AppleInsider AppleInsider Forums


Go Back   AppleInsider > Feedback
Register Members List New Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-27-2002, 04:23 PM   #1
macaddict
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Boston MA
Posts: 1,055
Future Hardware Idea

I am getting so sick of wading through endless crap posted by new users coming to the board, claiming whatever specs for new hardware products and spawning a million replies and flame wars. There's a difference between speculating and posting "confirmed" info, and there are tons of new posters who just come along and splurge out new topics.

I say we make a rule that a new member must either wait a week or get ten posts before being allowed to post a new topic in Future Hardware. Hopefully it will tone down the endless spawning of pointless threads, like the twenty G5 threads we have going on now.

People who do have real info will hopefully post in an existing thread. And the last time we really got the scoop on new hardware was what, a year and a half ago?


*Registered March 1, 1999*
Member #14
macaddict is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2002, 05:01 PM   #2
Paul
Roast Beef
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: NYC/Chestnut Hill
Posts: 5,257
Exactly!!


125/51041 (top .2449%)-Amie Street - awesome independent DRM-free music
People really have got to stop thinking there is only one operating system, one economic system, one religion, and one business model. -EvilTwinSkippy (/.)
Paul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2002, 05:05 PM   #3
EmAn
Moderator Emeritus
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: New City, NY/West Hartford, CT
Posts: 7,192
I think that's a great idea. I'm also really getting sick of everything that's going on in FH.
EmAn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2002, 05:19 PM   #4
qazII
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 305
[quote]Originally posted by MacAddict:
<strong>
I say we make a rule that a new member must either wait a week or get ten posts before being allowed to post a new topic in Future Hardware.</strong><hr></blockquote>

Great. So we get ten junk posts PLUS a junk topic.
qazII is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2002, 05:21 PM   #5
Paul
Roast Beef
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: NYC/Chestnut Hill
Posts: 5,257
[quote]Originally posted by qazII:
<strong>

Great. So we get ten junk posts PLUS a junk topic.</strong><hr></blockquote>

@ least we could then identify the poster as being a troll...


125/51041 (top .2449%)-Amie Street - awesome independent DRM-free music
People really have got to stop thinking there is only one operating system, one economic system, one religion, and one business model. -EvilTwinSkippy (/.)
Paul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2002, 06:38 PM   #6
CosmoNut
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Non-Cupertino-based
Posts: 4,831
I think something needs to be done, but I don't know that that will help. I don't have any ideas either, though.


AppleInsider's "journalists" are anything but.
CosmoNut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2002, 09:54 PM   #7
macaddict
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Boston MA
Posts: 1,055
Then maybe forget the 10 posts part, keep the 1 week wait part.

Actually how about 1 month.

Nah, 1 year.


*Registered March 1, 1999*
Member #14
macaddict is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2002, 10:26 PM   #8
Cosmo
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 646
Its a great idea and would achieve its intended goal, however it also prevents people who really do have inside info from registering simply to post that info.

for example if i was going to break my NDA by posting here, i certainly wouldn't be using an account that can be traced back to my home computer. I would be going to a public place (internet cafe, etc), registering a new account and then posting.

It is a plan that works on paper, but i think it would discourage the few real insiders that we do get, thus defeating the purpose of a board that strives fo as much inside info as possible.

Look at Time, for example. I could be wrong but i thought he registered simply to post his info. He had real info that was correct. If he had had to wait a week after registering he couldn't have posted.

The proposed plan works on paper...but so does communism.

cheers :cool:
Cosmo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2002, 11:14 PM   #9
qazII
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 305
How about a "New Rumors" forum?

1. FH would have no more of these usually-worthless threads.
2. Anyone who wanted to ignore them could just stay in FH.
3. If anyone wants to see all the current rumors out there, he or she would be able to do it much more easily as it would all be in the New Rumors forums, which would have relatively infrequent new threads. All threads which did not impart new information would be locked/moved.
qazII is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2002, 02:44 PM   #10
Logan Cale
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,281
Just leave it like it is. I for one like the "endless crap" as it's what makes Future Hardware what it is. The stories people come up with, "CONFIRMED!", all that. It's part of AI history and it's entertaining.


Logan Cale is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2002, 05:21 PM   #11
macaddict
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Boston MA
Posts: 1,055
[quote]It's part of AI history and it's entertaining.<hr></blockquote>

It really isn't though. Back in say, 1999, the Hardware (not Future Hardware) forum wasn't trolled, flamed, and spammed with endless crap.

Maybe we could have one topic for "Insider Information", and combine the FH and CH threads. I dunno...we just get so much crap from new users. I just went to FH to see 5 threads, all by users with less than 10 posts, which in no way should be in FH. Luckily, they were locked quickly.


*Registered March 1, 1999*
Member #14
macaddict is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2002, 04:27 AM   #12
agent302
"I'm learnding!"
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 974
personally, i think a could way to get rid of all the crap is for the mods to delete threads, rather than just locking them.


"Oh boy, sleep! That's where I'm a viking!"
agent302 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2002, 01:56 PM   #13
Amorph
Moderator Emeritus
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Iowa City
Posts: 6,811
I would say that people posting random, off-topic threads in FH is a bigger problem than rumor trollers, based on the number of threads per day I end up moving.

However: The fact is that FH is an attractive destination for trollers. Why? Because anything that looks like a rumor is all but guaranteed to spawn a lovefest filled with demands for proof, insults, debates about the authenticity of every other rumormonger in the board's history, and maybe, if fortune is smiling, an interesting subthread discussing actual technical merit.

Just to make things worse, nobody sane with inside information is going to post anything like proof, because it can be traced right back to them. So there's no way to tell a real insider from a clever troll.

So what can we do? Well, trolls want replies. That's the whole point. They don't care what kind of replies - although the more colorful they are, the better. The biggest hurt we can inflict on a troller is to let him watch his topic sink off the first page with 0 replies. Flaming them (or the people who do reply to them) just encourages them. Flaming real insiders (and speculators) will probably drive them off the boards.

So, if you're interested in a cleaner, more hospitable Future Hardware:

[1] Only post topics concerned with future Apple hardware there.

[2] Don't reply to any thread you think is a troll.

[3] Don't go into attack-dog mode at the slightest whiff of a rumor. This is related to [2]. Flames and rudeness drive off good posters, drain any intellectual merit out of discussions, and attract and encourage trolls.

[4] This is one of the oldest rules of USENET, the world's oldest online discussion forum, and it ties into [3]: Never, ever post while angry.

Stay calm, be nice, and have fun. That's what we're all here for, right?


"...within intervention's distance of the embassy." - CvB

Original music:
The Mayflies - Black earth Americana. Now on iTMS!
Becca Sutlive - Iowa Fried Rock 'n Roll - now on iTMS!
Amorph is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.