|
|||||||
| Register | Members List | New Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 4,598
|
Why don't people in movies and TV close things?
Open a door to enter a house, why bother to close it behind yourself? Doesn't everybody walk into their house and leave the door wide open until... well, until someone shoots a scene of you leaving the house, by which time it's magically closed again?
Getting some milk out of the fridge? I guess it's just prop food inside anyway, so no need to close the door to keep it cold. Open a desk drawer, supposedly trying to be sneaky about searching a place... wouldn't closing the drawer when you're done be a good idea? Being chased by someone who's trying to kill you? Sure, why not leave the door open to the stairs you fled through, to make it blindingly obvious which way you went? Is it just oversight, because people aren't relating to sets and props like the real thing? Is there some rule of cinematography that says it "slows down the action" too much, or some such thing, to close stuff people normally close? In some cases, like not closing and shutting things that make it stupidly obvious that someone has been searching a place, is it a deliberate trick to raise tension by making to audience worry about the obvious signs being left behind?
We were once so close to heaven
Peter came out and gave us medals Declaring us the nicest of the damned -- They Might Be Giants See the stars at skyviewcafe.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1
|
LOL!
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 5,813
|
Mystery of the ages.
![]()
I'm no square but isn't that counter-indicated by my operations manual?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,195
|
Actors never eat or finish their meals either.
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: In rehab for sex addiction
Posts: 9,485
|
Nor use the toilet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 5,813
|
And they almost never watch TV. And when they do it's some bullshit black and white film that no one really watches.
I'm no square but isn't that counter-indicated by my operations manual?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
My snark goes to 11.
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: People's Republic of California
Posts: 11,853
|
They eat in Quentin Tarantino movies.
There is a level of cowardice lower than that of the conformist: the fashionable non-conformist.
Ayn Rand |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,195
|
Very interesting observation. Especially Pulp Fiction, lots of food references and scenes of eating. You have the "Le Big Mac" intro scene, Big Kahuna Burger scene, the (in)famous dinner date, stoner Eric Stolz eating cereal, Willis' girlfriend's craving for blueberry pancakes and the Diner finale.
That movie makes me hungry just thinking about it. Now in Jackie Brown there's the Food Court scenes and in Kill Bill II, the brilliant "Bill's making a sandwich" scene (but do we see them eat?)...but that's all I can recall. In most movies, no one touches their meals or finishes them though, unless they were lost in the jungle/desert and wolf an gulp everything voraciously. "Don't eat too fast, you'll get sick!" |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,195
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 4,598
|
At least in the case of using the toilet, such action is reasonably off-scene in most cases, and typically doesn't relate to the story being told.
The door closing/drawer closing type of thing... that stuff would reasonably (more than reasonably when a character is supposed to be behaving in a stealthy manner) happen in plain view, right within the very scenes where you see something opened. My pet peeve is an open-and-shut case. ![]()
We were once so close to heaven
Peter came out and gave us medals Declaring us the nicest of the damned -- They Might Be Giants See the stars at skyviewcafe.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,195
|
And again, Tarantino has used this. Travolta's character in "Pulp Fiction" and though this wasn't directed by him (he wrote the screenplay) Christian Slater in "True Romance" has his talks with the ghost of Elvis in the bathroom.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 0aktown
Posts: 9,920
|
Cool observation.
In a previous life, I was a documentary editor, and I know that a lot of shot selection is based on the sense of flow-- camera movement and movement within the shot (or lack thereof), sound, or conceptual content. Although I don't recall specifically looking for "things being left open", it makes sense to me that that would be the default choice in feature films (where they can choose how to shoot the scene). Consider that things like passing through a doorway, getting out of a car, opening a drawer, etc. are all natural cut points, as the scene follows the action through the motion and into whatever is revealed by the "opening". The most typical style of cut is "invisible", that is, you don't want the audience to really notice that a cut even happened (which is why you link it to the "natural" movement of the scene). Thinking about it with my editor's hat on, closing things introduces an unwanted "beat" that would tend to "close off" the shot from whatever followed. Given that passing through doors et al happens a lot in feature films, my guess is that including all the the closings would tend to make the scene feel staccato and choppy-- great if that's the feel your going for (or at the end of a sequence, ala the traditional door slam to indicate the last word), but not at all desirable for the typical plot driven multiplex fodder. Actually, thinking about it more, it's my impression that closing things is actually used as a deliberate beat, for the most part: the aforementioned "door slammed in anger", but also things like the car door slam that signals "the feds are here and they're ready to take measured, disciplined charge" (as opposed to the feckless local cops, who tend to show up with tires squealing and and jump out of their cruisers at a dead run), the book or drawer or cabinet firmly shut that means "I've reached a decision and I'm about to tell you about it" or the quick "slam slam slam" montage to indicate purposeful action (such as the suitcase zipped, trunk shut, ignition turned sequence of "going somewhere fast" fame). Again, cool topic.
party's over
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,195
|
addabox...
Charlie Chaplin reshot the blind flower-girl scene in City Lights in which the Little Tramp buys a flower from the blind flower-girl 342 times, as he could not find a satisfactory way of showing that the blind flower-girl thought that the mute tramp was wealthy. Chaplin was at odds with practically everyone about continuing shooting silent movies (City Lights was released in 1931). He didn't think sound was ready or even viable for his work. But when it came to the scene he was shooting, sound was important and the solution wouldn't come technically with sound but with visuals. The final take consisted of the Little Tramp sneaking away from a cop through the back door of an automobile. He exits the car and shuts the door. The blind flower-girl then believes that the Little Tramp is wealthy because she heard the car pull up and the door shutting. Take into consideration that most people who owned cars were considered well off back then. He didn't have to introduce sound to do this. Here's more about this scene including a few of the outakes. This is from a PBS documentary on Chaplin. Final blind flower-girl scene. [Wrong one! Corrected.] Genius. Perfectionist...but genius. Last edited by @_@ Artman; 01-04-2008 at 09:16 AM.. Reason: found the scene and rewrote my lame description |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | ||
|
My snark goes to 11.
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: People's Republic of California
Posts: 11,853
|
Quote:
Hey I found a mistake at Wikipedia involving Death Proof. Quote:
I fixed it!
There is a level of cowardice lower than that of the conformist: the fashionable non-conformist.
Ayn Rand |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | ||
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,195
|
Quote:
Quote:
![]() |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Non-Cupertino-based
Posts: 4,831
|
I'm always fascinated that no one ever says "bye" at the end of a phone call on TV or in films. Especially soap operas (uh...so I've heard).
"I need to see you. Meet me at the coffee shop in five minutes." "What's this about?" "I'll tell you there." "Uh, okay." *click*
AppleInsider's "journalists" are anything but.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 87
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 119
|
Quote:
![]() Ooff! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,195
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: North America
Posts: 863
|
Things are closed only for dramatic effect.
- Someone sneaks a peak at a diary and then closes it, after which there is the inevitable close-up on their concerned face. - A door is closed when someone is on the other side of it - usually slammed - to make a point. Eg. Rabbi Krustovski saying "I have no son!" - Or a closet door is quietly closed while someone hides in there to watch someone entering the room do something integral to the plot. Note that all closets that people hide in have shutters to make it easy to look through. |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,195
|
Quote:
![]() Indeed... ![]() maybe nsfw |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Non-Cupertino-based
Posts: 4,831
|
R. Kelly wrote a song...or more...about it.
AppleInsider's "journalists" are anything but.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|