I just noticed that Apple makes no mention of the HD3000/2000 (the lower end ones use the 2000) integrated graphics in the new iMac's on their specs page. I wonder if since this is a desktop and they don't have to worry about battery, they didn't bother with graphics switching technology? Or since the 2000 is half as powerful as the already weak 3000, it might not have suited them even for base tasks on that large screen? Or alternatively, they do use it, but thought it wasn't important to market?
Thoughts?
Thoughts?






