or Connect
AppleInsider › Forums › Mac Hardware › Future Apple Hardware › CDMA iPhone, AMD-powered Apple TV with iOS, 7-inch iPad rumored
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

CDMA iPhone, AMD-powered Apple TV with iOS, 7-inch iPad rumored - Page 3

post #81 of 208
Quote:
Originally Posted by antkm1 View Post

they could develop and interface with the new Magic Trackpad. They do have a remote that already works with the current aTV. Plus they have apps for the iPhone and Touch that interface with aTV.

But the app was developed by one person, who is now working "on other things"
post #82 of 208
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hattig View Post

"on my lap"

Many people hold the iPad up, either with both hands for reading, like a book, or with one hand whilst using the other for touch control.

In that case, 1.5lbs over an extended duration can be tiring.

It's not about going to the gym, that's a ridiculous statement to make.

Thank You!
post #83 of 208
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hattig View Post

It's not about going to the gym, that's a ridiculous statement to make.


It was a joke. You highlight your stupidity and blinkered vision. Well done.
post #84 of 208
Quote:
Originally Posted by kotatsu View Post

With gaming so profitable and successful on the iPhone and iPad, I wonder if this new AMD chip will be for gaming? Are we talking Wii level performance or higher? I can't imagine it would be anywhere near 360 or PS3 level, but then again, those systems are 5 years old now. Anyone have any stats on the AMD chip?

As for iOS on the big screen, it makes a lot of sense, but only with properly retooled apps. When paired with a motion sensing Wiimote style controller a lot of games would work pretty well, leaving the touch screen ones off limits unless more significantly reworked. Combine it with a cable killing subscription plan (admittedly, this would be something of an epic achievement if anyone pulled it off), and you'd have a pretty compelling box.

Quote:
Originally Posted by nvidia2008 View Post

The AMD Fusion could do near-PS3 level graphics at 1080p. If CPU and GPU is utilised thoroughly and intelligently. A Radeon 5500 series GPU, for example, can do 1080p PC games at low detail settings. On a Fusion chip, I really can imagine near-PS3 or PS3-level graphics...

AppleTV can become cloud-streaming and gaming and apps. Apple just has to pull the trigger. I think though it may not happen in first-half of 2011. Not until Fusion is a bit more proven, perhaps. By mid-2011, ARM+PowerVR(??) may have very compelling packages that can do 1080p games at PS3-level graphics.

Concerning the supposed AppleTV, if Apple is indeed pursuing touch-based gaming on the big screen (I don't see it being any other way), who wants to place bets. I'm thinking game apps (made for and downloaded on AppleTVs) will connect to future Touches/iPhones via bluetooth, with said devices becoming fully touch-based "controllers" while the game itself is on the TV. Would be pretty far out, huh?
post #85 of 208
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dick Applebaum View Post

The AppleTV UI lends itself to a remote multitouch device: MagicPad, Magic Mouse variant, iPhone, iPod Touch, iPad. AppleTV could double as a game console supporting multiple remote touch devices (above) as multiplayer controls (or a single control, that is passed from player to player.

I'm still saying Wiimote clone. Touch sucks when there is a disconnect between the device and the screen.




Quote:
Originally Posted by iReality85 View Post

Concerning the supposed AppleTV, if Apple is indeed pursuing touch-based gaming on the big screen (I don't see it being any other way), who wants to place bets. I'm thinking game apps (made for and downloaded on AppleTVs) will connect to future Touches/iPhones via bluetooth, with said devices becoming fully touch-based "controllers" while the game itself is on the TV. Would be pretty far out, huh?

Bet taken
I think they will have something that looks a lot more like a Wiimote than a Magic Trackpad. Maybe they will blend them together somehow, but I think it will be distinctively more Wiimote than Trackpad.

I've had a PC of sorts connected to my TV for over a decade now and I've used every controller imaginable... and nothing even comes close to the Wiimote as an all-in-one controller
post #86 of 208
Quote:
Originally Posted by anonymouse View Post

And, a 7-inch iPad or iPod Touch would essentially combine all the disadvantages of both models with none of their respective advantages.

Well this is purely speculative, but I bet you can't list many of these "disadvantages" out.

Personally, I see the reverse.

- All the disadvantages of the iPhone (and it's not like there are a lot), basically come down to things being too small or not having software that allows me to do anything besides consume media. The web pages are sometimes too small to read, there is a lack of good writing software, etc.

- All the disadvantages of the iPad to me are disadvantages because of it's large size, it's weight, the huge bezel and the impossibility of using it productively in a mobile environment. It's too large to type on effectively without putting it down on a table like a laptop, it's too heavy to hold in one hand for long periods of time, etc.

Although I don't believe these rumours at all, and think it won't happen for at least a year or more, a 7" "iPad Pro" is a total sweet spot for a real mobile computer IMO. Small enough to put in a large pocket but large enough to read on easily. Small enough to allow for typing while walking, but large enough so that you can actually use good software to do it.

It's such a no-brainer to me that I'm seriously looking at buying Android devices whenever they come out in this form factor. So far the Android slates are all such crap that it isn't worth it, but this is a form factor that Apple might have to compete in earlier than they planned as many other manufacturers are coming out with models in this size.
post #87 of 208
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe hs View Post

How exactly would iOS work on apple TV? It's a completely different category of device to iPhone, iPod Touch & iPad.

Quit thinking of the Apple TV as some be-all, end-all media center that will play everything and do everything and it makes perfect sense. People have been trying to make the current Apple TV into that sort of device without much success.Think of the Apple TV as an iPad without a screen and with an HDMI port. Think of what the iPad does as a content consumption device and put it on your HDTV. Or think of it integrated inside an Apple branded HD display.

In my opinion it makes sense.
post #88 of 208
Quote:
Originally Posted by Firefly7475 View Post

I'm still saying Wiimote clone. Touch sucks when there is a disconnect between the device and the screen.

The Wiimote clone sounds like a good idea, but couldn't an iPhone 4/iPod Touch 4G (?) with a gyroscope be suitable for using as a wiimote clone as they would combine the Wiimote style motions to control the TV as well as the touch-based input.
post #89 of 208
Best reason that I can think of for a smaller iPad is expanded markets.
How about one for retailers where they take your order?
After watching the sales people at the Apple store take and process orders on the Touch and phones, I think a larger version would be great for them. IMHO
post #90 of 208
Quote:
Originally Posted by nvidia2008 View Post

Any iDevice bigger than the current iPhone/iPod touch has to be using "iPad OS" or better.

iPad os is just a fork of iOS 3 (3.2, to be exact). This allowed the iOS developers to work concurrently on two varieties of iOS fot the iPad and iPhone 4. The iPad iOS will be factored into iOS 4.x in the fall.

It's currently a PITA for developers, but there is really only 1 iOS.

.
"...The calm is on the water and part of us would linger by the shore, For ships are safe in harbor, but that's not what ships are for."
- Michael Lille -
Reply
"...The calm is on the water and part of us would linger by the shore, For ships are safe in harbor, but that's not what ships are for."
- Michael Lille -
Reply
post #91 of 208
Cortex A9, Fusion...

Why are the Chinese so ignorant of the A4? The new workhorse is doing exactly what it's been expected to. Amazing power efficiency is in place. Why to ditch? Just because the guy who led the development could not get along with Apple's corporate culture? Or have they not heard of yet?

We mean Apple no harm.

People are lovers, basically. -- Engadget livebloggers at the iPad mini event.

Reply

We mean Apple no harm.

People are lovers, basically. -- Engadget livebloggers at the iPad mini event.

Reply
post #92 of 208
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe hs View Post

The Wiimote clone sounds like a good idea, but couldn't an iPhone 4/iPod Touch 4G (?) with a gyroscope be suitable for using as a wiimote clone as they would combine the Wiimote style motions to control the TV as well as the touch-based input.

An iPod Touch with an IR receiver (or a big glowing "PS-Move" ball) would do the trick... or they could have a Wiimote with a touch surface on top instead of buttons.
post #93 of 208
I welcome any increase in effective screen resolution on the iPad, but I don't know if I'd buy a 7" model just to get a sharper screen. The smaller form factor would be better for reading books in bed, but that's a smaller part of what I use the iPad for. What I'm really hoping for is the current iPad dimensions with a large increase in resolution. Going from my iPhone 4 to the iPad's grainy screen is almost painful. Of course, it would become a lot more difficult to power 3D games at that resolution (component cost, heat, battery life).

AppleTV is a brilliant product, but is in bad need of an update. I think iOS would be fine, but don't believe the streaming-only design approach is likely because it would limit the user base to only those homes with decent broadband (America lags the world there). Granted, all content on ATV is purchased and downloaded, but downloading once and storing locally is very different than streaming-only. If anything, I would imagine Apple would enable the USB port for external storage; I just can't imagine my kids streaming the same Monsters and Aliens from Apple's servers again and again and again. And hopefully they would build in support for a home media server so I wouldn't have to leave my energy-sucking computer running 24 x 7 to host the iTunes library.
post #94 of 208
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dick Applebaum View Post

iPad os is just a fork of iOS 3 (3.2, to be exact). This allowed the iOS developers to work concurrently on two varieties of iOS fot the iPad and iPhone 4. The iPad iOS will be factored into iOS 4.x in the fall.

It's currently a PITA for developers, but there is really only 1 iOS.

.

While they no doubt share a lot of code, I would not be surprised to find that these remain separate development branches because of distinct device differences.
post #95 of 208
Quote:
Originally Posted by island hermit View Post

The Kindle is doing well?

Yes the Kindle is doing well, especially and almost exclusively among women*. I almost never see Ipads on the train which I find both curious and telling. It appears that as an e-reader and when compared to the Kindle, the Ipad is just too heavy or bulky to hold, more so with a case, which is almost always present.

* Kindle adverts are also strongly marketed towards women, at least those on rotation in my area.

That being said, a 7" Ipad could pose a real threat to the Kindle and it's cousins and would likely be marketed as such.
post #96 of 208
Quote:
Originally Posted by nvidia2008 View Post

Funny, just a few hours ago today, I was thinking of posting a poll about who thought Apple was "secretly" compiling iOS for x86. But as someone mentioned, iOS and OS X share so much in common, I'm sure there's R&D going both ways:

iOS on ARM
iOS on x86
OSX on ARM
OSX on x86

Well, I believe that iOS "is" OSX on ARM (minus Cocoa plus CocoaTouch).

I understand going with AMD since: Apple has had a few clashes with intel, and the AppleTV can afford a non-low consumption chip (it is plugged to the wall). I can see Xcode building "universal binaries" for ARM and x86... And not every app is supposed to support all hardware, just as there are currently many iPad-only apps, etc. Bundling ALL the different sizes of the graphics resources AND both versions of the code could make the binaries quite heavy, though. I guess mostly games could be universal; utility apps are kind of more device-specific...
I've accomplished my childhood's dream: My job consists mainly of playing with toys all day long.
Reply
I've accomplished my childhood's dream: My job consists mainly of playing with toys all day long.
Reply
post #97 of 208
.

... As others have posted, here, the iPad has given us a lap display-- and even a lap keyboard!

I've along been a proponent of a lap mouse...

... or even a lap JoyStick!

Think of the possibilities!

Wheee! Or is that "Wii-ii-ii"?

.
"...The calm is on the water and part of us would linger by the shore, For ships are safe in harbor, but that's not what ships are for."
- Michael Lille -
Reply
"...The calm is on the water and part of us would linger by the shore, For ships are safe in harbor, but that's not what ships are for."
- Michael Lille -
Reply
post #98 of 208
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boogerman2000 View Post

Yes the Kindle is doing well, especially and almost exclusively among women*. I almost never see Ipads on the train which I find both curious and telling. It appears that as an e-reader and when compared to the Kindle, the Ipad is just too heavy or bulky to hold, more so with a case, which is almost always present.

* Kindle adverts are also strongly marketed towards women, at least those on rotation in my area.

That being said, a 7" Ipad could pose a real threat to the Kindle and it's cousins and would likely be marketed as such.

Nevertheless, the new black Kindle looks more sleek and 'manly'. I guess reading books is still 'a little gay' in the U.S.

(Braces for flames in 3... 2... 1...)
I've accomplished my childhood's dream: My job consists mainly of playing with toys all day long.
Reply
I've accomplished my childhood's dream: My job consists mainly of playing with toys all day long.
Reply
post #99 of 208






post #100 of 208
Quote:
Originally Posted by Prof. Peabody View Post

Although I don't believe these rumours at all, and think it won't happen for at least a year or more, a 7" "iPad Pro" is a total sweet spot for a real mobile computer IMO. Small enough to put in a large pocket but large enough to read on easily. Small enough to allow for typing while walking, but large enough so that you can actually use good software to do it.

Amen, I say. The most often cited advantages of dedicated ebook readers over the iPad are weight, size, and cost. These few factors are keeping Kindle, Nook, et al in the game. All three factors are addressed by a 7" iPad. I see this move as a natural one for Apple in order to consolidate its dominance in the tablet market. While HP and Android play catch up with the original iPad, Apple changes the game a bit. Typical of Apple's recent strategy.
A.k.a. AppleHead on other forums.
Reply
A.k.a. AppleHead on other forums.
Reply
post #101 of 208
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boogerman2000 View Post

Yes the Kindle is doing well, especially and almost exclusively among women*. I almost never see Ipads on the train which I find both curious and telling. It appears that as an e-reader and when compared to the Kindle, the Ipad is just too heavy or bulky to hold, more so with a case, which is almost always present.

* Kindle adverts are also strongly marketed towards women, at least those on rotation in my area.

That being said, a 7" Ipad could pose a real threat to the Kindle and it's cousins and would likely be marketed as such.

I'm happy for you that you have information that has heretofore not been available to the rest of the population. Amazon hides its Kindle sales figures from the public.

Estimates hold that the Kindle has sold around 4 million units in its lifetime... roughly the same number as the iPad has sold in the 6 months since it was brought to the market. It's also estimated that the iPad will sell at least 2 million more units this year (that's on the conservative side) and another 11-12 million units next year, almost triple the estimate (and I mean that literally) for 2011 Kindle sales.

Your anecdotal evidence aside... the iPad seems to be eating the Kindle's lunch.

Why the need for a 7" iPad when the current size seems to be doing so well.
na na na na na...
Reply
na na na na na...
Reply
post #102 of 208
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hattig View Post

"on my lap"

Many people hold the iPad up, either with both hands for reading, like a book, or with one hand whilst using the other for touch control.

In that case, 1.5lbs over an extended duration can be tiring.

It's not about going to the gym, that's a ridiculous statement to make.

ANd that's a ridiculous argument. Most of the books I read weigh more than the iPad. Are you saying that books are impractical?

Besides, very few people are going to be holding the iPad at arms length. More often than not, it's on a table or on your lap.

Quote:
Originally Posted by antkm1 View Post

yes, Apple has priced themselves into a hole for sure. Unless the iPod Touch gets a huge price reduction in September, I don't see a 6"-7" iPad in the near future.

Not at all:

iPod touch
32 GB $299
64 GB $399

iPad
32 GB $599
64 GB $699

That's a fairly large gap to add a 7" iPad. I'm not saying that they're going to do it, but arguing that there's not a big enough gap in between for a new product is silly.
"I'm way over my head when it comes to technical issues like this"
Gatorguy 5/31/13
Reply
"I'm way over my head when it comes to technical issues like this"
Gatorguy 5/31/13
Reply
post #103 of 208
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boogerman2000 View Post

Yes the Kindle is doing well, especially and almost exclusively among women*. I almost never see Ipads on the train which I find both curious and telling. It appears that as an e-reader and when compared to the Kindle, the Ipad is just too heavy or bulky to hold, more so with a case, which is almost always present.

* Kindle adverts are also strongly marketed towards women, at least those on rotation in my area.

That being said, a 7" Ipad could pose a real threat to the Kindle and it's cousins and would likely be marketed as such.

see my quote...

Quote:
Originally Posted by antkm1 View Post

the kindle is doing well because it's about 1/3 the cost of the iPad and it's marketed properly to the right people. It's truly meant to only read books, listen to audio and very light internet/email. It's not a very good comparison.

by "the right people" meaning people who only want those things (reading books, audio books & music and very light email and internet).
post #104 of 208
Quote:
Originally Posted by antkm1 View Post

i would tend to agree. The Touch was originally the alternative to the iPhone, for people who didn't want to buy into ATT. However, the Touch is so popular now that eliminating it entirely for say a 5" or 6" screen may be the answer. Iit probably would piss-off some people at first, but I think that's the best argument I've heard...and keep the same price-points as the current touch.

The key to me is to figure out how large you can go while still having a device that can be slipped into a pocket. If that means a 4.5" screen, rather than a 5", or if you can go 5.5" and still retain the ability to pocket the device, then it's mission accomplished.

The appeal of the Touch is that you can easily slip it into a pocket. But I can't imagine anyone objecting to more screen if that functionality remained intact. Nothing suffers from more screen and just about everything benefits. Even if there was still an element of compromise, i.e. the device wasn't quite large enough to be ideal for browsing, etc. (the iPad hits the sweet spot on that front), improvement without any significant loss of functionality is always welcome.

It might not seem like much to go from a 3.5" screen to maybe a 5" screen but I'll bet the user experience would be significantly enhanced.
post #105 of 208
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robin Huber View Post

Amen, I say. The most often cited advantages of dedicated ebook readers over the iPad are weight, size, and cost. These few factors are keeping Kindle, Nook, et al in the game. All three factors are addressed by a 7" iPad. I see this move as a natural one for Apple in order to consolidate its dominance in the tablet market. While HP and Android play catch up with the original iPad, Apple changes the game a bit. Typical of Apple's recent strategy.

I don't think Apple has intended the iPad to be primarily an electronic book reader. For sure it does that and fairly well. But if that's the intent then it's overpriced by a considerable sum. Remember, Apple rarely emulates another product. Instead, it takes ideas from other products and attempts something new with it's own set of uses.
post #106 of 208
Regarding the new Apple TV, I sure hope that current owners of the device can upgrade to the new OS. As it stands, we've been using a beta OS this entire time.

If this were to happen, I'm sure it'd be like the transition to iOS 4, in which earlier devices didn't support all features in the new OS. That's fine. I just hope they don't leave us completely out in the cold.
post #107 of 208
Quote:
Originally Posted by nkhm View Post

It was a joke. You highlight your stupidity and blinkered vision. Well done.

Whatever.

I don't like craning my neck by looking downwards at the iPad lying flat on a table - not for extended durations. Sure, I could lie on my back and have it resting against my legs, but that's not applicable all day! So I'll be wanting to hold it upright to read it comfortably, even if the base is resting on something solid. I also hold books at a comfortable angle when reading them, but they tend not to weigh 1.5 lbs.

And it also doesn't help people who are standing and reading, like anyone who stands on the bus or train on their daily commute because there aren't any seats available. This might not apply to your car-centric world, but that applies to vast numbers of people elsewhere (and you accuse me of blinkered vision!). That's the exact free time that people have to use a device like an iPad.

A 7" iPad would fill in that market space, and it whilst it might mean an iPod sale loss, it's not a loss to a Kindle or Nook or whatever competitor product is available.
post #108 of 208
Quote:
Originally Posted by Firefly7475 View Post

I'm still saying Wiimote clone. Touch sucks when there is a disconnect between the device and the screen.





Bet taken
I think they will have something that looks a lot more like a Wiimote than a Magic Trackpad. Maybe they will blend them together somehow, but I think it will be distinctively more Wiimote than Trackpad.

I've had a PC of sorts connected to my TV for over a decade now and I've used every controller imaginable... and nothing even comes close to the Wiimote as an all-in-one controller

The MagicMouse feels comfortable in either hand, is light-weight, is multi-touch, multi-button, and inexpensive!

Replace the laser with IR or WiFi and yu just might have something.

.
"...The calm is on the water and part of us would linger by the shore, For ships are safe in harbor, but that's not what ships are for."
- Michael Lille -
Reply
"...The calm is on the water and part of us would linger by the shore, For ships are safe in harbor, but that's not what ships are for."
- Michael Lille -
Reply
post #109 of 208
Quote:
Originally Posted by iLikeBananas View Post

Why do you think the kindle is doing so well . a 6 inch would be better.

If you sell something for less than cost, you shouldn't be surprised that it 'does well.'

The only question is whether you will 'do well.'
post #110 of 208
Quote:
Originally Posted by island hermit View Post

I'm happy for you that you have information that has heretofore not been available to the rest of the population. Amazon hides its Kindle sales figures from the public.

Estimates hold that the Kindle has sold around 4 million units in its lifetime... roughly the same number as the iPad has sold in the 6 months since it was brought to the market. It's also estimated that the iPad will sell at least 2 million more units this year (that's on the conservative side) and another 11-12 million units next year, almost triple the estimate (and I mean that literally) for 2011 Kindle sales.

Your anecdotal evidence aside... the iPad seems to be eating the Kindle's lunch.

Why the need for a 7" iPad when the current size seems to be doing so well.


I'm glad you're happy for me, I'm happy for me too-- but of course you took my response as some sort of personal attack which is typical among fanbois. Sigh. Yes, I'm aware of the stats. I stated AS AN E-READER. As a niche E-READER, the Kindle is doing well. The proof, as I stated in my anecdote, is real world evidence despite the numbers. I see on a daily basis far more Kindles than Ipads being used as E-READERS. E-READERS. Hence, the possibility of a new, lighter, more sleek, easier to hold 7" iPAD. nO?


*cough* E-READER *cough*
post #111 of 208
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dick Applebaum View Post

The MagicMouse™ feels comfortable in either hand, is light-weight, is multi-touch, multi-button, and inexpensive!
Replace the laser with IR or WiFi and yu just might have something.

That would do the trick! It would also need compass\\accelerometer\\gyro though.






Wow... that looks familiar.
post #112 of 208
Quote:
Originally Posted by Prof. Peabody View Post

Well this is purely speculative, but I bet you can't list many of these "disadvantages" out.

Personally, I see the reverse.

- All the disadvantages of the iPhone (and it's not like there are a lot), basically come down to things being too small or not having software that allows me to do anything besides consume media. The web pages are sometimes too small to read, there is a lack of good writing software, etc.

- All the disadvantages of the iPad to me are disadvantages because of it's large size, it's weight, the huge bezel and the impossibility of using it productively in a mobile environment. It's too large to type on effectively without putting it down on a table like a laptop, it's too heavy to hold in one hand for long periods of time, etc.

Although I don't believe these rumours at all, and think it won't happen for at least a year or more, a 7" "iPad Pro" is a total sweet spot for a real mobile computer IMO. Small enough to put in a large pocket but large enough to read on easily. Small enough to allow for typing while walking, but large enough so that you can actually use good software to do it.

It's such a no-brainer to me that I'm seriously looking at buying Android devices whenever they come out in this form factor. So far the Android slates are all such crap that it isn't worth it, but this is a form factor that Apple might have to compete in earlier than they planned as many other manufacturers are coming out with models in this size.

I envision a 7" iPad as more of a business-targeted device as opposed to a consumer-targeted device.

A 5.5" diagonal iPod Touch would still fit in most shirt pockets, pants pockets and holsters. It too, could serve as a business device-- POST (Point Of Sale Terminal) ala the Apple store. Better able to enter signatures, display receipts, etc.

.
"...The calm is on the water and part of us would linger by the shore, For ships are safe in harbor, but that's not what ships are for."
- Michael Lille -
Reply
"...The calm is on the water and part of us would linger by the shore, For ships are safe in harbor, but that's not what ships are for."
- Michael Lille -
Reply
post #113 of 208
AMD Fusion

http://sites.amd.com/us/fusion/APU/Pages/fusion.aspx

AMD Fusion Blog:

http://blogs.amd.com/fusion/

Reference to a Dual Core Bobcat I'm guessing they think may go into the AppleTV:

http://blogs.amd.com/fusion/2010/07/...-right-client/

Excerpt:

Quote:
AMD Fusion.

Its not just an idea it is a reality. We recently announced that we expect our Ontario APU and Brazos notebook platform to begin shipping to customers beginning in early 2011. When achieved, this will result in the realization of the AMD Fusion vision, and we believe, drastically change the processing capabilities of small form factor PCs. For those who want to access cloud data on-the-go while simultaneously creating and sharing dynamic and vivid content this may be the solution for you. No longer will there have to be a choice between mobility and truly next-generation application experiences.

Recently Announced:

Quote:
AMD may be ramping up its production schedule, moving its 2011 chip to 2010 instead. AMD CEO Dirk Meyer said during a recent conference call that the company's Ontario ultra-mobile chips are due to arrive in the fall, "ahead of schedule."

Those looking to AMD for ultraportables may want to wait and see what comes out, as Ontario will be built on a 40nm process, using a dual-core Bobcat architecture. It'll have integrated graphics too, with support for DirectX 11 and a built in memory controller.

If you're looking to AMD just for graphics, you might also have something to look forward from ATI. Meyer said at the conference call, "We will start introducing the second-generation of our DX 11 products before the end of the year."'

ATI's second generation DX 11 products, code named Southern Islands, will be fabricated on the 40nm process as well and be branded as the Radeon HD 6000 series.

Personally, I don't see it. I see the ARM Cortex 9 based Apple A5, or whatever they call it, to replace the Intel inside with the AppleTV.
post #114 of 208
Quote:
Originally Posted by nkhm View Post

The smaller size would be zero issue for developers if the screen resolution was the same, as rumored.

Yes it would. Size of controls are different, even if the number of pixels are the same, the size of them are different.
GIGO. The truth in all of life.
Reply
GIGO. The truth in all of life.
Reply
post #115 of 208
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boogerman2000 View Post

I'm glad you're happy for me, I'm happy for me too-- but of course you took my response as some sort of personal attack which is typical among fanbois. Sigh. Yes, I'm aware of the stats. I stated AS AN E-READER. As a niche E-READER, the Kindle is doing well. The proof, as I stated in my anecdote, is real world evidence despite the numbers. I see on a daily basis far more Kindles than Ipads being used as E-READERS. E-READERS. Hence, the possibility of a new, lighter, more sleek, easier to hold 7" iPAD. nO?


*cough* E-READER *cough*

Forget about it. Apple's position of strength is a form factor that targets multiple intersecting markets into one device.

The current iPad is the sweet spot between several applications. Building a custom eReader when the iPad has it and more goes against Apple's consolidated product lines.
post #116 of 208
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boogerman2000 View Post

I'm glad you're happy for me, I'm happy for me too-- but of course you took my response as some sort of personal attack which is typical among fanbois. Sigh. Yes, I'm aware of the stats. I stated AS AN E-READER. As a niche E-READER, the Kindle is doing well. The proof, as I stated in my anecdote, is real world evidence despite the numbers. I see on a daily basis far more Kindles than Ipads being used as E-READERS. E-READERS. Hence, the possibility of a new, lighter, more sleek, easier to hold 7" iPAD. nO?


*cough* E-READER *cough*

I saw nothing in your original statement about "E-reader".

Nice back pedal.

Fanbois? lol

Next...

[on edit: I thought you were the original poster (something about bananas). Not sure why you took up the banner... but, anyway, my original argument holds... the Kindle is being pulverized by the iPad... no need for a smaller size to cause confusion... the Kindle is a niche market that I would guess Apple has no interest in entering because there is no return selling products below cost.]
na na na na na...
Reply
na na na na na...
Reply
post #117 of 208
Quote:
Originally Posted by ivan.rnn01 View Post

Cortex A9, Fusion...

Why are the Chinese so ignorant of the A4? The new workhorse is doing exactly what it's been expected to. Amazing power efficiency is in place. Why to ditch? Just because the guy who led the development could not get along with Apple's corporate culture? Or have they not heard of yet?

Papermaster didn't lead the design of the A4.
post #118 of 208
You can be sure that APPLE has a few things in its pipeline and is simply not resting on its current products. Whether or not the rumors are the actual products is anyones guess.
post #119 of 208
Quote:
Originally Posted by Firefly7475 View Post

I'd be amazed if they couldn't achieve Wii-level performance.

Oh please. You'd have to try really hard not to beat the POC that is the Wii. iPhone 4 alone can do that, and pretty easily.

iPhone 4S 64GB, Black, soon to be sold in favor of a Nokia Lumia 920
Early 2010 MacBook Pro 2.4GHz, soon to be replaced with a Retina MacBook Pro, or an Asus U500

Reply

iPhone 4S 64GB, Black, soon to be sold in favor of a Nokia Lumia 920
Early 2010 MacBook Pro 2.4GHz, soon to be replaced with a Retina MacBook Pro, or an Asus U500

Reply
post #120 of 208
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lukeskymac View Post

Oh please. You'd have to try really hard not to beat the POC that is the Wii. iPhone 4 alone can do that, and pretty easily.

Don't insult the Wii :O the Wii is epic , but yeah the graphics, processor, memory, storage & UI all suck- I'm not even sure why I like it
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Future Apple Hardware
AppleInsider › Forums › Mac Hardware › Future Apple Hardware › CDMA iPhone, AMD-powered Apple TV with iOS, 7-inch iPad rumored