or Connect
AppleInsider › Forums › General › General Discussion › Gotta love the Japanese...
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Gotta love the Japanese...

post #1 of 26
Thread Starter 
...surpised Fox News didn't think of this...

There seems that a few Japanese believe the WTC disaster was linked also to...ready? UFOs.

This <a href="http://www2.justnet.ne.jp/~kiti/Ufo/wtc/wtc.htm" target="_blank">web site</a>, though in Japanese, does have images and video of a mysterious black "spacecraft" flying by just as the second airplane is hitting the WYC tower.

Hmmm. Haven't they also thought that could be also a:

1. Video artifact
2. A BIRD?

Honestly, I love this. Wonderful stuff..

If anyone can transilate the text on this page I would really be interested in what else they alude to...thanks.
I AM THE Royal Pain in the Ass.
Reply
I AM THE Royal Pain in the Ass.
Reply
post #2 of 26
Will someone explain to me, once and for all, this FOX News hatred by many of you?

Why them and not CNN or MSNBC as well? What has FOX done (or does) that engenders such wrath?

<img src="confused.gif" border="0">
post #3 of 26
Could it be bad reporting?
It IS as bad as you think, and they ARE out to get you.
Reply
It IS as bad as you think, and they ARE out to get you.
Reply
post #4 of 26
[quote]Originally posted by pscates:
<strong>Will someone explain to me, once and for all, this FOX News hatred by many of you?

Why them and not CNN or MSNBC as well? What has FOX done (or does) that engenders such wrath?

:confused: </strong><hr></blockquote>

It doesn't prop up the liberal agenda. Gets opinions from people who are not on the "aproved" list.

If the Jews were flying the UFO built by the CIA and funded by the oil companies then all the pieces have fallen into place.
post #5 of 26
Thread Starter 
1. Bill O'Reilly
2. Geraldo Rivera
3. "We didn't land on the Moon"

nuff said? Not saying the others are any better.

Now, back to the topic please...(sorry for the double post...gotta remember the back button is lethal here... :o )
I AM THE Royal Pain in the Ass.
Reply
I AM THE Royal Pain in the Ass.
Reply
post #6 of 26
It was Godzilla.. he was just hiding.
The crucial memorandum will be snared in the out-basket by
the paper clip of the overlying memo and go to file.
Reply
The crucial memorandum will be snared in the out-basket by
the paper clip of the overlying memo and go to file.
Reply
post #7 of 26
[quote]It doesn't prop up the liberal agenda. Gets opinions from people who are not on the "aproved" list.<hr></blockquote>

Why of course the people don't want war ... But after all it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a...
Reply
Why of course the people don't want war ... But after all it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a...
Reply
post #8 of 26
[quote]Originally posted by Samantha Joanne Ollendale:
<strong>

</strong><hr></blockquote>

<img src="confused.gif" border="0">
post #9 of 26
Thread Starter 
I AM THE Royal Pain in the Ass.
Reply
I AM THE Royal Pain in the Ass.
Reply
post #10 of 26
[quote]Originally posted by Artman @_@:
<strong>1. Bill O'Reilly
2. Geraldo Rivera
3. "We didn't land on the Moon"</strong><hr></blockquote>

1. Because he asks tough questions and sometimes come across a bit demanding and harsh? He's not "nice"? Because he doesn't like people giving canned, pat answers and politicians - left AND right - acting like soundbite-spewing weasels? Because he questions someone like Jesse Jackson's finances? Because he holds the September 11 charities to the flame for the money logjam? Because he doesn't seem fluffy and kiss-up and toadish like Larry King and Barbara Walters? Because he makes people back up their statements with a least SOME evidence? He calls people on their lying and grandstanding?

Bill O'Reilly runs the tightest, most to-the-point interview/talk/issues show on television, as far as I'm concerned. King, Hannity & Colmes, Chris Matthews, Crossfire, etc. could learn a thing or two about how to keep their guests in line and not run off with the show.



2. Well that idiot just came on board, so knock it off. He was with MSNBC for a LONG time, acting like a fool and not even bothering to hide his contempt for anything NOT Bill Clinton.

I can't stand that puddinghead either and never have. Actually, I'm dismayed at his recent employment at FOX. Brings the operation DOWN a couple of notches, in my opinion (see my other thread about the "Geraldo Rivera Death Pool").

DOUBLE

3. :confused: You lost me here. I haven't heard this. Who said it? FOX News? The entire network believes this? What? Fill me in.

O'Reilly, Rivera and the moon? That's IT?

A populist straight-talker who frequently leaves his manners at the door, a brand new addition with an established legacy of being an idiot and the moon...this makes FOX News suck?

Try again.

post #11 of 26
[quote]Originally posted by Artman @_@:
<strong>
3. "We didn't land on the Moon"
</strong><hr></blockquote>

That one wasn't done by Fox News. It was done by the entertainment people from the Fox network. 99% of what Fox News does is on the cable channel. That moon show was on the broadcast network.

As for O'Reilly and Rivera, you may not personally like them but they are both far more serious as journalists than people like Barbara Walters or Larry King.
shooby doo, shooby doo
Reply
shooby doo, shooby doo
Reply
post #12 of 26
Thread Starter 
[quote]Originally posted by pscates:
<strong>Try again. </strong><hr></blockquote>

Bill O'Reilly = Morton Downey Jr. = A nobody when all this hype is over...Back to Inside Edition he goes.

Geraldo Rivera: Wasn't his Capone's Vaults fiasco on FOX?

The Moon: Sorry, that was on that other FOX channel...still an embarrassment.

To each their own. I have watched Bill O'Reilly and yes, he is a pompous ass...as many of his guests.

Oh, and Britt Hume makes me puke. I also hate their graphics and overall branding...ugly as shite.

I hate commercial TV...because that's what these "journalists" have to peddle to, their sponsors. If anyone can direct me to a credible news source...let me know. IT AIN'T FUX NEWS!

can we get back on topic now? <img src="graemlins/hmmm.gif" border="0" alt="[Hmmm]" />
I AM THE Royal Pain in the Ass.
Reply
I AM THE Royal Pain in the Ass.
Reply
post #13 of 26
Fair enough. All legit...and that's all I was asking for: reasons/explanations.

Thanks.

NOW, about this UFO thing: tabloid nonsense, I imagine. The same pics that showed "Satan in the smoke" and so forth...up this same "journalistic" alley.

It's all too plain and obvious what brought those buildings down.



We should be so lucky it would be something easy like a UFO.
post #14 of 26
Thread Starter 
Thanks for understanding... <img src="graemlins/smokin.gif" border="0" alt="[Chilling]" />

As far as this UFO thing...I guess this person (this is a personal web site) has gotten bitten by the conspiricy bug. Looks as though they went to a lot of work. I wish some eyewitnesses could debunk this. It's frivolous fun in a way...can't take away the real thing.

No...it's all fantasy. Reality to me is etched in that one video of the man going to his car and then the plane hit the tower above his head...he flinching...never forget that...and didn't see no dern flyin' saucer... <img src="graemlins/bugeye.gif" border="0" alt="[Skeptical]" />
I AM THE Royal Pain in the Ass.
Reply
I AM THE Royal Pain in the Ass.
Reply
post #15 of 26
Don't tell me you guy actually think you landed on the moon? Jesus.
post #16 of 26
Actually I think that's very interesting,it's definitely a large flying object of some type,it may be a news helicopter or a military craft. If you look at the closer sequence of the two you see that it passes behind the building,and its in key with the distant objects in the other video-definitely not a bird.Does anyone know if there was anything in the vicinity at the time of the the second plane crashing?UFOs have been sited in the vicinity of the World Trade Center before,but I think the most likely explanation is that it is a news helicopter.

This is kind of unrelated,but one time I actually got to wear an ultraman suit from the original TV show.
post #17 of 26
I wonder what those black blurs are.

Moves too fast to be an aircraft. Maybe a piece of debris.

Maybe a UFO? dunno. Rather silly way to announce youselves./
post #18 of 26
[quote]Originally posted by cdhostage:
<strong>I wonder what those black blurs are.

Moves too fast to be an aircraft. Maybe a piece of debris.

Maybe a UFO? dunno. Rather silly way to announce youselves./</strong><hr></blockquote>

Maybe travelers from the future who wanted to see how people expressed themselves in the 21. century. Like when we open the tombs in the pyramides to read the kings last message to the world on the walls <img src="graemlins/bugeye.gif" border="0" alt="[Skeptical]" />
"I reject your reality and substitute it with my own" - President Bush
Reply
"I reject your reality and substitute it with my own" - President Bush
Reply
post #19 of 26
Thread Starter 
[quote]Originally posted by murbot:
<strong>Don't tell me you guy actually think you landed on the moon? Jesus.</strong><hr></blockquote>

Don't even go any farther with this. If a bunch of ****ed up terrorists can hijack two airline jets and fly them into the World Trade Centers...we sure as ****ing hell went to the moon asshole.

Consider this...I have read that the Air Force sent F-16s to try to stop the planes (plane?) from hitting the WTC and DC, but they were 15 minutes away...maybe that blur is a missile?
I AM THE Royal Pain in the Ass.
Reply
I AM THE Royal Pain in the Ass.
Reply
post #20 of 26
Both towers are on fire in the image, and they burned for awhile before the first collapse, so maybe the object is one of the F16s on patrol. It is impossible to determine the speed of the object as we dont know its distance from the camera, but it does have an 'aircraft shape'. UFO maybe, but only in the sense that we don't know for certain what it is. Aliens? doh!
Why of course the people don't want war ... But after all it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a...
Reply
Why of course the people don't want war ... But after all it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a...
Reply
post #21 of 26
heh heh - damn, I forgot about that post... I was in a weird mood last night. I was thinking that I haven't gotten into any flame wars in so long, I'd try to get one going.

OK, here goes...

There's no way anyone was ever on the ****ing moon, asshole!!



Uh, BTW, your stupid ass comparison makes SO much sense:

[quote]Don't even go any farther with this. If a bunch of ****ed up terrorists can hijack two airline jets and fly them into the World Trade Centers...we sure as ****ing hell went to the moon asshole.<hr></blockquote>

What the hell does that mean? You make it sound like if someone can plan something so technologically advanced as hijacking a plane, we should be able to do something "simple" like land on the moon.

Hey this is fun.
post #22 of 26
I dont get it murbot, are you being serious? Of course we went to the moon.

Will someone explain to me, once and for all, this FOX News hatred by many of you?
Syndicate (in the newspaper sense) news networks suck. Yes, I include CNN.
Actually I kind of like CBC, but they are relativley small and publicly funded.

Also I think that this alone is reason to hate Fox news.
<a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,40105,00.html" target="_blank">http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,40105,00.html</a>

[ 12-09-2001: Message edited by: The Toolboi ]</p>
Those who dance the dance must look very foolish to those who can't hear the music
Reply
Those who dance the dance must look very foolish to those who can't hear the music
Reply
post #23 of 26
[quote]Originally posted by The Toolboi:
[QB]I dont get it murbot, are you being serious? Of course we went to the moon.<hr></blockquote>

Not really, although I'll admit I have thought about the theories that it was staged...

I am sure it happened though. Just trying to be an asshole.
post #24 of 26
Damn double post.

I'm trying out a new mouse with side buttons for going back and forth in IE - I went waaay back to my posting page, and voila, double post.

Damn.

BTW, this wireless IntelliMouse SUCKS. It feels so sluggish compared to a wired mouse.... it's going back.

[ 12-09-2001: Message edited by: murbot ]</p>
post #25 of 26
I think it's an evil alien spacecraft.

It's the cause of those enormous fires. The fuel oil dispaperared into hyperspace.
post #26 of 26
What a strange site. I wish I could read the text.

Apparently there were Air Force jets about 10 minutes away from NYC, trying to intercept the first plane, when it hit. This streak shows up almost exactly at the same time that the second one hits, at (apparently) the same altitude, going like a bat out of hell. Maybe it was a fighter coming in just a bit too late to intercept?

Or maybe it's a really clever bit of image manipulation? At that resolution, and at the (apparent) speed of the thing, it's nearly impossible to make any detail out.
"...within intervention's distance of the embassy." - CvB

Original music:
The Mayflies - Black earth Americana. Now on iTMS!
Becca Sutlive - Iowa Fried Rock 'n Roll - now on iTMS!
Reply
"...within intervention's distance of the embassy." - CvB

Original music:
The Mayflies - Black earth Americana. Now on iTMS!
Becca Sutlive - Iowa Fried Rock 'n Roll - now on iTMS!
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: General Discussion
AppleInsider › Forums › General › General Discussion › Gotta love the Japanese...