or Connect
AppleInsider › Forums › General › General Discussion › Antigravity
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Antigravity

post #1 of 18
Thread Starter 
See: <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/2157975.stm" target="_blank">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/2157975.stm</a>

I've heard of his experiment but I've also heard that other scientists had difficulty in duplicating it. So why is Boeing, BAE, and Nasa looking into it? Perhaps Boeing duplicated the experiment but is keeping on the DL? Is there any merit to this phenomena?

My understanding of modern Quantum physics is that every force (Strong nuclear, weak nuclear, electro-magnetic, and gravity) has an associated boson (force transmitting particle). The only one yet to be directly observed is the Graviton. But bosons do not have anti-particles like baryons and fermions (eg. there is no anti-photon or anti-W particle) so how would you reproduce anti-gravity? Even anti-matter produces normal gravity... So this is why I have a heard time believing in anti-gravity, unless I am missing something significant here.
post #2 of 18
While I'm just starting to grasp some of these concepts in my own readings, I get the sense many of these particles and their properties are still misunderstood somewhat by science. Detecting these types of particles and then discerning what it was that you detected with any sort of reproduceable proof seems a tough haul.

I wonder if our understandng of things like quarks, leptons, bosons, etc. is at the same level of understanding we had when we first unconvered the atom and its constituent parts. Surely there were initial observations or assumptions made about the nature of atoms that proved to be incorrect (or only partially correct) as the math and instrumentation improved.

We are on the right track but I have a feeling we're just learning to crawl if you take my meaning. Read any good book about cosmology and the related theories of how things came to be, and there are clearly areas we are just beginning to understand. I think anti-particles and their role in the universe is one of those things.

[ 07-29-2002: Message edited by: Moogs ]</p>
Aldo is watching....
Reply
Aldo is watching....
Reply
post #3 of 18
Maybe Boeing should talk with David Copperfield...
I AM THE Royal Pain in the Ass.
Reply
I AM THE Royal Pain in the Ass.
Reply
post #4 of 18
Boeing just moved the corporate HQ to Chicago. This must be related. Getting the higher ups away from a new ground zero if something goes wrong?
post #5 of 18
I just read in SciAm about a guy working on an E&M to grav wave transducer. That's what this anti-grav device sounds like.
post #6 of 18
I made an Antigravity device once. Alas, when I turned it on it flung free of the earth's atmosphere at 25,000 mph and I never saw it again
Be quiet, Brain, or I'll stab you with a Q-tip
Reply
Be quiet, Brain, or I'll stab you with a Q-tip
Reply
post #7 of 18
<img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laughing]" />
Aldo is watching....
Reply
Aldo is watching....
Reply
post #8 of 18
Thread Starter 
One can argue that a chemical rocket booster is an anti-gravity device
post #9 of 18
don't forget the buttered cat anti-grav system.


strap some toast (butter side up) to the back of a cat

drop from at least table height.

toast always wants to land butter side down...

a cat always wants to land on its feet.

the result of this experiment is that at about a height of 4 inches, the cat and toast spin perpetually, each repelling the other from floor contact, generating an anti-gravity effect!

with enough toast and enough cats, we're flying.
<img src="graemlins/hmmm.gif" border="0" alt="[Hmmm]" />

[ 07-29-2002: Message edited by: curiousuburb ]</p>
"I do not fear computers. I fear the lack of them" -Isaac Asimov
Reply
"I do not fear computers. I fear the lack of them" -Isaac Asimov
Reply
post #10 of 18
[quote]Originally posted by Outsider:
<strong>One can argue that a chemical rocket booster is an anti-gravity device </strong><hr></blockquote>

Not successfully though.
post #11 of 18
[quote]Originally posted by curiousuburb:
<strong>don't forget the buttered cat anti-grav system.


strap some toast (butter side up) to the back of a cat

drop from at least table height.

toast always wants to land butter side down...

a cat always wants to land on its feet.

the result of this experiment is that at about a height of 4 inches, the cat and toast spin perpetually, each repelling the other from floor contact, generating an anti-gravity effect!

with enough toast and enough cats, we're flying.
<img src="graemlins/hmmm.gif" border="0" alt="[Hmmm]" />

[ 07-29-2002: Message edited by: curiousuburb ]</strong><hr></blockquote>

The problem with this is that the repulsive force of the toast is not nearly as strong as the force from the cat (a much larger object), therefore the cat's force will win and it will land on it's feet.

The above is based on my own experimental data.

[ 07-29-2002: Message edited by: Snof ]</p>
Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, even if it is wrong.
Reply
Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, even if it is wrong.
Reply
post #12 of 18
okay, maybe we'd have to up the toast-coefficient by using,
say... blackberry jam over an expensive white carpet.

then the toast forces overwhelm all but pumpkin sized cats

[ 07-29-2002: Message edited by: curiousuburb ]</p>
"I do not fear computers. I fear the lack of them" -Isaac Asimov
Reply
"I do not fear computers. I fear the lack of them" -Isaac Asimov
Reply
post #13 of 18
A chemical Rocket boost is an anti gravity device because the resuly propulsion is working AGAINST gravity....so its anti gravity
har har har.

I like cats....and buttered toast....but my friend's already tried this, and sure enough no spinning.
orange you just glad?
Reply
orange you just glad?
Reply
post #14 of 18
This is actually very interesting. After searching for Dr Podkletnov's name on the Internet some cool articles came up. Apparently ANY object would reduce in weight by 2% if it was placed above this machine, even if it was several floors up. Thats crazy...

BTW: I heard a rumor that Apple will use this technology in their next Breakthrough Digital Device. They will call it the iPodklenov ok, that was bad..

[ 07-30-2002: Message edited by: Blizaine ]</p>
wow my very own signature
Reply
wow my very own signature
Reply
post #15 of 18
Another interesting subject in the same vein,which actually has been repeated experimentally is that of lifters,only so far no one has any idea how they work.

<a href="http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/lifters.htm" target="_blank">http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/lifters.htm</a>
post #16 of 18
Thread Starter 
I found a device that can power your floating apparatus! <a href="http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/meg.htm" target="_blank">The MEG!</a>
post #17 of 18
I read somewhere awhile back that Townsend Brown's gravity control experiments and ideas have been the basis of the USAF's research efforts at the legendary Area 51 testing facility in Nevada and the Green River site in Utah. It seems a little more plausible than "reverse-engineered alien spacecraft", and the strange objects floating and zipping through the skies there are more a result of American, rather than Pleiadeian ingenuity and invention. Anti-gravity has always fascinated me!

BTW... could a ladder be correctly descibed as an anti-gravity device?

<img src="graemlins/surprised.gif" border="0" alt="[Surprised]" />
Why of course the people don't want war ... But after all it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a...
Reply
Why of course the people don't want war ... But after all it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a...
Reply
post #18 of 18
Actually,from what is known about physics aliens are more plausible than anti-gravity.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: General Discussion
AppleInsider › Forums › General › General Discussion › Antigravity