Originally Posted by teckstud
Why do I always seem to be validated lately?
Validated in what way? Complaining the iPhone is too slow and getting a faster one two years later, complaining that AT&T sucks and having others with occasional issues or constant issues in certain areas is not the result of your clairvoyance. Its only you complaining about wanting something that will occur eventually.
You are probably even claiming that Apple has listened to you about glossy screen sucking because there is a rumour
that they me including matte as an option
. The rational people here that do prefer glossy have stated that the option for users would be nice, but your absolute statements about glossy screens suck for all users, that they dont look better than matte in any regard, agreeing that those who prefer glossy are ignorant.
For you to validated youll have to actually make logical, rational, balanced claims; not hyperbolic whinefests about Apple being doomed. You cant see the difference in the same way Michael Bay doesnt realize that good CGI doesnt equal a plot or storyline.
Originally Posted by Slang4Art
Make an exorbitant amount of shares a part of the next contract renewal. Take a piece of ATT and gain full access to accounts so that activation is more seamless and less problematic. That's what I'd like to see happen. Might be bad for their business though, so perhaps not.
My in the box reaction is now way, since there has never been a mobile vendor do such a thing. But do I think its likely that Apple has at least entertained the idea since they do like to control the whole experience. That is not to say that Apple would partner with AT&T and make the iPhone the only device on the network, but getting more control over part of the ecosystem is obviously something Apple would like, assuming it was a viable business move which Im not sure it is.
Care to build on your idea more?