Apple will have the Mac App Store in place within 90 days. There is no reason why Adobe can’t put their free Flash player on the store for the very simple install that they showed in the demo yesterday. This takes Apple out of the equation for supporting Flash, it let’s Adobe get Flash updates to users faster and prevents the
oh so dreadful(¡) eventuality that Mac OS X Lion could get finalized with a slightly out of date version of Adobe Flash on it.
The horror!¡
Are there any other 3rd-party SW that Apple has been including on their systems that would be better regulated to the Mac App Store? I think this will be a trend and I think this may be the real reason for the exclusion at this point, not the performance of the LV/ULV C2D.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
djmikeo 
If Apple had flash installed, they would need to change the advertising to reflect the battery life.
Without Flash , up to 7 hours
With Flash, Up to 2 hours.

All hyperbole aside, there may be some truth in that. Steve did say they were getting more stringent with their battery testing and they do list the battery times as being for Wirelesss Browsing.
PS: Apple has had the best battery measurements for at a half decade now. It’s too bad that no one but Sony has followed them into the real-world mean usage.