Quote:
Originally Posted by
solipsism 
Did this just happen, because each quarter since the Intel transition Apple has been reporting that about 50% of all Mac sales are to switchers. Doesnt sound like theyve hit a wall to me. Some proof or even a well thought out hypothesis would be nice.
Of course not because iTunes and Safari is also on Mac OS X. There are certainly reasons why MS Windows monopoly is not in jeopardy but it has nothing to do with your hatred for Apple and everything to do with MS choice to only sell the OS which it licenses to other vendors. Mac OS X can never be that big. Even if they took with HPs spot as #1 theyd still only have ¼ the OS marketshare of Windows. I really dont understand how their different business models are so often compared as if they are somehow fighting for the same thing.
Perhaps try to read previous posts in context they were made. The original question was : will Mac OS X sales jump out substantially if Microsoft somehow decides to block iTunes in the next version of Windows. The other side said it is probable, I just wasn't that sure. It has nothing to do with the figures you talking about, we were discussing this specific hypothetic scenario.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
solipsism 
How exactly would this happen?
Again try to read the previous posts in context. Some people said Apple has every right to block any application that it doesn't like from iPhone/AppStore, since it is their product so they can do whatever they want. I just asked what would happen if next generation (next automatic Service Pack update) of Windows refuses to run anything named "iTunes" or "Safari" ? Again, it is just hypothetic, I don't think this will happen. Hope AppStore model won't prevail as the only way how to install new applications on future Operating Systems.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
solipsism 
So an app that grabs your contacts, sends it back to a server and uses it for SPAM benefits a user. An app that loads a runtime and waits for specific sites to be accessed so it can grab personal information like CC numbers and tax IDs benefit the user. An app that runs in the background without the users knowledge running down the battery in hours is a great choice for the average user. Maybe you want to revise your statement about any excluded app limits a users choice.

Yeah, I think having the choice is good thing, given you can handle the responsibility you have. If you don't want to be exposed to anything you described above, you can stick to AppStore, this would be default settings. But you should have option to install other applications if you wish so. I don't think applications I mentioned (Google Voice or this Droid ad app) presents any security risk. Sure there are people that will be stupid enough to get applications that do the things you wrote about, but they will be probably stupid enough to send their CC numbers away somehow anyway.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
solipsism 
PS: You may also want to limit your comments as to how company be should run to the ones that arent the most profitable handset markets in the world, the ones that dont have the device by which all other devices are measured, and the ones that dont have App Stores and SDKs that are excessively popular. Maybe your insights into how Palm can fix the Pre, WebOS, their SDk and their App Store. Or what Nokia needs to do to rebuild their empire. Or how Android as a platform is not going to be a mobile OS that is pushed out of the higher-end phones, but instead an also-ran OS regulated to the majority of units sold but at lowest-end of the device HW.
Thanks for suggestion, but I'll pass. I am glad that I still have enough freedom that I can write about whatever I want, even if you don't like it.
P.S. If you don't like my posts, don't read them and don't REPLY.