crazy cool stuff you already have that we so easily take for granted
You know what, I'm getting annoyed with comments like this. COPY AND PASTE is SO FREAKING BASIC, it should have been in the iPhone since the beginning. Perhaps, C&P doesn't fit in YOUR lifestyle in a phone (or smartphone). Fine, then don't use it. However, for MANY of us it is absolutely indispensable.

I'll give you something related to C&P: editing documents. Many of the same people who complain (like you) about people like me (and other peeps asking for C&P) are the same people who are wondering: why aren't there enough apps for document editing like keynote/powerpoint, pages/word, etc.? Why? BECAUSE THERE'S NO C&P.

How about something basic? How about e-mailing your friend and sending them contact info? Guess what, w/o C&P (or some sort of contact transfer system), you have to manually do this by hand. If you depend on giving away your contact info for business purposes, this can be a big pain in the butt that can be EASILY solves with either C&P or contact transfer system.

These are just some BASIC things. The fact that there isn't C&P in the iPhone imho simply inexcusable.

w00master
w00master is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2009, 03:16 PM   #40
melgross
Global Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: NYC
Posts: 19,612
Quote:
Originally Posted by w00master View Post
You know what, I'm getting annoyed with comments like this. COPY AND PASTE is SO FREAKING BASIC, it should have been in the iPhone since the beginning. Perhaps, C&P doesn't fit in YOUR lifestyle in a phone (or smartphone). Fine, then don't use it. However, for MANY of us it is absolutely indispensable.

I'll give you something related to C&P: editing documents. Many of the same people who complain (like you) about people like me (and other peeps asking for C&P) are the same people who are wondering: why aren't there enough apps for document editing like keynote/powerpoint, pages/word, etc.? Why? BECAUSE THERE'S NO C&P.

How about something basic? How about e-mailing your friend and sending them contact info? Guess what, w/o C&P (or some sort of contact transfer system), you have to manually do this by hand. If you depend on giving away your contact info for business purposes, this can be a big pain in the butt that can be EASILY solves with either C&P or contact transfer system.

These are just some BASIC things. The fact that there isn't C&P in the iPhone imho simply inexcusable.

w00master
But this thread has nothing do do with any of that. While we do veer off the central theme, it's usually taken in steps. Throwing in a pet peeve that has nothing at all to do with the thread, esp. when it's something people are always throwing into unrealated threads does become annoying to most readers.
melgross is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.