Come on, Apple bashers. This is not SJ writing from his iPad. This is someone deep in the bowels of the legal department being, well, litigious. The parody most likely crossed some legal boundary with logos and trademarks and likely has nothing to do with content. Some attorney did her job. That is what they are paid to do.
Naturally, Ellen did not come out and say that she crossed some boring, oblique legal boundary; she got as much mileage out of it as she could. That is exactly what a good comedian should do. Her apology was much funnier than the original joke. It wouldn't surprise me if there was no contact from Apple. The producers may have found that the joke fell somewhat flat, and found a way to spice it up.
Finally, if this was really a serious legal action from Apple, I think they would have demanded something more than an apology. This is not a playground. If they thought they were damaged, they would likely have demanded damages. People who are complaining that Apple should grow a sense of humor just don't get it. If Apple is really involved in this, then this IS Apple's sense of humor. It is some of the posters around here that should lighten up.
Apple has no competition. Every commercial product which competes directly with an Apple product gives the distinct impression that, Where it is original, it is not good, and where it is good, it...
Apple has no competition. Every commercial product which competes directly with an Apple product gives the distinct impression that, Where it is original, it is not good, and where it is good, it...