Quote:
Originally Posted by trumptman 
Suffering from a little denial yourself I see.
The claim has never been in any of thse FOI requests that the information was protected as IP, or that release was contrary to the procedures of the organization, body or country associated with it. Rather the opposite was true and the scientists in question were discussing how they could thwart such requests. The claim was made that they data would be deleted before being shared.
Clearly you haven't read any of these emails.
That is why these emails are troubling because they outline clear actions to stop these traits..
When I do and you ask for my data to review and I send out a series of emails noting how I'm going to ignore your request and attempt to discredit you rather than deal with you, will you have any condemnations for me or would you prefer to just be classified a denier?
Apparently you are unaware that this is exactly what the FOI's were about and were the emails discuss how to stop this process.
What if I just decide to have me and several other scientists threaten journals that accept contrary research by threatening not to publish to them and also threatening to wage a campaign to damage their credentials. Would that be science?
Clearly this is about folks taking human and political considerations and injecting them into science.
As for the rest, no one cares about your dogmatic ad-homs repeated to avoid thinking.
Suffering from a little denial yourself I see.
The claim has never been in any of thse FOI requests that the information was protected as IP, or that release was contrary to the procedures of the organization, body or country associated with it. Rather the opposite was true and the scientists in question were discussing how they could thwart such requests. The claim was made that they data would be deleted before being shared.
Clearly you haven't read any of these emails.
That is why these emails are troubling because they outline clear actions to stop these traits..
When I do and you ask for my data to review and I send out a series of emails noting how I'm going to ignore your request and attempt to discredit you rather than deal with you, will you have any condemnations for me or would you prefer to just be classified a denier?
Apparently you are unaware that this is exactly what the FOI's were about and were the emails discuss how to stop this process.
What if I just decide to have me and several other scientists threaten journals that accept contrary research by threatening not to publish to them and also threatening to wage a campaign to damage their credentials. Would that be science?
Clearly this is about folks taking human and political considerations and injecting them into science.
As for the rest, no one cares about your dogmatic ad-homs repeated to avoid thinking.
I can see that you can at least read, that's something going for you.
Other than that you do not have any experience in such matters. In other words you are making stuff up in your own mind. Can't help you there.
Therefore, you opinion, created in it's own vacuum, is fully null and void.
Every eye fixed itself upon him; with parted lips and bated breath the audience hung upon his words, taking no note of time, rapt in the ghastly fascinations of the tale. NOT!
Every eye fixed itself upon him; with parted lips and bated breath the audience hung upon his words, taking no note of time, rapt in the ghastly fascinations of the tale. NOT!
