The American Left Slides Into Psychosis - Page 12

Wow. All that work by JG and not a single link, quote or even attempt at thought in rebuttal.

It was all just dismissed. It's all lies, nonsense and we know this due to nothing more than strident denials and dismissals.

Sorry you got duped into MJ's lies there JG. Please try not to feed the troll in the future. I've posted at least half a dozen links in this thread he hasn't touched either. He'll also spam the thread and likely several others with the same requests that you've already met declaring he has the right to do so since you haven't met his burden of proof.

It's why he's been permabanned multiple times. Put him on ignore and let it go.

The point isn't the conclusion here. I've posted some links in here and JG has as well. People can agree or disagree. The point is this. If someone has linked to what they believe is true and you declare you have the right to harass them and ignore the posting guidelines because they haven't proven it to your satisfaction, then you will likely have the moderator come down on you. The definition of harass in this instance involves spamming this thread with about 25-30 requests and the banned party in question often loses it and begins spamming multiple threads with an additional 10-15 requests each.


I'm pretty sure JG posted those as recent and historical examples. The leftists on here make strident statements that certain attributes are impossible within their realm of political thought. My contention has more to do with believing certain individuals are elite or superhuman to the point of being able to lord or rule over someone else when that person does not desire it. When you decide that you have the right to rule by decree rather than by consent, that is practicing eugenics. You've declared the good of the whole must outweigh the consent of the governed for the betterment of society as a whole. This is a central point in the formation of all leftist authoritarian governments.

The language of said thought reflects the masses being unfit to decide for themselves. Myself and others have posted links to that language. That is a subpoint within the overall point of the thread which is the left losing touch with reality when the promised nirvanna their policies and votes associated with them were supposed to bring instead turned into the tea party and being bounced from office. Instead of believing the voters actually voted their interests and desire the language of the leadership declares them stupid, scared, disengaged, uninformed, misinformed, etc. This is delusional language because it says the majority of people out basically don't know how to or deserve to run their own lives.


He wasn't banned just once. He was banned multiple times for harassment and spamming. It had nothing to do with his political orientation or worldview. If you follow the thread of that link it is because his method of trolling is identifiable and when called on it, he denied his identity. The forum software allows you to ignore certain posters. If that poster registers under a different name and begins harassing the same parties, they've sought to override the software, the intent of the person not desiring to be harassed and also are working to circumvent the posting guidelines.

You've seen posters here declaring they are right not by reasoning, but by a consensus of complainers. What you may not realize is several of these accounts, perhaps not this time, but in the past have been the same person. So if I log on with four different accounts and have all of them say you are wrong on some point and then send several messages from each account in the same thread declaring you must be wrong due to the consensus of parties noting you are wrong, when I'm all really the same person, then that isn't a legitimate use of the discussion feature of the forums. If you go to member list and look at all the accounts starting with Hassan you will see what we mean.

Now when someone becomes harassing or abusive, for example they go from saying someone is childish to saying someone beats their wife, they get temp banned from here. That means they tell them to go away and cool off for a period of three to ten days. If you decide to use one of your "alternative" accounts or create to come back in and begin harassing and abusing said poster again, you get permabanned. This permabanning has happened to MJ aka Hassan in several different forms multiple times.

He wasn't banned for being of a political orientation. He was banned for being harassing abusive and then ignoring the mod advice to cool off by creating new accounts to circumvent the cool down bans.

Does something need to be forced to be considered eugenics?

If someone paid black women to be sterlized is that eugenics?
If someone inacted housing boundries or job limitations or made barriers of entry to high is that eugenics.
If someone thought "mixing" of the "races" was wrong and bad for society, is that eugenics?

Of course all of those are degrees of eugenics.

Please stop the strawman of declaring that force must be taken before it is eugenics.

Here's something that's not at all bizarro. Not a single leftist on these forums has taken issue with, condemned or even declared wrong in any form or fashion Ted Rall calling for harm or perhaps murder of large segments of the United States population. Likewise no one has said anything about Tim Wise and his threatening statements against white people. Finally no one on here has condemned or declared wrong in any fashion all the statements from Democratic leadership that declares the majority of the voting public to be completely inept and uninformed morons who are harming themselves and others.

All these things are just fine for the posters on here. They'd rather scream for 100 posts that they didn't get enough or strong enough "proof" for the supposed non-answers they didn't get for questions that were never asked.

How can they be taken seriously when they won't condemn threats of violence and harm?

The original premise stands. The eugenics idea is one that we are having some fun discussing because it was brought up as part of an ad-hom by a forum poster.

You can read the original post with the link to the original article is still on the first post. These threads all get a bit whimsical a few hundred posts in. You don't really have a choice when some psycho wants to call you a dozen names, allege things about you, and throw a hissy fit.

Looking at that original thread premise, it was prognosticating, it was not discussing history or contemporary events as what the left will do after these election losses.


The ironic humor related to the thread is watching the leftist forum posters act exactly like the thread predicted.

In Bizarroland the tea party is actually violent and the Tories are breaking into offices and burning them down.