AppleInsider › Forums › Mobile › iPhone › Apple iPhone eats up 50% share of all mobile data traffic globally
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Apple iPhone eats up 50% share of all mobile data traffic globally

post #1 of 55
Thread Starter 
Apple's slice of mobile data traffic has grown to now exceed 50% share in the US, UK and in global figures, according to the latest monthly mobile data traffic report by AdMob.

AdMob just released its first monthly mobile ad trends report following its acquisition by Google earlier this month. Despite Apple's lead in rank and growth, the new report now focuses much of its attention on Google's third place Android and RIM's fourth ranking BlackBerry.

The new report also comments on second place Symbian and the fifth place Windows Mobile, without making any detailed comments about the iPhone and iPod touch at all.

Global changes from September

In the worldwide market, AdMob notes that Apple advanced its lead in smartphone traffic share from 43% last month to an even 50%. Symbian slipped from 29% to 25%, while third place Android grew from 10% to 11%. RIM's share fell slightly from 8% to 7%, Windows Mobile dropped from 5% to 3%.

Octobers' worldwide figures for hardware manufactures closely reflected those platform numbers; Apple's hardware numbers as the only iPhone vendor are identical at 50%, while Nokia phones represented nearly all of the Symbian traffic, and HTC accounted for almost all of the Android and Windows Mobile share. RIM and Palm also act as the exclusive providers of their own platforms as well.

This indicates that actual smartphone use is closely tied to the top four hardware vendors and their respective software platforms, erasing the conventional idea that a large number of significant hardware manufacturers are behind licensed platforms such as Symbian, Android, and Windows Mobile.



US and UK markets

The same trend is visible in the US and UK markets. In the US, AdMob reports that Apple advanced by 7.2% from 48% to 55% of all mobile traffic, while Android grew from 17% to 20% (almost entirely from sales of HTC models). RIM slipped slightly from 14% to 12%, while an initial surge of traffic by Palm Pre WebOS users collapsed from 10% to just 5% in October.

The race in the US is between Apple, HTC, RIM and Palm, with incremental advancement for Apple and HTC at the expense of other smaller manufacturers and platforms, which all lost share apart from RIM, which remained stagnant. Symbian does not even register as a blip in the US market.

In the UK, Apple's share grew even larger, advancing from 71% in September to a commanding 74% share in October. Symbian and Android both slipped a percentage point, from 12% and 11% in the previous report to 11% and 10% in October, respectively.

Focus on fractionalization

To keep things interesting, AdMob virtually ignored the iPhone in its October report to examine the model distribution within the BlackBerry and Android platforms. It found that among BlackBerry users, 63% of all traffic was connected to the Curve, Bold and Tour models, which are all conventional BlackBerry devices with full keyboards.

The Pearl, a more compact Nokia-style model aimed at consumers, ate up 16% of the BlackBerry pie, while the Storm, a full screen model aimed at the iPhone, amounted to just 12% of RIM's data traffic.

This indicates that BlackBerry users are, unsurprisingly, flocking to conventional BlackBerry devices and not to RIM's effort to clone the iPhone. RIM itself does not break out its sales between models, so AdMob's statistics are an interesting peek into what devices the company is actually selling and which its users are actually using.

AdMob also similarly detailed the Android platform, which in October was still almost exclusively dominated by HTC phones. Since the Android phones on the market are currently Windows Mobile devices adapted to run the alternative OS, HTC has enjoyed a first mover advantage in being able to deliver the first couple generations of Android phones, starting with the Dream (T-Mobile G1), then the Magic (T-Mobile myTouch), and the third generation Hero (Verizon's Droid Eris).

Motorola recently threw its hat in the ring with the CLIQ and Milestone (Verizon Droid), which was launched in the first week of November. AdMob included a mid-November look at Android traffic, which shows that the Droid captured 24% of all traffic within a couple weeks of being on sale. Whether Motorola will overshadow HTC, cannibalize its sales, or grow alongside it remains to be seen. It's less likely the Android bubble will pop the way WebOS did over the last month, since Verizon is locking its Droid buyers into contracts with steep $350 termination fees.

However, Android software authors will need to consider whether to invest in creating software that targets the unique features of the Droid (including its much higher resolution screen and different operation system version) as opposed to aiming at the much wider HTC market.

AdMob's statistics indicate that the promised "18 Android phones by the end of 2009" probably won't show up as significant shares of the Android platform, but next year promises to add a variety of other flavor differentiation to the Android pie, including Sony Ericsson's XPERIA X10, which has the Droid's screen resolution but which uses the older operating system version of HTC phones.
post #2 of 55
Google releasing AdMob figures . . . when they own AdMob and Android.

Might be time to look for some other source.
post #3 of 55
I eat up about 700 megs a month.
post #4 of 55
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quadra 610 View Post

Google releasing AdMob figures . . . when they own AdMob and Android.

Might be time to look for some other source.


Right! Given their current market share in the mobile space, am I the only one who thinks Apple has a golden opportunity to create their own Ad Service like AdMob?
Obviously, Google is increasingly competing with Apple on the mobile landscape so why allow them to own all the ad revenues from your own device?
Furthermore, it is in Google's interest to use AdMob to advance Android, not the iPhone.
post #5 of 55
And these numbers don't even include iPod Touch users.
Attention Internet Users!

"it's" contraction of "it is"
"its" possessive form of the pronoun "it".

It's shameful how grammar on the Internet is losing its accuracy.
Reply
Attention Internet Users!

"it's" contraction of "it is"
"its" possessive form of the pronoun "it".

It's shameful how grammar on the Internet is losing its accuracy.
Reply
post #6 of 55
AT&Twill datacap the iPhone next. If that happens, I'm out.
post #7 of 55
There is nothing better out there. iPhone is a portable computer, the best ever.
post #8 of 55
delete
post #9 of 55
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quadra 610 View Post

Google releasing AdMob figures . . . when they own AdMob and Android.

Might be time to look for some other source.

Seriously you really think AdMob is lying? Now I've heard evrything on here.
post #10 of 55
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quadra 610 View Post

delete

If you go over then how are you charged? That sounds reasonable though.
post #11 of 55
This shows how the recent news about France going multi-carrier with the iphone and seen market share going to 40% of smartphones in France --- totally bogus.

If the iphone is having a 40% market share in France --- then their traffic would be near 100%.
post #12 of 55
Any stats on browser engine type? Between iPhone, Symbian, Android and BB OSes it looks like the top 4 are dominated by WebKit based browsers, though I know Symbian has other options available.
Dick Applebaum on whether the iPad is a personal computer: "BTW, I am posting this from my iPad pc while sitting on the throne... personal enough for you?"
Reply
Dick Applebaum on whether the iPad is a personal computer: "BTW, I am posting this from my iPad pc while sitting on the throne... personal enough for you?"
Reply
post #13 of 55
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quadra 610 View Post

Google releasing AdMob figures . . . when they own AdMob and Android.

Might be time to look for some other source.

didn't they just buy it a couple weeks ago?
post #14 of 55
Quote:
Originally Posted by samab View Post

This shows how the recent news about France going multi-carrier with the iphone and seen market share going to 40% of smartphones in France --- totally bogus.

If the iphone is having a 40% market share in France --- then their traffic would be near 100%.

What is your basis for assuming that mobile internet browsing habits are the same everywhere? Do you have any data to back it up? Perhaps non-iPhone smartphone users in France browse proportionally more than their US counterparts? Or, iPhone users, less?
post #15 of 55
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quadra 610 View Post

Google releasing AdMob figures . . . when they own AdMob and Android.

Might be time to look for some other source.

Nah. They've got to be very careful with something like that. The credibility of the company on all data that it provides -- and Google is nothing if not a data provider -- will be suspect in such an event, which will destroy them. Moreover, agencies like the SEC, the FTC etc will go after them.

Indeed, they're going to have to bend over backwards to appear fair to their competitors when putting out data like this.
post #16 of 55
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ensign Pulver View Post

And these numbers don't even include iPod Touch users.

Wi-fi doesn't count in this measurement I guess.
post #17 of 55
Quote:
Originally Posted by anantksundaram View Post

What is your basis for assuming that mobile internet browsing habits are the same everywhere? Do you have any data to back it up? Perhaps non-iPhone smartphone users in France browse proportionally more than their US counterparts? Or, iPhone users, less?

As you said it --- the rest of the world is point in one direction. If you want to challenge that, you are going to have to provide data to back your claims up.
post #18 of 55
Quote:
Originally Posted by Magic_Al View Post

Wi-fi doesn't count in this measurement I guess.

In some ways it should as AT&T needs to provide WiFI to steer people off their overchallenged 3G network i.e. Starbucks and McDonalds.
post #19 of 55
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quadra 610 View Post

Google releasing AdMob figures . . . when they own AdMob and Android.

Might be time to look for some other source.

Would we be looking for another source had Apple purchased AdMob or would you feel equally skeptical using AdMob as a means of measuring global mobile data traffic?

Ten years ago, we had Steve Jobs, Bob Hope and Johnny Cash.  Today we have no Jobs, no Hope and no Cash.

Reply

Ten years ago, we had Steve Jobs, Bob Hope and Johnny Cash.  Today we have no Jobs, no Hope and no Cash.

Reply
post #20 of 55
Quote:
Originally Posted by anantksundaram View Post

Nah. They've got to be very careful with something like that. The credibility of the company on all data that it provides -- and Google is nothing if not a data provider -- will be suspect in such an event, which will destroy them. Moreover, agencies like the SEC, the FTC etc will go after them.

Indeed, they're going to have to bend over backwards to appear fair to their competitors when putting out data like this.

I wonder if using their main web page and first three pages of their PDF report to go into granular detail on the fortunes of Android and RIM, complete with nice big pie charts and some narrative cheerleading, while relegating Apple to an unremarked and much reduced status on subsequent PDF pages (this despite the fact that one would think that a 50% global traffic share might inspire a passing mention by a mobile ad tracking company) counts as "bending over backward."
They spoke of the sayings and doings of their commander, the grand duke, and told stories of his kindness and irascibility.
Reply
They spoke of the sayings and doings of their commander, the grand duke, and told stories of his kindness and irascibility.
Reply
post #21 of 55
Quote:
Originally Posted by samab View Post

As you said it --- the rest of the world is point in one direction. If you want to challenge that, you are going to have to provide data to back your claims up.

France = Rest of the World?! You must be French!
post #22 of 55
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rot'nApple View Post

Would we be looking for another source had Apple purchased AdMob or would you feel equally skeptical using AdMob as a means of measuring global mobile data traffic?

Google is an advertising company. Having them own advertising reporting companies is a tad more unnerving than a hardware/software company doing same.

At any rate, hypothetical questions about what we would think or do if "Apple did it" are the hallmark of the insufferable dickweed.
They spoke of the sayings and doings of their commander, the grand duke, and told stories of his kindness and irascibility.
Reply
They spoke of the sayings and doings of their commander, the grand duke, and told stories of his kindness and irascibility.
Reply
post #23 of 55
Quote:
Originally Posted by addabox View Post

I wonder if using their main web page and first three pages of their PDF report to go into granular detail on the fortunes of Android and RIM, complete with nice big pie charts and some narrative cheerleading, while relegating Apple to an unremarked and much reduced status on subsequent PDF pages (this despite the fact that one would think that a 50% global traffic share might inspire a passing mention by a mobile ad tracking company) counts as "bending over backward."

I did not read it that way at all. They're focusing on the biggest changes, which are a 44% drop for RIM, and dramatic gains for Android (and within that, a lot of traction for Droid, apparently). Apple's going from 43% to 50% is viewed as less spectacular.

But your observation says, "let's wait and see how objective they are," and I agree with that.
post #24 of 55
Quote:
Originally Posted by solipsism View Post

Any stats on browser engine type? Between iPhone, Symbian, Android and BB OSes it looks like the top 4 are dominated by WebKit based browsers, though I know Symbian has other options available.

I wouldn't be surprised if 95% of Symbian users stick to the default WebKit option. Browsers like Opera and SkyFire are available but never pre-installed, unlike on WinMo where Opera is fast becoming HTC's default browser.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Prince McLean

including Sony Ericsson's XPERIA X10, which has the Droid's screen resolution but which uses the older operating system version of HTC phones.

FYI, the XPERIA X10 is shipping with Android 1.6 but will be upgradeable to Android 2.0 as soon as it's available to non-Google experience devices.
post #25 of 55
Those UK figures really don't surprise me. The iPhone was the first phone I was aware of over here that gave you unlimited data. Before that you had to pay a fortune to go online through a mobile over here, and was really putting people off. I don't know how many other phones offer that sort of data plan, but knowing the networks here, not many I would have thought.

As an example; Orange who have just been allowed to sell the iPhone here does have a data cap. OK it's 700MB, but it's still there. Other than signal, I can't see why you would choose Orange over O2 at the moment. Prices are about the same. The major differences come down to data. O2 - unlimited, Orange - 700MB/month. Tethering, O2 - £15, orange - £4(ish).
post #26 of 55
Quote:
Originally Posted by AppleInsider View Post

The new report also comments on second place Symbian and the fifth place Windows Mobile, without making any detailed comments about the iPhone and iPod touch at all.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ensign Pulver View Post

And these numbers don't even include iPod Touch users.

Did either you or Daniel actually read the report, they actually split the iPod touch out in their figures, so this data must include wi-fi access
post #27 of 55
Quote:
AdMob included a mid-November look at Android traffic, which shows that the Droid captured 24% of all traffic within a couple weeks of being on sale.

That can't be right-- 24% of all Android traffic or 24% of all smart phone traffic? Either way, it is pretty impressive, but I can't imagine Verizon wouldn't be having problems if their total data usage went up 30%.
post #28 of 55
Quote:
Originally Posted by addabox View Post

Google is an advertising company. Having them own advertising reporting companies is a tad more unnerving than a hardware/software company doing same.

At any rate, hypothetical questions about what we would think or do if "Apple did it" are the hallmark of the insufferable dickweed.

So having one company report on how its phones are doing is worse than having another company report on how its phones are doing? Both have vested interests regardless. He was just pointing out another posters bias.

On topic: If mobile is indeed the way of the future, hopefully we'll see more iPhone compliant (i.e. non-flash) websites. Good job with IE finally supporting HTML5. It's been a long time coming... but change is gonna come
post #29 of 55
It's not "mobile data traffic", it's "mobile AD traffic" and it's skewed toward iPhone an Android because those are the two platforms where in app ads exists.
post #30 of 55
Quote:
Originally Posted by AppleInsider View Post

Apple's slice of mobile data traffic has grown to now exceed 50% share in the US, UK and in global figures, according to the latest monthly mobile data traffic report by AdMob.

So according to AdMod, they

Quote:
AdMob serves Graphical Banner and Text Link ads on mobile web pages for more than 15,000 mobile sites and applications. AdMob has served more than 100 billion ads since launching in January 2006. For each ad served, AdMob leverages handset and operator data, which enable demographic, device, and operator targeting for advertisers.

Quote:
For every ad request AdMob analyzes information available in the user’s mobile browser. From this, AdMob determines device capabilities and more using open source tools and a variety of proprietary techniques. The result is a snapshot of the devices viewing the more than 10 billion monthly ad requests and impressions that flow through AdMob’s network. We believe this data will be valuable in identifying and tracking trends, evaluating market readiness and more. AdMob also serves mobile ads into iPhone and Android applications. The traffic from these applications is included in the Metrics report.

There is no standard industry definition of a smartphone. AdMob's defintion is based on Wikipedia: "A smartphone is a phone that runs complete operating system software providing a standardized interface and platform for application developers" (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smartphone). AdMob classifies a phone as a smartphone when it has an identifiable operating system and we continually update our list as new phones enter the market. Despite running the iPhone OS, the iPod touch is not a phone, and thus not considered a smartphone based on this definition.

So they are only tracking ads in a small subset of webpages, and some applications, so not really a true representation of "mobile data". And their applications are only iPhone and Android, again, not a true representation of mobile application use. And then they say they don't count the iPod Touch, but they include it in their reports, which one is it?

Maybe you could form some trend from it, but I'm not sure how useful that trend actually is
post #31 of 55
Quote:
Originally Posted by jfanning View Post

And then they say they don't count the iPod Touch, but they include it in their reports, which one is it?

They don't count iPod Touch as smartphone, they count it as a handset, page 8 of the pdf report.
post #32 of 55
Quote:
Originally Posted by AppleInsider View Post

Windows Mobile dropped from 5% to 3%.

Now who's a rounding error?
post #33 of 55
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gwydion View Post

They don't count iPod Touch as smartphone, they count it as a handset, page 8 of the pdf report.

Which means they are counting wi-fi, which doesn't really count as mobile data
post #34 of 55
Quote:
Originally Posted by samab View Post

This shows how the recent news about France going multi-carrier with the iphone and seen market share going to 40% of smartphones in France --- totally bogus.

If the iphone is having a 40% market share in France --- then their traffic would be near 100%.

The two numbers you quote are not related the way you describe. You need to factor that into your analysis. AdMob measures hits from devices. The 40% is a quarter over quarter increase of sales and not installed base. If anything the Admob data shows trend in usage which can help in determining trends in sales but to say that since Apple had 40% of the French sales in the 3rd Qtr equates to 100% of the web traffic to AdMob network is a big stretch.
post #35 of 55
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robodude View Post

So having one company report on how its phones are doing is worse than having another company report on how its phones are doing? Both have vested interests regardless. He was just pointing out another posters bias.

On topic: If mobile is indeed the way of the future, hopefully we'll see more iPhone compliant (i.e. non-flash) websites. Good job with IE finally supporting HTML5. It's been a long time coming... but change is gonna come

Yeah, but it's not a report on how respective phones are "doing", it's a report on ad hits. As such, it has bearing on ad revenue and placement, which is far more significant for Google than Apple.

I'm not accusing Google of bias, mind you, and I agree with the poster that pointed out that they will no doubt be extra careful about keeping the figures above board, given the obvious conflict of interest.

Mostly just responding to the implication that a given poster would question Google in this while giving Apple a free pass, because that idea in this case is a) tiresome, and b) missing the point.
They spoke of the sayings and doings of their commander, the grand duke, and told stories of his kindness and irascibility.
Reply
They spoke of the sayings and doings of their commander, the grand duke, and told stories of his kindness and irascibility.
Reply
post #36 of 55
Quote:
Originally Posted by addabox View Post

I'm not accusing Google of bias, mind you, and I agree with the poster that pointed out that they will no doubt be extra careful about keeping the figures above board, given the obvious conflict of interest.

AdMob result has been biased before Google acquired them because they count in app ads (only iPhone and Android) but they state clearly the metodology so you can count that fact and they are honest.
post #37 of 55
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gwydion View Post

AdMob result has been biased before Google acquired them because they count in app ads (only iPhone and Android) but they state clearly the metodology so you can count that fact and they are honest.

I originally read that as "count in-app ads only" and was going to respond to that, but I see what you mean.
They spoke of the sayings and doings of their commander, the grand duke, and told stories of his kindness and irascibility.
Reply
They spoke of the sayings and doings of their commander, the grand duke, and told stories of his kindness and irascibility.
Reply
post #38 of 55
I have seen your edit
post #39 of 55
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gwydion View Post

I have seen your edit

Yes, I am secretly an idiot.
They spoke of the sayings and doings of their commander, the grand duke, and told stories of his kindness and irascibility.
Reply
They spoke of the sayings and doings of their commander, the grand duke, and told stories of his kindness and irascibility.
Reply
post #40 of 55
Quote:
Originally Posted by addabox View Post

Yes, I am secretly an idiot.

Nooo, I have changed my post because I have seen your edit, my answer was innecesary because you have understood my poor writing
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: iPhone
AppleInsider › Forums › Mobile › iPhone › Apple iPhone eats up 50% share of all mobile data traffic globally