The American Left Slides Into Psychosis - Page 8

Partial quotes to distort the meaning. What an interesting new tactic from you FT. The desperation must be setting in quite strongly. Way to avoid noting which practices denote eugenics again as well while demanding someone give you examples of what you won't define.


Yes, I understand that you consider postings free of hatred and vitriol to be empty, but not all of us can be hatemongers on the same scale as you.

Clear misrepresentation isn't a compliment.



Yes except, now you've proven and admitted that you will partially quote so as to distort meaning. Interestingly I state exactly the type of thing they are talking about that I consider to be a eugenics practice. You've just quoted it again.

You then say you agree to my definition, and that you are fine with it, only you fail to quote where I ask you to clarify your understanding of my definition. You've cited what you consider to be links to eugenic practices. I've asked you to state, using my definition, what practices make them eugenics. You won' do that either.

I really could care less what a few other illogical folks practicing ad-homs think about my posts on here.

Also you do remember that the thread was begun with a post full of examples of violence and psychosis on my part. Sorry FT but the little practice of just dropping off a link, a quote and no thought doesn't roll well with me. If you want to discuss something, you've got to be willing to engage a person not just make demands and distort what they type. The point of the thread stands. My assertion stands and anyone can easily do a google search or two and find all manner of instances where Democratic leadership are blaming the voter and declaring them stupid, ill-informed and more to justify why they were slaughtered in the election results.

Your little pump and dump where you drop some pretty pictures, or quote articles whole but provide no thought is going to be called what it really is, spamming. You can't have a discussion with a spammer. Beginning for me to spam rather than discuss won't change the nature of what you do either. You have to engage FT.

I provided an answer. I won't bother with links to that answer until you agree that to the answer.

Sorry that you can't tell the difference. You wanted PROOF of the answer but you won't agree that it is the answer.

You want proof to something you won't define.

You must be horribly embarrassed by this.

I already answered but you want proof for the answer. Proof to something you won't admit is AN answer. How embarrassing for you this must be!

You're projecting again. Either that our you're preparing to bring about the violence you feel deserved against those who are of an animal nature and who debase the entire human race.

Sorry that we aren't of master race stock like yourself there Seg. You'll just have to put up with our mongrel ways and thoughts. They aren't pure and higher level like your own. Try not to stomp us to death out or pure contempt please.

It was answered. You've even quoted it. You even quoted and noted that myself and another poster were going back and forth about it. You said you wanted proof. I said let's agree on a definition and Ill give proof. You've spammed the thread since then and now are trying to alter what you said dozens of posts back.


He gave the definition of those who disagree with him. The label is easy to see. Sorry if you don't like the definition. Perhaps you and he would prefer the term untermensch instead. You state that something is beneath human nature, then by definition you are saying they are under humans or subhumans. I have no doubt that since Seg loves the author of Übermensch so much and clearly labels and considers those in disagreement to be inferior.

As the article notes....


See the difference between yourself, Seg and say... the Nazi's is that they applied the term racially. Now I always have to get clarification about racial stuff, something which I've asked your for now about a dozen times, because the European and American concepts of race are different. The American concept of race is wrapped up largely in skin color whereas in Europe it is wrapped up in religion, language, culture, etc.

So the Nazi's applied the concept via their European version of race. You appear to have applied it using the American form of race. We can't be sure since you won't answer questions but prefer to spam the thread. Regardless of how it is applied though the concept exists and when you hold in your mind the concept of Übermensch and the belief that others are Untermenschen, then you are practicing eugenics. You may be using different criteria to select your master race, but you are indeed practicing it.

Not surprisingly the Übermensch feel the Untermenschen are not capable of running their own lives. They promote policies and burdens to lessen their child bearing potential and ultimately to lessen their numbers completely. The Übermensch accomplish this by consolidating power in a large central government and dictating life to the Untermenschen. They don't feel bad denying them freedom or rights because of course they are that which must be overcome and that which is less than man.


If this is not enough of an answer for you, or if you did not have this understanding prior to this, then you have it now. It is not hard to find statements from Democratic leadership that reflects this understanding at all. Every time they label voters or constituents as anything inferior, they are practicing this concept. They believe themselves the superior and believe they have failed to convince the inferior. When they believe the inferior cannot be convinced, they seek authoritarian forms of government and control and history has shown they do so violently and killing millions in the process.

I bid you good day.

You apparently just ignored the very extended and elaborated on answer above defining eugenic terms, thoughts and actions in my view.

Holy cow don't forget the damn Italians of which I happen to be one. I mean we've still got that nice minstrel show Jersey Shore on for goodness sakes!


I can and have provided links. I've mentioned general examples. If you want to find a specific example and ask about it then link to it and let's fire away. However I'm already doing all the heavy lifting here while you feign ignorance and ask for repetition while spamming the thread with links you refuse to discuss and pretty pictures.

I'm pretty sure there were links in those posts as well.

The American left... man are the "the American people" aka those who voted for Republican stupid and dumb. They are a special brand of crazy. They are voting against their own interests, etc.

The irony when they talk about Lindsey Lohen is just hilarious. If you want to see pure tabloid journalism with comical faces and not much else, take a look at the Huffington Post front page. Take a look at whole is going to rally's and getting their news from COMICS.

The irony kills me here.

Wow, some of the KosKids are losing their minds.


and....


and....


They sure are a happy bunch! Please enjoy the fact that they are praying for your death.

It's crazy to someone like you we understand. See there is this thing called intent and another thing called action. There is rhetoric and there is reality.

So someone on the left claims they want peace, then they smash in shop windows, loot them, overturn cars and burn down buildings.

Meanwhile someone on the right declares that liberty comes at the cost of blood, and they protest peacefully and often even clean up the messes of others.

In your mind the good intentions excuse the bad actions.

Likewise in your mind, the caricatures you've created and the motivations and intentions you've assigned to them obscure the good actions.

Please take off the mental blinders and give reality a good hard stare.

Interesting that you appear to have no ability to discern between a government sanctioned by the people who then hire volunteers to defend them, and violence brought against the people and their government by leftist radicals seeking to undermine it and society in general.

Yes and by nature we know you mean their intentions of course.

I guess you are arguing with your mind-based caricatures because I don't know what the heck you are talking about.

Come back out of intent land Seg. Join us here in reality for a bit.

Actually I do thanks. Your careful refutation of my in depth analysis with snide asides doesn't change that fact.

Well I only have to link to the obscure stuff. There are plenty of mainstream quotes from Democratic leadership claiming the American people are too stupid to manage themselves.

You can find those yourself though.