Quote:
Originally Posted by ghostface147
Damn, I didn't think I would get that much negative reaction. I just don't like carrying two devices.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
nvidia2008 
No problem, I don't like it as well, that's why I got an iPad 3G.
I just think the Verizon option is reasonable for people that prefer Verizon over ATT for whatever reason. More carriers is usually a good thing.
There are some subtleties here, that are [somewhat] hidden by the bundle:
-- A WiFi Tablet
-- A cell-WiFi bridge
-- A non-contractual cell service
1) We have a Universal,
cell-band-independent mobile tablet [device]
2) We have a Universal,
carrier-independent mobile tablet [device]
3) We have a Universal,
contract-independent mobile tablet [device]
4) We have a Universal,
subsidy-independent mobile tablet [device]
Who's to say that AT&T could not offer a similar
cell-WiFi bridge (or iPhone Tether) as part of an
AT&T bundle?
Or Sprint? Or Anyone?
Who says that some
non-carrier can't offer one or more
cell-WiFi bridges (for different cell radio bands)?
Who says you can't
build your own bundle of bits
you purchase separately-- one from column (provider) A, one from column (provider) B... ?
Who's to say the mobile tablet [device] can't be used as a phone to make and receive calls?
Where does that leave the consumer vis-a-vis the Carrier?
What effect does that have on voice and data plan tiers and offerings?
What effect does that have on contracts?
What effect does that have on subsidies?
What effect does that have on
Carrier branding, crapware, forced UI inclusions and restrictions... ?
...