Originally Posted by trumptman Another day, another example of left-wing hate.
Now I know this is hard for some to comprehend because profanity laced tirades are somewhat a norm from the left on here, but believe it or not, that is some violent imagery and hateful language. Worse still it was propagated by false claims and lies. We can be a bit relieved because all though they have and make mention of the gun, apparently they only plan to sock someone in the face with it.
No figurative language, no similies or metaphores, straight up violence. Just like the only racist incident at a tea party protest so far has been the unions beating up a black tea partier.
The problem is that although there probably is some hate on the Left (there is a lot to hate on the Right; I am proud to hate racism, Islamophobia and general moronicism for example) this cannot be an example of it.
Let's break it down:
1) The caller here (and I think this is significant...wingers are obsessed with phone-ins) is clearly facing significant challenges in the areas of expression, vocabulary and grammatical syntax and the general rules of etiquette.
This should give one pause straight away: a phone-in talk show, a ranting caller, a distinct lack of grasp of English idiom, general frothing and ranting.
All unique hallmarks of the Right-wing...but let's suspend judgement awhile..
2) 'Teabaggers'. Suspicions were aroused with item 1 above but here they positively pulsate. It is almost a unique right-wing trait to take the name of a thing and to twist into a pejorative.
Clearly this is linked to a frustration with their inability to frame coherent arguments - we have seen this glaring clue in item 1 too. We might paraphrase Paul Gallico who said:
No one can be as calculatedly rude as the British, which amazes Americans, who do not understand studied insult and can only offer abuse as a substitute.
Only re-applying this to right-wingers who do not seem to understand very much at all and revert to abuse as a default catch-all across the board.
3) Extreme violence. Wingers often claim that liberals are 'chickens' and 'peaceniks' and 'anti-war' (oddly meant as an insult as in that they are PRO war and anyone not wanting their head blown off by an IED is somehow lacking in something...what this 'something' might be is perhaps beyond the scope of this analysis but suffice to say that the words 'manhood', 'Freud' and 'big boy' figure large)....and yet...and yet...
Clearly, mixed up as wingers are, Liberals cannot both be ultra-violent and ultra-peaceful. It is a dilemma.
Fortunately though all we need to do to solve it is to look at the wingers themselves and assume that Liberals are the opposite....
When we do we find that this phraseology and content is 100% patented Right-wing.
4) The clincher..... f***ing .09 mm. F***
Now I don't know what a "f***ing .09 mm. F***" actually is but I assume it is some sort of weapon.
Why don't I know what it is? Well....I am a rabid Leftie. Were I a winger I would certainly know what it is...in fact I probably would have one stuffed down my trousers where my John Thomas should be, have a couple in the trunk of my hummer and have shares in the Company.
So there we have it.
I don't know what is sadder; the fact that WIngers now have to resort to ringing talk-showspretending to be 'libeerrulls', the fact they are so bad at it or the fact they even produce it like a rabbit out of a hat in public
and try to convince people it means something...