AppleInsider AppleInsider Forums


Go Back   AppleInsider > General Discussion
Register Members List New Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-06-2009, 04:26 PM   #41
NMMI89
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 3
Roflmao

"Mental that one...."

Great "Harry Potter" shout out.


My mind is the weapon. Everything else is merely an accessory.


Last edited by NMMI89; 11-06-2009 at 04:26 PM.. Reason: correct quote
NMMI89 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2009, 05:51 PM   #42
charlituna
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 658
Quote:
Originally Posted by swtchdtomak View Post
Yes, but those who chose to be their legal representatives on the other hand.
sounds like Mr Ipod is choosing to rep himself.

and yeah he needs to put done the bong and go outside.
charlituna is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2009, 06:02 PM   #43
sheff
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 124
Lol the guy shoulda started a company himself. Maybe name it after a fruit and wear a black turtleneck with jeans to its IPO... With products he descirbed... 20 years ago that would have been a great company, today people would just dismiss him for copying apple...


--SHEFFmachine out
sheff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2009, 07:17 PM   #44
Mac Jones
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 3
The guys is simply a paranoid schizophrenic .

I've conversed with a few of them and they all sound exactly like this.

You joke about it but it's a terrible illness.He probably is on and off meds (many do this).

The problem with delusion is you don't know it's delusion so you stop taking meds as they are (not really what they are but poison) or you actually desire the manic buzz from insanity.

Could you imagine living like that? This guy actually believes these things happened!

A constant roller coster of crazy drama.

poor slob Take your meds dude?
Mac Jones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2009, 09:10 PM   #45
jragosta
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 245
Quote:
Originally Posted by myapplelove View Post
MS is facing a similar case from someone claiming they invented the zune and the zune hd.
Not a chance. Even a lunatic wouldn't admit to that.
jragosta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2009, 09:51 PM   #46
Phredd
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 5
His website is http://cooltvnetwork.com/

He met Sarah Jessica Parker in 1989 when she presented his award for a pencil drawing.

The FBI responded that they could not locate the records he requested.
Phredd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2009, 10:11 PM   #47
MacDSmith2
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phredd View Post
His website is http://cooltvnetwork.com/

He met Sarah Jessica Parker in 1989 when she presented his award for a pencil drawing.

The FBI responded that they could not locate the records he requested.
What, when she was 24 years old? Not likely!
MacDSmith2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2009, 10:54 PM   #48
Phredd
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 5
Quote:
Originally Posted by MacDSmith2 View Post
What, when she was 24 years old? Not likely!
Phredd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2009, 11:09 PM   #49
Phredd
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 5
That clipping was an exhibit from his complaint. And if you're wondering how a pencil drawing self portrait could possibly show that he invented the iPod, here it is:



Yes, this guy really was a genius - way ahead of his time. You can see why the FBI confiscated his works in the interest of national security.
Phredd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2009, 01:35 AM   #50
Denton
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 719
Rather shameful reporting on someone who is quite obviously mentally ill.
Denton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2009, 04:38 AM   #51
Maximara
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 134
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eriamjh View Post
I love those crazy people!
I don't especially as their crazy actions are taking away money that could have gone into R&D or even wages has to be used to deal with them. This totally is a prime example why the US so badly needs tort reform so nutty lawsuits like are stopped dead.
Maximara is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2009, 08:36 AM   #52
hill60
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 642
So should we start preparing for the Y2KX bug?

Quote:
Originally Posted by teckstud View Post
Here we go again- mixing Apples with Oranges. I'm talking about the term "of the decade" and you start talking "century" just like "he who's name shall dare not be mentioned".


iDo let you use the Internet or check your email while on a call...

iDroid don't.
hill60 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2009, 11:37 AM   #53
alexhasfun28
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: In the southwest.
Posts: 4
Ugh! you can tell this is all fake.
He's basically naming all the apple products except for atleast a couple.

I believe this is untrue and just non-sense.
Apple succedded in it anyways..
alexhasfun28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2009, 12:24 PM   #54
wizard69
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,481
Nope, just saying they need to be more careful about how they group stories.

Quote:
Originally Posted by justflybob View Post
Good grief. Should AI look in their closet and under the bed before turning out the lights and getting under the covers as well?
It is not my web site but if the people that do own AI want to keep publishing, I'm simply suggesting that they be more careful about how they group stories together. Clearly the two stories covered here are not on the same level of possibility nor rationality.

It is especially important to understand this in the context of the movie and music industries were people are often not paid what they expect to get. What I'm saying is that these law suits are vastly different and trying to link one to another is not in AIs best interests.

Dave
wizard69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2009, 01:09 PM   #55
hillstones
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 859
Quote:
Originally Posted by wizard69 View Post
It is not my web site but if the people that do own AI want to keep publishing, I'm simply suggesting that they be more careful about how they group stories together. Clearly the two stories covered here are not on the same level of possibility nor rationality.

It is especially important to understand this in the context of the movie and music industries were people are often not paid what they expect to get. What I'm saying is that these law suits are vastly different and trying to link one to another is not in AIs best interests.

Dave
And you think AppleInsider is known for any journalistic integrity?
hillstones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2009, 02:24 PM   #56
Ronbo
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 255
Quote:
Originally Posted by solipsism View Post
On that note, why do people with Tourette’s always blurt out profanities? Why not random compliments?
Tourette's people don't always blurt out profanities. Vocal tics can also take the form of coughs or grunts. But the question stands: why profanity? We'll see this in stroke patients too, sometimes. Left hemispheric stroke -> language deficits -> trouble with expressive language, but a lot of “damns”. The commonly given explanation is that profanity is “over-learned.” If you'd counted up the number of times you'd said each word in your lexicon, the profanity would end up being embarrassingly higher than other words (not many choices, and a lot of opportunities to use them). But there are cases where the patient reportedly never swore and yet it happens. So that explanation seems to fall short. Another reason is that our profane words tend also to be short and explosive, matching their use. So they're also some of the easiest words to use, for someone who is struggling to say something. (That would be strokes, of course. Tourette's people obviously aren't 'struggling to say something.' They're often struggling not to, and it happens anyway. What they do isn't quite involuntary, and it isn't quite voluntary. The urge to yield to the tic is involuntary; the act of actually doing it is voluntary. It's just that the urge cannot be withstood forever, and it gets worse the longer you fight it).
Ronbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2009, 02:30 PM   #57
tcphoto
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 11
It sounds like Mr. Wakefield has his actors mixed up. Wouldn't the story be more believable is it we Micheal J Fox and the movie was Back to the Future? Since when did SJP have Steve Job's ear when it comes to product development? She did use an Apple notebook in Sex and the City but I doubt that even Woz would visit the set let alone Jobs. Good try but I don't see the connection.
tcphoto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2009, 02:38 PM   #58
solipsism
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: The Ansible
Posts: 11,867
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronbo View Post
Tourette's people don't always blurt out profanities. Vocal tics can also take the form of coughs or grunts. But the question stands: why profanity? We'll see this in stroke patients too, sometimes. Left hemispheric stroke -> language deficits -> trouble with expressive language, but a lot of “damns”. The commonly given explanation is that profanity is “over-learned.” If you'd counted up the number of times you'd said each word in your lexicon, the profanity would end up being embarrassingly higher than other words (not many choices, and a lot of opportunities to use them). But there are cases where the patient reportedly never swore and yet it happens. So that explanation seems to fall short. Another reason is that our profane words tend also to be short and explosive, matching their use. So they're also some of the easiest words to use, for someone who is struggling to say something. (That would be strokes, of course. Tourette's people obviously aren't 'struggling to say something.' They're often struggling not to, and it happens anyway. What they do isn't quite involuntary, and it isn't quite voluntary. The urge to yield to the tic is involuntary; the act of actually doing it is voluntary. It's just that the urge cannot be withstood forever, and it gets worse the longer you fight it).
I was making a joke, but I was also curious, so thanks for taking the time to reply.

On the idea of “most common words” that would fall to adjectives, prepositions, and conjnctions, like the, of, to and and. And even two, too and to are common making the vocalization even more common, so frequency of usage can’t be the reason.
http://www.world-english.org/english500.htm
The idea of exclamations being the factor is interesting, but there are lot of exclamations that aren’t swear words. Like danger, get out, help, watch out, fore.

If it is something in way taboo words are stored and the disorder someone taps into that, then I have to wonder what the syndrome would have been like 100 years ago, or 1000 years ago when the words were very different. I wonder if there is any recorded evidence of this.
solipsism is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2009, 03:20 PM   #59
addabox
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 0aktown
Posts: 9,242
So the guy's website features the bastard spawn of a Teletubby and Howard the Duck, inviting you to plunge into a network enabled toilet.

Doing so gets you a patent claim that appears to cover Skype, iTunes, Ebay, Hulu and pretty much any and all internet commerce.

It's a mighty invention indeed that simultaneously involves clicking on hot spots, shopping, bidding, video streaming, media storage, telephony, and, I guess, "doing stuff online."

I look forward to seeing this all-encompassing device/software/Fortress of Solitude, as it should preclude every having to buy or do anything ever again.


party's over
addabox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2009, 03:35 PM   #60
addabox
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 0aktown
Posts: 9,242
Oh wait, it gets better: the "COOLTvNetwork.com depiction of the Howard the Duck/Teletubby thing is credited to COOLCARTOONS.COM, which features the horrifying, diaper wearing (?) daughter (?) of same, demonstrating that plunging into the network enable toilet causes you to disintegrate. She seems strangely pleased, if not sexually aroused, by this outcome.

All of Mr. Wakefields endeavors are heavily larded with "TMs" and patent numbers, in the manner of children who put little copyright symbols on their doddles, including references to the "ClickVideoShop" which, sadly, appears to exist only as a domain name registration.


party's over
addabox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2009, 06:54 PM   #61
otayranchdweeb
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 13
Apple R&D clearly stole Wakefield's intellectual property. At the time of the intellectual property theft, Wakefield wasn't aware that Apple staff were ransacking his home because they were wearing their invisibility suits.

Another reason to stay off crystal meth, kids.
otayranchdweeb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2009, 08:18 AM   #62
ascii
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 799
Poor bugger, his mind is clearly in need of some medical attention. But that doesn't give him the right to waste other people's time with this lawsuit.
ascii is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2009, 04:42 PM   #63
danielchow
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: philadelphia, pa
Posts: 61
iFART!

was a trade secret.

i shared it with a few trusted friends, but they couldn't hold it in!


now

iSue!


danielchow is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.