The American Left Slides Into Psychosis - Page 3

You're so cute when you play the intent game. Don't worry Seg, Lott won't be right wing when he does that. He will temporarily change to left wing and then go back to being right wing by virtue of engaging in actions that can never be defined as right wing per your strange type of reasoning. Also you may be right that it is a top 3 genocide, but in actual numbers, it is only 1/10 the size of the genocides perpetuated by those nasty collectivists. They win again.


Do you think if someone was building a German Cultural Center that was celebrating the achievements of Nazi Germany that it would go over with no protests? Again we are talking about a city where you cannot build a Walmart. See I don't have to create some false equivalence and imply future violence from it in some desperate attempt to sway people since the argument you present itself is not compelling. I have a real equivalence. I have a real instance whereby the left has not only protested against, but at time litigated against an actual company here in the United States.

So, and talk about your example of psychosis, we see that some on the right my consider a mosque "near" by their reasoning, ground zero is something that is done in poor taste. They consider it, be it by weak association or not, to be something to easily associated with reminders of terrorism.

Yet on the right, we see the equivalence is Walmart. Yes, Seg that means that the left consider a Walmart store to be equal on terms to both 9/11 and terrorism.



Oh here you talk about wanting to not put on clothes associated with certain movements and yet you practice such eliminationism yourself. Should I quickly march myself off to Siberia or is there a local gas chamber you can march me into since per your reasoning, if you don't agree the right of that person is forfeited.


Maybe the rationality is that folks like yourself use their motives to excuse their real life actions.


You have to remember that Seg likes to be blunt and absurd on purpose. Some of us are quite used to that little game though.



Welcome comrades!
We will protect the German people of impurity!

Yeah, except for that part of course. The statement that started it and from which the others flowed.

This might help a bit.


Seg would be giving Nietzsche fellatio if possible, or to put this in more reasonable terms, Seg believes him a profound influence and emulates him in many ways. This understanding will help you understand his posting style which amounts to 40% personal attack, 40% caricatured/illogical/intentionally absurd thinking and 20% actual attempt at substance.

My guess would be that he believes the 80% softens you up and makes you more receptive to the 20%. It's not much different from what Ann Coulter does so well. Seg just needs better writers I guess so he doesn't sound so much like Bill Maher discussing religion a few too many tequila shots into the evening.

BTW, in the interest of helping FineTunes, this post will be responded to, but will also have the various meta-mechanisms within it pointed out as well.



This is a rationalization for why he gets to mistreat people and attack them.


This is a bit of absurdist caricature. At least it must be because no one could truly be so ironic as to be crafting a reality about some entire monolithic caricatured masses crafting reality. Notice also how it isn't really addressing the topics discussed in any form or fashion. It's almost a pure strawman. Yet it isn't really meant to knock someone off their game. It's more like he has to say this to himself to justify his own actions. Reinforce the caricature, then you can treat the real people saying real things badly due to this imagined preconceptions. It's quite fascinating.


Notice again the absurdity here in reasoning. Amazingly enough in this scenario it is cheaper to control and manipulate factors completely out of ones control than it is to pay to manipulate the variables one can control. Again a bit of absurdism and a nice personal attack thrown in for good measure.

See, Seg wants you to believe that these heartless and cruel wealthy folks can somehow control what all the "sheep" think and do and that this is cheaper and easier than actually tossing a few extra bucks at that folks doing all the work. You can apparently cheaply and easily convince them to act completely contrary to perceived reality. This magic spell of course cannot be cast by those of the left. Their policies always fail, not through any actual measure of their own effectiveness but because the right spoke up and got the masses to buy the "big lie."

Thus the most intelligent are always defeated by the evil due to the sheep. It's quite a nice narrative and in keeping with the thread theme, probably pretty easy to keep internally reinforcing.



Nice strawman. Did anyone say anything about celebrating the holocaust? Can you quote me on that please?

FT, please note the nice strawman here because it justifies the mistreatment that follows.



Well you as an individual do not count. There are several individuals on here who have stated no problems or issues with what is proposed in NY. Yet the brush paints very broadly from you.


They already have. They simply call them ethnic enclaves and assign them a Democratic Congressman who represents them for life while providing no improvement in their lives. The sheep could question why their lives haven't improved, but their Democrats owners manage to scream racism every time they start to blink awake from the sleep of their continued impoverished circumstances.

(Note: This is me giving back Seg a bit of what he does. I have to have a little fun too and considering how absurd his claims are, it keeps things light since his attempt with all the caricatures and absurdity is to rile the poster up.)


This is Seg moving from the reality of what has been posted, linked and cited and instead personalizing it. The reality that Walmarts have been banned in NY City is no longer of importance because, well because I'm not a good benchmark. The discussion of how some people feel it important to determine what is in and how it influences their neighborhood isn't important when discussing Islamic cultural and community centers. It is important when discussing Walmart though.


Wow indeed. No one has stopped the center but they have crafted laws and kludged up the approval process to keep out Walmart. To the left, Walmart is equivalent to Hitler or terrorists and by that I mean their feelings for that issue are so strong that they override pure reason and they feel they can act purely on matters of taste and emotional appeals.


Why do they need to chill out? If they are merely expressing a preference or are willing to help assist in or lobby for someone else to purchase the land to put something else there, what is wrong with that?


More absurdly caricatured analogies.


Ad-hom personal attack


This is a fun bit of bait. Often as conversations wind down Seg will say what he really thinks. In this instance he will later probably admit that the left should be free to keep the sheep away from the evil corporate Walmart and likewise the sheep must tolerate whatever is built with whatever title and Islamic connotations it has associated with it. The elites that always seem to lose, but know best should win and those who win by telling the big lie, well they should lose since the elites are only protecting the sheep from themselves and the lies.



This is a bit of Seg fun where he keeps repeating how evil his associations with the right must be due to the murder of 12 million Jews, Gypsies and others. When pressed as to why the Communists have killed ten times that many the answers are absurd, personal attacks, or sometimes even, this the price of progress and everyone does it, but not really since the victors only said the losers did it and the victors were evil rich people and the losers were all the smart people.... who always lose.


This is Seg's nice way of saying his eliminationist rhetoric is justified. The people who don't agree with him are slow, dimwitted, likely sub-human if he cared to fess up to it and thus when they are eliminated, as has often been the case when authoritarian leftist regimes come to power, they aren't really hurting anyone but merely cracking some eggs in the name of "progress."


This deep bit of reasoning is the defense for the eliminationist rhetoric.



This line shows that this is for the hungry and poor masses, who we will help against those teling the big lie, even though the hungry and poor masses don't seem to understand, want or desire our help. When we take over, those who agree with us will benefit, those who aren't will be assigned to that "special class" due to their falling behind with regard to enlightenment. That class will go on a fieldtrip where they will all conveniently turn up dead, but hey, at least they aren't shopping at Walmart and they certainly won't be intolerantly protesting Islamic cultural centers so all is good with the world in the end.

I have to have my own bit of fun there at the end too. Considering what was posted, I've been quite the model of restraint.

I think you might need to go down to the pub Seg. See that wasn't at all a rant.

That was child's play. It's pretty funny actually. You felt that was something inspired and it was nothing but me throwing open your little bag of tricks for the world. You're sort of like the kid who feels good because you realized no one really took your nose and now you see how dumb those adults are for thinking they were fooling you.

Sadly though, you don't get to play with the big boys yet Seg. It takes a little more than realizing no one took your nose. You've got to grow up and stop playing with the little bag of tricks.