The rising tide of left wing extremism and violence

As those on the left so often like to remind us, no person that acts like this acts alone. They are merely the fringe element that was compelled to act via a chorus of hate speech being sent out by the leadership and leading voices representing that portion of the political spectrum.

Amy Bishop


As the Bayh retirement shows, along with the loses in New Jersey, and Virginia, that extreme hate of the left especially as portrayed by those like Matthews, O'Donnell, Olbermann, and Maddow, just to name a few, is driving some marginal folks over the edge and into violence.

What makes such a person feel no remorse about killing family, bombing someone or even gunning down several people in a rampage of violence. Perhaps it is the fact that George Lopez feels he can call Sarah Palin a "b*tch" on national television. Perhaps it is Olbermann going so off the deep end that even Stewart has to reprimand him noting that those calling women "a bag of meat" have no moral high ground. Perhaps it is the daily HuffPo headlines noting who has been "slammed", "eviscerated", or "destroyed" by the inane reasoning of their bloggers.

It is clear the left has become UNHINGED and are now moving from hope to hate. Their president and congress promised them utopia and instead we have unemployment, record debt, and hate speech piled on in an attempt to deflect from the problems. As VP Biden loves to note, everyone is basically a liar who opposed the Obama administration. Sure the Democrats are filled with people who think Obama is "clean and articulate" or speaks with "no discernable dialect" by it is everyone else who is racist and keeping away utopia.

So the answer becomes to shoot them. Be it tenure or utopia, they might be incited to come for you next so watch out. Just look at some of the speech on here by some of our leftist members, it borders right on the edge of seething. They might be the ones to tip next thanks to the daily diet of MSNBC, Maher and DailyKOS/HuffPo telling them that all those worst people of the day are the only reason utopia isn't here. There aren't disagreements, only the party of NO so kill them off (since they can't be bought off like Mary or Ben) and let's hurry up and get to utopia.

Well Sammi, seriously you should know better. Obviously this post is a reflection of those we get here quite often whenever guilt by association or exception proving the rule reasoning is applied by leftist elements as is often the case here and in the political world at large.

That was why it opened up like this.....

As those on the left so often like to remind us, no person that acts like this acts alone. They are merely the fringe element that was compelled to act via a chorus of hate speech being sent out by the leadership and leading voices representing that portion of the political spectrum.

People who are trying to spin reality will take isolated events and attempt to form a trend with them where there is none. I did that here for an obvious reason and that is to show that while it may be possible to make it sound coherent, it doesn't make the reasoning correct.

I gladly admit the reasoning is wrong. The whole purpose is to show that such reasoning is wrong in hopes that it will be avoided in the future. Such threads here are often started to provoke demands for the fairness doctrine or to limit free speech. I oppose such reasoning and showing how it could be used against causes one supports ought to make folks consider the principle rather than the political.

Really and you think the whole shooting her brother, sending bombs and finally going on a shooting spree didn't trigger the nutjob vibes.

It was just all those around her and their political views that actually put her (apparently incorrectly) in that group.

Hi, I'm the story the left wing media complex will spend no time on because they'd rather spend time trying to tar the tea party movement.


Yes it's the intent game once again. Amy Bishop was allowed to kill, send a bomb, and finally stopped after her shooting spree because of who she was and what she believes. The media still won't focus on her for those exact reasons. It doesn't fit their agenda, and sadly worse, her agenda is the same as the medias.

I'm sure in the end, the media will even discover that those folks deserved to be shot by that brave fighter against -isms, Amy Bishop. She was Harvard educated but had to put up with those folks in the South. It's already been suggested in this very thread so of course it isn't far fetched to imagine at all.

Intent Game
Intent Game
Intent Game
Intent Game
Intent Game
Intent Game

Hey some asshole just flew a plane into my house. Then he got out and went on a shooting spree.

SEGOVIUS!!!

I think that discussion might be a bit better suited for PM's. The discussion so far has almost driven you to become an example for the thread so take it there and the violent tendencies exhibited might remain under better control.

I'll gladly take your buzz word suggestions there.

Let's look at this.

The claim is that you posted about this in 08 and I didn't want to discuss it then.

Please prove that point. Please link to where you posted about this shooting in 08 and how I ignored the post or was called out to address it and did not.

Otherwise stop making crap up thanks. As for disorders, someone is going to be suffering from a few when their hundreds of posts about Republicans never winning anything are proven wrong in the midterms.

The silence on the claims is indeed deafening.

A new bit of information, at least to me since I don't watch my news on television. It turns out all the people Amy Bishop murdered were of minority status.



Now we all know the media doesn't have time to discuss the implications of this via their 24/7 analysis because they are far to busy discussing how the Tea Party and CPAC are really, really racist with no proof. As we see in this thread and others, you make the claim, walk away and then make it over and over again in different places at different times. Later you claim "everyone knows," and use your own claims over time as the proof.

It's sad now how many events that have occurred that the media just makes go away because it isn't convenient to their narrative. How many Fort Hoods, and Amy Bishops do we need before the violence are properly assigned?

How much more misogyny do we need to witness related to Sarah Palin before the hate there is called exactly what it is, hate. Questioning her womb, burning her church and intentionally sexualizing her is just fine with the left in that instance because the reasoning is the ends justify the means.

It is exactly such thinking that creates the Amy Bishops of the world.

Intent game. Obama's popularity in Alabama in no form changes the racist nature of Tonton's actions.

Also for future reference, the white female, Harvard educated professor who BLOWS HOLES in a bunch of minority folks is the hateful one by any standard you can measure. Murder is certainly hate.

Too bad thanks to the intent game, you can't even realize that.

Keep up the snark. Anyone reading the words....."where any white person " will understand the reality of what Tonton was saying.

Newsbusters.org


So glad to see all of you condemning this very clear violence advocated and supported by MSNBC.

Look at that drop off. Those still supporting this president and his agenda are obviously a radical and fringe element. All the middle ground folks are retiring or leaving. The independents have already dropped their support. All that is left are the violent and crazy loons shooting up college campuses and watching their hate be reinforced on MSNBC 24/7.

Of course I do and it was what were Republicans were called after losing the presidential election in 2008. We also have nice threads like this from here along with posts like this one and even this one.

I can find a lot more of course.

Like this one of course.

Do I need to go on?

Why is it so hard to remember all the nice people in these forums declaring that only having 40-45% support would drive a group so insane as to consider assassination? My memory works just fine.

I'm betting there are plenty of Jimmac posts in those links declaring what that 40-45% would do.

Who argued that? The claim was that Republicans at 40-45% had been called a fringe group by many on here. I've easily proven that. You also agreed with Tauron's points so don't try to walk away from them.

Try again. The threads are clear.