The American Left Slides Into Psychosis - Page 10

You called my answers a tirade and then demand another. Interesting....

I showed you my answers. What about them is not "answery" enough for you?

Is English not your first language?

You didn't quote any questions. I showed you my statements of fact to the non-asked questions. What more do you want?

You want proof of my answers. That's fine. State what constitutes proof and I'll be happy to provide it.

However considering you can't even recognize the answer, why am I going to piss in the wind to find proof when you won't even state what you will accept as proof.


My tutoring you has worked pretty well. This is probably the longest you've typed without some emotions or quoting entire articles and their links with no comment.

I'm having quite the positive effect on you.

You're welcome.

Since you aren't using the quote function, and in fact are reinterpreting my words, I'll need clarification. What do you mean by possibility of eugenics? I have to ask since thy are your words and not mine.


I said there were lots of articles that noted the language of Democrats and Democratic leaders whereby they argued the Democrats were arguing they were Übermensch and those voting against them were not. Do you doubt these articles?


It isn't about intent. Übermensch isn't some bullshit I made up.

Zarathustra ties the Übermensch to the death of God. While this God was the ultimate expression of other-worldly values and the instincts that gave birth to those values, belief in that God nevertheless did give life meaning for a time. God is dead means that the idea of God can no longer provide values. With the sole source of values no longer capable of providing those values, there is a real chance of nihilism.

Zarathustra presents the Übermensch as the creator of new values. In this way, it appears as a solution to the problem of the death of God and nihilism. Because the Übermensch acts to create new values within the moral vacuum of nihilism, there is nothing that this creative act would not justify. Alternatively, in the absence of this creation, there are no grounds upon which to criticize or justify any action, including the particular values created and the means by which they are promulgated.

In order to avoid a relapse into Platonic Idealism or asceticism, the creation of these new values cannot be motivated by the same instincts that gave birth to those tables of values. Instead, they must be motivated by a love of this world and of life. Whereas Nietzsche diagnosed the Christian value system as a reaction against life and hence destructive in a sense, the new values which the Übermensch will be responsible for will be life-affirming and creative.

It is a set of values and a goal.

Some commentators associate the Übermensch with a program of eugenics.[6] This is most pronounced when considered in the aspect of a goal that humanity sets for itself. The reduction of all psychology to physiology implies, to some, that human beings can be bred for cultural traits. This interpretation of Nietzsche's doctrine focuses more on the future of humanity than on a single cataclysmic individual. There is no consensus regarding how this aspect of the Übermensch relates to the creation of new values, and many would deny vehemently that Nietzsche would countenance a eugenics program at all.

Please note what you don't get and I'll hit it more. This is not about intent.

Oh noes. Someone is getting upset because they think the public sand box belongs to them. I understand him just fine Sego and your weird little prattling here doesn't change that fact.


Can you prove this accusation? Can you show the only reason I noted Nietzsche is due to a right wing blog or Fox news? I'd love to see you do it.


Oh, now we need to keep adding to your little tirade of name calling. Are you going to same I'm a poopy head until I give you back your public sandbox Sego?


Yes well you going into claims about my mind and what supposedly can and cannot conceive means exactly jack and diddly. It's just another sad little ad-hom from you.


Why thank you for putting me back in my place oh Übermensch. I'll take me and my limited mind back to the horse stalls and do your labor for you. I'll go pick the veggies before I feel your well justified whip across my back for the sake and good of all humanity. You are quite the little tyrant Sego.

Yes especially when that nuance amounts to the third grade version of you rule and I drool so I better shut up or you'll beat me up for not knowing the school playground is really yours.


You're so cute. Do the Prince picture first.


Oh I assure you that I'm not the only one noting this. There are lots of folks out there. Much like how you didn't "get" the teaparty or "get" the elections. Just because you have blinders on doesn't mean the information isn't out there. You are the type who dismisses sources and avoids them when they aren't on your approved reading list. Now I've already linked to a few and you dismissed them. You don't get more to dismiss. You can go back and address the current examples and at leat provide rationales for why you disagree with them.



I'd say gee cute child, did your Mommy or Daddy get put on a watch list because they are a veteran? I'd ask if they voted Republican and thus are "scared." or "know-nothings." I'd ask if they were one of those voters out there that President Obama labeled "enemies."

Because if the government has your profile on a watch list, if your leaders are declaring you incompetent and an enemy, you aren't paranoid, my dear student. I would also console them as to why the president labeled their mommy and daddy as enemies.

BTW, I'm pretty sure all those examples were in the first post of the thread too. Would you console the student MJ? Would you make them feel better if they asked you why the president called their mommy or daddy an enemy of America?

FT, be honest. There are more than two choices for what you can do to a hypothetical past, present or future Hitler. The only choices aren't murder him or don't.

BTW, I've posted the initial examples and answered plenty of questions and provided PLENTY of explanation. You dancing band of fools have answered none. Please do. It's quite rude to demand of others what you don't demand of yourself.

Have you noticed you are kind of chanting to yourself here MJ? It's a very curious thing.

I've fully justified my post in a multitude of ways with a multitude of sources. You are down to multiple dismissals and denials in the same post. You're just repeating yourself now while asking for more work to dismiss and deny. You don't even rationalize your dismissal and denials and YOU'VE BEEN ASKED TO DO SO.

FYI, the executive branch certain decides whether to issue a report or not and on top of that, it certain can decide whether to follow or ignore the guidelines and whether they are valid or not. However I like your view. I'm the president, I'm not responsible and I wash my hands of it sounds like quite the reelection campaign for 2012. The position of Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security was filled by President Obama and his appointed person is using the recommendations.

Now, I don't need to convince you against your will. I've humored you, patted you on the head and now you repeated yourself ad-infinitum grows tedious. You can play your little tyrant games where you scream demands into the air and then dismiss them because, oh you don't think the soup is the right temp, and that is your perogative. However I won't be inclined to deal with it.

MJ, I think you've gone off the deep end. If you're going to write fiction at least sign up for NaNOWriMo.

Yes but as you've noticed, I put some captions I've written with the pictures. Thus there is no need for the reader to infer my intent and then have me get off on telling them they inferred wrong and thus suck.


Thanks. MJ especially is being such a prime example too but all the others are working very hard. Sego has fallen into quotations. MJ is is screaming names at everyone. FT is noting who is doing what and acting paranoid.

They are quite insane.

JG....

FT says you weren't sharing the toys in the sandbox.

What do you have to say for yourself young man?

Yes I agree entirely MJ. To say that anyone is stupid, a know-nothing, acting out of ignorance, acting against their best interests or is an enemy of America do indeed hold perfectly reasonable political ideas. The people who have lost their votes should realize that instead of losing their minds and going all insane and ad-homing them. That would be a terrible and stupid thing for them to do since it loses their votes, loses them the election and eventually shows they've lost their mind. When they've lost on all accounts, they'll got all insane and then go authoritative and demand these people who refuse to do as their told be handled.


I think the thread was meant to discuss a point, but then I'm the originator and you are the artist/tyrant so clearly you must know what I was thinking before I thought it.


Silly MJ, we thought you were insane well before that. The thread just affirms it. However watching you start to lose it when your little authoritarian rants don't yield what you want is a bit humorous. You pointing your fingers and calling your names is cute and funny.


Yes and the links and quotes prove nothing while the strident declarations prove everything. Since in MJ world strident declarations prove everything, then I'm saying a million times very stridently, the Democratic worldview and quotes show eugenic thinking.


Not all of us define supporting evidence as calling other people a bunch of names and insinuating many things about them. So by that definition you might be right. However much support and evidence has been offered and I'm sure many lurking minds have been persuaded. The last election certainly showed that for sure!


Say that three times fast. I dare ya!