|
|||||||
| Register | Members List | New Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Kasper's Automated Slave
Join Date: Nov 1997
Posts: 6,168
|
High-quality unboxing photos of Apple's third-gen iPod shuffle
Apple retail stores on Thursday began receiving the company's third-generation 4GB iPod shuffle in extremely limited quantities. What follows are a few dozen unboxing and comparison shots, along with some commentary.
Average to mid-size Apple stores we spoke with report receiving only a couple dozen of each color (black and gray) as part of their initial shipment, with more expected by the end of the week. Thus far, the black model is proving to be far more popular with early adopters than the grey model, and was expected to sell out at several locations by day's end. Apple says the third-gen iPod shuffle ships in packaging that's 40% smaller and 33% lighter than the one used for the second-gen shuffle, and it shows (comparison photos below). The plastic capsule-like container can be concealed almost completely in the palm of your hand. Inside the box is a pair of Apple Earphones with*Remote, a 1.8-inch iPod shuffle Dock sync USB cable, a Quick Start guide, and of course the 4GB shuffle itself. The first thing we noticed is how incredibly tiny the player is. It's no bigger than the length and width of three pieces of Chiclets chewing gum aligned side-by-side. It's also considerably smaller than the mini BiC lighters it resembles. If you've ever gone diving between the couch cushions to find your misplaced Apple Bluetooth Headset, watch out with the new shuffle. It's most comparable in size -- slight shorter but wider, and approximately the same width (not factoring in the headset's earpiece). On top, there's a 3.5mm stereo headphone jack, a three-way control switch (shuffle, play in order, turn off) and tiny LED that could easily be mistaken for a spec of dust or some other form of debris. Meanwhile, the back sports a new version of the shuffle's familiar clip, only this time with a chromed finish and grainy off-white Apple logo with a bit of sparkle. More generally speaking, the precision anodized aluminum molding of the player is perfection at its finest. While floating in its retail packaging, the new shuffle appears to lack seams entirely. It's only after a close inspection that you'll notice seams for what looks like a trap door mostly obscured by the clip on the back of the device. At this juncture, it would also be impossible for Apple to deliver a thinner digital music player without substituting the 3.5mm jack with a new generation of connector. It's that thin. We'll be putting the new shuffle through our gauntlet and will deliver a full review of the player and its new VoiceOver interface in coming days. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 211
|
looks like the monolith from 2010... except much much smaller.
![]() Baaaaaa Baaaaaa BA BA.... BOM bom BOM bom... |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 229
|
I'm really tempted by this, looks like a pretty great upgrade. And I have owned all the Shuffle designs so far, so it's kind of a tradition.
Might get one after my DSi
Mac mini Core2 Duo 1.83 GHz 1GB RAM/80GB HDD With eyeTV for DTT and 750GB Maxtor External HDD
White iPhone 3G[S] 32GB |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 8,461
|
Again, it looks great but there are so many 'minuses' for me in this iteration that I'll gladly stick with my 2G shuffle.
"The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield, and government to gain ground."
—Thomas Jefferson Proud AAPL stock owner. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 4
|
integrated USB
I don't see why they couldn't have integrated the USB plug on the device itself (just like 1st gen Shuffle). Just put a nice, secure, matching cap on it.
It would be a subtle feature, but extremely convenient. Who wants to deal with more cables than is absolutely needed. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: united mexican states
Posts: 1,326
|
okay nice robot porn guys.
it looks like an apple lighter. i'm still not completely convinced about the uni-click button. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 9
|
Yuck
Couldn't you find a dustier environment for your pictures?
(I am not talking about the technical issues :-) enough people are talking about it already) |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Austria
Posts: 5
|
Quote:
What have you done with it??
M
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Administrator
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 795
|
Quote:
Thanks, K
EIC- AppleInsider.com
Questions and comments to : kasper@appleinsider.com |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 6,203
|
Did Steve really approve this?
Once you go Mac, you never go back!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 113
|
Aside from the worthless idea of having the controls on the cable....
And the pictures look nice.... But, how does it sound in comparison to the 2nd gen Shuffle? I cannot stand my wife's 2nd gen and still use my 1st gen when running. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ketchikan, Alaska
Posts: 153
|
yet the ipod classic still has that small screen...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 171
|
Appleinsider...I love you guys.
Keep up the great work! |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Arizona
Posts: 385
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 8,461
|
Quote:
"The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield, and government to gain ground."
—Thomas Jefferson Proud AAPL stock owner. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Arizona
Posts: 385
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Administrator
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 795
|
Quote:
The photos were taken outside tho. That's problem No. 1. Lightbox time. K
EIC- AppleInsider.com
Questions and comments to : kasper@appleinsider.com |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Arizona
Posts: 385
|
Quote:
I to have owned all the shuffle iterations to date and this one is the best looking. (I give the old ones to my nieces.) I especially like the chrome clip. After using the iPhone earbuds controller I think I would like the controller on the new Shuffle. All those PHD's at Apple are always think'n! ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Administrator
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 795
|
Quote:
K
EIC- AppleInsider.com
Questions and comments to : kasper@appleinsider.com |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Arizona
Posts: 334
|
I'm curious as to why they included the shuffle / power switch. I would have thought you would just shake the device to start shuffling your songs. You would turn on and off the device by pressing the + and - buttons together for 3 seconds. Seems simple enough! Heck, we could have done away with the remote too. Twist left to rewind, twist right to play. Short stop shake stops the device, holding it to your ear makes it tell you the playlist...
I could go on but I think its not funny anymore. ![]()
openSuSe 11.2, 32 and 64 bit, for Mac and PC!
"Shiny capt'n. Everything thing is A-Okay." |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 6,203
|
Notice how all the shots are of its back? Every comparison shot shows us its back? It has no character whatsoever- the most un- Apple product I've ever seen. If it sounds as good as the first however, my opinion may change. Did Apple bring back good sound to the shuffle?
Stay tuned. ![]()
Once you go Mac, you never go back!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 38
|
The button interface is brilliant
What most people are forgetting regarding the shuffle is who uses it. I bet the LARGEST usage group is during exercise, or in public transport, etc. You don't want to be fiddling in your pockets, when you can put your hand near your ear all Secret Service style!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Arizona
Posts: 385
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Earth
Posts: 258
|
The buttons are a no go for me. I use my shuffle for when I ride my bike and I run my headphone cable through my shirt, thus I wouldn't be able to change the song or anything.
Oh well, I don't need any more iPods anyways. "Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better
idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning." -Rick Cook |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 28
|
Great shots! i def. like how it looks, not so much how it functions.
i prefer visual feedback to audio feedback (it's faster & seems less gimmicky) |
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 16
|
Great Packaging
When they announced the new Shuffle I thought it would be a hard sell, with the average consumer dumbfounded by how to use it. The packaging though gives you a great visual, showcasing how the device will work
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Arizona
Posts: 123
|
Why is Apple in love with using dongles....
Macbook Air requires dongles for extra USB ports, ethernet and blah blah MacBook requires a dongle for additional USB, a dongle for video. MacBook Pro requires a dongle for Firewire 400. Shuffle requires a dongle for USB connectivity. Instead of making the device overstated small, why not make it functionally small.... I freaking hate dongles more than anything else. For one, they are cumbersome and you always misplace them somewhere. Make the Shuffle with built-in USB. That would be cool and yet still small enough to want. (imo) |
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1
|
It looks like a cheap knock off, of an Apple product... Does not say great Apple design to me !!
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 16
|
Button scheme makes sense
As an iPhone owner I find I use the headphones to control all my music. Its much quicker to grab and pinch then look and click. I think apple also realized this and the new shuffle was created.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: No GPS signal.
Posts: 1,169
|
Imagine finding one of these 5 years ago. You'd never guess what the heck it was.
nagromme
Would you like a treatment? |
|
|
|
|
|
#32 | |
|
Global Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: .US
Posts: 9,127
|
Quote:
I'm sure it was a joke, a riff on complaints about previous product introductions, such as the original nano which some of them were very easy to scuff due to a bad batch of plastic. Among others. Last edited by JeffDM; 03-12-2009 at 06:59 PM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 18
|
And if I close my eyes when I wave it over my head when I'm listening to iTunes will I get the full concert experience?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Ireland
Posts: 8,564
|
It's the new iPod lighter. Plays playlists and lights cancer sticks.
P.S. The most measly amount of cable on that charger evR! I'm sure laptop owners won't mind, but iMac owners certainly will.
Collecting my SSD iMac Fry-die. :D
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 942
|
Quote:
m Edit: It is tough to shoot really small parts. I do a lot of that type of table top work and my setup includes some pretty specialized lighting equipment. If Apple continues on this course you might need an electron microscope set up. Last edited by mstone; 03-12-2009 at 07:37 PM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Ireland
Posts: 8,564
|
Quote:
Collecting my SSD iMac Fry-die. :D
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1
|
They should fit the shuffle in the earphone clicker itself. That would make it even smaller and more eco-friendly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 106
|
I can't help but think that the three buttons on the headphones would fit on the front face of the new shuffle. Sure, its too small for the old interface that the shuffle used to have, but my problem with the new design isn't the buttons themselves, but the location. Its been mentioned before, but the shuffle has been the ultimate gym/running iPod for a while now, and most users tend to tuck their headphone cables inside their shirts so they don't get tangled up in them. As a result, the placement of the buttons on the cable is just downright silly. Sure, buttons on the front of the shuffle might ruin the monolithic appearance, but it would work much better for the average user.
I guess to sum it up - I like the new design of the unit, but I have no desire to trade in my 2nd gen shuffle for one, unlike the 2nd gen, which made me scrap my first gen shuffle immediately. |
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 4
|
Bought the new shuffle. My first iPod
I bought the black shuffle this morning at the Leawood, KS Apple store. The person who walked in the door in front of me bought one too. Both of us have never owned an iPod, something that, as a stockholder, kind of made me think.
Being an iPod newbie, I'm not in a position to compare it to other models, but I do wonder if the shuffle's voice over feature, coupled with the control location is going to garner sales. it certainly was the reason I bought one. I understand some may not like the control location, but it works just fine for me. It seems a person could easily run the cord under a shirt if they wanted to, since the controls hang near the base of the neck, right above my t-shirt collar. Some cyclists might prefer controls closer to the waist though. I bought it specifically to work out, by the way. A comment about the black model being more popular. Well, I bought it because I wanted some contrast between it and the shirts I normally wear working out. After all, if people can't see the thing, they might think I just have some big old clunky iPod in my pocket! |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|