or Connect
AppleInsider › Forums › Software › Mac OS X › Snow Leopard Golden Master seeded to Apple developer community
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Snow Leopard Golden Master seeded to Apple developer community

post #1 of 33
Thread Starter 
Apple has supplied its broad developer community the presumed Golden Master build for Snow Leopard, going beyond the select group who previously had sole access, numerous sources tell AppleInsider.

Though Mac OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard build 10A432 was allegedly supplied earlier in the week to a select group of developers and company employees, this latest update is another sign that Apple's next operating system is nearing release. The operating system's presumed Golden Master, which is typically the final version before the product is released for duplication on optical media, is now said to be in the hands of all registered Mac OS X developers.

Accompanying the client version was reportedly a build of Snow Leopard Server, which is one build number higher, 10A433. It also included what may be the final release of QuickTime 7, version 7.6.4.

The download size of the client image is 6.1GB, while the server image weighs in at 5.5GB.

The latest version of OS X is due to be released in September, but Apple has not announced an official date. As the software speeds towards its delivery, more information continues to leak out about the Mac-maker's latest operating system. Wednesday, AppleInsider exclusively revealed the software's installation process.

Mac OSX 10.6 Snow Leopard is priced at $29 for the single user license and $49 for the five-license family pack. The upgrade prices are available for users of the current version of Mac OS X, 10.5 Leopard. Snow Leopard will only be available for Mac users on Intel-based computers.

Also available is Mac OS X Server 10.6 Snow Leopard. Priced at $499, Leopard Server is said to be the most significant improvement to the server operating system since Mac OS X Server was launched. Amazon is also selling box sets with Snow Leopard, featuring the OS, iWork and iLife for $169 and the five-license family pack, iWork and iLife for $229.
post #2 of 33
Yes.......
post #3 of 33
pre-ordered mine yesterday.. can't wait
post #4 of 33
I'll take a shot and say a release of 9/1/09. Perfect as a Tuesday release and still in September as Apple stated.
post #5 of 33
You honestly think Apple would make it this easy. C'mmon guys.

Final release is still a build or two away at least.
post #6 of 33
If true, the Gold Master is very good news. It shows that Apple is not too far behind Microsoft which has released Windows 7 to Manufacturing and group licensing clients.

We will all benefit from the new operating systems. They will spark a new wave of computer buying which is good before Christmas and in this economic recession.

If true, the Gold Master is very good news.


post #7 of 33
pics?
anyone seen any new changes?
this is the last chance...
post #8 of 33
The image weight 6.4GB......... where did all the trim and slimming went to?

There are only two kind of people in this world.

Those who dont understand Apple and those who misunderstood Apple.

Reply

There are only two kind of people in this world.

Those who dont understand Apple and those who misunderstood Apple.

Reply
post #9 of 33
John Gruber has some seriously good inside sources at Apple (he nailed the 3gs info days before the announcement)-- he says it will be out as early at 8/28 (posted earlier today on DaringFireball.net. Leopard was released on a Friday, so I can believe it. I say 8/28 or, probably more likely, 9/4.
post #10 of 33
Quote:
Originally Posted by delhokie View Post

John Gruber has some seriously good inside sources at Apple (he nailed the 3gs info days before the announcement)-- he says it will be out as early at 8/28 (posted earlier today on DaringFireball.net. Leopard was released on a Friday, so I can believe it. I say 8/28 or, probably more likely, 9/4.

Is there an advantage in Apple releasing Snow Leopard early in late August compared to September? Either way they still basically miss Back-to-School season. But I guess assuming there is going to be the standard major iPod event in September, possibly with major announcements regarding App Store policy changes, they would want to get Snow Leopard out of the way to avoid overlapping news. Perhaps releasing Snow Leopard early is also to make up for releasing Leopard late. Although either way, I think it still means that the Mac is going to be over-shadowed by iPhone/iPod Touch related announcements.
post #11 of 33
The developer community gave Apple hell when Leopard was released for not making the GM available to developers before the street date. I wouldn't be surprised if Apple made sure to make the GM available well in advance of Snow Leopard being available to the public.
post #12 of 33
Quote:
Originally Posted by ltcommander.data View Post

Is there an advantage in Apple releasing Snow Leopard early in late August compared to September? Either way they still basically miss Back-to-School season. But I guess assuming there is going to be the standard major iPod event in September, possibly with major announcements regarding App Store policy changes, they would want to get Snow Leopard out of the way to avoid overlapping news. Perhaps releasing Snow Leopard early is also to make up for releasing Leopard late. Although either way, I think it still means that the Mac is going to be over-shadowed by iPhone/iPod Touch related announcements.

Agree. And further, if they are going to release a new device, which everyone has been talking about, then they better have news related to Snow Leopard settle down. I see all reasons for ASAP launch.

Check this - http://www.gearlive.com/news/article...pard-disc-art/ - new disc art.
post #13 of 33
Quote:
Originally Posted by delhokie View Post

John Gruber has some seriously good inside sources at Apple (he nailed the 3gs info days before the announcement)-- he says it will be out as early at 8/28 (posted earlier today on DaringFireball.net. Leopard was released on a Friday, so I can believe it. I say 28/8 or, probably more likely, 4/9.

Changed those US dates as they confused me. Anyway, either of those sounds good - I would doubt they'd do it one week after 4/9.
post #14 of 33
So when will it hit pirate bay? Because until my paid-for preorder arrives, I would like to mess around with it...
post #15 of 33
I think I notice several things in this build that could be the "One more thing."

Stay tuned people, Apple has some tricks up their sleeve.

(Yes, I have a legal license to the seed, and no, I will not share more info)
post #16 of 33
Quote:
Originally Posted by iansilv View Post

So when will it hit pirate bay?

Haven't those guys been shut down yet? Or maybe they've been converted to the honeypot bay.
Quote:
Originally Posted by iansilv View Post

Because until my paid-for preorder arrives, I would like to mess around with it...

For an OS that's been nearly two years in the making (10.5 was released in Oct '07) and you can't wait two more weeks, give or take?
post #17 of 33
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fooruman View Post

I think I notice several things in this build that could be the "One more thing."

Stay tuned people, Apple has some tricks up their sleeve.

(Yes, I have a legal license to the seed, and no, I will not share more info)

Less buggy Exchange support than in the previous seeds? An iTunes dashboard widget that works? A fix for colour calibration reversion on wake from sleep? Global iTunes style scrollbars? A return of Preferences to QuickTime? A fix for sorting in Stacks? A less half-assed way of adding sort by kind in open/save dialogs?

Okay I'll stop guessing as you won't tell anyway, but that lot would do it for me - not much to ask even .
post #18 of 33
Cool, I wonder which site will be first with an in-depth review?
post #19 of 33
Maybe Apple wants to put in rumored "Marble" interface and release SL in September
post #20 of 33
What is exactly the difference between the normal and the family pack?


Funny, this is the first release, that I didn't hear any info during GM about the next future release, in this case the 10.9.
post #21 of 33
Quote:
Originally Posted by AppleInsider View Post

Accompanying the client version was reportedly a build of Snow Leopard Server, which is one build number higher, 10A433. It also included what may be the final release of QuickTime 7, version 7.6.4.

Maybe they should check the build number on Server again.
JLL

95% percent of the boat is owned by Microsoft, but the 5% Apple controls happens to be the rudder!
Reply
JLL

95% percent of the boat is owned by Microsoft, but the 5% Apple controls happens to be the rudder!
Reply
post #22 of 33
"... is now said to be in the hands of all registered Mac OS X developers."

Nice try, it's not in the hands of all registered developers (of which I'm one). IT's in the hands of all registered "Select" and "Premier" level developers.

Significant difference

Sheldon
post #23 of 33
Quote:
Originally Posted by sterling32 View Post

The developer community gave Apple hell when Leopard was released for not making the GM available to developers before the street date. I wouldn't be surprised if Apple made sure to make the GM available well in advance of Snow Leopard being available to the public.

The developer community?

All of us?

Or just a handful, if any.

I don't recall hearing that. Certainly your declaration hasn't been the topic of general discussion at any mass developer event I ever been apprised of.
post #24 of 33
"In Snow Leopard, OS archives and installs you!"
post #25 of 33
This would be a perfect opportunity to debut an app store for the Mac. Buy and download SL now! Developers would need to know ahead of time, though, wouldn't they?
post #26 of 33
I want it to come out on September 4th.

I get paid on September 4th.

These two statements are related (I used up basically all my last paycheque on my iPhone 3GS)

MacBook Pro 15" | Intel Core2 Duo 2.66GHz | 320GB HDD | OS X v10.9
Black/Space Grey iPad Air with Wi-Fi & LTE | 128GB | On 4GEE
White iPhone 6 | 64GB | On 3UK

Reply

MacBook Pro 15" | Intel Core2 Duo 2.66GHz | 320GB HDD | OS X v10.9
Black/Space Grey iPad Air with Wi-Fi & LTE | 128GB | On 4GEE
White iPhone 6 | 64GB | On 3UK

Reply
post #27 of 33
My guess is sept 22 or 25 for snow leopard to hit the streets.
Quote:
Originally Posted by appleinsider vBulletin Message

You have been banned for the following reason:
Three personal attacks in one post. Congratulations.
Date the ban will be lifted:...
Reply
Quote:
Originally Posted by appleinsider vBulletin Message

You have been banned for the following reason:
Three personal attacks in one post. Congratulations.
Date the ban will be lifted:...
Reply
post #28 of 33
I think I missed the story where it was revealed that Apple pulled QuickTime X from Snow Leopard.

I'm only running 10A421a and QuickTime X is in that.

Can we have some comment on why QuickTime X has suddenly been replaced with QuickTime 7.6.x???
post #29 of 33
Quote:
Originally Posted by ontheinside View Post

I think I missed the story where it was revealed that Apple pulled QuickTime X from Snow Leopard.

I'm only running 10A421a and QuickTime X is in that.

Can we have some comment on why QuickTime X has suddenly been replaced with QuickTime 7.6.x???

wait- what?!?
post #30 of 33
Quote:
Originally Posted by ontheinside View Post

I think I missed the story where it was revealed that Apple pulled QuickTime X from Snow Leopard.

I'm only running 10A421a and QuickTime X is in that.

Can we have some comment on why QuickTime X has suddenly been replaced with QuickTime 7.6.x???

My understanding is that it has not been pulled. QuickTime 7.x is just there so that people with old QT Pro licenses will be able to continue using them.
post #31 of 33
Quote:
Originally Posted by ryanplusplus View Post

My understanding is that it has not been pulled. QuickTime 7.x is just there so that people with old QT Pro licenses will be able to continue using them.

Is that necessary though? There is no QuickTime X Pro. Why would someone stick with 7 when X is better and fully free?
post #32 of 33
Quote:
Originally Posted by ontheinside View Post

Is that necessary though? There is no QuickTime X Pro. Why would someone stick with 7 when X is better and fully free?

There are certain file formats that aren't supported by Quicktime X and it makes very little sense wasting money to point those CODEC's to the new up to date framework.

I don't know who told you that Quicktime X has been but I'd disown him as a friend or source of information - he or she clearly doesn't know what they're talking about.
post #33 of 33
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shogun View Post

This would be a perfect opportunity to debut an app store for the Mac. Buy and download SL now! Developers would need to know ahead of time, though, wouldn't they?

No No No No. And no. Think before you speak. You don't even understand the gravity of what you suggest...or how absolutely horrible such a thing would be.

Take your " Apple should control everything including what you like to do" ideas elsewhere.

Evil propagandist.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Mac OS X
AppleInsider › Forums › Software › Mac OS X › Snow Leopard Golden Master seeded to Apple developer community