AppleInsider › Forums › Other Discussion › AppleOutsider › PoliticalOutsider › The American Left Slides Into Psychosis
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

The American Left Slides Into Psychosis - Page 19

post #721 of 824
Quote:
Originally Posted by MJ1970 View Post

Well...technically...it sounds like the letter writer was only suggesting torture for Sarah Palin. Any death that occurred would be accidental and unintentional (though probably considered fortune and beneficial by the letter writer.)

Ok..you can answer it yes or no too:

If you were an Officer of the Law would you arrest this person for inciting murder?

If not why not?
What is Faith? When your good deed pleases you and your evil deed grieves you, you are a believer. What is Sin? When a thing disturbs the peace of your heart, give it up - Prophet Muhammad
Reply
What is Faith? When your good deed pleases you and your evil deed grieves you, you are a believer. What is Sin? When a thing disturbs the peace of your heart, give it up - Prophet Muhammad
Reply
post #722 of 824
Quote:
Originally Posted by segovius View Post

Ok..you can answer it yes or no too:

If you were an Officer of the Law would you arrest this person for inciting murder?

If not why not?

My answer is that I don't know. I'm not an officer of the law. I don't know the specifics of the law in this case and what I could or couldn't arrest someone for.

That said, do you think that the writer has clearly expressed an interest in Michael Vick torturing Sarah Palin with a cattle prod? Yes or no? If not, why not?

The state is nothing more than a criminal gang writ large.

Reply

The state is nothing more than a criminal gang writ large.

Reply
post #723 of 824
Quote:
Originally Posted by MJ1970 View Post

My answer is that I don't know. I'm not an officer of the law. I don't know the specifics of the law in this case and what I could or couldn't arrest someone for.

That said, do you think that the writer has clearly expressed an interest in Michael Vick torturing Sarah Palin with a cattle prod? Yes or no? If not, why not?

Imo this is clearly sarcasm and humour. You may not get the humour because it is partisan humour. I'm sure the Right has an equivalent.

Can't think of one...wait...what about Bush mocking the woman on death row who pleaded for a reprieve? When he mocked her in that silly voice "please don't kill me Mr Bush..." and laughed hysterically and uncontrollably...

Or maybe that's something else.

But to answer the second part - why" err...because I understand the English language?
What is Faith? When your good deed pleases you and your evil deed grieves you, you are a believer. What is Sin? When a thing disturbs the peace of your heart, give it up - Prophet Muhammad
Reply
What is Faith? When your good deed pleases you and your evil deed grieves you, you are a believer. What is Sin? When a thing disturbs the peace of your heart, give it up - Prophet Muhammad
Reply
post #724 of 824
Quote:
Originally Posted by segovius View Post

Imo this is clearly sarcasm and humour. You may not get the humour because it is partisan humour.

OK. It is humor. Humor containing violent suggestions of what to do to another person. So then we could say that it is humor in extremely poor taste I guess.


Quote:
Originally Posted by segovius View Post

I'm sure the Right has an equivalent.

Possibly it does. I don't know.


Quote:
Originally Posted by segovius View Post

Can't think of one...wait...what about Bush mocking the woman on death row who pleaded for a reprieve? When he mocked her in that silly voice "please don't kill me Mr Bush..." and laughed hysterically and uncontrollably...

Or maybe that's something else.

Sounds like a similar example.


Quote:
Originally Posted by segovius View Post

But to answer the second part - why" err...because I understand the English language?

Well, in all fairness, this goes beyond simply "understanding the English language" and into divining the intent of the writer/speaker. You assume the intent is to be humorous, and perhaps, even probably it is. But you must imagine the intent and not just the words themselves.

The state is nothing more than a criminal gang writ large.

Reply

The state is nothing more than a criminal gang writ large.

Reply
post #725 of 824
Quote:
Originally Posted by MJ1970 View Post

Sounds like a similar example.

Similar...except of course the woman really was killed in that case.
What is Faith? When your good deed pleases you and your evil deed grieves you, you are a believer. What is Sin? When a thing disturbs the peace of your heart, give it up - Prophet Muhammad
Reply
What is Faith? When your good deed pleases you and your evil deed grieves you, you are a believer. What is Sin? When a thing disturbs the peace of your heart, give it up - Prophet Muhammad
Reply
post #726 of 824
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by segovius View Post

Question: not to get into a discussion about this either way but - simple yes or no - do you actually believe that he is calling for the murder of Sarah Palin?

That's a crime isn't it? If you were an Officer of the Law would you arrest him for this?

I'm not a trained officer. I'm more apt to keep speech free than confine it. I'd leave the gray areas more open than closed. Do I believe he is calling for the murder of Palin? He is trying to do so in a more lighthearted way, but yes he is calling for her murder or at minimum extreme torture.

Quote:
Originally Posted by segovius View Post

Imo this is clearly sarcasm and humour. You may not get the humour because it is partisan humour. I'm sure the Right has an equivalent.

Can't think of one...wait...what about Bush mocking the woman on death row who pleaded for a reprieve? When he mocked her in that silly voice "please don't kill me Mr Bush..." and laughed hysterically and uncontrollably...

Or maybe that's something else.

But to answer the second part - why" err...because I understand the English language?

I'd love a link to that humor. I know that humor has been used to rationalize many genocidal thoughts by the left worldwide this year as they engage in their riots. It's all fun and games to press a button and blow up people who disagree with you.

The real problem is that humor to be funny has to have a bit of truth to exaggerate.

The reason they end up funny is what is being exaggerated is still a profoundly sick premise.

"During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act." -George Orwell

Reply

"During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act." -George Orwell

Reply
post #727 of 824
Quote:
Originally Posted by segovius View Post

Similar...except of course the woman really was killed in that case.

You seem to be under the impression that I condone one and not the other. Is this the case?

The state is nothing more than a criminal gang writ large.

Reply

The state is nothing more than a criminal gang writ large.

Reply
post #728 of 824
Quote:
Originally Posted by MJ1970 View Post

You seem to be under the impression that I condone one and not the other. Is this the case?

No. I don't make judgements. I just record the unvarnished facts. I am a camera.
What is Faith? When your good deed pleases you and your evil deed grieves you, you are a believer. What is Sin? When a thing disturbs the peace of your heart, give it up - Prophet Muhammad
Reply
What is Faith? When your good deed pleases you and your evil deed grieves you, you are a believer. What is Sin? When a thing disturbs the peace of your heart, give it up - Prophet Muhammad
Reply
post #729 of 824
Quote:
Originally Posted by segovius View Post

No.

Good.

The state is nothing more than a criminal gang writ large.

Reply

The state is nothing more than a criminal gang writ large.

Reply
post #730 of 824
Quote:
Originally Posted by MJ1970 View Post

Good.

Cool.

It's like the labels in our other thread: sometimes people (not you) HAVE to label something rather than have it just there....just being what it is.

So things often seem other than they are.
What is Faith? When your good deed pleases you and your evil deed grieves you, you are a believer. What is Sin? When a thing disturbs the peace of your heart, give it up - Prophet Muhammad
Reply
What is Faith? When your good deed pleases you and your evil deed grieves you, you are a believer. What is Sin? When a thing disturbs the peace of your heart, give it up - Prophet Muhammad
Reply
post #731 of 824
Quote:
Originally Posted by trumptman View Post

I'm not a trained officer. I'm more apt to keep speech free than confine it. I'd leave the gray areas more open than closed. Do I believe he is calling for the murder of Palin? He is trying to do so in a more lighthearted way, but yes he is calling for her murder or at minimum extreme torture.



I'd love a link to that humor. I know that humor has been used to rationalize many genocidal thoughts by the left worldwide this year as they engage in their riots. It's all fun and games to press a button and blow up people who disagree with you.

The real problem is that humor to be funny has to have a bit of truth to exaggerate.

The reason they end up funny is what is being exaggerated is still a profoundly sick premise.

A link to the humor. I am not going to editorialize:

http://old.nationalreview.com/daily/nr080999.html
NoahJ
"It is unwise to be too sure of one's own wisdom. It is healthy to be reminded that the strongest might weaken and the wisest might err." - Mahatma Gandhi
Reply
NoahJ
"It is unwise to be too sure of one's own wisdom. It is healthy to be reminded that the strongest might weaken and the wisest might err." - Mahatma Gandhi
Reply
post #732 of 824
Quote:
Originally Posted by MJ1970 View Post

Wrong.




So you must step in an tell them how to live their lives?

As another poster here recently said, I hope your shackles lay lightly upon you.


There's incredible irony (and hypocrisy) in the government regulating food for health reasons while subsidizing things like the corn industry and tariffing cane sugar imports (making the much less healthy high-fructose corn syrup relatively cheaper and used more more abundantly)...to say nothing of what it has done to out beef supply because most cows are now corn fed instead of grass fed or becoming the soybean industry's bitch by demonizing coconut oil, then subsidizing the soybean industry to give us trans fats for so many years. And these are only a couple of the ways in which government's involvement has actually made our food supply less healthy.

And segovius' mention of Aspartame is downright hilarious since this went through government channels and was approved by the FDA (which is more or less a living example of regulatory capture). In fact, arguably, FDA approval (or sometime denial of potentially live-saving medications) has become something of an artificial and dangerous "Good Housekeeping Seal of Approval." Artificial because it is so politicized and essentially owned by the food and drug industries and dangerous because people think it's actually independent, objective and trustworthy!

Well thank you once again for your opinion. I thought the cigarette ad was a perfect example of wat I was talking about. These companies lied for years about lots of things and would still be doing so if the goverment hadn't stepped in.

You still haven't given me a reason that they wouldn't still be doing that ( still preying on people's lack of knowledge also ) if there were no laws governing them. And yes I'm sure they still find ways around them as no implementation of the law is perfect.
Without the need for difference or a need to always follow the herd breeds complacency, mediocrity, and a lack of imagination
Reply
Without the need for difference or a need to always follow the herd breeds complacency, mediocrity, and a lack of imagination
Reply
post #733 of 824
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimmac View Post

You still haven't given me a reason that they wouldn't still be doing that ( still preying on people's lack of knowledge also ) if there were no laws governing them.

Well...you haven't given us a reason why you have the right to tell other people what they can and cannot do with their own bodies.

P.S. Most of what I wrote in that post wasn't opinion...it was fact about how the government's intervention into the agricultural sector of the market has clearly resulted in worse health outcomes for many Americans.

The state is nothing more than a criminal gang writ large.

Reply

The state is nothing more than a criminal gang writ large.

Reply
post #734 of 824
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by NoahJ View Post

A link to the humor. I am not going to editorialize:

http://old.nationalreview.com/daily/nr080999.html

I managed to find it as well. Bush denies the incident and of course the words themselves aren't offensive, just their described delivery. I don't think that equivalent at all to a first hand source where the words and their described actions are outright violence.

This does shows an interesting double-standard though with regard to political thought.

One the one hand we have an actual first hand source saying that Palin is the same as a dog and that she ought to be electrocuted. Now the definition of electrocuted btw, for MJ and perhaps for you is to kill with electricity.

So yes, the letter writer was calling for the murder of Palin. If you want to grant him some sort of ignorance then perhaps it could be seen as torture instead.

Either way this is humor right? Calling for the murder of people and comparing them to tortured and murdered dogs is ..... all in good humor.

So of course that isn't offensive and the equivalent is....

A man who allegedly repeated a request for clemency but the third party account declares he was smirking and mocking.

Can leftists ever actually find sources that deal with actual words and actions rather than examining intent and "what we all really know" must be going on instead of reality?

I'm a bit tired of this continual break with reality from them. Delusional people aren't any fun and on top of it when they claim delusions are jokes but your reality is offensive, it becomes pretty insufferable.

"During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act." -George Orwell

Reply

"During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act." -George Orwell

Reply
post #735 of 824
Quote:
Originally Posted by trumptman View Post

I managed to find it as well. Bush denies the incident and of course the words themselves aren't offensive, just their described delivery. I don't think that equivalent at all to a first hand source where the words and their described actions are outright violence.

This does shows an interesting double-standard though with regard to political thought.

One the one hand we have an actual first hand source saying that Palin is the same as a dog and that she ought to be electrocuted. Now the definition of electrocuted btw, for MJ and perhaps for you is to kill with electricity.

So yes, the letter writer was calling for the murder of Palin. If you want to grant him some sort of ignorance then perhaps it could be seen as torture instead.

Either way this is humor right? Calling for the murder of people and comparing them to tortured and murdered dogs is ..... all in good humor.

So of course that isn't offensive and the equivalent is....

A man who allegedly repeated a request for clemency but the third party account declares he was smirking and mocking.

Can leftists ever actually find sources that deal with actual words and actions rather than examining intent and "what we all really know" must be going on instead of reality?

I'm a bit tired of this continual break with reality from them. Delusional people aren't any fun and on top of it when they claim delusions are jokes but your reality is offensive, it becomes pretty insufferable.

Ok...so he was calling for murder. Let's assume you think that.

What are you going to do about it?

You could make a campaign. You could try to get him arrested. It's a crime.

Are you going to do these things? If not then why not?
What is Faith? When your good deed pleases you and your evil deed grieves you, you are a believer. What is Sin? When a thing disturbs the peace of your heart, give it up - Prophet Muhammad
Reply
What is Faith? When your good deed pleases you and your evil deed grieves you, you are a believer. What is Sin? When a thing disturbs the peace of your heart, give it up - Prophet Muhammad
Reply
post #736 of 824
Quote:
Originally Posted by MJ1970 View Post

Well...you haven't given us a reason why you have the right to tell other people what they can and cannot do with their own bodies.

P.S. Most of what I wrote in that post wasn't opinion...it was fact about how the government's intervention into the agricultural sector of the market has clearly resulted in worse health outcomes for many Americans.

Quote:
Well...you haven't given us a reason why you have the right to tell other people what they can and cannot do with their own bodies.

Well you haven't given a good reason for the government to stand by while these companies prey on people. If they had we'd have a hell of a of a lot more people dying of lung cancer. That costs the tax payers and the country money. See how this works?

Quote:
Most of what I wrote in that post wasn't opinion...it was fact about how the government's intervention into the agricultural sector of the market has clearly resulted in worse health outcomes for many Americans.[/

Most of what I wrote wasn't opinion either! It's fact that after the government stepped in and raised awareness about the effects of smoking people began to quit. Unfortunately because it's an addiction something a little stronger had to added.

Now as far as most things I believe people should take responsibility for their own bodies. For example I think they should legalize pot. I think the war on drugs is a miserable failure and can't succeed anymore that prohibition did with alcohol But that's another set of issues from tobacco.

But when it reaches such astronomical proportions as cigarette smoking has and is as unhealthy as it is ( remember all the documented health risks that go with that plus as addictive as Heroin ) something had to be done.

And it's the same thing with types of food aditives. Look at it this way trumptman believes that the Boomers are so unhealthy because of the drugs they did early on ( not that I buy into that idea but for the purposes of comparison ) well what about the legal drugs that have been forced on us in the name of profit?

You have to remember before the government stepped in and forced labeling of the risks on the packaging the attitude before that was that it was cool and a " Breath of springtime ". Everybody did it so why don't you?

That's why at times the controls and regulation are necessary. Sorry if you don't believe that and I know I'll never sway you on this point. But as you said you're not interested in being swayed. I know talking at not with. I got that.
Without the need for difference or a need to always follow the herd breeds complacency, mediocrity, and a lack of imagination
Reply
Without the need for difference or a need to always follow the herd breeds complacency, mediocrity, and a lack of imagination
Reply
post #737 of 824
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimmac View Post

Well you haven't given a good reason for the government to stand by while these companies prey on people.

It's always private companies that prey on innocent unsuspecting people, never government.


Quote:
Originally Posted by jimmac View Post

If they had we'd have a hell of a of a lot more people dying of lung cancer. That costs the tax payers and the country money. See how this works?

No. Please explain.


Quote:
Originally Posted by jimmac View Post

But as you said you're not interested in being swayed.

Well actually I don't believe I have ever said that at all. But I think you have told me that I will never change your mind.

The state is nothing more than a criminal gang writ large.

Reply

The state is nothing more than a criminal gang writ large.

Reply
post #738 of 824
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by segovius View Post

Ok...so he was calling for murder. Let's assume you think that.

What are you going to do about it?

You could make a campaign. You could try to get him arrested. It's a crime.

Are you going to do these things? If not then why not?

Im doing exactly what i can and should do. I'm documenting and raising awareness. This incident isnt isolated or even that out of character for the left. They spent the Bush years imagining all manner of presodential assasination attempts. They still speak graphically of what they "hope" happens to Cheney.

This thread, it's part of the solution.

"During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act." -George Orwell

Reply

"During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act." -George Orwell

Reply
post #739 of 824
Quote:
Originally Posted by MJ1970 View Post

It's always private companies that prey on innocent unsuspecting people, never government.




No. Please explain.




Well actually I don't believe I have ever said that at all. But I think you have told me that I will never change your mind.

Quote:
It's always private companies that prey on innocent unsuspecting people, never government.

That's not an answer! Double




Quote:
Well actually I don't believe I have ever said that at all. But I think you have told me that I will never change your mind.[/


Quote:
:
Originally Posted by jimmac
That's just the way it is. It's a philosophical difference on which you'll never win me over.

MJ's reply :
I'm not trying to.

That's true you never said that so what are you doing? This statement also points out that you're just telling me like it is. Not a discussion. No dialog. Just a lecture.


Quote:
No. Please explain.


Please don't play dumb I already have explained. It's history. Before the surgeon general's report in 1965 and government intervention smoking was considered more than ok you weren't cool if you didn't. A time I'm sure you don't remember but just look at some old movies. As a matter of fact a friend of mine and I were watching the original version of The Day The Earth Stood Still ( a million times better than that crappy the new version ). At the beginning of the film the alien is taken to Walter Reed hosipital where the doctors all smoke! And while they were smoking they were commenting on why he was so healthy ( while they both were both holding cigarettes ). You couldn't help but crack up.

That was the attitude back then. If the government had done nothing it would still be ( except the incident of people dying of lung cancer would be much worse ).

And please don't even try to tell me I don't know that. Smoking was something everyone did. There was this vauge idea that there might be somthing bad about it but before the report and the government label warning ( and what came later ) that was largely ignored.

It is extremely addictive so stronger measures were needed.

Now you can say that the government had no right and therefore shouldn't intervene but I really don't think many would agree with you on this one. after all they didn't arrest people for smoking. They encouraged them strongly not to.
Without the need for difference or a need to always follow the herd breeds complacency, mediocrity, and a lack of imagination
Reply
Without the need for difference or a need to always follow the herd breeds complacency, mediocrity, and a lack of imagination
Reply
post #740 of 824
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimmac View Post

That's true you never said that so what are you doing? This statement also points out that you're just telling me like it is. Not a discussion. No dialog. Just monolog.

Since when did you become interested in dialogue?


Quote:
Originally Posted by jimmac View Post

Please don't play dumb I already have explained.

Point me to the post so we I can avoid wasting more of your time and your truthfulness can be verified.


Quote:
Originally Posted by jimmac View Post

Now you can say that the government had no right and therefore shouldn't intervene but I really don't think many would agree with you on this one.

I'm quite sure you're right about that. But then what is right and wrong, truth and fact, logic and reason are not determined by popular vote. Or, if they are, we live on a foundation of sand...quick sand actually.

The state is nothing more than a criminal gang writ large.

Reply

The state is nothing more than a criminal gang writ large.

Reply
post #741 of 824
Quote:
Originally Posted by MJ1970 View Post

Since when did you become interested in dialogue?




Point me to the post so we I can avoid wasting more of your time and your truthfulness can be verified.




I'm quite sure you're right about that. But then what is right and wrong, truth and fact, logic and reason are not determined by popular vote. Or, if they are, we live on a foundation of sand...quick sand actually.

Quote:
Since when did you become interested in dialogue?

Cheap shot number one.

Quote:
Point me to the post so we I can avoid wasting more of your time and your truthfulness can be verified.

Cheap shot number 2. Is that the best you can do?

Quote:
I'm quite sure you're right about that. But then what is right and wrong, truth and fact, logic and reason are not determined by popular vote. Or, if they are, we live on a foundation of sand...quick sand actually


Well I think popular vote said we don't want more people to needlessly die!

Jesus!
Without the need for difference or a need to always follow the herd breeds complacency, mediocrity, and a lack of imagination
Reply
Without the need for difference or a need to always follow the herd breeds complacency, mediocrity, and a lack of imagination
Reply
post #742 of 824
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimmac View Post

Cheap shot number one.

Not at all. You claim to be interested in having a dialogue but the sum total of what I've seen from your posts don't suggest this at all. So this is a sincere question.


Quote:
Originally Posted by jimmac View Post

Cheap shot number 2. Is that the best you can do?

Not at all. You claim to have answered my question. I'm simply asking you to point me to where you answered it so I can read it.

The state is nothing more than a criminal gang writ large.

Reply

The state is nothing more than a criminal gang writ large.

Reply
post #743 of 824
Quote:
Originally Posted by MJ1970 View Post

Not at all. You claim to be interested in having a dialogue but the sum total of what I've seen from your posts don't suggest this at all. So this is a sincere question.




Not at all. You claim to have answered my question. I'm simply asking you to point me to where you answered it so I can read it.

Quote:
Not at all. You claim to be interested in having a dialogue but the sum total of what I've seen from your posts don't suggest this at all. So this is a sincere question.

Sorry if you have this opinion but I would say much the same of you.

Quote:
Not at all. You claim to have answered my question. I'm simply asking you to point me to where you answered it so I can read it

Well it seems you didn't understand so I went into greater detail for you in my last post. You seemed to understand ( even if you don't agree ) last time.
Without the need for difference or a need to always follow the herd breeds complacency, mediocrity, and a lack of imagination
Reply
Without the need for difference or a need to always follow the herd breeds complacency, mediocrity, and a lack of imagination
Reply
post #744 of 824
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimmac View Post

Sorry if you have this opinion but I would say much the same of you.

Thanks for expressing your opinion. Are you not going to answer my question?


Quote:
Originally Posted by jimmac View Post

Well it seems you didn't understand so I went into greater detail for you in my last post.

Are you not going to answer my question? I will repost the exchange so we're both clear:

Quote:
Originally Posted by jimmac

If they had we'd have a hell of a of a lot more people dying of lung cancer. That costs the tax payers and the country money. See how this works?

I've emphasized the part I was hoping for an explanation of. How exactly and precisely do people's poor health choices "cost the tax payers money?" This should be a simple and straightforward answer.

The state is nothing more than a criminal gang writ large.

Reply

The state is nothing more than a criminal gang writ large.

Reply
post #745 of 824
Quote:
Originally Posted by MJ1970 View Post

Thanks for expressing your opinion. Are you not going to answer my question?




Are you not going to answer my question? I will repost the exchange so we're both clear:



I've emphasized the part I was hoping for an explanation of. How exactly and precisely do people's poor health choices "cost the tax payers money?" This should be a simple and straightforward answer.

Well I've always been interested in a dialog. I wouldn't be here otherwise. We just don't agree. And if you're Libertarian I already know the party line " Victimless crimes " Taxation is theft " " rights of the invidual ". I even agree with some of it. However the reason I left was because some of their expectations were unreasonable. Especially about how people act in a free society. I wish it was the way they think! I really, really do! I just know better. But some day maybe.


Quote:
I've emphasized the part I was hoping for an explanation of. How exactly and precisely do people's poor health choices "cost the tax payers money?" This should be a simple and straightforward answer

You have heard of health insurance? When people get needlessly sick in large numbers it costs everyone.
Without the need for difference or a need to always follow the herd breeds complacency, mediocrity, and a lack of imagination
Reply
Without the need for difference or a need to always follow the herd breeds complacency, mediocrity, and a lack of imagination
Reply
post #746 of 824
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimmac View Post

Well I've always been interested in a dialog. I wouldn't be here otherwise. We just don't agree.

OK. So this is some additional clarity. We merely disagree with one another and that I've not said anything that changes your mind at all, it's not that I'm simply engaging in monologue with no interest in dialogue. Got it.


Quote:
Originally Posted by jimmac View Post

You have heard of health insurance? When people get needlessly sick in large numbers it costs everyone.

Yes. What does this have to with "costs the tax payers and the country money" though?

The state is nothing more than a criminal gang writ large.

Reply

The state is nothing more than a criminal gang writ large.

Reply
post #747 of 824
Quote:
Originally Posted by MJ1970 View Post

OK. So this is some additional clarity. We merely disagree with one another and that I've not said anything that changes your mind at all, it's not that I'm simply engaging in monologue with no interest in dialogue. Got it.




Yes. What does this have to with "costs the tax payers and the country money" though?

Not only does health insurance go up coverage for medicare goes up. When you have an unhealthy society it costs everyone.

I'm an ex smoker who still liked smoking when I quit but knew it was killing me. So I know how hard it is to quit. But this issue isn't limited to cigarettes.

We're sort of in agreement that I like the idea of the individual doing what they want to do. However there are times when the problem is so prevalent

something has to be done about it. That's why we have laws. That's part of being in a civilization. Cigarettes do nothing for you. Having certain additives in food don't benifit you either as much as they do the manufacturer. We really don't need all that salt in our food and it's unhealthy. I really don't think the government will step in and outlaw salt. But they might limit it in prepackaged stuff. I'd be ok with that. If you want to salt it afterwards pull out the shaker and don't worry about what it does to you.

What I'm saying here is that there's no storm troopers breaking down your door because you might use this stuff. But it's being discouraged. Just like cigarettes were.
Without the need for difference or a need to always follow the herd breeds complacency, mediocrity, and a lack of imagination
Reply
Without the need for difference or a need to always follow the herd breeds complacency, mediocrity, and a lack of imagination
Reply
post #748 of 824
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimmac View Post

Not only does health insurance go up coverage for medicare goes up.

So, when the government pays for your healthcare, they justified is using their power f coercion to prevent or discourage certain actions based on how those actions affect your health because they bear the cost of that negative health situation?

Is that correct?


Quote:
Originally Posted by jimmac View Post

What I'm saying here is that there's no storm troopers breaking down your door because you might use this stuff. But it's being discouraged. Just like cigarettes were.

We're not talking about the enforcement mechanisms yet, merely the reasoning for the use of some kind of government coercion regarding the actions people can or can't make regarding what they consume or, more generally, what they do with their bodies.

The state is nothing more than a criminal gang writ large.

Reply

The state is nothing more than a criminal gang writ large.

Reply
post #749 of 824
Quote:
Originally Posted by MJ1970 View Post

Well...you haven't given us a reason why you have the right to tell other people what they can and cannot do with their own bodies.

P.S. Most of what I wrote in that post wasn't opinion...it was fact about how the government's intervention into the agricultural sector of the market has clearly resulted in worse health outcomes for many Americans.

I couldn't help but read the quoted part before I realized it was jimmac. That is the only way I see his posts, as you may know. Ignore list, how I love thee.

Anyway, one has to realize how he and many other secular-liberal-progressives (whatever) think. It's not that most of them want to control our bodies (well, some do, but I don't think most do). It's that they have different views of two core constituencies:

1. They view corporations as pure evil. They make products that kill us. They fire people. They reduce or eliminate health benefits. They avoid taxes whenever possible. We only need them because they do pay some taxes, and they do employ so many people. We need to onerously regulate those human being-hating, profit-mongering monstrosities to protect the public. In fact,they'd like to figure out a way to get rid of them and give everyone "green jobs" funded by tax dollars.

2. They view citizens as victims. They are victims of food companies. They are victims of restaurants. They are victims of their employers. They are victims of their doctors. They are victims of the transportation companies/airlines (which the government has propped up, creating a virtual monopoly). They are victims, and they aren't smart enough to run their own lives. They can't plan their retirement, their college savings, their healthcare costs, their housing or vehicle costs, nor their credit card bills, nor their stock accounts. Stupid victims that need smart people in government to save them. That's what they need.


Well, most of us have a different view. We view corporations (large and small) as the backbone of the economy. Make their lives easier, and the economy will grow. They will hire. Demand will be created. All ships will rise in the harbor. Now, they do need some regulation. Some WILL abuse their power. We need to regulate monopolies and have some basic protections for the consumer, like the requirement to disclose ingredients on food and to follow health and safety standards, etc. But we don't think corporations are all out to screw the world.

We view citizens differently, too. We believe that people are (or can be) self-reliant. They should and can find a way to provide for themselves and their families. They should manage their own diets, education, job, housing and finances. They may need some short-term assistance when they lose a job. Those who can't provide for themselves mentally/physically need to be taken care of. But most people can and will provide for themselves, and can make decisions for themselves. They just need the information to do it. They know that fast food is bad for them. If they eat it anyway--with full disclosure on what it contains--that's their problem. If they take drugs--that's their problem. If they suck down a container of salt a week, that's their problem.

The worst part is that folks with view #1 rarely admit it. I have a feeling your sparring partner will go bonkers when he reads this.
To save time, assume I know everything.
Reply
To save time, assume I know everything.
Reply
post #750 of 824
Quote:
Originally Posted by SDW2001 View Post

I couldn't help but read the quoted part before I realized it was jimmac. That is the only way I see his posts, as you may know. Ignore list, how I love thee.

Anyway, one has to realize how he and many other secular-liberal-progressives (whatever) think. It's not that most of them want to control our bodies (well, some do, but I don't think most do). It's that they have different views of two core constituencies:

1. They view corporations as pure evil. They make products that kill us. They fire people. They reduce or eliminate health benefits. They avoid taxes whenever possible. We only need them because they do pay some taxes, and they do employ so many people. We need to onerously regulate those human being-hating, profit-mongering monstrosities to protect the public. In fact,they'd like to figure out a way to get rid of them and give everyone "green jobs" funded by tax dollars.

2. They view citizens as victims. They are victims of food companies. They are victims of restaurants. They are victims of their employers. They are victims of their doctors. They are victims of the transportation companies/airlines (which the government has propped up, creating a virtual monopoly). They are victims, and they aren't smart enough to run their own lives. They can't plan their retirement, their college savings, their healthcare costs, their housing or vehicle costs, nor their credit card bills, nor their stock accounts. Stupid victims that need smart people in government to save them. That's what they need.

And...

3. Government as the savior.

The state is nothing more than a criminal gang writ large.

Reply

The state is nothing more than a criminal gang writ large.

Reply
post #751 of 824
Quote:
Originally Posted by SDW2001 View Post

The worst part is that folks with view #1 rarely admit it. I have a feeling your sparring partner will go bonkers when he reads this.

More untruth...practically everyone I know thinks this (more or less - minus the irrational hyperbole) and is proud to admit it.

In fact, they very often state it in the course of opposing the excesses of these corporations.

I certainly hold this view and have never denied it.
What is Faith? When your good deed pleases you and your evil deed grieves you, you are a believer. What is Sin? When a thing disturbs the peace of your heart, give it up - Prophet Muhammad
Reply
What is Faith? When your good deed pleases you and your evil deed grieves you, you are a believer. What is Sin? When a thing disturbs the peace of your heart, give it up - Prophet Muhammad
Reply
post #752 of 824
If corporations are "pure evil", then surely you must divorce yourself of anything produced by said "evil" corporations. By using their products and services you are supporting their "evil".

You must immediately retire to a grass hut and live off the fat of the land.

I'd be happy to take any computers or technology off your hands.

Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem.

(I prefer the tumult of liberty to the quiet of servitude.)

Reply

Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem.

(I prefer the tumult of liberty to the quiet of servitude.)

Reply
post #753 of 824
Quote:
Originally Posted by jazzguru View Post

If corporations are "pure evil", then surely you must divorce yourself of anything produced by said "evil" corporations. By using their products and services you are supporting their "evil".

You must immediately retire to a grass hut and live off the fat of the land.

I'd be happy to take any computers or technology off your hands.

I don't agree with that analysis on many levels.

On a philosophical/spiritual one (which actually is how I try to live my life so it is relevant) I believe the entire world is 'evil' in some sense and must be endured - possibly as penance for some crime/sin committed elsewhere - until death's release.

On a more prosaic level, I would argue that the 'evildoers' have taken over things in entirety (this can be related to the above) and thus run the show 100%.

So any 'opting out' would essentially mean opting out of life itself - ie suicide. Which I am not prepared to do at this time though I don't rule it out as a viable option at some potential later point.

Further, why must I 'retire to a grass hut and live off the fat of the land' (though actually I am working on some equivalent plan not involving a grass hut.....) ?

I may want to subvert this Society and somehow undermine it in ways not possible from a grass hut. Grass huts are were the powers-that-be want all malcontents: disempowered, impoverished and easily visible.

Not for me.
What is Faith? When your good deed pleases you and your evil deed grieves you, you are a believer. What is Sin? When a thing disturbs the peace of your heart, give it up - Prophet Muhammad
Reply
What is Faith? When your good deed pleases you and your evil deed grieves you, you are a believer. What is Sin? When a thing disturbs the peace of your heart, give it up - Prophet Muhammad
Reply
post #754 of 824
Quote:
Originally Posted by MJ1970 View Post

So, when the government pays for your healthcare, they justified is using their power f coercion to prevent or discourage certain actions based on how those actions affect your health because they bear the cost of that negative health situation?

Is that correct?




We're not talking about the enforcement mechanisms yet, merely the reasoning for the use of some kind of government coercion regarding the actions people can or can't make regarding what they consume or, more generally, what they do with their bodies.

It's pretty mild coercion. Like I've said they didn't throw anyone in jail and you can still do it anyway. It just costs you more and is less socially acceptable. But you can still do what ever you want. And yes it's justified. If they were throwing people in jail or were using storm troopers you might have a point.
Without the need for difference or a need to always follow the herd breeds complacency, mediocrity, and a lack of imagination
Reply
Without the need for difference or a need to always follow the herd breeds complacency, mediocrity, and a lack of imagination
Reply
post #755 of 824
Quote:
Originally Posted by SDW2001 View Post

I couldn't help but read the quoted part before I realized it was jimmac. That is the only way I see his posts, as you may know. Ignore list, how I love thee.

Anyway, one has to realize how he and many other secular-liberal-progressives (whatever) think. It's not that most of them want to control our bodies (well, some do, but I don't think most do). It's that they have different views of two core constituencies:

1. They view corporations as pure evil. They make products that kill us. They fire people. They reduce or eliminate health benefits. They avoid taxes whenever possible. We only need them because they do pay some taxes, and they do employ so many people. We need to onerously regulate those human being-hating, profit-mongering monstrosities to protect the public. In fact,they'd like to figure out a way to get rid of them and give everyone "green jobs" funded by tax dollars.

2. They view citizens as victims. They are victims of food companies. They are victims of restaurants. They are victims of their employers. They are victims of their doctors. They are victims of the transportation companies/airlines (which the government has propped up, creating a virtual monopoly). They are victims, and they aren't smart enough to run their own lives. They can't plan their retirement, their college savings, their healthcare costs, their housing or vehicle costs, nor their credit card bills, nor their stock accounts. Stupid victims that need smart people in government to save them. That's what they need.


Well, most of us have a different view. We view corporations (large and small) as the backbone of the economy. Make their lives easier, and the economy will grow. They will hire. Demand will be created. All ships will rise in the harbor. Now, they do need some regulation. Some WILL abuse their power. We need to regulate monopolies and have some basic protections for the consumer, like the requirement to disclose ingredients on food and to follow health and safety standards, etc. But we don't think corporations are all out to screw the world.

We view citizens differently, too. We believe that people are (or can be) self-reliant. They should and can find a way to provide for themselves and their families. They should manage their own diets, education, job, housing and finances. They may need some short-term assistance when they lose a job. Those who can't provide for themselves mentally/physically need to be taken care of. But most people can and will provide for themselves, and can make decisions for themselves. They just need the information to do it. They know that fast food is bad for them. If they eat it anyway--with full disclosure on what it contains--that's their problem. If they take drugs--that's their problem. If they suck down a container of salt a week, that's their problem.

The worst part is that folks with view #1 rarely admit it. I have a feeling your sparring partner will go bonkers when he reads this.

Did they stop you from smoking cigars? And when you're lying there suffering from lung cancer they'll even help pick up the cost.
Without the need for difference or a need to always follow the herd breeds complacency, mediocrity, and a lack of imagination
Reply
Without the need for difference or a need to always follow the herd breeds complacency, mediocrity, and a lack of imagination
Reply
post #756 of 824
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimmac View Post

It's pretty mild coercion.

So it is coercion. OK. Got it.


Quote:
Originally Posted by jimmac View Post

And yes it's justified.

On what basis? By what reasoning?

The state is nothing more than a criminal gang writ large.

Reply

The state is nothing more than a criminal gang writ large.

Reply
post #757 of 824
Quote:
Originally Posted by jazzguru View Post

If corporations are "pure evil", then surely you must divorce yourself of anything produced by said "evil" corporations. By using their products and services you are supporting their "evil".

You must immediately retire to a grass hut and live off the fat of the land.

I'd be happy to take any computers or technology off your hands.

Remember you're the one who said " Pure evil ". No one else did. They're just trying to make a fast buck and they're not too careful how they do it. That's all.
Without the need for difference or a need to always follow the herd breeds complacency, mediocrity, and a lack of imagination
Reply
Without the need for difference or a need to always follow the herd breeds complacency, mediocrity, and a lack of imagination
Reply
post #758 of 824
Quote:
Originally Posted by MJ1970 View Post

So it is coercion. OK. Got it.




On what basis? By what reasoning?

Because in the long run it costs everyone money. Including those who say for instance don't smoke.
Without the need for difference or a need to always follow the herd breeds complacency, mediocrity, and a lack of imagination
Reply
Without the need for difference or a need to always follow the herd breeds complacency, mediocrity, and a lack of imagination
Reply
post #759 of 824
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimmac View Post

Because in the long run it costs everyone money. Including those who say for instance don't smoke.

So...

Coercion is justified to stop actions that cost everyone money in the long run.

Have I summarized that correctly?

The state is nothing more than a criminal gang writ large.

Reply

The state is nothing more than a criminal gang writ large.

Reply
post #760 of 824
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimmac View Post

They're just trying to make a fast buck and they're not too careful how they do it.

Who is "they?"

The state is nothing more than a criminal gang writ large.

Reply

The state is nothing more than a criminal gang writ large.

Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: PoliticalOutsider
AppleInsider › Forums › Other Discussion › AppleOutsider › PoliticalOutsider › The American Left Slides Into Psychosis