AppleInsider › Forums › General › General Discussion › Former Apple Retail mastermind jumps ship from Microsoft to Tesla
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Former Apple Retail mastermind jumps ship from Microsoft to Tesla

post #1 of 57
Thread Starter 
George Blankenship, the strategic genius behind Apple's booming retail segment, lasted only a year attempting to jumpstart a similar effort at rival Microsoft before being lured away from the software giant to architect the retail experience for upstart Tesla Motors.

It's arguable, in many ways, that Tesla's vision mirrors that of Apple's. The Silicon Valley-based designer and manufacturer of highway-capable electric automobiles prides itself on energy efficiency, environmental responsibility and striking industrial designs. It's hoping to shake things up in the automotive industry in a manner similar to the way Apple altered the landscape for modern computing.

Tesla's primary goal is to increase the number and variety of electric automobiles available to mainstream consumer through the retail sale of its own vehicles, marketing its patented electric powertrain components to other automakers, and setting a positive example for the troubled automotive industry by proving there's a market for vehicles that are not only fun to drive but also socially responsible.

Executives for the automaker have even gone on record to admit that they're modeling their retail showrooms after Apple's and that of Starbucks. The company currently operates 11 retail stores worldwide and plans to launch another 50 or so over the next few years to support the launch of its new $50,000 Model S sedan.

To this end, Blankenship, 57, brings thirty years of international retail and real estate experience to Tesla. Best known as the architect of Apple’s brand building retail strategy, he defined and executed an International “Smart Growth Hit List” that encompassed major cities in Asia, Europe and North America.

Instead of choosing store locations purely to avoid high lease prices or insisting on locating them in technology-centric shopping areas, Blankenship from 2001 onwards insisted on placing Apple stores in high-traffic areas and frequently in locations that were considered upscale shopping districts.

Apple's original Tokyo flagship store, for example, was placed in the fashion district of Ginza rather than in the technology haven of Akihabara. Apple counted on the sheer volume of business to overcome any costs associated with running the store in such an expensive space.

That strategy has helped Apple grow its business to produce $1.683 billion in revenue in just its latest quarter while many of its Windows PC-making rivals have fallen far short of the mark. Gateway, for example, was eventually forced to shutter its stores after both choosing cheap, out-of-the-way locations and never carrying PCs in store; Dell has only produced a small number of similar test-only stores and was eventually forced to offer PCs to third-party retail stores to compete against Apple, Gateway, HP and other top-tier computer makers.

Tesla's Model S sedan, which retails for $50,000 after a tax rebate.

For its part, Microsoft was similarly determined to shadow Apple's example, so much so that it courted Blankenship away from the iPhone maker one year ago to serve as a consultant for its own retail strategy that kicked off last fall with the launch of its Mission Viejo, Calif. location. Since then, the Redmond, Wash.-based heavyweight has managed to launch just three additional stores.

Not much has been said about the success of Microsoft's fledgeling retail effort, though its latest store opening in the San Diego's Fashion Valley Mall -- located just a few slots down from one of Apple's -- was completely overshadowed by the launch of the iPhone 4 on the same day.

One of Tesla's retail stores, modeled after those of Apple.

In addition to closely following Apple's retail placements, as it also did with its first Mission Viejo store, Microsoft has also worked to mimic the look and experience of Apple's outlets, creating viral marketing buzz and high profile launch events patterned after those originally initiated by the iPhone maker's own retail team.

For example, it drew initial crowds at its first retail store launch by giving away hundreds of dollars worth of software, free concert tickets, free merchandise with new PC purchases, and by making significant charitable donations. It's retail employees were also trained to start spontaneously line dancing in the middle of stores to material from music artist Black Eyed Peas.

Many of those employees were similarly poached from Apple with the promise of pay raises and compensation for moving expenses. In one case detailed by AppleInsider, Microsoft was able to court an Apple retail market manager, who had recently left the company. The manager was offered a pay raise and was then reportedly asked to contact the most seasoned Apple employees that he had presided over in an effort to recruit them as well.
post #2 of 57
Any job that makes you line dance, and isn't Coyote Ugly, is probably one you should think twice about.
post #3 of 57
Quote:
It's retail employees were also trained to start spontaneously line dancing in the middle of stores to material from music artist Black Eyed Peas.

I don't think that meets the definition of the word 'spontaneous'.
post #4 of 57
So Tesla is going to open company-owned retail stores instead of franchised dealerships? If so, it breaks with the auto industry model for selling cars going back about a thousand years. That might be the real news here. They are going to need a genuine retailing genius to make it work.
Please don't be insane.
Reply
Please don't be insane.
Reply
post #5 of 57
Would much rather have him at Tesla than Microsoft.
post #6 of 57
I guess he's leaving Microsoft because he discovered the hard way that you can't make a silk purse out of a sow's ear.
Been using Apples since 1978 and Macs since 1984
Long on AAPL so biased. Strong advocate for separation of technology and politics on AI.
Reply
Been using Apples since 1978 and Macs since 1984
Long on AAPL so biased. Strong advocate for separation of technology and politics on AI.
Reply
post #7 of 57
Quote:
Originally Posted by bdkennedy1 View Post

Would much rather have him at Tesla than Microsoft.

Me too. I also imagine Tesla to be a far more interesting proposition than MS. Apple and Tesla are both forward looking innovative companies wanting to stir things up whereas MS just wanted to copy.
post #8 of 57
Quote:
Originally Posted by paxman View Post

Me too. I also imagine Tesla to be a far more interesting proposition than MS. Apple and Tesla are both forward looking innovative companies wanting to stir things up whereas MS just wanted to copy.

And it seems that even with the purported original mastermind of Apple's success that MS fell flat.

Maybe he was unable to think differently enough to be successful at MS.
post #9 of 57
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr Millmoss View Post

So Tesla is going to open company-owned retail stores instead of franchised dealerships? If so, it breaks with the auto industry model for selling cars going back about a thousand years. That might be the real news here. They are going to need a genuine retailing genius to make it work.

Agreed, that is the real news here. I don't know squat about the benefits or pitfalls of franchise ownership vs. company owned dealers...my guess is that by allowing franchising, the company puts all it's financial concerns (start-up costs and anual up-keep costs) of dealer ownership in the hands of some salesman/owner that thinks he/she knows how to sell cars. Then the dealer calls the shots as far as how much to sell them for and competition. Like Best Buy Apple "Geniuses" vs. Apple Store "Geniuses". Or better yet, like the beer guys at ball-games. They put money up-front for the merch. (at a discount/ or cost) and then adjusts the prices to meet their business models.

Whatever the case may be, if Tesla wants to run the dealerships themselves, more power to them. Perhaps then there will be more control over how the cars sell. Let's face it, unless Tesla starts making low-cost electric cars to compete with the Toyota Prius, Honda Insight or the likes, Teslas are NICHE market cars and probably wouldn't benefit from franchising. People who buy a Tesla will probably pay sticker price for it without a blink.

Being a mild apple fan, and had the scratch, i'd buy a Tesla. But not at $50g. Plus i'd have to drag an extension cord from my crappy appartment building out to the street to charge it
post #10 of 57
Quote:
Originally Posted by lilgto64 View Post

Maybe he was unable to think differently enough to be successful at MS.

If anything I would say the converse is more likely true: he thought too differently for Microsoft's liking.
post #11 of 57
Quote:
Originally Posted by lilgto64 View Post

And it seems that even with the purported original mastermind of Apple's success that MS fell flat.

Maybe he was unable to think differently enough to be successful at MS.

that's probably because MS has nothing in their arsenal to sell in a retail environment. They are a software company, save for the XBox, Zune and the up-comming wP7. When i first heard MS was trying to do an Apple Retail Copycat, i just

I also think it might fall flat because MS has no clear direction other than OS' dev's and MS Office. It's kind of hard to window shop or kick the tires on MS Office unless they hold street-side demo's like the old tonic salesmen from the 1800's.

Sure you can kick the tires on the XBox, but then it turns into a mobscene of overweight little kids and fanboys/girls trying to play MOH like it's a free archade. (ie Best Buy)

If MS is going to compete in any real way now, they need to keep their focus. Not pet projects (table PC, phones, etc...)
post #12 of 57
Must have been all those "spontaneous" dancing outbursts at the stores that made him think twice.
Pity the agnostic dyslectic. They spend all their time contemplating the existence of dog.
Reply
Pity the agnostic dyslectic. They spend all their time contemplating the existence of dog.
Reply
post #13 of 57
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr Millmoss View Post

So Tesla is going to open company-owned retail stores instead of franchised dealerships? If so, it breaks with the auto industry model for selling cars going back about a thousand years. That might be the real news here. They are going to need a genuine retailing genius to make it work.

I agree. Daewoo tried this in the UK in 1995 and at the time was the only manufacturer not to use traditional dealerships.

I could be wrong but the US car sales model works similar to over here in the UK and is highly dependent on vehicle part exchange. I can remember working for a Citroen dealership at the time and you couldn't compete with some of the deals Daewoo were offering. Their part exchange values were through the roof. They literally bought customers business.

Because they had no dealerships and operating out of supermarkets they didn't have proper aftersales facilities and sent people to kwik-fit centers. They also never had the real estate to sell on the part exchange vehicles so were forced to go to auction. They suffered massive losses because their underwriting was so out of tune with the market.

2-3 years later when customers went back to Daewoo to trade up to a new car, they were either kicked in the teeth with an ultra low part exchange value or told they are not taking these part exchanges back in. Meanwhile the rest of the franchised networks simply boycotted used Daewoo's, partly down to the negative press Daewoo sent out against traditional dealerships, you all know the car salesman jokes, and because if you took one in you couldn't get rid of it.

Needless to say it was forced to sell to GM 7 years later and rebranded as Chevrolet with a franchised network.

Car retailers work on extremely slim margins and rely on aftersales and customer loyalty to return a more reasonable ROI.

Since then we've had internet setups like Virgin and JamJar. All gone now.

This guys got his work cut out.
A reputation is not built upon the restful domain of one's comfort zone; it is made out of stalwart exposition of your core beliefs, for all challenges to disprove them as irrelevant hubris.- Berp...
Reply
A reputation is not built upon the restful domain of one's comfort zone; it is made out of stalwart exposition of your core beliefs, for all challenges to disprove them as irrelevant hubris.- Berp...
Reply
post #14 of 57
Quote:
Originally Posted by antkm1 View Post

Agreed, that is the real news here. I don't know squat about the benefits or pitfalls of franchise ownership vs. company owned dealers...my guess is that by allowing franchising, the company puts all it's financial concerns (start-up costs and anual up-keep costs) of dealer ownership in the hands of some salesman/owner that thinks he/she knows how to sell cars. Then the dealer calls the shots as far as how much to sell them for and competition. Like Best Buy Apple "Geniuses" vs. Apple Store "Geniuses". Or better yet, like the beer guys at ball-games. They put money up-front for the merch. (at a discount/ or cost) and then adjusts the prices to meet their business models.

Whether it's done for cars or fast food, franchising is a way of spreading out the risk of retail expansion. Franchisees build and own their own buildings, hire their own employees, etc. All they really get from the company is the right to sell their products and marketing assistance. But as we saw with GM, the scheme doesn't work unless the underlying business is at least stable if not growing. One of the main reasons GM went through bankruptcy was to shed unneeded dealerships to which they were contractually obligated.

Maybe Tesla can break the mold, but it's not going to be easy or cheap. They raised a bunch of money through their IPO a couple of weeks ago, so perhaps this is how they plan to spend it.

At $50k they might be getting close to a sweet spot for an all-electric car. It will naturally be compared to the Nissan Leaf and the Chevy Volt, but I think Tesla is aiming higher in terms of performance and amenities. This is the real competition, and they are ALL niche cars. In fact most cars are niche market products. Nothing wrong with that. I'm rooting for Tesla. I hope they can make it work.
Please don't be insane.
Reply
Please don't be insane.
Reply
post #15 of 57
A big part of Apple store (iPad, iPod, iPhone...) is really Steve Jobs' vision.

You won't have the same Apple (or Google lol) without Steve.
post #16 of 57
I guess, in the future, kids that play with toy cars will go "Whooosh, whooosh" instead of "Vrooom, vrooom".
Pity the agnostic dyslectic. They spend all their time contemplating the existence of dog.
Reply
Pity the agnostic dyslectic. They spend all their time contemplating the existence of dog.
Reply
post #17 of 57
Quote:
Originally Posted by AppleInsider View Post

Instead of choosing store locations purely to avoid high lease prices or insisting on locating them in technology-centric shopping areas, Blankenship from 2001 onwards insisted on placing Apple stores in high-traffic areas and frequently in locations that were considered upscale shopping districts.

Putting stores where there are lots of people with money is rocket science? Wow. Says a lot about the marketing biz if anything less passes for competence.

Quote:
For its part, Microsoft was similarly determined to shadow Apple's example, so much so that it courted Blankenship away from the iPhone maker one year ago to serve as a consultant for its own retail strategy....

...Microsoft has also worked to mimic the look and experience of Apple's outlets, creating viral marketing buzz and high profile launch events patterned after those originally initiated by the iPhone maker's own retail team.

For example, it drew initial crowds at its first retail store launch by giving away hundreds of dollars worth of software, free concert tickets, free merchandise with new PC purchases, and by making significant charitable donations. It's retail employees were also trained to start spontaneously line dancing in the middle of stores to material from music artist Black Eyed Peas.

Was that dance the Whiskey Tango Foxtrot?

Which was more embarrassing for MS, that or the Win 7 "host your own launch party" video?:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1cX4t5-YpHQ

That mimics Apple about as well as the clown-colored Windows mimics OS X. Emulating Aqua by calling it "Glass" was pretty obvious, but unfortunately that's about as far as they were able to take it.

MS fits the definition of Cargo Cult perfectly:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cargo_cult_programming

They kinda see how a good thing works when it washes up on shore, but just don't understand the underlying principles well enough to do anything useful with it.

If the line dancing was one of Blankenship's contributions, perhaps his departure from both Apple and Microsoft was not entirely of his own choice.
post #18 of 57
Quote:
Originally Posted by digitalclips View Post

I guess he's leaving Microsoft because he discovered the hard way that you can't make a silk purse out of a sow's ear.

Oh, the guy is no dim bulb. He knew that from day one, he just couldn't resist the pay package. Then left before he stayed long enough to get the blame pinned on him.
post #19 of 57
Quote:
Originally Posted by justflybob View Post

I guess, in the future, kids that play with toy cars will go "Whooosh, whooosh" instead of "Vrooom, vrooom".

Unless you're a clueless gurl* messing with your electrical system, in which case it's "*FTTT!!* WAAAK! SPARKY!!"


*playing on stereotypes, although in this case it's warranted in the (humorously) self-deprecating story thus linked.
post #20 of 57
Quote:
Originally Posted by AppleInsider View Post

In addition to closely following Apple's retail placements, as it also did with its first Mission Viejo store, Microsoft has also worked to mimic the look and experience of Apple's outlets, creating viral marketing buzz and high profile launch events patterned after those originally initiated by the iPhone maker's own retail team.

MS didn't follow too closely! Where are the mass crowds lined up for blocks and camping out for days in order to obtain the latest must have product release, the Kin One and Kin Two? What about those huge profits from selling all of those Zunes, Windows Vista, etc?

You can put lipstick on a pig, it's still a pig!

Ten years ago, we had Steve Jobs, Bob Hope and Johnny Cash.  Today we have no Jobs, no Hope and no Cash.

Reply

Ten years ago, we had Steve Jobs, Bob Hope and Johnny Cash.  Today we have no Jobs, no Hope and no Cash.

Reply
post #21 of 57
Quote:
Originally Posted by ihxo View Post

A big part of Apple store (iPad, iPod, iPhone...) is really Steve Jobs' vision.

You won't have the same Apple (or Google lol) without Steve.

The key is "genuine product differentiation", without it, no one can create a retail strategy that will sustain the cost. If Tesla's car does not catch consumer's heart, it does not matter whether they have a retail outlet or not.
post #22 of 57
Quote:
Originally Posted by antkm1 View Post

that's probably because MS has nothing in their arsenal to sell in a retail environment. They are a software company, save for the XBox, Zune and the up-comming wP7. When i first heard MS was trying to do an Apple Retail Copycat, i just

I also think it might fall flat because MS has no clear direction other than OS' dev's and MS Office. It's kind of hard to window shop or kick the tires on MS Office unless they hold street-side demo's like the old tonic salesmen from the 1800's.

Sure you can kick the tires on the XBox, but then it turns into a mobscene of overweight little kids and fanboys/girls trying to play MOH like it's a free archade. (ie Best Buy)

If MS is going to compete in any real way now, they need to keep their focus. Not pet projects (table PC, phones, etc...)

I'm on the same wavelength as you. When Microsoft announced the store, my first question was what will they sell that is compelling and unique enough to lure customers to the store? Apple's non-iPod offerings were treated like redheaded stepchildren in every major retailer that they tried to sell through so they really needed to develop their own retail channel. Microsoft's products are already front and center in the computer and gaming sections of Best Buy, Walmart, etc. Plus, every mall has a Gamestop or whatever that chain's name is now.

And then, to make things worse they wanted the stores to be as upmarket as the Apple Store. It's like selling Kias in a showroom built to Mercedes Benz dealership specs.

Just one more failed enterprise in the endless procession of failed Microsoft emterprises of which the latest, but certainly not the last, is Kin.
post #23 of 57
Quote:
Originally Posted by antkm1 View Post


Being a mild apple fan, and had the scratch, i'd buy a Tesla. But not at $50g. Plus i'd have to drag an extension cord from my crappy appartment building out to the street to charge it

Until the charging infrastructure develops, I would stick with a plug-in hybrid.

The Chevy Volt actually looks potentially promising.
post #24 of 57
Quote:
Originally Posted by paxman View Post

Me too. I also imagine Tesla to be a far more interesting proposition than MS. Apple and Tesla are both forward looking innovative companies wanting to stir things up whereas MS just wanted to copy.

I kind of wonder if this is actually a demonstration of the article yesterday explaining that projects Steve gets involved in are done as if Apple are a startup again. I bet this chap found M$ the bureaucratic nightmare that most big companies are when trying to get something new going. I'm sure if Steve was backing the Apple store idea, getting the money to setup the high cost stores Apple have done was relatively easy, but in M$ it was probably too hard (hence only 3 stores have opened).

I wish him well at Tesla, and obviously they are far more likely to have a startup mentality. I'd like to see them do well as a company, since electric cars would be a benefit to all, whether you believe in climate change or not, energy independence would be a real boon.

Unfortunately I can't see it working yet. For electric only cars to really work we need a serious (and probably government backed) commitment to implementing a charging infrastructure. A start would be to require all new houses to have three phases brought in, so you could have a 415v charging point in the garage. Trying to charge an electric car off 110v, or even 220v if you have a couple of phases, is going to take too long.
post #25 of 57
Quote:
Originally Posted by anantksundaram View Post

Until the charging infrastructure develops, I would stick with a plug-in hybrid.

The Chevy Volt actually looks potentially promising.

The newer all-battery cars are promising ranges of 200 miles or better. That's plenty, even for most commuting. An expanded charging infrastructure isn't going to help very much for longer trips, since it takes hours to recharge the batteries.
Please don't be insane.
Reply
Please don't be insane.
Reply
post #26 of 57
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr Millmoss View Post

The newer all-battery cars are promising ranges of 200 miles or better. That's plenty, even for most commuting. An expanded charging infrastructure isn't going to help very much for longer trips, since it takes hours to recharge the batteries.

True, but I do think there needs to be some sort of "away from home" charging infrastructure. When I take weekend breaks, it's rare that I go more than 200 miles from home, but it's also rare that I go less than 100 miles from home, hence for the round trip, I would need there to be some place to charge when I get to where I'm going.

I wonder if the electric vehicle market will get big enough to justify someone like the Hilton chain to put charging points in as a selling point?
post #27 of 57
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dlux View Post

Unless you're a clueless gurl* messing with your electrical system, in which case it's "*FTTT!!* WAAAK! SPARKY!!"


*playing on stereotypes, although in this case it's warranted in the (humorously) self-deprecating story thus linked.

That gal's site is hilarious. Thanks for the laugh.
Pity the agnostic dyslectic. They spend all their time contemplating the existence of dog.
Reply
Pity the agnostic dyslectic. They spend all their time contemplating the existence of dog.
Reply
post #28 of 57
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulMJohnson View Post

True, but I do think there needs to be some sort of "away from home" charging infrastructure. When I take weekend breaks, it's rare that I go more than 200 miles from home, but it's also rare that I go less than 100 miles from home, hence for the round trip, I would need there to be some place to charge when I get to where I'm going.

I wonder if the electric vehicle market will get big enough to justify someone like the Hilton chain to put charging points in as a selling point?

Maybe, some day. Costco put in charging stations pretty quickly when the first electric cars (EV1) were on the road, though I'm not sure why, because there weren't many of them. I don't think any of the newer electric cars require any special charging apparatus so it should be relatively easy for retailers, hotels, etc. to make provisions.
Please don't be insane.
Reply
Please don't be insane.
Reply
post #29 of 57
Interesting. George is a super guy, and I enjoyed working with him during the early days of Apple Retail, but he's really more of a mall-based retail specialist. Seems like a new challenge for a very talented guy. Good luck, George.
post #30 of 57
Quote:
Originally Posted by anantksundaram View Post

Until the charging infrastructure develops, I would stick with a plug-in hybrid.

The Chevy Volt actually looks potentially promising.

Since I have a family (wife, kid, parents), our needs are a bit all over the place. We would kill for either a hybrid minivan (toyota! where is my Sienna hybrid?!) or a full-electric replacement for one of our existing Priuses (perhaps Leaf?).

If the Tesla S Sedan has adequate range, there should be no real reason to shun it... how often, honestly, have you done a road trip ... and if you have, don't you, your family, your friends you're tripping with, have another car that accepts gas?

It's a bit analogous to having a (powerpc) mac a few years ago... I still needed a PC for games and work (provided in my case) or running the one or two critical legacy apps, but the Mac was oh-so-much nicer to both play with and create DVDs, host photos and edit music.

Lot of folks could use a Mac-like 2nd car, and the Leaf and Tesla S look like they're selling to that market.
post #31 of 57
Quote:
Originally Posted by antkm1 View Post

that's probably because MS has nothing in their arsenal to sell in a retail environment. They are a software company, save for the XBox, Zune and the up-comming wP7. When i first heard MS was trying to do an Apple Retail Copycat, i just

Is it really copying when Microsoft hires the same person who originally worked on the Apple store? Can you accuse someone of copying his own work?

And instead of praising Blankenship, why aren't AI readers flaming this guy for taking a job at Microsoft? Didn't he betray Apple users everywhere by going to work for Microsoft?
post #32 of 57
I bet Blankenship has a great collection of bright colored t-shirts.
post #33 of 57
This is great. Tesla is a great company. Their the kind of company that would put a fire under the heals of the rest of the dreadful and arcane auto manufacturers out there. I mean hybrids, really? lame. Wish Tesla and Blankenship the best of luck. I'd stand behind anything a company like that did.

PS just to be picky, am I the only one that hates it when people use the word "upstart" to describe a startup. I thought upstart referred to kind of a parvenu. I guess it sort of applies to Tesla Motors.
turtles all the way up and turtles all the way down... infinite context means infinite possibility
Reply
turtles all the way up and turtles all the way down... infinite context means infinite possibility
Reply
post #34 of 57
Quote:
Originally Posted by spliff monkey View Post

This is great. Tesla is a great company. Their the kind of company that would put a fire under the heals of the rest of the dreadful and arcane auto manufacturers out there. I mean hybrids, really? lame. Wish Tesla and Blankenship the best of luck. I'd stand behind anything a company like that did.

PS just to be picky, am I the only one that hates it when people use the word "upstart" to describe a startup. I thought upstart referred to kind of a parvenu. I guess it sort of applies to Tesla Motors.

Since you are being picky.... You probably meant "They're the kind of company..." instead of "Their the kind of company..." And maybe a fire under the "heels" instead of "heals." Only since you are being picky.
post #35 of 57
Everyone please note that the Tesla can be charged from any electrical outlet.

See http://www.teslamotors.com/goelectric at the bottom of the page.
post #36 of 57
Quote:
Originally Posted by spliff monkey View Post

PS just to be picky, am I the only one that hates it when people use the word "upstart" to describe a startup. I thought upstart referred to kind of a parvenu. I guess it sort of applies to Tesla Motors.

Upstart works, though it probably got used because it sounds like startup, which puts it on the verge of trite. Not that I'd necessarily call Tesla a startup at this point. At least the way I've seen it used, parvenu usually refers to someone with more money than taste.
Please don't be insane.
Reply
Please don't be insane.
Reply
post #37 of 57
Quote:
Originally Posted by quinney View Post

Everyone please note that the Tesla can be charged from any electrical outlet.

See http://www.teslamotors.com/goelectric at the bottom of the page.

Please note that I already said as much.
Please don't be insane.
Reply
Please don't be insane.
Reply
post #38 of 57
I think it's a very interesting development if Tesla Motors is looking at Apple as it's role model for building itself on.

There really isn't an apple equivalent within the automotive industry, and there isn't an industry which needed one more. Tesla could be it.
post #39 of 57
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr Millmoss View Post

Please note that I already said as much.

Do you mean this?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr Millmoss View Post

Maybe, some day. Costco put in charging stations pretty quickly when the first electric cars (EV1) were on the road, though I'm not sure why, because there weren't many of them. I don't think any of the newer electric cars require any special charging apparatus so it should be relatively easy for retailers, hotels, etc. to make provisions.

You made it sound like there will need to be charging stations and provisions made.
The link I posted, which was not the vague speculation of your post, shows that is not the case.
post #40 of 57
Quote:
Originally Posted by antkm1 View Post

Agreed, that is the real news here. I don't know squat about the benefits or pitfalls of franchise ownership vs. company owned dealers...my guess is that by allowing franchising, the company puts all it's financial concerns (start-up costs and anual up-keep costs) of dealer ownership in the hands of some salesman/owner that thinks he/she knows how to sell cars. Then the dealer calls the shots as far as how much to sell them for and competition. Like Best Buy Apple "Geniuses" vs. Apple Store "Geniuses". Or better yet, like the beer guys at ball-games. They put money up-front for the merch. (at a discount/ or cost) and then adjusts the prices to meet their business models.

Whatever the case may be, if Tesla wants to run the dealerships themselves, more power to them. Perhaps then there will be more control over how the cars sell. Let's face it, unless Tesla starts making low-cost electric cars to compete with the Toyota Prius, Honda Insight or the likes, Teslas are NICHE market cars and probably wouldn't benefit from franchising. People who buy a Tesla will probably pay sticker price for it without a blink.

Being a mild apple fan, and had the scratch, i'd buy a Tesla. But not at $50g. Plus i'd have to drag an extension cord from my crappy appartment building out to the street to charge it


Some more news in this article at business wire: http://www.businesswire.com/portal/s...32&newsLang=en

Quote:
Tesla is revolutionizing the auto purchasing experience. Unlike traditional car dealerships, Tesla stores are designed to be stylish and inviting. Blankenship will build a long-term retail development plan to give customers the opportunity to purchase cars and learn about Tesla technology. Blankenship’s initial projects will include opening Tesla stores in Tokyo, Japan, Toronto, Canada, and Washington, DC.


Sounds like they are taking a more retail approach than a dealership one. Actually, considering they only have two models to sell, they really don't need giant "lots" like the traditional dealership.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: General Discussion
AppleInsider › Forums › General › General Discussion › Former Apple Retail mastermind jumps ship from Microsoft to Tesla