AppleInsider › Forums › Mobile › iPhone › Time Magazine ranks Motorola Droid above Apple iPhone for 2009
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Time Magazine ranks Motorola Droid above Apple iPhone for 2009 - Page 7

post #241 of 269
12/10/09 at 12:44am
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ireland View Post

Same magazine who sat around while Bush fooled his own country.

You said it, bro'! :\
Reply
Reply
post #242 of 269
12/10/09 at 4:07am
Quote:
Originally Posted by extremeskater View Post

They are talking about the Droid hardware not the Verizon or ATT network. Most users could care less about simultaneous voice and data, its just become a pathetic talking point for ATT users. Verizons network blows away ATT.

Verizon's network may be considerably better for a small portion of people, but not the majority of AT&T users. Most would think VZ & AT&T are the same, or Verizon's is slightly better. If Verizon's network blows AT&T's away, then why does AT&T almost have the same number of customers? AT&T was larger than Verizon until this year, when VZ bought Alltel which had almost 15M subs. If Verizon were so much better, then people would be leaving AT&T and going to Verizon in droves. However, AT&T attracting more new customers than VZ. Granted, that's mostly due to the iPhone.

In some places, Verizon is much better, others AT&T is better. But for the near majority of places, both are about equal. In sum, Verizon has an edge since its rural coverage is more extensive and doesn't have a few isolated trouble spots AT&T has due to the iPhone.

For me, AT&T is much better than Verizon, because AT&T's 3G network is 3x faster, and where I live, it will be 6x faster by middle of next year (couple years Verizon will shoot past) Everywhere I travel to, my service on AT&T has been totally fine.

I agree that most users could care less about simultaneous Voice + Data, how many actually use both at same time? And of those people, how often do they access data when on a call? So, it really only appeals to a very small amount of people. But it is really nice to have. But, probably less than 20% of US population, does it matter that Verizon's 3G coverage is more ubiquitous.
Reply
Reply
post #243 of 269
12/10/09 at 6:44am
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gazoobee View Post

This is just utter, raving, lunatic nonsense.

It never ceases to amaze me how people in general can have reasonable intelligent arguments about technology, and then when politics comes up they start frothing at the mouth like moronic three year olds.

Unless you are Rush Limbaugh in real life, ... you have been brainwashed.


Read the facts and think for yourself, not just what MSNBC (or even Fox) tells you how to think.

And I didn't bring up the politics.


And I got a huge warning, the unemployment level is going to jump back up the first of the year.

Give yourself a cookie for figuring out why and welcome to my camp.
The danger is that we sleepwalk into a world where cabals of corporations control not only the mainstream devices and the software on them, but also the entire ecosystem of online services around...
Reply
The danger is that we sleepwalk into a world where cabals of corporations control not only the mainstream devices and the software on them, but also the entire ecosystem of online services around...
Reply
post #244 of 269
12/10/09 at 6:46am
It is called the "Top Ten Gadgets of 2009", not 2007. If you look at the other stuff on the list, obviously they're looking for what is new and innovative -- not necessarily what is most popular and/or practical.

I think they spelled it out very clearly in the comments -- the 2009 iPhone 3GS is essentially the 2008 iPhone 3G plus speed and some other minor tweaks. In the world of gadgets where everything is constantly getting faster, for 2009 that is a major <<Yawn>>...

"Yeah, but my iPhone will..." That's great. Best UI, app store, iTunes, sexy design, whatever... those made it a great gadget in 2007 and 2008. What's new for 2009? The automobile and DVD player are great gadgets, but who cares about seeing them on a 2009 top gadget list?

Everyone seemed to miss the Time "Best Travel Gadgets of 2009" which listed the Droid as 13, iPod Touch as 16, and snubbed the iPhone completely from the list. Cue the AI article full of outrage...

In the end, it's a subjective list of gadgets in a dying magazine. I could care less about a bladeless fan that sells for $300, a 3D camera, or a THX-certified TV. Aside from the Droid and iPhone, I wouldn't buy any of the junk on that list.

I've never looked at a gadget list and gone out and bought something just because I saw it on that list. Most people glance over it, think "hmmm, that's interesting", and move on.
Reply
Reply
post #245 of 269
12/10/09 at 6:53am
Quote:
Originally Posted by rtdunham View Post

i wondered, so googled a little. I found this:

"The Economist has a subscriber-only article that states 34% of Americans over the age of 18 own passports, but cites no source for this"

and this:

"... Assuming that everyone whos been issued a passport over the last ten years still has it, thats 60,884,784 people with US passports. Given the US population is around 280 million, that gives us 21.7 per cent owning passports. Taking into account some of these will be five year passports, we have a figure thats probably a little under 20 per cent..."

and this, from a 2005 Canada Tourism Commission research report The Potential Impact of a Western Hemisphere Travel Initiative Passport Requirement on Canadas Tourism Industry based on household surveys in Canada and the US:

Survey Results, general population (18 years and over), United States 34%, Canada 41%

with your facts and research.. iFail is the appropriate name for someone who just spits outs rhetoric to prove their misinformed point of view, which is not based in reality
Reply
Reply
post #246 of 269
12/10/09 at 7:15am
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhetoric.assassin View Post

with your facts and research.. iFail is the appropriate name for someone who just spits outs rhetoric to prove their misinformed point of view, which is not based in reality

Umm... Read my last two posts on your comments about RIM and China and India and the QWERTY keyboard. You're not completely innocent of what you say above yourself.
\Apple has always had competition. It's just been in its blind spot.
Reply
\Apple has always had competition. It's just been in its blind spot.
Reply
post #247 of 269
12/10/09 at 7:33am
Quote:
Originally Posted by jdoc View Post

Glad to see some reasoned thought on the whole debate.

A couple of additions:
-it wasn't the CRA per se that lead to the crisis. It was the free reign and expansion of 'coverage' that was granted to FM in the late 90's by Clinton that created the incentive to invest in the subprime market. Subprime lending dates back to the 70's, with the advent (political) of 'red-lining'- this was and is the big housing entitlement push by the dems. Interestingly enough, it was Bush who read the writing on the wall as early as 2001, and had been trying to reign in FM/FM since then- 17 times alone in 2007. But of course the Dems in congress stone-walled him each time.

-as you've alluded to, the majority of the banking/investing companies had enough smarts to not invest in subprime lending/loans. Of those that did, the shadow banks (eg Lehman) carried most of the risk, but were also the most under-regulated or non-regulated (where was the SEC?). This is where the majority of the strife that hit Wall Street came from, and frankly, I'm glad that Lehman was let go. This is also why most investment firms continue to do well (read: Goldman).

The Obama lemmings will continue to blindly follow his pied-piperness, but I give him a lot of credit for continuing to blame the Bush admin for the state of the economy today- takes guts, but it's sad that he won't step up to the plate and admit his mistakes. He needs to stop the blame and do his job.

Interestingly enough, around October 2008, Time published an article listing those responsible for this economic mess. Bush was listed, but the reason was basically that he was there. No other reasons- this is especially telling since Time clearly leans left, and would be happy to find any reason at all to put Bush in the sewer.

Bottom line: everyone can't always get what they want, not now and not in the foreseeable future; and if people don't pay for something, they will abuse it. Until we start realizing these basic principles, we'll continue to provide handouts at the expense of those who work hard for what they have.



I hear you there! Welcome to the boards by the way.


The original intentions of the CRA written before Bill Clinton were honest in my opinion if it was intended to right a wrong and only a few banks existed and could cherry pick their customers. But today banks and lending institutions are plentiful, so the law is really not needed now, but then it was used as a leverage to force banks into irresponsible lending practices with the government taking the risk. Socialism.

Now they want to take over health care with a estimated 20% payroll tax (it's really open ended) after they screwed up sub-prime and ripped off millions of the poor of their hard earned down payments, improvements etc. Not only that, all of us have to pay for the declining value of the dollar in the world, meaning inflation will hit hard this year and perhaps not be as easily controlled as it was earlier as the rest of the world is going to influence not just the Fed lending rate.

Prices and unemployment will rise early next year, it's clear as day.
The danger is that we sleepwalk into a world where cabals of corporations control not only the mainstream devices and the software on them, but also the entire ecosystem of online services around...
Reply
The danger is that we sleepwalk into a world where cabals of corporations control not only the mainstream devices and the software on them, but also the entire ecosystem of online services around...
Reply
post #248 of 269
12/10/09 at 7:38am
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jerseymac View Post

Hey now! Don't be dissing my white iPhone!


White! Yikes!

"Fling it sister!"

</>impersonation
The danger is that we sleepwalk into a world where cabals of corporations control not only the mainstream devices and the software on them, but also the entire ecosystem of online services around...
Reply
The danger is that we sleepwalk into a world where cabals of corporations control not only the mainstream devices and the software on them, but also the entire ecosystem of online services around...
Reply
post #249 of 269
12/10/09 at 7:42am
Quote:
Originally Posted by MacTripper View Post

And Bush deserved it, don't lump him with the other criminals.

Bush and the Treasury created a wonderful real estate bubble that put a lot of people to work. Only fools didn't know what it was.

It was the Congress that changed hands under Bush and California (yea that bankrupt I.O.U giving California) liberal socialist ideals that got some banks AND the government controlled Freddie and Fannie into the failure of the sub-prime market in 2005. Their failure to adhere to the tried and true three rules of lending: Credit, Collateral and Character; is the primary reason our economy is in the mess that's it's in.



ummmm....wrong forum???


Tell that to the original poster I was responding too.
The danger is that we sleepwalk into a world where cabals of corporations control not only the mainstream devices and the software on them, but also the entire ecosystem of online services around...
Reply
The danger is that we sleepwalk into a world where cabals of corporations control not only the mainstream devices and the software on them, but also the entire ecosystem of online services around...
Reply
post #250 of 269
12/10/09 at 8:09am
Quote:
Originally Posted by syvalley View Post

Hitler was TIME Magazine's Man Of The Year in 1938. Stalin was TIME Magazine's Man Of The Year for 1939 and 1942. George W. Bush was also picked twice, 2000 & 2004.

That doesn't mean they liked these guys - it means they were the people who had the most impact. And that was certainly accurate.
Reply
Reply
post #251 of 269
12/10/09 at 11:15am
Quote:
Originally Posted by halfyearsun View Post

why didn't you research the phone more before you bought it? or like, use a display phone.

also if it helps, there's a new button on the home screen that lets you take moving pictures.

I had an iPhone from launch to until I bought the 3GS. I know what I was buying, and all it was was hype. The previous two phones were excellent, and the 3GS is a good phone, but not a step forward.

My God! moving pictures, like you mean video? That just proves my earlier post, it was being done years before, yet you all soak it up like it's a revolution.

I see a lot of people here dismissing the multi-tasking argument. It is a step forward, and no, the iphone does NOT multi task. I don't mean having 15 different applications open, if you need that go home and turn on your computer. Here is an example - I was browsing eBay on my Palm Pre, and I saw a listing that I wanted to set an alarm for so I would remember to dive in for a bid at the death. I checked the time on the screen and went out and set the alarm. I then flicked back and continued reading the listing, making sure it was worth a bid. Simple, and far more useful than what its given credit for. Can the 3rd gen iPhone do that simple task? No, it cant. If I come out i"m back at my bookmarks and starting the whole browsing process back over again. Little things, but on here you are all so bloody blind you will never admit it. "I can listen to music while I browse the web". Can you reply to a mail while you watch a film? Or even a text?
Reply
Reply
post #252 of 269
12/10/09 at 11:22am
You mean like syncing your iPhone to Google for free, instead?

Done by ticking a box.

Quote:
Originally Posted by os2baba View Post

There are far more useful features like background synching of calendar/contacts without having to pay $100 for mobile me.

As far as "no difference" you obviously no nothing about hardware, CPU's, graphics chips etc.

Yes, after you set the time on your alarm you go back to exactly where you left off in Safari, if you are reading through a column you open at the same place.

The "multitasking myth" is one of the most hyped things of all time among iPhone detractors.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scaramanga89 View Post

I had an iPhone from launch to until I bought the 3GS. I know what I was buying, and all it was was hype. The previous two phones were excellent, and the 3GS is a good phone, but not a step forward.

My God! moving pictures, like you mean video? That just proves my earlier post, it was being done years before, yet you all soak it up like it's a revolution.

I see a lot of people here dismissing the multi-tasking argument. It is a step forward, and no, the iphone does NOT multi task. I don't mean having 15 different applications open, if you need that go home and turn on your computer. Here is an example - I was browsing eBay on my Palm Pre, and I saw a listing that I wanted to set an alarm for so I would remember to dive in for a bid at the death. I checked the time on the screen and went out and set the alarm. I then flicked back and continued reading the listing, making sure it was worth a bid. Simple, and far more useful than what its given credit for. Can the 3rd gen iPhone do that simple task? No, it cant. If I come out i"m back at my bookmarks and starting the whole browsing process back over again. Little things, but on here you are all so bloody blind you will never admit it. "I can listen to music while I browse the web". Can you reply to a mail while you watch a film? Or even a text?

"The cobbler's children have no shoes", is a saying that applies a lot to companies who provide products and services. -KDarling on Google Search.

Reply

"The cobbler's children have no shoes", is a saying that applies a lot to companies who provide products and services. -KDarling on Google Search.

Reply
post #253 of 269
12/10/09 at 12:03pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by hill60 View Post

As far as "no difference" you obviously no nothing about hardware, CPU's, graphics chips etc.

The "multitasking myth" is one of the most hyped things of all time among iPhone detractors.

The same to you about spelling. I kid, I kid.

Multitasking is hyped about as much as the "can do voice and data at the same time" comment. Are both useful? Yes. Does a phone on Verizon that can't do data and voice at the same time (without WiFi) instantly cripple it? No. Does the iPhone not being able to multitask third-party apps cripple it? No.

We're make it seem that either feature is something of so much importance as to be a reason to call the other phone useless for not being able to do it. We're really just waving our swords at each other here.
\Apple has always had competition. It's just been in its blind spot.
Reply
\Apple has always had competition. It's just been in its blind spot.
Reply
post #254 of 269
12/10/09 at 12:19pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by hill60 View Post

You mean like syncing your iPhone to Google for free, instead?

Done by ticking a box.



As far as "no difference" you obviously no nothing about hardware, CPU's, graphics chips etc.

Yes, after you set the time on your alarm you go back to exactly where you left off in Safari, if you are reading through a column you open at the same place.

The "multitasking myth" is one of the most hyped things of all time among iPhone detractors.

I notice you avoided the video question, and the point. You have to close down Safari to open another app. Then close that app down to re-open the previous app in order to continue with your task. I used to work in a bar, and there they called it double-handling, or in common parlance, wasting time and energy.

Dont make such idiotic statements like I know nothing about this or that. Anyone can read and understand the specs of the phones and appreciate the difference. The phone looks the same, no change, it is faster yes, but not blindingly so. For all the talk about GPU and graphics rendering, it's still doing it all on a 320x480 screen, which is miles behind most new phones. And those videos look tremendous at night. Along with those pictures.

Beano.
Reply
Reply
post #255 of 269
12/10/09 at 12:28pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scaramanga89 View Post

I notice you avoided the video question, and the point. You have to close down Safari to open another app. Then close that app down to re-open the previous app in order to continue with your task.

You arent making any sense and using semantics incorrectly to the point that one might be inclined to consider you a troll.

While Safari is loading a page you can switch to other apps and when return to Safari the page is loaded. It doesnt have to reload the page like you do when you close out a web browser on the desktop. This means that there are processes for Safari still running in the background, just as there are processes for many other apps still running in the background while I perform other tasks.

Your other examples of being able to write an email while watching a movie are completely asinine. If you are not simply trolling then youll be kind enough to tell us how you think this should be done on a 3.5" display.
Dick Applebaum on whether the iPad is a personal computer: "BTW, I am posting this from my iPad pc while sitting on the throne... personal enough for you?"
Reply
Dick Applebaum on whether the iPad is a personal computer: "BTW, I am posting this from my iPad pc while sitting on the throne... personal enough for you?"
Reply
post #256 of 269
12/10/09 at 12:58pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by hill60 View Post

The "multitasking myth" is one of the most hyped things of all time among iPhone detractors.

You're correct. Because like MMS, tethering, and 3rd party apps, it has been a standard feature on "smart" phones for years. So naturally, one would assume that the world's best, most innovative smart phone of all time would at least support standard features.

One would also think the 3GS with "twice the speed" and its advanced (non-removable) battery system could competently handle multitasking without imploding. Perhaps the issue here is more about control than technology?

With the Droid, I can take a call while using Navigator and it will continue to speak upcoming turns in the background behind my conversation, completely unknown to the person on the other end. Or I can stream online radio while using Navigator, and even quickly check out a new e-mail without missing a beat (or a turn). All the while, that Weather.com widget on my home screen is showing the weather for my current location (via GPS) and will put an alert in the menu bar if any serious weather alerts come through. None of this may be game-changing, but it is very practical.

Yet my battery still lasts all day and my phone has yet to slow down, much less melt down. So it seems to me that the "myth" here is completely Apple's...
Reply
Reply
post #257 of 269
12/10/09 at 1:30pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by AsianBob View Post

Umm... Read my last two posts on your comments about RIM and China and India and the QWERTY keyboard. You're not completely innocent of what you say above yourself.

like I said before, it still a production fail with a hardware keyboard. And they are only going after businesses, only recently they have announced to launch in the major cities.

Let's see how they sell, and they have not outsold the iphone....they have just recently been OK'd to be able to sell them. They still have to build specialized handsets....so proves my earlier point that making multiple devices to do the same exact same thing is poor planning and strategy which further confuses the end consumer. Apple has to disable the wifi, which will probably change later, vs. having to build a special phone for another market.

http://tech2.in.com/india/news/smart...n-china/8553/0

http://www.digitaltrends.com/interna...erry-to-china/

Please show me where Blackberry has sold one phone in China before the Iphone was released....saying Blackberry has been selling for years vs. planning for 8 years is not the same.....
Reply
Reply
post #258 of 269
12/10/09 at 1:36pm
If I bought a Milestone (the droid isn't available here) the the navigator would say nothing as voice is only available in the U.S, so what happens when the cache runs out?

Do you hang up the call and wait for a reload or stop the car and continue the call?

Whichever way you put it controlled multitasking is still multitasking and controlled multitasking is what the iPhone does.

The screen resolution is like many other things we've seen over the years, as other manufacturers have bought out higher resolution screens all of a sudden it becomes an issue where previously it wasn't even mentioned.

Come back when the Droid/milestone sells twenty million.

Quote:
Originally Posted by shawnb View Post

You're correct. Because like MMS, tethering, and 3rd party apps, it has been a standard feature on "smart" phones for years. So naturally, one would assume that the world's best, most innovative smart phone of all time would at least support standard features.

One would also think the 3GS with "twice the speed" and its advanced (non-removable) battery system could competently handle multitasking without imploding. Perhaps the issue here is more about control than technology?

With the Droid, I can take a call while using Navigator and it will continue to speak upcoming turns in the background behind my conversation, completely unknown to the person on the other end. Or I can stream online radio while using Navigator, and even quickly check out a new e-mail without missing a beat (or a turn). All the while, that Weather.com widget on my home screen is showing the weather for my current location (via GPS) and will put an alert in the menu bar if any serious weather alerts come through. None of this may be game-changing, but it is very practical.

Yet my battery still lasts all day and my phone has yet to slow down, much less melt down. So it seems to me that the "myth" here is completely Apple's...

"The cobbler's children have no shoes", is a saying that applies a lot to companies who provide products and services. -KDarling on Google Search.

Reply

"The cobbler's children have no shoes", is a saying that applies a lot to companies who provide products and services. -KDarling on Google Search.

Reply
post #259 of 269
12/10/09 at 2:07pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhetoric.assassin View Post

like I said before, it still a production fail with a hardware keyboard. And they are only going after businesses, only recently they have announced to launch in the major cities.

Let's see how they sell, and they have not outsold the iphone....they have just recently been OK'd to be able to sell them. They still have to build specialized handsets....so proves my earlier point that making multiple devices to do the same exact same thing is poor planning and strategy which further confuses the end consumer. Apple has to disable the wifi, which will probably change later, vs. having to build a special phone for another market.

http://tech2.in.com/india/news/smart...n-china/8553/0

http://www.digitaltrends.com/interna...erry-to-china/

Please show me where Blackberry has sold one phone in China before the Iphone was released....saying Blackberry has been selling for years vs. planning for 8 years is not the same.....

http://China Mobile, which has more ...na since 2006.

Fifth paragraph down. It quotes: "China Mobile, which has more than two thirds of China's mobile telecom market, has been offering BlackBerries to large corporate customers in China since 2006."

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...484624300.html

And how's about a WSJ article where in the second paragraph it states: "RIM introduced the BlackBerry in China in 2006 but so far has sold it only to big companies."

http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-...08-700260.html

Again, a WSJ article that on the third paragraph states: "Blackberry handsets have been available since 2006 to big businesses in China through China Mobile."

http://wirelessfederation.com/news/1...berry-service/

Oh no! A forth article stating that: "Worlds biggest phone carrier by subscribers, China Mobile has been providing BlackBerry services in China since 2006 but the use was limited mainly to employees of a few major corporations."

Now that I've shown you repeatedly that BlackBerries have been sold in China long before the iPhone was even first introduced in the US market, can we please move off this topic?


I don't see how any of this is poor planning. Only the customers in China will see these BlackBerry models. Do you plan on traveling all the way over to China to buy a phone? Would you travel all the way over there to purchase an iPhone? Most likely not, since we have our own stores right here in the US. Not to mention that they won't run over here, since they use China's own off-standard TD-SCDMA network. So there is no confusion to be had.

But again, since China (being the control-freak-government it is) just allowed its people to start buying iPhones and now BlackBerries, we'll have to see as time passes how things turn out.
\Apple has always had competition. It's just been in its blind spot.
Reply
\Apple has always had competition. It's just been in its blind spot.
Reply
post #260 of 269
12/10/09 at 2:11pm
I suppose the all those times that Apple products and Steve Jobs made the cover of Time magazine over the years meant absolutely SQUAT.
Reply
Reply
post #261 of 269
12/10/09 at 3:14pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by solipsism View Post

You aren’t making any sense and using semantics incorrectly to the point that one might be inclined to consider you a troll.

While Safari is loading a page you can switch to other apps and when return to Safari the page is loaded. It doesn’t have to reload the page like you do when you close out a web browser on the desktop. This means that there are processes for Safari still running in the background, just as there are processes for many other apps still running in the background while I perform other tasks.

Your other examples of being able to write an email while watching a movie are completely asinine. If you are not simply trolling then you’ll be kind enough to tell us how you think this should be done on a 3.5" display.


Jesus, everybody here is either a troll or a fanboy to you lot, it must be nice living in such a clearly black and white world. As for using semantics incorrectly, where? Are you sure you know what it means?

How are they asinine? And why? Because you don't have a ready answer for them? Let me explain: you have to CLOSE the browser window to OPEN another window to CLOSE that WIndow to REOPEN another window, with the application having to load each time, albeit back to a saved state, where in a true multi tasking phone you can simply swipe or click and not have to do this. The less steps, the more efficient.
If I get a text in a film, for example I am on a train and meeting someone at a station, and they text to say "are you on time?" I would like to just knock out a quick, "yes" and jump back in. On a multi tasking phone I can, I miss about 5 seconds of the film, but I can live with that. Not close the program, reopen at a bookmark etc. It's not the end of the world, I am simply saying that it is easier, more efficient.

As for being a troll? Even your use of the term speaks volumes about you. Your username is perfect; your mind is indeed the only one that exists - in your own myopic world. The only person on here with any perspective seems to be Teckstud.
Reply
Reply
post #262 of 269
12/10/09 at 4:47pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scaramanga89 View Post

JIf I get a text in a film, for example I am on a train and meeting someone at a station, and they text to say "are you on time?" I would like to just knock out a quick, "yes" and jump back in.

It won't happen:-

a) I don't watch movies on my iPhone, I prefer the cinema, my 55" plasma or at a pinch my MacBook,

b) I don't catch trains,

c) I'm not stupid enough to reply to an SMS while driving.

I do however consult Safari for movie times while engaged in a conversation to arrange which movie to see and at what time, does the Pre do that, you know access the web during a phonecall?

"The cobbler's children have no shoes", is a saying that applies a lot to companies who provide products and services. -KDarling on Google Search.

Reply

"The cobbler's children have no shoes", is a saying that applies a lot to companies who provide products and services. -KDarling on Google Search.

Reply
post #263 of 269
12/10/09 at 7:21pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by hill60 View Post

If I bought a Milestone (the droid isn't available here) the the navigator would say nothing as voice is only available in the U.S, so what happens when the cache runs out?

Do you hang up the call and wait for a reload or stop the car and continue the call?

Whichever way you put it controlled multitasking is still multitasking and controlled multitasking is what the iPhone does.

The screen resolution is like many other things we've seen over the years, as other manufacturers have bought out higher resolution screens all of a sudden it becomes an issue where previously it wasn't even mentioned.

Come back when the Droid/milestone sells twenty million.

Actually, the general consensus is that Google Navigator is not available in Europe because Google is concerned about being sued by the EU for monopolistic practices. So the fact that your Milestone would be crippled with a stripped down Nav software provided by a 3rd party is courtesy of your government, not the fault of Motorola/Google.

To your other question, you would do neither. The entire route is cached, so you would not need to hang up to reload.

I am curious, what would you do with the iPhone? That is, if you were using that Nav software you paid $100 for, and got a phone call mid-route while you were driving? Would you pull over until the call was completed, since you can't run the 3rd party Nav software while you're talking on the phone? Or would you just keep driving and hope you didn't miss a turn? Just asking...

There is no iPhone multitasking for non-Apple apps... period.

You're right about the screen... just like monochrome was just perfect until color came along. Darn those color-pushing troublemakers for solving a problem that didn't even exist!!
Reply
Reply
post #264 of 269
12/11/09 at 4:13am
Quote:
Originally Posted by hill60 View Post

It won't happen:-

a) I don't watch movies on my iPhone, I prefer the cinema, my 55" plasma or at a pinch my MacBook,

b) I don't catch trains,

c) I'm not stupid enough to reply to an SMS while driving.

I do however consult Safari for movie times while engaged in a conversation to arrange which movie to see and at what time, does the Pre do that, you know access the web during a phonecall?

That is the most silly reply yet, it really is. Get your head out of wherever it's stuck - there are more than you in the world. No-one with an iPhone catches trains then? No one-watches movies on them? Who wouldnt prefer to watch it in the cinema, but there arent any cinemas on trains I travel on sadly. I think only Hugh Heff has that. If you dont use the ipod part of your iPhone, then why did you buy it? And who mentioned driving?

I never do that, if I have checked the movie times then I know when I'm going already - I dont need to be checking them again. And if I did, I can put them in a note which will automatically display when I call the person - which is faster and more handy.
Reply
Reply
post #265 of 269
12/11/09 at 5:46am
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scaramanga89 View Post

That is the most silly reply yet, it really is. Get your head out of wherever it's stuck - there are more than you in the world. No-one with an iPhone catches trains then? No one-watches movies on them? Who wouldnt prefer to watch it in the cinema, but there arent any cinemas on trains I travel on sadly. I think only Hugh Heff has that. If you dont use the ipod part of your iPhone, then why did you buy it? And who mentioned driving?

I never do that, if I have checked the movie times then I know when I'm going already - I dont need to be checking them again. And if I did, I can put them in a note which will automatically display when I call the person - which is faster and more handy.

What I would be interested in hearing is how the tone of the whole "voice and data at the same time" would change if (and I'm well aware it's a speculative if) the whole deal between Verizon and Apple did work out and the iPhone was a CDMA device.

I'm pretty damned sure they wouldn't hype it as much as they currently do. They'd probably be saying the exact same thing as you. That we'd plan ahead of time and note the time and place. Or that they use text messages to communicate, so no voice is being taken up. Or any of the many other things that many of us on Verizon have been doing to get along just fine without using voice and data at the same time.
\Apple has always had competition. It's just been in its blind spot.
Reply
\Apple has always had competition. It's just been in its blind spot.
Reply
post #266 of 269
12/11/09 at 5:57am
Quote:
Originally Posted by AsianBob View Post

What I would be interested in hearing is how the tone of the whole "voice and data at the same time" would change if (and I'm well aware it's a speculative if) the whole deal between Verizon and Apple did work out and the iPhone was a CDMA device.

I'm pretty damned sure they wouldn't hype it as much as they currently do. They'd probably be saying the exact same thing as you. That we'd plan ahead of time and note the time and place. Or that they use text messages to communicate, so no voice is being taken up. Or any of the many other things that many of us on Verizon have been doing to get along just fine without using voice and data at the same time.

Agreed; I actually prefer the note thing, or a text instead of a call. If there is any level of compexity you need to write it down anyway (or I do at least). Maybe I am just too old and sozzled with the drink. I'm sure it's useful upon occasion, but I had an iPhone for two and a half years and I never used that feature once.
Reply
Reply
post #267 of 269
12/16/09 at 10:11am
[CENTER]Oh Well...

(Looks Like Function Prevailed Over Fanaticism) [/CENTER]
"Why iPhone"... Hmmm?
Reply
"Why iPhone"... Hmmm?
Reply
post #268 of 269
12/16/09 at 10:41am
Your post somewhat dismisses that fact that simply because something was done before, that at some point it cannot be done better. From studies that have been done, more video is watched on the iPhone than all other smartphones combined.

The iPhone does multitask. If it did not you would not be able to receive calls, text messages, emails, or alerts while in another app. You can listen to iTunes music while in another app. There is an API that allows third party apps to access music in the iTunes app.

The eBay app for the iPhone allows you to set alerts this same way. Why would you want to write an email while watching a film on a 3 inch screen, that makes no sense.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Scaramanga89 View Post

I had an iPhone from launch to until I bought the 3GS. I know what I was buying, and all it was was hype. The previous two phones were excellent, and the 3GS is a good phone, but not a step forward.

My God! moving pictures, like you mean video? That just proves my earlier post, it was being done years before, yet you all soak it up like it's a revolution.

I see a lot of people here dismissing the multi-tasking argument. It is a step forward, and no, the iphone does NOT multi task. I don't mean having 15 different applications open, if you need that go home and turn on your computer. Here is an example - I was browsing eBay on my Palm Pre, and I saw a listing that I wanted to set an alarm for so I would remember to dive in for a bid at the death. I checked the time on the screen and went out and set the alarm. I then flicked back and continued reading the listing, making sure it was worth a bid. Simple, and far more useful than what its given credit for. Can the 3rd gen iPhone do that simple task? No, it cant. If I come out i"m back at my bookmarks and starting the whole browsing process back over again. Little things, but on here you are all so bloody blind you will never admit it. "I can listen to music while I browse the web". Can you reply to a mail while you watch a film? Or even a text?
Reply
Reply
post #269 of 269
12/16/09 at 10:46am
Irony............



"That is the most silly reply yet, it really is. Get your head out of wherever it's stuck - there are more than you in the world."

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scaramanga89 View Post

Agreed; I actually prefer the note thing, or a text instead of a call. If there is any level of compexity you need to write it down anyway (or I do at least). Maybe I am just too old and sozzled with the drink. I'm sure it's useful upon occasion, but I had an iPhone for two and a half years and I never used that feature once.
Reply
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: iPhone
AppleInsider › Forums › Mobile › iPhone › Time Magazine ranks Motorola Droid above Apple iPhone for 2009