AppleInsider › Forums › Mobile › iPad › The inside track on Apple's tablet: a history of tablet computing
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

The inside track on Apple's tablet: a history of tablet computing - Page 2

post #41 of 201
1/15/10 at 8:27am
I'm not really all that sure that using photoshop on a tablet is all that appealing anyway. Surely a bigger screen is much better for such software?
Reply
Reply
post #42 of 201
1/15/10 at 8:27am
Quote:
Originally Posted by pembroke View Post

That's a great comprehensive analytical article -I really enjoyed it!

Comprehensive except it talked about PDAs and not tablets. Blowing off the entire Table PC evolution with a sentence is hardly useful in discussing historical successes and failures of tablet.

No mention of TransNote, Motion Computing, the uses of tablets in the medical industry (one of the few tablet successful niche areas). Zero discussion of slate vs convertible tablets and why convertibles beat slates. No mention of OneNote from Microsoft or Inkwell from Apple or even the freaking modbook.

PDAs, Palm, Newton, iPhones are all not tablets. Even there he got PDA history wrong. PDAs didn't die because of the dot bomb left no market for "executive toys" but because they evolved to become SMARTPHONES. Jeez. Crackberries killed PDAs (and Palm) starting 2002 with the 5810 and java apps. Emerging smartphones (and just smarter regular phones) cratered trditional PDA growth finally killing it entirely. Palm being idiots didn't help but the writing was on the wall in 2002 and the great extinction started in 2004 and declared dead by pundits because of phones.
Reply
Reply
post #43 of 201
1/15/10 at 8:30am
Quote:
Originally Posted by GlynC View Post

There will be no 'Tablet Device' !!!

There will be a new iPhone with incredibly fast processor.

There will then be an accessory that acts as a large touchscreen display into which the iphone will fit, and will be either OLED, or PixelQI, optimised for reading, but capable of any kind of digital media, including HD video playback etc.


Worst prediction evr!

DaHarder just got banned. Let's crack open the champagne.

Reply

DaHarder just got banned. Let's crack open the champagne.

Reply
post #44 of 201
1/15/10 at 8:31am
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gazoobee View Post

This is really unlikely given that the Apple product with the closest form factor to the tablet right now (the Air) has only one USB port.

It will have probably have an iPhone dock connector also, so there will be no need for an extra video out port. If there is no need, it won't be included. Apple is usually very anal about that kind of thing.

Personally, I doubt that it will have any connectors other than a headphone jack and a dock connector.

The tablet will probably see the introduction of the new Apple Dock Connector, the one that will support HDMI amongst other things. It might be the same physical layout so that some existing dock systems will work (not that a tablet will slot into most of them), especially for audio, but you need more than composite and SD output these days.

Headphone jack - yes. Microphone built-in - yes. Camera built in - yes. Dock connector - most likely. USB - probably. SD card - probable.

Comes with a tablet dock device with more outputs - probable. Outputs on this device if it exists: HDMI - yes. Optical audio out - maybe. Multiple USB - possible. DisplayPort - Maybe. Ethernet - Possible (for places where wireless is weak, etc). The dock will be something you position near your TV, and thus should have all the relevant connections. You'll be able to use the tablet like a SqueezeBox. It'll have bluetooth and a bluetooth remote for when it is docked, and a 10ft UI as well as a standard tablet UI.

If there is a physical dock, then the tablet itself will be headphone, SD and dock connectors only.
Reply
Reply
post #45 of 201
1/15/10 at 8:36am
Dear Mr Jobs,

Please make it have xcode
Reply
Reply
post #46 of 201
1/15/10 at 8:36am
Quote:
Originally Posted by crazybrit@mac.com View Post

This was an excellent article, and brought back a lot of memories for me. I owned many of the devices!

I think there is a big piece that is missing though, and I think it is the reason why the iPod through iPhone products have been successful where others have not. It has to do with MEDIA. In developing the iPod, Jobs struck deals with all the record labels to offer songs that are downloadable through iTunes. This was the groundbreaking idea, offering the infrastructure all the way from the product (the song) to the listener.

With the iPhone and Apple TV came the deals with TV companies and Studios. Next, with the iSlate, there will be deals with publishers so that we can get rich magazine content on a convenient device. This will be a Kindle killer.

I was also surprised that Danger/Sidekick didn't get a mention, since they were an instrumental player in the business, and inspired teens to get into mobile computing/messaging/social networking.

Well said. There's even more too it also. And it's got to do with technology finally catching up with the manufacturers imagination, through miniaturization and technologies like SSD, NAND, thinner LCD displays and OLED. And Apple's MT. All this is coming together to make a tablet of this sort for the first time even possible.

You're right though, the infrastructure plays a big part also. However I feel without the store the iPod would have still done relatively well, as the iTunes app itself is of huge importance. Apple now just need to rewrite iTunes from the ground up to make is much faster as it's become bloated as of late. Especially when you have a lot of media.

DaHarder just got banned. Let's crack open the champagne.

Reply

DaHarder just got banned. Let's crack open the champagne.

Reply
post #47 of 201
1/15/10 at 8:41am
Thanks to Prince McLean and the AI staff who put this wonderful article and time line together.


I hope Apple see's the wisdom of having spring loaded flush mounted SD card slots in all their future and present devices.


To those who voiced their concerns about Pro apps being on the iSlate, I don't think Apple is going to market their tablet in that direction.

Rather they are going to focus on the consumer market with it and let the "pro" line of MacBook Pro's and MacPro's cater to the pro apps.

What Apple could do is increase the security and privacy features of the iSlate relative to the iPhone's poor one to make it more attractive to business, corporations, hospitals etc. who would jump on a tablet device with a solid and stable Unix core.

I think Apple should also take the duo approach, like the iPhone and iPod touch, of having one on cell networks and one not. But not decrease features out of one like the iPod Touch does compared to the iPhone, make each equal and over time if people want and willing to pay for more hardware features then improve.
The danger is that we sleepwalk into a world where cabals of corporations control not only the mainstream devices and the software on them, but also the entire ecosystem of online services around...
Reply
The danger is that we sleepwalk into a world where cabals of corporations control not only the mainstream devices and the software on them, but also the entire ecosystem of online services around...
Reply
post #48 of 201
1/15/10 at 8:43am
Quote:
Originally Posted by vinea View Post

Comprehensive except it talked about PDAs and not tablets. Blowing off the entire Table PC evolution with a sentence is hardly useful in discussing historical successes and failures of tablet.

Totally agree. Gates also deserves some recognition for maintaining belief that the tablet is the future, even if his company couldn't produce the product that made his words reality. He has continually and insistently said the tablet computer is the future of computing.

DaHarder just got banned. Let's crack open the champagne.

Reply

DaHarder just got banned. Let's crack open the champagne.

Reply
post #49 of 201
1/15/10 at 8:43am
Quote:
Originally Posted by vinea View Post

Comprehensive except it talked about PDAs and not tablets. Blowing off the entire Table PC evolution with a sentence is hardly useful in discussing historical successes and failures of tablet.

No mention of TransNote, Motion Computing, the uses of tablets in the medical industry (one of the few tablet successful niche areas). Zero discussion of slate vs convertible tablets and why convertibles beat slates. No mention of OneNote from Microsoft or Inkwell from Apple or even the freaking modbook.

PDAs, Palm, Newton, iPhones are all not tablets. Even there he got PDA history wrong. PDAs didn't die because of the dot bomb left no market for "executive toys" but because they evolved to become SMARTPHONES. Jeez. Crackberries killed PDAs (and Palm) starting 2002 with the 5810 and java apps. Emerging smartphones (and just smarter regular phones) cratered trditional PDA growth finally killing it entirely. Palm being idiots didn't help but the writing was on the wall in 2002 and the great extinction started in 2004 and declared dead by pundits because of phones.

Motion Computing products are indeed the only tablets out there. Everything, which has the keyboard is not a tablet. Everything, which is for media distribution only (readers, for example), is not, strictly speaking, a computer and can't count in the history of computing.

We mean Apple no harm.

People are lovers, basically. -- Engadget livebloggers at the iPad mini event.

Reply

We mean Apple no harm.

People are lovers, basically. -- Engadget livebloggers at the iPad mini event.

Reply
post #50 of 201
1/15/10 at 8:53am
Quote:
Originally Posted by GlynC View Post

There will be no 'Tablet Device' !!!

There will be a new iPhone with incredibly fast processor.

There will then be an accessory that acts as a large touchscreen display into which the iphone will fit, and will be either OLED, or PixelQI, optimised for reading, but capable of any kind of digital media, including HD video playback etc.


This is possible -- they had a patent for that type of device quite a while back. That would be awesome.
Reply
Reply
post #51 of 201
1/15/10 at 8:58am
There will be a tablet. Stop saying there won't be. This was exactly like the time just before the iPhone launched, a whole lot of people here were saying Apple won't release a phone. There's going to be a tablet in a few weeks, just deal with it. Making the iPhone much more powerful would kill the battery, you can't avoid that fact. Also, Apple stand to make a lot more money by making a tablet and the iPhone, getting money from you twice, and not simply for a screened iPhone peripheral, but a full cost computing device.

The tablet will be called Mac touch, or I'll eat my hat. I also have a sneaking feeling as of late it may actually have an OLED display. They can charge even more that way, make more money, and have superb viewing angles and contrast that would give this device an ever more revolutionary feel about it. Plus it would help make the tablet even thinner and give it improved battery performance, and super display refresh rates.

Imagine watching a letter-boxed movie on this thing, when the black letterbox top and bottom boarders are "OFF", the movie would pop like you can't imagine.

DaHarder just got banned. Let's crack open the champagne.

Reply

DaHarder just got banned. Let's crack open the champagne.

Reply
post #52 of 201
1/15/10 at 9:03am
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ireland View Post

The tablet will be called Mac touch, or I'll eat my hat.

Get ready to eat your hat then.

It's doubtful it will run anything similar to Mac OS X.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carniphage

Putting Mac OS X on a tablet is like putting a steering wheel on a motorcycle.
Reply
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carniphage

Putting Mac OS X on a tablet is like putting a steering wheel on a motorcycle.
Reply
post #53 of 201
1/15/10 at 9:05am
Quote:
Originally Posted by GlynC View Post

There will be no 'Tablet Device' !!!
There will be a new iPhone with incredibly fast processor.

There will then be an accessory that acts as a large touchscreen display into which the iphone will fit, and will be either OLED, or PixelQI, optimised for reading, but capable of any kind of digital media, including HD video playback etc.

That's just silly - first off, the 'incredibly fast' iphone processor is still a long way away. Secondly, what a pain to have to stick your phone / ipod into another device. What when the phone rings? You'll either be scrambling to get your iphone out, or you'll look like a right dork speaking on the largest cell phone ever.
Quote:
Originally Posted by drdb View Post

I'm not really all that sure that using photoshop on a tablet is all that appealing anyway. Surely a bigger screen is much better for such software?

The tablet - whatever it'll be - will not replace a powerful PS cs4 work horse, but why not a PS slate app? A touch version of Elements to do basic tasks. Who knows, there may be a touch version of iPhoto. Cropping, repositioning, color and contrast adjustment - the very basics for photo manipulation. Sounds cool to me.
Reply
Reply
post #54 of 201
1/15/10 at 9:06am
Quote:
Originally Posted by iMacmatician View Post

Get ready to eat your hat then.

Ok.

Quote:
Originally Posted by iMacmatician

It's doubtful it will run anything similar to Mac OS X.

OS X touch will be the official OS name. As opposed to the official iPhone OS name: OS X iPhone.

DaHarder just got banned. Let's crack open the champagne.

Reply

DaHarder just got banned. Let's crack open the champagne.

Reply
post #55 of 201
1/15/10 at 9:09am
I think different too,

there will be no tablet.

Just a new iPhone with free magnifier glass.
Reply
Reply
post #56 of 201
1/15/10 at 9:10am
Quote:
Originally Posted by lord anubis View Post

I think different too,

there will be no tablet.

Just a new iPhone with free magnifier glass.

If you need glasses wear them.

DaHarder just got banned. Let's crack open the champagne.

Reply

DaHarder just got banned. Let's crack open the champagne.

Reply
post #57 of 201
1/15/10 at 9:10am
Quote:
Originally Posted by str1f3 View Post

I find the idea of moving computers to closed environment to be very disturbing.

Yes! The direction of moving to all applications needing to be signed and approved by the platform maker is a scary one.

Think about these scenarios:
  • Platform maker is partnered with a large entertainment company - thus you can't create an application which plays DRM-free audio/video
  • Platform maker is partnered with a large cellular service provider - thus you can't create a VoIP application which works over any network
  • Platform maker partnered with a large TV service provider - thus you can't create a streaming video application which works for any video stream
  • Various other partnerships which would limit the type of applications you can make and stifle innovation/creation of new markets
  • Platform maker creates custom connectors for which you can't get documentation unless you pay them

The beauty of the PC is that it's always been open enough that anyone can make software/hardware to work with it, not just the big players. This has allowed for great innovation and many new markets to be created in the past 30 years.

While Apple tends to foster open development for the most part, there are still motivations for them to ensure that innovation doesn't affect their business relations and their bottom line.
It's a world full of people
Reply
It's a world full of people
Reply
post #58 of 201
1/15/10 at 9:34am
Good read all the way through the last paragraph where we were rewarded with:

Quote:
...was completely flummoxed.

Note to self - save this for later. If fact I'm going to try to use it today.

Life is too short to drink bad coffee.

Reply

Life is too short to drink bad coffee.

Reply
post #59 of 201
1/15/10 at 9:37am
Quote:
Originally Posted by powderdust View Post

There are two ways this Tablet can go for me.

If Apple decide to make a brilliant device that runs OSX 10.6 where I can install Adobe CS4, Apache, PHP, ColdFusion, Office etc I'm in and you can happily take my cash. But I only want one 3G phone contract.

However, if Apple plump for the iPhone OSX with iTunes AppStore apps lockdown you can count me out. I already have an iPhone 3GS and and a MacBook running CS4 and the rest and that will suit me fine until my contract is up and i'll just pick-up the next gen iPhone.

This tablet needs to replace my laptop - possibly taking out the MacBook Air. What it don't need to be is a large iPhone.

Actually what you don't need is a tablet. This is exactly why they never took off in the Windows world. This is all Microsoft offered; Windows on a pen-driven device. It doesn't work. Why? Because desktop operating systems are designed around keyboards and pointing devices. Take away the keyboard and you are left with something with less usability.

This is also the problem with people understanding how useful a tablet computer could be; they can't unwrap their heads from the desktop UI paradigm. They envision all the things they do with their PC's and try to duplicate that on a device with no keyboard. It doesn't work like that. And neither does Apple. They will design an interface specifically for the device and its primary functions. What those functions are? Only Apple knows.
Disclaimer: The things I say are merely my own personal opinion and may or may not be based on facts. At certain points in any discussion, sarcasm may ensue.
Reply
Disclaimer: The things I say are merely my own personal opinion and may or may not be based on facts. At certain points in any discussion, sarcasm may ensue.
Reply
post #60 of 201
1/15/10 at 9:48am
Quote:
Originally Posted by kiwee View Post

yeah.. I bit to long to read while at work. maybe later.

My predictions for jan 27.

Sending girlfriend off.
Calling in sick.
Liveblogs
Clicking "Buy Now"

Might not want to get your hopes up. I doubt it will be available right away.


Quote:
Originally Posted by jglavin View Post

We're all, in one way or another, setting ourselves up for disappointment in a week and a half

(except those who are ignoring the whole thing - but is that anyone?)

I dont think I am. Ill wait to see if this is a product that will make my life better before deciding to buy. If it doesnt exist then the answer is clear. Im still unsure what good a tablet will do for the average person.


Quote:
Originally Posted by powderdust View Post

There are two ways this Tablet can go for me.

If Apple decide to make a brilliant device that runs OSX 10.6 where I can install Adobe CS4, Apache, PHP, ColdFusion, Office etc I'm in and you can happily take my cash. But I only want one 3G phone contract.

However, if Apple plump for the iPhone OSX with iTunes AppStore apps lockdown you can count me out. I already have an iPhone 3GS and and a MacBook running CS4 and the rest and that will suit me fine until my contract is up and i'll just pick-up the next gen iPhone.

This tablet needs to replace my laptop - possibly taking out the MacBook Air. What it don't need to be is a large iPhone.

How about choice number three, the logical choice. Apple uses there skills to make a 4th branch of OS X specifically for the tablet form factor and specs.


Quote:
Originally Posted by hodgkin View Post

Do Apple have a history of cannibalizing old product names? Wasn't the iBook the "consumer" level portable during the late PowerBook days?

Yeah. I like iBook better than iTablet but it may be too soon to bring that back into the fold.


Quote:
Originally Posted by powderdust View Post

You see the thing is I'm not that nerd in my parent's basement. As you my have read I would like the tablet to be a replacement for my laptop. Fine - I can do with out most of the connect-ability ports. Accessing DVDs for software loading over a network works fine for the MacBook Air. I would like the ability to run CS4 at least - after all I am a designer and Mac is upheld dearly by the design community.

I would like the tablet change the way people work on a MAC OSX environment the same way the iPhone changed the way people used a mobile phone. I understand the limitations of connect-ability but there should be no issue with capacity as the MBA works fine running CS4.

Then a tablet isnt right for you. Snow Leopard is not designed to be used by fingers on a tablet. Snow Leopard is designed to use a pointing device and a keyboard separate from the monitor.

Try this: Open CS4, now imagine you can only use your finger to navigate everything. See not designed for that type of input. Now imagine that its a 10 display and the problem becomes considerably worse.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Hattig View Post

The tablet will probably see the introduction of the new Apple Dock Connector, the one that will support HDMI amongst other things.

You think HDMI over mDP when mDp can output HDMI, its cheaper to implement and has a smaller port? I dont think so. I dont even know if we can expect mDP on this tablet if Apple wants you to use a single port for power, syncing, and video out. They already have cable for this stuff on the market.

I would like to see a new iPod Dock Connector that is smaller.
Dick Applebaum on whether the iPad is a personal computer: "BTW, I am posting this from my iPad pc while sitting on the throne... personal enough for you?"
Reply
Dick Applebaum on whether the iPad is a personal computer: "BTW, I am posting this from my iPad pc while sitting on the throne... personal enough for you?"
Reply
post #61 of 201
1/15/10 at 9:58am
Quote:
Originally Posted by GlynC View Post

There will be no 'Tablet Device' !!!

There will be a new iPhone with incredibly fast processor.

There will then be an accessory that acts as a large touchscreen display into which the iphone will fit, and will be either OLED, or PixelQI, optimised for reading, but capable of any kind of digital media, including HD video playback etc.


Hmm, if you gonna carry both devices with you why not make them separate OS then. This doens't make sense.
Apple had me at scrolling
Reply
Apple had me at scrolling
Reply
post #62 of 201
1/15/10 at 10:00am
Quote:
Originally Posted by GlynC View Post

There will be no 'Tablet Device' !!!

There will be a new iPhone with incredibly fast processor.

There will then be an accessory that acts as a large touchscreen display into which the iphone will fit, and will be either OLED, or PixelQI, optimised for reading, but capable of any kind of digital media, including HD video playback etc.


Very interesting idea.
MacMini, MacBook, iPhone 4, AppleTV, Time Capsule.
Mac user since 1996 ("The Dark Days")
Reply
MacMini, MacBook, iPhone 4, AppleTV, Time Capsule.
Mac user since 1996 ("The Dark Days")
Reply
post #63 of 201
1/15/10 at 10:02am
Quote:
There will be no 'Tablet Device' !!!

There will be a new iPhone with incredibly fast processor.

There will then be an accessory that acts as a large touchscreen display into which the iphone will fit, and will be either OLED, or PixelQI, optimised for reading, but capable of any kind of digital media, including HD video playback etc.

When i first read this i thought yes possiblities. But then you can already use your iPhone to control an Apple TV using the phones touch screen. So if Apple were to build an accessory screen then an iPhone wouldn't need to fit into anything, just connect to it in the same way.

Fitting an iPhone into something else just isn't the Apple way. BOSE maybe (ie sound dock) but not Apple.
A reputation is not built upon the restful domain of one's comfort zone; it is made out of stalwart exposition of your core beliefs, for all challenges to disprove them as irrelevant hubris.- Berp...
Reply
A reputation is not built upon the restful domain of one's comfort zone; it is made out of stalwart exposition of your core beliefs, for all challenges to disprove them as irrelevant hubris.- Berp...
Reply
post #64 of 201
1/15/10 at 10:05am
Excellent article Prince, what a treat, thanks!
Reply
Reply
post #65 of 201
1/15/10 at 10:07am
Quote:
Ireland:OS X touch will be the official OS name. As opposed to the official iPhone OS name: OS X iPhone.

I love your style Ireland.
A reputation is not built upon the restful domain of one's comfort zone; it is made out of stalwart exposition of your core beliefs, for all challenges to disprove them as irrelevant hubris.- Berp...
Reply
A reputation is not built upon the restful domain of one's comfort zone; it is made out of stalwart exposition of your core beliefs, for all challenges to disprove them as irrelevant hubris.- Berp...
Reply
post #66 of 201
1/15/10 at 10:09am
I just don´t see the point in a tablet. Let the iPhone have a bigger screen, maybe 5 inches, at best 7, make it more usable with more processing power and please let it have a better batterie. Boom, that´s all you need.
Reply
Reply
post #67 of 201
1/15/10 at 10:10am
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ireland View Post

Totally agree. Gates also deserves some recognition for maintaining belief that the tablet is the future, even if his company couldn't produce the product that made his words reality. He has continually and insistently said the tablet computer is the future of computing.

The only thing I can say about this is that Gates has said EVERYTHING will be the future of computing at some point. His predictions aren't precise bullets, they're more like shotgun shot.

His predictions of the future of computing and their failures are because he's always envisioned a future based around pushing Windows into different form factors without considering the utility of doing so. Why do they do this? They are afraid of introducing a new platform to the masses. Why? Because then it opens up others to build competing platforms and when that happens, Microsoft has proven itself unable to truly compete when innovation is free to run amok.

They are afraid of letting go of their bread and butter, Windows. They know Windows has a majority of the market not due to innovation or choice, but because of how they got started and their ability to retain a tight grip on the market. Once the "desktop" computer is replaced with some other paradigm, so will Windows as the dominant operating systems of those devices.

We're seeing this happen in the mobile world now. And this will repeat itself when the desktop goes the way of the dodo. Although, I don't believe that desktops will completely go away, there will always be a need for them, especially for developing software. However, it will someday relinquish its title of being the dominant computing device.
Disclaimer: The things I say are merely my own personal opinion and may or may not be based on facts. At certain points in any discussion, sarcasm may ensue.
Reply
Disclaimer: The things I say are merely my own personal opinion and may or may not be based on facts. At certain points in any discussion, sarcasm may ensue.
Reply
post #68 of 201
1/15/10 at 10:11am
Quote:
Originally Posted by JustReelFilms View Post

Tell me what chip that's more energy efficient than ARM? No the Intel Atom is not one of them.

I don't disagree. I'm a total ARM fanboy. But I also understand why laptops, including the MacBook/MacBook Pro, still use x86 CPUs.
Reply
Reply
post #69 of 201
1/15/10 at 10:19am
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ireland View Post

OS X touch will be the official OS name. As opposed to the official iPhone OS name: OS X iPhone.

Im glad youve dropped the Mac designation from the Tablet.
Dick Applebaum on whether the iPad is a personal computer: "BTW, I am posting this from my iPad pc while sitting on the throne... personal enough for you?"
Reply
Dick Applebaum on whether the iPad is a personal computer: "BTW, I am posting this from my iPad pc while sitting on the throne... personal enough for you?"
Reply
post #70 of 201
1/15/10 at 10:23am
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lukeskymac View Post

Nopes.

It will have 2 USBs and a Mini Display Port. It's all it needs to be a fully functional computer.

It will not be a "fully functional computer". Why would Apple essentially kill, or severely damage, its MacBook line? We will have to wait and see who's predictions are the closest to reality. In any event those who expect this device to be some be-all, do-all gadget are going to be sorely disappointed.
Reply
Reply
post #71 of 201
1/15/10 at 10:26am
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ireland View Post

Totally agree. Gates also deserves some recognition for maintaining belief that the tablet is the future, even if his company couldn't produce the product that made his words reality. He has continually and insistently said the tablet computer is the future of computing.

But Gates should be smacked in the face for failing to realize that it was going to take more than a declaration of a new category of UMPCs for this to work. He was trying to create some kind of "moonshot" moment and force his monopoly onto another platform. Remember all that "Origami" PR?

It was obvious at the time, given constraints of battery life and the hogginess of windows, mainly, that no UMPC running a full version of windows would ever fly. Just like declaring "let's make a flying car" and then stipulating that it's a 1982 Lincoln Continental pretty much dooms it right there. Classic brute-force microsoft move.

Whoever did the tablet right will have to triumph in the art of execution, not conception (everyone's already thought a flying car or a tablet computer would be cool):

Leaner software, better batteries, preexisting developer community, end-to-end user ecosystem/experience, groundbreaking interface. It will all have to work.

Pass the popcorn.
Reply
Reply
post #72 of 201
1/15/10 at 10:30am
I really can't wait for the "EPIC FAIL" comments that are on the way once this device premiers. They say only two things are certain, death and taxes, but there's third one. It's the negative comments from armchair hardware, software, and marketing "experts" whenever Apple releases a new product.

This is going to one for the ages to watch. Pull up the lawn chairs, pop open the Budweiser Selects, get the pretzels and cheese sticks, and enjoy!
Reply
Reply
post #73 of 201
1/15/10 at 10:35am
I still have questions about the overall ergonomic soundness of these (any) tablets. Are you supposed to hold it in one hand while you interface with the screen using the other hand? Won't the holding hand get tired? Set it on the table and the screen no longer faces your eyes. Hold it in your lap and again screen not oriented to your face.

I just don't see how this sort of physical human interface is any kind of improvement over the laptop with an adjustable screen that can be angled to best suit the user.
Reply
Reply
post #74 of 201
1/15/10 at 11:03am
Quote:
Originally Posted by WelshDog View Post

I still have questions about the overall ergonomic soundness of these (any) tablets. Are you supposed to hold it in one hand while you interface with the screen using the other hand? Won't the holding hand get tired? Set it on the table and the screen no longer faces your eyes. Hold it in your lap and again screen not oriented to your face.

I just don't see how this sort of physical human interface is any kind of improvement over the laptop with an adjustable screen that can be angled to best suit the user.

Humans have this wonderful thing called a neck. Wouldn't a touch screen in a traditional laptop orientation be even worse? how would you interact with that?
The key to enjoying these forums: User CP -> Edit Ignore List
Reply
The key to enjoying these forums: User CP -> Edit Ignore List
Reply
post #75 of 201
1/15/10 at 11:04am
As usual - for a website that flies under the radar and typically branded a "rumors" site, you have done an outstanding job on writing up some relevant information. I really enjoy these in-depth articles.

Brian
Reply
Reply
post #76 of 201
1/15/10 at 11:06am
Quote:
Originally Posted by solipsism View Post

Im glad youve dropped the Mac designation from the Tablet.

DaHarder just got banned. Let's crack open the champagne.

Reply

DaHarder just got banned. Let's crack open the champagne.

Reply
post #77 of 201
1/15/10 at 11:07am
Quote:
Originally Posted by cmf2 View Post

Humans have this wonderful thing called a neck.

haha!

DaHarder just got banned. Let's crack open the champagne.

Reply

DaHarder just got banned. Let's crack open the champagne.

Reply
post #78 of 201
1/15/10 at 11:08am
Quote:
Originally Posted by pembroke View Post

I wonder whether Apple will be marketing the tablet as a worthy substitute for the laptop? Laptops have media drives which are often very useful. I wonder whether Apple have found room in their tablet for a DVD media drive?

my guess: yes to #1 and definitely no to #2.
Reply
Reply
post #79 of 201
1/15/10 at 11:08am
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Underhill View Post

I love your style Ireland.

Thank you, Sir.

DaHarder just got banned. Let's crack open the champagne.

Reply

DaHarder just got banned. Let's crack open the champagne.

Reply
post #80 of 201
1/15/10 at 11:11am
Quote:
Originally Posted by str1f3 View Post

I disagree to a certain extent. If they were to simply put 10.6 on the tablet they would be making the same mistake MS made with the Tablet PC. The best idea is to fully redesign 10.6 to make it touch-based. Supposedly the iPhone OS came from the tablet project. Hopefully this is where Apple is headed. It won't use CS4 but it would give Adobe a chance to give a much needed redesign to the bloated and hideous UI of their apps like Photoshop.

My main problem is that I think it is the future of Apple computing. Let me explain. Look at the progression of Apple products during the Jobs era. The Apple II was a completely open device and fully customizable. The Mac essentially stopped those hardware customizations but there was still a level of openness to software though it was more simplified compared to the Apple II. The tablet will be a fully locked down device where the only apps you can install are the apps that Apple says it ok to use and it is even less complex in it's capabilities compared to Mac OSX.

I find the idea of moving computers to closed environment to be very disturbing.

You find it disturbing, but I think that in the grand scheme of things, it is taking a very complex item (a computer) and simplifying (or dumbing down, take your pick) the device. OS X desktop is great, but iPhone carries a lot of the power there, and yet makes it easy enough for my 2yr old to literally use quite a bit of it as naturally as I do. I don't see that as disturbing but rather amazing! Apple is bringing computing power to the masses. There will always be those who want to tinker with every setting (I'm one of those a lot of times) but when it comes to my phone, and my day to day device, I prefer to know it just works, and has no issues
Reply
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: iPad
  • The inside track on Apple's tablet: a history of tablet computing
AppleInsider › Forums › Mobile › iPad › The inside track on Apple's tablet: a history of tablet computing