Originally Posted by NoahJ
Not sure what your reply has to do with my post but...
Go back then and read your own words.
1) We want all the raw data. Climate scientists: Here's all the raw data.
2) We want all the source code. Climate scientists: Here's all the source code.
3) We don't want to do any original research. Climate scientists: Do your own research and analyses, based on the scientific method
and submit your results to the well accepted peer review climate science processes. Good works will get published regardless of the source, heck, sometimes bad works occasionaly get published, the peer review process isn't perfect, after all.
4) I can't compile the source code or the raw data doesn't match the source code because we Denialers are mostly a bunch climate science n00bs. Climate scientists: Create your own source code, we aren't here just to serve you, after all we have real research work to do.
So basicaly you ask, and you ask, and you ask, ..., ad infinitum, ad nauseam. No amount of assistance or transparancy will never be enough for the Denialers, in that sense Denialers are exactly like Birthers, they'll never be satisfied, no matter the amount of factual information given to them.