WTF? Four links that don't have anything to do with a lack of cease and desist letters? That do not, in anyway explain the lack of photos showing it turned onbefore the subsequent letter (not a C&D) was sent?
Did you read the post you replied to before posting 4 links to the same letter, which was unrelated to either of the two questions asked?
Hey, Tulkas, how've you been?
mjohn68 thinks these aren't actual images of an actual iPhone:
The four links showed him that the "actual images of an actual iPhone" are real enough that Apple Senior VP and General Counsel Bruce Sewell asked for the actual device back.
The C&D isn't going to happen because you basically can't get that genie back into the bottle.
FWIW, my guess is that Brian Lam, Jason Chen and Nick Denton are going to wish they got a C&D from Apple Legal. My guess is that what's going to go down is going to be a bit more serious than a C&D letter.