or Connect
AppleInsider › Forums › Mac Hardware › Future Apple Hardware › iGuide may be service tied to forthcoming Apple tablet
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

iGuide may be service tied to forthcoming Apple tablet

post #1 of 52
Thread Starter 
With evidence mounting that Apple is racing towards an early 2010 introduction of its much-anticipated multi-touch tablet, the guessing game over what name the company will use to market the device has kicked into overdrive, with yet another candidate surfacing this week in "iGuide."

It was reported last week that Apple set up a shell company by the name of Slate Computing, LLC three years ago in an effort to secure a trademark on the term "iSlate" without drawing the attention of its competitors and the media, similar to what it had accomplished through the shell company Ocean Telecom in regards to the "iPhone" mark.

Slate Computing, in addition to owning the iSlate mark, is also the listed register of the trademark on "Magic Slate." Both terms seem well-suited for an Apple tablet that would resemble a device akin to a jumbo iPod touch.

In particular, the former stands out as the most likely contender given that the editor of rumored Apple tablet content provider, the New York Times, made mention of an "impending Apple slate" during a presentation to the newspaper's digital staff two months before word of Apple's involvement with Slate Computing was brought to light.

"We need to figure out the right journalistic product to deliver to mobile platforms and devices," he said. "I'm hoping we can get the newsroom more actively involved in the challenge of delivering our best journalism in the form of Times Reader, iPhone apps, WAP, or the impending Apple slate, or whatever comes after that."

Meanwhile, it surfaced Tuesday that Apple also appears to be behind another shell company by the name of iGuide Media, LLC, which has held a pending application on the "iGuide" trademark since December of 2007. MacRumors, which reported the connection, says the discovery may shed doubt on earlier assumptions that Apple may coin its tablet the iSlate because the trademark classifications for iGuide seems a better fit for the rumored device:

Computer hardware and computer software for accessing, browsing, searching, recording, organizing, storing, transmitting, receiving, manipulating, streaming, reproducing, playing, and reviewing audio, video, games, music, television, movies, photographs, and other multimedia content.

The classification also covers a wide variety of downloadable electronic content:

Downloadable electronic publications in the nature of books, magazines, newsletters, journals, and blogs in the fields of entertainment, sports, science, history, culture, celebrities, news, current events, politics, technology, and education;

TechCrunch, however, did some more digging and found no evidence that Apple owns any iGuide-related domain names. By contrast, it was also revealed last week that Apple has taken control of a handful of iSlate domain names.

The technology blog also points out that the description of goods and services given to iGuide Media in its filings weighs more heavily towards services than that give to iSlate. It therefore concludes that iGuide is more likely to be a service tied to the Apple tablet than the name of the device itself.

Still, there's no concrete evidence that Apple will use any of the aforementioned names in relation to its tablet. The Cupertino-based firm has the capacity to set up any number of shell companies it desires, with very little effort or monetary resources. The only surefire assumptions that can be made from the past two weeks of discoveries is that the company at one time saw enough interest in the aforementioned terms to secure the rights to use them down the line if it so chooses.
post #2 of 52
Apple could have been purchasing names and trademarks to eliminate potential knock-off un-innovative competitors. Apples not light years ahead just by accident.

Since the iPod, companies all over like to use iThis and iThat. For people us the US look at Jeeps new saying " iLive iRide iAm ... Jeep " Hands down Apple inspires others which is soooooo cool.

Plus JEEPS Are probably the Best ALL AROUND VEHICLE to drive.
Apple!

Think Different
Reply
Apple!

Think Different
Reply
post #3 of 52
iGuide sounds like a Nav device. at least iSlate (or iPod Slate which might be more likely) sounds neutral enough to cover all the likely bits and pieces of the device.
post #4 of 52
How about integrating iGuide with iTunes U? That would make sense.
post #5 of 52
"an Apple tablet that would resemble a device akin to a jumbo iPod touch"

Really?
It wouldn't itself be akin to a jumbo iPod Touch? Or directly resemble a jumbo iPod Touch?
It would resemble some other device that was akin to a jumbo iPod Touch?
post #6 of 52
good job on saying that this doesn't give any firm evidence as to what the name or the services associated with it our going to be but rather, "these are all options". Excellent reporting.
post #7 of 52
Quote:
Originally Posted by charlituna View Post

iGuide sounds like a Nav device. at least iSlate (or iPod Slate which might be more likely) sounds neutral enough to cover all the likely bits and pieces of the device.

My first thought was a guide for TV subscriptions, but your idea of their rumoured maps and nav app sounds much better.
Dick Applebaum on whether the iPad is a personal computer: "BTW, I am posting this from my iPad pc while sitting on the throne... personal enough for you?"
Reply
Dick Applebaum on whether the iPad is a personal computer: "BTW, I am posting this from my iPad pc while sitting on the throne... personal enough for you?"
Reply
post #8 of 52
Imagine Apple made a whole new App called iGuide. Not gone on that name though.
Citing unnamed sources with limited but direct knowledge of a rumoured device - Comedy Insider (Feb 2014)
Reply
Citing unnamed sources with limited but direct knowledge of a rumoured device - Comedy Insider (Feb 2014)
Reply
post #9 of 52
So what's the fuss all about? Who really cares what Apple names or calls a new device. In the scheme of things, it "ain't" no big deal!
post #10 of 52
Quote:
Originally Posted by Orangeoutsider View Post

So what's the fuss all about? Who really cares what Apple names or calls a new device. In the scheme of things, it "ain't" no big deal!

It may not be a big deal, but names are important and it's interesting to speculate.

If the iPod was called the IX200920F Media Player it may not have gotten the breaks it has gotten. Take the name "Apple", it's a good name, a very good name for a company for several reasons. Therefore there are good names and bad names. Names matter whether you want to admit that or not.
Citing unnamed sources with limited but direct knowledge of a rumoured device - Comedy Insider (Feb 2014)
Reply
Citing unnamed sources with limited but direct knowledge of a rumoured device - Comedy Insider (Feb 2014)
Reply
post #11 of 52
If I had an online store with 100k+ apps and games for distribution, plus a music store with several million songs for sale, plus a video store with thousands of movies and tv shows for sale, and I wanted to add e-books and e-magazines and subscriptions...
Why would I call it iTunes? The name "iGuide" picks up a meme from TVGuide as well as the i-anything-Apple meme. And it is clear that with tens of millions of iThings to buy we all need some i-Guidance.
Prediction: iGuide will be the successor to the iTunes preview/store. In the future there still will be an iTunes media player application for your mac or pc, but you will buy iThings using the iGuide to the Apple Store.
post #12 of 52
Quote:
Originally Posted by pt109 View Post

If I had an online store with 100k+ apps and games for distribution, plus a music store with several million songs for sale, plus a video store with thousands of movies and tv shows for sale, and I wanted to add e-books and e-magazines and subscriptions...
Why would I call it iTunes? The name "iGuide" picks up a meme from TVGuide as well as the i-anything-Apple meme. And it is clear that with tens of millions of iThings to buy we all need some i-Guidance.
Prediction: iGuide will be the successor to the iTunes preview/store. In the future there still will be an iTunes media player application for your mac or pc, but you will buy iThings using the iGuide to the Apple Store.


Pretty decent first post. Welcome.

Life is too short to drink bad coffee.

Reply

Life is too short to drink bad coffee.

Reply
post #13 of 52
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ireland View Post

It may not be a big deal, but names are important and it's interesting to speculate.

If the iPod was called the IX200920F Media Player it may not have gotten the breaks it has gotten. Take the name "Apple", it's a good name, a very good name for a company for several reasons. Therefore there are good names and bad names. Names matter whether you want to admit that or not.

Absolutely. It's impossible to overestimate the power of Apple's branding and how they have maintained simplicity and clarity in their product lineup.

My guess is that if there is such an animal as an "iGuide", it will be the Tablet OS equivalent to the Finder, an with emphasis on hooks to the cloud and live content.

If there's a single, significant point of differentiation to be made between traditional desktop OSes and something closer to the iPhone OS, it's around the whole idea of a "Finder", with its hierarchical file structures and folder based desktop metaphor.
They spoke of the sayings and doings of their commander, the grand duke, and told stories of his kindness and irascibility.
Reply
They spoke of the sayings and doings of their commander, the grand duke, and told stories of his kindness and irascibility.
Reply
post #14 of 52
Quote:
Originally Posted by pt109 View Post

If I had an online store with 100k+ apps and games for distribution, plus a music store with several million songs for sale, plus a video store with thousands of movies and tv shows for sale, and I wanted to add e-books and e-magazines and subscriptions...
Why would I call it iTunes? The name "iGuide" picks up a meme from TVGuide as well as the i-anything-Apple meme. And it is clear that with tens of millions of iThings to buy we all need some i-Guidance.
Prediction: iGuide will be the successor to the iTunes preview/store. In the future there still will be an iTunes media player application for your mac or pc, but you will buy iThings using the iGuide to the Apple Store.

I don’t quite get the obsessive need to make iTunes, out of all the product names in the world, fit exactly with the store’s complete content. If there is a cardinal rule in marketing it’s you don’t change the name of a well known product that is working. You only change it to lessen an unfavorable association with that name. They dropped “Music” from the name to show that it included more than just audio, but they didn’t change iTunes because it’s the important part of the name and it’s a word they made up.

7-Eleven convenient stores are usually opened 24 hours now yet they didn’t change the name. Coca-Cola no longer contains cocaine. Sugar and caffeine free Pepsi has nothing in it to give you ‘pep'. McDonald’s hasn’t been owned by the McDonald brothers since 1955. The list goes on and on. The iPod was never really fit into any of the pod definitions.

I think the maps and navigation app Apple is rumoured to be building is a more likely fit.
Dick Applebaum on whether the iPad is a personal computer: "BTW, I am posting this from my iPad pc while sitting on the throne... personal enough for you?"
Reply
Dick Applebaum on whether the iPad is a personal computer: "BTW, I am posting this from my iPad pc while sitting on the throne... personal enough for you?"
Reply
post #15 of 52
http://wilstar.net/caffeine.htm
I think you meant coke no longer has cocaine. it still has caffeine.
post #16 of 52
Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeymantle View Post

http://wilstar.net/caffeine.htm
I think you meant coke no longer has cocaine. it still has caffeine.

Yes, that is what I meant. Fixed.

Interesting that Diet Coke has a lot more caffeine than Coca-Cola Classic.
Dick Applebaum on whether the iPad is a personal computer: "BTW, I am posting this from my iPad pc while sitting on the throne... personal enough for you?"
Reply
Dick Applebaum on whether the iPad is a personal computer: "BTW, I am posting this from my iPad pc while sitting on the throne... personal enough for you?"
Reply
post #17 of 52
I had the same reaction as mstone: I think this is a likely name for an online hub related to content. This especially so when you consider that media outlets have been planning their own common gateway independent of iTunes, so iGuide would be a hub from which you could access other online slate-related content and functions.

Interesting description of the projected functions of the device:

"Computer hardware and computer software for accessing, browsing, searching, recording, organizing, storing, transmitting, receiving, manipulating, streaming, reproducing, playing, and reviewing audio, video, games, music, television, movies, photographs, and other multimedia content"

Among other things, think of how a video camera has already been integrated into the iPod nano, and now imagine the possibilities for a much larger device, with all the space for the extra circuitry and sensors for much higher quality video and photography, and all the sophistication that Apple software coupled with a large multi-touch screen could bring to photography and video-making. Intriguing...
post #18 of 52
Quote:
Originally Posted by solipsism View Post

Yes, that is what I meant. Fixed.

Interesting that Diet Coke has a lot more caffeine than Coca-Cola Classic.

And both still have spent Coca leaves for flavor. Diet also has Aspartame, which is notoriously bad for you.
Citing unnamed sources with limited but direct knowledge of a rumoured device - Comedy Insider (Feb 2014)
Reply
Citing unnamed sources with limited but direct knowledge of a rumoured device - Comedy Insider (Feb 2014)
Reply
post #19 of 52
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ireland View Post

And both still have spent Coca leaves for flavor. Diet also has Aspartame, which is notoriously bad for you.

Ah, yes they do. Okay, scratch that example and input 10 thousand more in its place to signify that a product or companys key marketing term should not be changed simply because it no longer fits exactly into a mold of the original term.


PS: I dont think Dr. Pepper ever went to medical school.
Dick Applebaum on whether the iPad is a personal computer: "BTW, I am posting this from my iPad pc while sitting on the throne... personal enough for you?"
Reply
Dick Applebaum on whether the iPad is a personal computer: "BTW, I am posting this from my iPad pc while sitting on the throne... personal enough for you?"
Reply
post #20 of 52
Quote:
Originally Posted by solipsism View Post

I dont quite get the obsessive need to make iTunes, out of all the product names in the world, fit exactly with the stores complete content. If there is a cardinal rule in marketing its you dont change the name of a well known product that is working. You only change it to lessen an unfavorable association with that name.

Like .Mac => Mobile Me because the Mac part was limiting the appeal to Windows users. In as much as the name iTunes may be less appealing to magazine publishers which Apple is rumored to be courting.

Life is too short to drink bad coffee.

Reply

Life is too short to drink bad coffee.

Reply
post #21 of 52
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ireland View Post

Imagine Apple made a whole new App called iGuide. Not gone on that name though.

I was thinking iGuide would be a good candidate for a touch Mac integrated into vehicles. Maybe Apple plans to go to car companies & sell the tablet as an interface for their vehicle systems; give SYNC a run for it's money.
post #22 of 52
Not happy

Once again, we're talking about future products . Should they be Windows related, we'd call them vaporware ...

Now, when the iMac i5 will be available ? The 2 weeks delay has been on Apple Store for 2 weeks now ...

Could AppleInsider investigate ?

Thanks
post #23 of 52
Quote:
Originally Posted by mstone View Post

Like .Mac => Mobile Me because the Mac part was limiting the appeal to Windows users. In as much as the name iTunes may be less appealing to magazine publishers which Apple is rumored to be courting.

1) iTunes is not Tunes. It’s a product name that is successful and very few are associating it only with music.

2) iTunes syncs with iPods, iPhones and AppleTVs all playing non-audio, yet one is buying an AppleTV and wondering how they play video if it syncs through iTunes and not an app called iVideo.

3) The iTunes Store contains within it the App Store. There is a separate app on iPhone OS devices to connect to this store. I can see an internal store within a different name associated to it for publishers, but not a dropping of the iTS completely.

4) .Mac had many failings, it needed to be revamped and a new name was expected with a new design. Many were expecting Apple to drop the idea altogether. I doubt that they changed the name to appeal to Windows users. I think they changed the functionality of it for the iPhone OS to appeal to Windows users and changed name to indicate a dramatic change in the lackluster service. The only way I can see Apple changing the iTunes name is with a completely new app that changes the feel, look and function, not just a OCD need to rename it because it doesn’t fit some silly dictionary term.
Dick Applebaum on whether the iPad is a personal computer: "BTW, I am posting this from my iPad pc while sitting on the throne... personal enough for you?"
Reply
Dick Applebaum on whether the iPad is a personal computer: "BTW, I am posting this from my iPad pc while sitting on the throne... personal enough for you?"
Reply
post #24 of 52
Quote:
Originally Posted by solipsism View Post

.Mac had many failings. It needed to be revamped and a new name was expected with the new design. many were expecting Apple to drop the idea altogether. The only way I can see Apple changing the iTunes name is with a completely new app that changes the feel, look and function, not just a OCD need to rename it because it doesn’t fit some silly dictionary term.

I find the ITunes Store very awkward and non-intuitive so a total revamp would be a welcome change in my opinion.

BTW I was disappointed when they dropped eWorld.

Life is too short to drink bad coffee.

Reply

Life is too short to drink bad coffee.

Reply
post #25 of 52
One thing I think will eventually pass is the whole obsession with "iEverything". But until that time, it seems as though Apple prefers a single syllable after the 'i" ruling out iTablet as a potential device name.

Life is too short to drink bad coffee.

Reply

Life is too short to drink bad coffee.

Reply
post #26 of 52
Quote:
Originally Posted by mstone View Post

I find the ITunes Store very awkward and non-intuitive so a total revamp would be a welcome change in my opinion.

BTW I was disappointed when they dropped eWorld.

By now iTunes as a proper noun invokes a certain meaning that trumps any word origin it may have had. Its silly to come in like an assassin to rename a word because are foolishly pedantic about its origins.

If Apple renames it will be when they feel iTunes is long in the tooth and new direction is in order. Many already feel that has happened and its possible that may occur with iTunes X, presumably arriving next Autumn (in the N. Hemisphere) with the revised iPods. I assume it will be completely Cocoa (and 64-bit) by then which may give rise to a completely new structure as it will have had to rewritten from the ground up. I look at QuickTime X and it appears that moving from Carbon to Cocoa while trying to maintain the same look and feel my be very difficult and rather pointless with so much change since these these Carbon apps were first started.

Sincerely,
Solipsism
Dick Applebaum on whether the iPad is a personal computer: "BTW, I am posting this from my iPad pc while sitting on the throne... personal enough for you?"
Reply
Dick Applebaum on whether the iPad is a personal computer: "BTW, I am posting this from my iPad pc while sitting on the throne... personal enough for you?"
Reply
post #27 of 52
Quote:
Originally Posted by solipsism View Post

By now iTunes as a proper noun invokes a certain meaning that trumps any word origin it may have had. Its silly to come in like an assassin to rename a word because are foolishly pedantic about its origins.

I'm not advocating anything, only looking at all the naming scheme possibilities. Personally I am not that hung up on product names especially when they are silly made up words although I do think AppleTV is a nice name.

Life is too short to drink bad coffee.

Reply

Life is too short to drink bad coffee.

Reply
post #28 of 52
Quote:
Originally Posted by mstone View Post

I'm not advocating anything, only looking at all the naming scheme possibilities. Personally I am not that hung up on product names especially when they are silly made up words although I do think AppleTV is a nice name.

Im going for Apple <name> with this rumoured device. Id like the i<name> to be for pocketable devices, Mac for their PCs that run Mac OS X, and AppleTV and Apple Slate/Tablet for their other devices.
Dick Applebaum on whether the iPad is a personal computer: "BTW, I am posting this from my iPad pc while sitting on the throne... personal enough for you?"
Reply
Dick Applebaum on whether the iPad is a personal computer: "BTW, I am posting this from my iPad pc while sitting on the throne... personal enough for you?"
Reply
post #29 of 52
Quote:
Originally Posted by charlituna View Post

iGuide sounds like a Nav device. at least iSlate (or iPod Slate which might be more likely) sounds neutral enough to cover all the likely bits and pieces of the device.

iGuide sounds better than iSlate (or iPod slate, for that matter) but it still sounds clumsy and lacks the subtlety of iPod.

Let's face it, all of the good "i" names have been used up at this point. There are still plenty of lousy ones.

Proud AAPL stock owner.

 

GOA

Reply

Proud AAPL stock owner.

 

GOA

Reply
post #30 of 52
It could even be called iNasserAE

Why not a service tier to AppleTV or Mac?! Why do they need to have a service for a device that doesn't exist yet and not what is already available now?!
post #31 of 52
Quote:
Originally Posted by NasserAE View Post

It could even be called iNasserAE

iDon'tthinkso.

How about reverse things and put the "i" on the end this time.... how 'bout Nav'i?

Proud AAPL stock owner.

 

GOA

Reply

Proud AAPL stock owner.

 

GOA

Reply
post #32 of 52
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpamSandwich View Post

iDon'tthinkso.

How about reverse things and put the "i" on the end this time.... how 'bout Nav'i?

Oh wait...

Nav'i

iNasserAE

They are mine now and no one can use them
post #33 of 52
Quote:
Originally Posted by rei_vilo View Post

Not happy

Once again, we're talking about future products . Should they be Windows related, we'd call them vaporware ...

This is just like the talk about the iPhone before the Macworld where the iPhone was released. The tablet is coming, we can't prove it conclusively, but we know it. I don't see what this has to do with Microsoft whatsoever. Microsoft has a habit of talking about products and not making them, Apple hasn't mentioned the tablet once, so it can't be vaporware. You're confusing vaporware with rumorware.
Citing unnamed sources with limited but direct knowledge of a rumoured device - Comedy Insider (Feb 2014)
Reply
Citing unnamed sources with limited but direct knowledge of a rumoured device - Comedy Insider (Feb 2014)
Reply
post #34 of 52
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ireland View Post

This is just like the talk about the iPhone before the Macworld where the iPhone was released. The tablet is coming, we can't prove it conclusively, but we know it. I don't see what this has to do with Microsoft whatsoever. Microsoft has a habit of talking about products and not making them, Apple hasn't mentioned the tablet once, so it can't be vaporware. You're confusing vaporware with rumorware.

Unlike the slate/tablet/thingy, vaporware AND rumorware are in plentiful supply here. Now taking orders!

Proud AAPL stock owner.

 

GOA

Reply

Proud AAPL stock owner.

 

GOA

Reply
post #35 of 52
Quote:
Originally Posted by MobileMe View Post

Apple could have been purchasing names and trademarks to eliminate potential knock-off un-innovative competitors. Apples not light years ahead just by accident.

Since the iPod, companies all over like to use iThis and iThat. For people us the US look at Jeeps new saying " iLive iRide iAm ... Jeep " Hands down Apple inspires others which is soooooo cool.

Plus JEEPS Are probably the Best ALL AROUND VEHICLE to drive.

Trademarks don't work that way. If you don't use it, you lose it. Imagine how horrible things would be if people can hoard trademarks like that. Then some trademark troll will have all the good ones and all the products we use will have long and horrible names because someone squatted all the trademarks.
post #36 of 52
Quote:
Originally Posted by solarein View Post

Trademarks don't work that way. If you don't use it, you lose it. Imagine how horrible things would be if people can hoard trademarks like that. Then some trademark troll will have all the good ones and all the products we use will have long and horrible names because someone squatted all the trademarks.

Remember Ciscos lack of use of their old iPhone trademark from a 1996 acquisition that they started slapping on products via stickers to claim they are actively using the name. They do look to have been within their legal right for name ownership but the after-the-fact stickering" sure screamed desperation.
http://blogs.cisco.com/news/comments...one_trademark/

Dick Applebaum on whether the iPad is a personal computer: "BTW, I am posting this from my iPad pc while sitting on the throne... personal enough for you?"
Reply
Dick Applebaum on whether the iPad is a personal computer: "BTW, I am posting this from my iPad pc while sitting on the throne... personal enough for you?"
Reply
post #37 of 52
Quote:
Originally Posted by solipsism View Post

By now iTunes as a proper noun invokes a certain meaning that trumps any word origin it may have had. Its silly to come in like an assassin to rename a word because are foolishly pedantic about its origins.

If Apple renames it will be when they feel iTunes is long in the tooth and new direction is in order. Many already feel that has happened and its possible that may occur with iTunes X, presumably arriving next Autumn (in the N. Hemisphere) with the revised iPods. I assume it will be completely Cocoa (and 64-bit) by then which may give rise to a completely new structure as it will have had to rewritten from the ground up. I look at QuickTime X and it appears that moving from Carbon to Cocoa while trying to maintain the same look and feel my be very difficult and rather pointless with so much change since these these Carbon apps were first started.

Sincerely,
Solipsism

The name iTunes is familiar to those already in the ecosystem, iPod/iPhone/AppleTV/Mac users who use it to purchase music, video, apps, etc. understand that it is much more than music.

But let's not forget that there are vast numbers of people who are completely unaware or unfamiliar with the ecosystem. But if Apple does get into the subscription TV/newspaper/ebook game, it may attract many such people who have not dealt with iTunes before, and they will be puzzled by the name initially. They will probably become familiar with it given time, but why present this extra barrier? If Apple is looking to completely revolutionize the iTunes platform by expanding into these new areas, this would be a good time to rename the service to something more encompassing to lessen the initial confusion of new adopters.
post #38 of 52
seriously, iSlate is a darn lousy name.

Apple iSlate. Apple iS late.
post #39 of 52
Quote:
Originally Posted by glenemil View Post

seriously, iSlate is a darn lousy name.

Apple iSlate. Apple iS late.

Proud AAPL stock owner.

 

GOA

Reply

Proud AAPL stock owner.

 

GOA

Reply
post #40 of 52
Quote:
Originally Posted by charlituna View Post

iGuide sounds like a Nav device. at least iSlate (or iPod Slate which might be more likely) sounds neutral enough to cover all the likely bits and pieces of the device.

yeah, you beat me to it. remember that recent news about apple buying "placebase" -- the *mapping* company? there's no way in hell that apple's tablet/slate will be called an "iguide." the word "guide" is far too specific -- and limiting -- to apply to a device as revolutionary and as versatile as it will be.

"iguide" is for something else. period.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Future Apple Hardware
AppleInsider › Forums › Mac Hardware › Future Apple Hardware › iGuide may be service tied to forthcoming Apple tablet