Miscellaneous News. - Page 39

Comic relief from Stephen Colbert :

http://www.colbertnation.com/the-colbert-report-videos/415944/june-27-2012/national-geographic-poll-on-alien-invasion-management

There's a commercial first sorry.

Enjoy!

Apparently it's wrong for Mitt Romney to raise funds for his re-election but it is okay for Obama.

Liberal hypocrisy truly has no limits.

Quote:

Originally Posted by MJ1970 

Apparently it's wrong for Mitt Romney to raise funds for his re-election but it is okay for Obama.

 

Liberal hypocrisy truly has no limits.

Doesn't he have enough money!

But I'm guessing you favor Romney? And of course you're not a conservative. You just support the same things.

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimmac 

Doesn't he have enough money!

I don't know. Doesn't Obama? Personally how much money any individual has is none of my business.

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimmac 

But I'm guessing you favor Romney?

Nope.

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimmac 

And of course you're not a conservative.

Nope.

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimmac 

You just support the same things.

Nope.

All of this is ironic from the guy who claims to be an independent but who never seems to criticize liberals or Democrats, always appears to support almost all their positions and is regularly critical and dismissive of and objects to almost all conservatives, Republicans and even libertarians.

Here's a little something for all of the consevatives here to chew on!

http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/07/08/12630094-in-hamptons-protesters-converge-on-romney-fundraisers-by-air-and-land?lite

An indicator of the mood of the country.

Meanwhile in other news : http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/48128869/ns/politics-the_new_york_times/

Really? You think?

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimmac 

Here's a little something for all of the consevatives here to chew on!

 

http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/07/08/12630094-in-hamptons-protesters-converge-on-romney-fundraisers-by-air-and-land?lite

 

 

 

 

 

 

An indicator of the mood of the country.

 

Meanwhile in other news : http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/48128869/ns/politics-the_new_york_times/

 

Really? You think?

How the hell is that indicative of the mood of the country?  And why is Romney's fundraiser a problem while Obama's star-studded, Hollywood gala fundraisers are not?  

Quote:

Originally Posted by SDW2001 

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimmac 

Here's a little something for all of the consevatives here to chew on!

 

http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/07/08/12630094-in-hamptons-protesters-converge-on-romney-fundraisers-by-air-and-land?lite

 

 

 

 

 

 

An indicator of the mood of the country.

 

Meanwhile in other news : http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/48128869/ns/politics-the_new_york_times/

 

Really? You think?

 

 

How the hell is that indicative of the mood of the country?  And why is Romney's fundraiser a problem while Obama's star-studded, Hollywood gala fundraisers are not?  

Tell me does Obama have off shore accounts? And the mood is that they don't like rich fucks with off shore accounts.

For those who want to listen a good read on what's really going on with the economy.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/04/opinion/krugman-this-republican-economy.html?_r=1&ref=paulkrugman

Cause everything Romney does is in a sort of clandestine way while Obama is out front.
 

Quote:

Originally Posted by marvfox 

Cause everything Romney does is in a sort of clandestine way while Obama is out front.
 

Thank you! I was wondering if I was going to get any other support here for this double barreled match. However I'm glad I could pose a common threat that would get these two conservatives united again in common cause. ( wink if I could ).

Quote:

Originally Posted by marvfox 

Cause everything Romney does is in a sort of clandestine way while Obama is out front.

Do you actually believe that?

I see that jimmac does, but then...well...

Yes, Mr. Barack "Executive Privilege" Obama is "out front".

Quote:

Originally Posted by MJ1970 

Quote:

Originally Posted by marvfox 

Cause everything Romney does is in a sort of clandestine way while Obama is out front.

 

Do you actually believe that?

 

I see that jimmac does, but then...well...

Lots of people believe things you don't. Are you going to try to discredit most of the country? ( eyes roll if they could )

Quote:

Originally Posted by jazzguru 

Yes, Mr. Barack "Executive Privilege" Obama is "out front".

One note ( wink if I could ).

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimmac 

Lots of people believe things you don't. Are you going to try to discredit most of the country? ( eyes roll if they could )

Not at all. I merely asked a question to a poster who declared something that isn't true and wondered if he actually believed something that wasn't true.

Quote:

Originally Posted by MJ1970 

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimmac 

Lots of people believe things you don't. Are you going to try to discredit most of the country? ( eyes roll if they could )

 

Not at all. I merely asked a question to a poster who declared something that isn't true and wondered if he actually believed something that wasn't true.

Only not true from your point of view. Hardly everyone or universal.

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimmac 

Only not true from your point of view. Hardly everyone or universal.

You're right. All of the facts that have been collected by and from many sources that demonstrate how not upfront, not transparent and not open Barack Obama is, is just my "point of view."

You're a riot!

Quote:

Originally Posted by MJ1970 

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimmac 

Only not true from your point of view. Hardly everyone or universal.

 

You're right. All of the facts that have been collected by and from many sources that demonstrate how not upfront, not transparent and not open Barack Obama is, is just my "point of view."

 

You're a riot!

 

See what I mean? Feighned superiority and not relevent to the substance of my post. If you find it is then my comments about " How Republican of you " are also. See how this works?

We can choose to be civil or not.

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimmac 

See what I mean? Feighned superiority and not relevent to the substance of my post. If you find it is then my comments about " How Republican of you " are also. See how this works?

 

We can choose to be civil or not.

Your posts have no substance. That's the point. There's nothing to address. Talking with you is like playing with a little kitten. It's amusing and mildly entertaining but doesn't really add anything of value to my life other than that.

Quote:

Originally Posted by MJ1970 

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimmac 

See what I mean? Feighned superiority and not relevent to the substance of my post. If you find it is then my comments about " How Republican of you " are also. See how this works?

 

We can choose to be civil or not.

 

Your posts have no substance. That's the point. There's nothing to address. Talking with you is like playing with a little kitten. It's amusing and mildly entertaining but doesn't really add anything of value to my life other than that.

Here we go again. You really don't have anything do you?

Well it's after 11:00 am here gotta go and do things in the real world. I'm on a working around the house staycasion. Talk to you later.

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimmac 

Here we go again. You really don't have anything do you?

I have a lot. I've posted much of substance. You do not. You have not. You've simply come back to babble.

Post something with substance, reason, facts and logic...then we can discuss. Or point me to a recent substantive post of yours.

Fresh from invading Republican supporters' homes, the civility-loving left starts cutting vehicular engine lines.

Quote:

Originally Posted by MJ1970 

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimmac 

Here we go again. You really don't have anything do you?

 

I have a lot. I've posted much of substance. You do not. You have not. You've simply come back to babble.

 

Post something with substance, reason, facts and logic...then we can discuss. Or point me to a recent substantive post of yours.

I have you just refuse to acknowledge it. Like I've said above gotta go. You can insult me later.

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimmac 

I have you just refuse to acknowledge it.

Point it out.

Quote:

Originally Posted by MJ1970 

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimmac 

I have you just refuse to acknowledge it.

 

Point it out.

How about post # 1528 in this thread? Of course being the conservative ( or at least Republican sympathizer )  that you are you probably don't agree with it.

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimmac 

How about # 1528? Of course being the conservative ( or at least Republican sympathizer )  that you are you probably don't agree with it.

So...you're pointing me to a post...that contains a single link...to an opinion piece...by a liberal, Democrat-sympathizer...explaining why he thinks everything that's bad in the economy is the fault of the people he doesn't sympathize with...as an example of a "substantive" post of yours?

Quote:

Originally Posted by MJ1970 

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimmac 

How about # 1528? Of course being the conservative ( or at least Republican sympathizer )  that you are you probably don't agree with it.

 

So...you're pointing me to a post...that contains a single link...to an opinion piece...by a liberal, Democrat-sympathizer...explaining why he thinks everything that's bad in the economy is the fault of the people he doesn't sympathize with...as an example of a "substantive" post of yours?

 

So just because you don't agree with it there's no substance? WOW! ( head shakes if it could ).

I'd call that a closed mind and a blindspot. How Republican of you. Also how is this any different than your post # 1503 in this thread oh wise one?

Just so you don't go back and doctor it here's a quote :

And that was all you wrote in said post. ( wink if I could )

By the way there's an update to the article you linked to :

( Wink if I could ).

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimmac 

So just because you don't agree with it there's no substance? WOW! ( head shakes if it could ).

I didn't say that. I simply pointed out that it's an opinion piece. What do you want me to do. I have a different opinion. There...we have two opinions.

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimmac 

I'd call that a closed mind and a blindspot.

Call it whatever you like. I don't value your opinion on such matters.

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimmac 

How Republican of you.

:rolleyes:

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimmac 

Also how is this any different than your post # 1503 in this thread oh wise one?

Post 1503 contained a link to a news article about "the most open and transparent administration in US history" (and a President who, as a candidate was an outspoken critic of the previous president's use of "executive privilege for the same kind of things) invoking "executive privilege" to hide something and protect one its people.

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimmac 

Just so you don't go back and doctor it here's a quote :

 

And that was all you wrote in said post. ( wink if I could )

You're picking one post of mine as your sample set to imply that I post without any substance?

Sheesh.

Quote:

Originally Posted by MJ1970 

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimmac 

So just because you don't agree with it there's no substance? WOW! ( head shakes if it could ).

 

I didn't say that. I simply pointed out that it's an opinion piece. What do you want me to do. I have a different opinion. There...we have two opinions.

 

 

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimmac 

I'd call that a closed mind and a blindspot.

 

Call it whatever you like. I don't value your opinion on such matters.

 

 

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimmac 

How Republican of you.

 

:rolleyes:

 

 

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimmac 

Also how is this any different than your post # 1503 in this thread oh wise one?

 

Post 1503 contained a link to a news article about "the most open and transparent administration in US history" (and a President who, as a candidate was an outspoken critic of the previous president's use of "executive privilege for the same kind of things) invoking "executive privilege" to hide something and protect one its people.

 

 

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimmac 

Just so you don't go back and doctor it here's a quote :

 

And that was all you wrote in said post. ( wink if I could )

 

You're picking one post of mine as your sample set to imply that I post without any substance?

 

Sheesh.

You were doing much the same with me. There are many more with just as much substance ( or not by your own definition ) that I could quote if you like.  Also read the update to that same article. I posted it above for your convenience. Nice back peddle though.

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimmac 

You were doing much the same with me.

No. I asked you to point me to a post of yours with substance. You pointed me to a post with a link to a biased opinion piece. Then you went and picked one of my posts with a link to a news article.

Anyway...I'm playing with children for now.

Quote:

Originally Posted by MJ1970 

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimmac 

You were doing much the same with me.

 

No. I asked you to point me to a post of yours with substance. You pointed me to a post with a link to a biased opinion piece. Then you went and picked one of my posts with a link to a news article.

 

Anyway...I'm playing with children for now.

And I asked you what's the difference between what you were questioning and what you've done ( multiple times ) yourself.

This is what you asked of me

Then I pointed out when you didn't like that you've done the same yourself. Then you insult me by inferring I'm a child ( another insult ). You just can't drop the phony superiority stuff can you?

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimmac 

And I asked you what's the difference between what you were questioning and what you've done ( multiple times ) yourself.

And I explained the difference.

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimmac 

Then I pointed out when you didn't like that you've done the same yourself.

What?!?!

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimmac 

Then you insult me by inferring I'm a child ( another insult ).

No, I implied it. Speakers/writers imply. Listeners/readers infer. Learn.

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimmac 

You just can't drop the phony superiority stuff can you?

Nothing phony about it.

Quote:

Originally Posted by MJ1970 

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimmac 

And I asked you what's the difference between what you were questioning and what you've done ( multiple times ) yourself.

 

And I explained the difference.

 

 

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimmac 

Then I pointed out when you didn't like that you've done the same yourself.

 

What?!?!

 

 

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimmac 

Then you insult me by inferring I'm a child ( another insult ).

 

No, I implied it.

 

 

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimmac 

You just can't drop the phony superiority stuff can you?

 

Nothing phony about it.

There was no difference to it ( maybe in your mind ) but you didn't offer anything new to that previous post besides the link and maybe your snide opinion ( subjective so no real substance there ).

Amounts to the same thing.

And completely phony ( A legend in your own mind ).

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimmac 

There was no difference to it ( maybe in your mind ) but you didn't offer anything new to that previous post besides the link and maybe your snide opinion ( subjective so no real substance there ).

Whatever. :rolleyes:

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimmac 

Amounts to the same thing.

No. They're not.

Quote:

Originally Posted by MJ1970 

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimmac 

There was no difference to it ( maybe in your mind ) but you didn't offer anything new to that previous post besides the link and maybe your snide opinion ( subjective so no real substance there ).

 

Whatever. :rolleyes:

 

 

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimmac 

Amounts to the same thing.

 

No. They're not.

Yes they are. They're both stupid insults when you use them MJ. And I thought you didn't approve of " Whatever "?

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimmac 

Yes they are. They're both stupid insults when you use them MJ. And I thought you didn't approve of " Whatever "?

Amazing. Someone points out how clearly wrong you are and your incorrect understanding of word usage and you just dig your heels in.

Amazing.

Quote:

Originally Posted by MJ1970 

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimmac 

Yes they are. They're both stupid insults when you use them MJ. And I thought you didn't approve of " Whatever "?

 

Amazing. Someone points out how clearly wrong you are and your incorrect understanding of word usage and you just dig your heels in.

 

Amazing

If only that had anything to do with what we were talking about. I forgot you ramble when you insult. Amazing. Besides I thought you were saying " Good day " to me in another post? ( wink if I could )

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimmac 

I forgot you ramble when you insult.

You're confusing correcting you with rambling.

Quote:

Originally Posted by MJ1970 

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimmac 

I forgot you ramble when you insult.

 

You're confusing correcting you with rambling.

Yeah. That must have been it. ( wink if I could )

Raise funds with not being secret about it that is Romney for you a sneak all the way!