S@r@h P@lin's 24,000 Embarrassing Announcements. - Page 2

Really. This is all they have left...reading non-office holder and non-candidate Sarah Palin's diary.

What? No smoking gun yet? Give it another week, this thread has to be based on something.

I'm sure there is a "dog whistle" email in there somewhere. You know like when she uses the word "the" that's code for "I hate niggers like all republikkkans do".

If you look at anyone's emails enough you will find something in them that could be construed as bad or negative. The President, the Pope, your grandmother, Mother Theresa... It does not matter. People are not perfect and they get angry or say things in the heat of the moment. I fully expect them to find something, but it will only be because they really fished for it. If they find nothing I will be surprised. Very surprised.

But it will prove that some will go to any lengths to destroy those they disagree with.

You say that as if it's not the Republicans' main strategy.

Could you show some current examples?

You say that is if two wrongs make a right.

I'll also note that he did not mention a specific party. He just said "some will go to any lengths to destroy those they disagree with." In this case the some might be Leftists. But this is probably a fairly true statement that applies to people of all political parties, factions and ideologies. I'd also argue that it's a behavior that, though not exclusively, predominantly can be found in the political realm.

Isn't it funny that is not at all what we're talking about? Palin is being followed by reporters everywhere. Newspapers have recruited an army of volunteers to go through e-mails. The Lefties are flipping their lids at her bus tour, and doing so long before the Revere comments. The same was true in 2008.

Hands, the Left hates this woman. Look at your own behavior. You started a thread called "S@r@h P@lins 24,000 Embarrassing Announcements." She's not announcing anything. She's not running for anything, and holds no office. So tell me...why would you, the media, Lefties in general...why even care?

Answer: because you hate her. She represents everything liberals despise. She's a successful, conservative woman. She's married. She's a Christian. She believes in the vision of America our founders laid out. And she's attractive. Worst of all, she represents a threat to the Democratic Party's stranglehold on women voters. Were she not a threat, they would have ignore her. But they are smart enough to read the polls: She was enormously popular in Alaska as governor. Contrary to a popular misconception, she enhanced McCain's popularity when announced as running mate.

And don't tell me this is about policy. It's not about policy at all. I've heard virtually NO criticism of Sarah Palin's policy positions. It's all about personal destruction. This is what the Left is all about. When do we ever hear policy criticisms from the Left? Virtually never. Instead, we hear "Bush is a warmonger who wrecked the economy" and "Dick Cheney is Darth Vader" and "John Boehner cries too much."

That's what the Left has become, you included.

You say that as if I used the words Republican and Democrat somewhere in that post. \

Seriously though Hands...how many? 150? 22? 1,500? 6,000?

Isn't it telling that you have begun using portions of Sarah Palin's emails in your signature, out of context, to somehow make a point? I am not sure what point you are making, because it does not seem to be what you think it is?

Find that smoking gun yet Hands?

Thanks for finally answering. It's helpful to know that you've drawn a conclusion about these 24,000 email by reading "a handful"...which we could reasonably take to mean not much more than, say, 20.

So, based on a reading about about...ummm...let's see here...less than 1/10th of 1 percent...you've drawn your conclusions.

Got it.



What I see very clearly is a person who created a thread entitled "S@r@h P@lin's 24,000 Embarrassing Announcements." without having read even 1% of those emails and asserting conclusions that sound quite comprehensive and broad based on reading less than 1/10th of 1 percentage of those emails.



Which you have clearly demonstrated in your creation of this thread and subsequent posts in it.



Yes, I think you should be personally embarrassed by this thread.



And your "contributions" have perpetuated this futility.



And, to prove your point, you created a thread designed from the beginning to avoid either of these things. And, to prove your point, your posts have been designed to avoid either of these things.

Good job old boy!

Are you suggesting that if there was something scandalous in these e-mails, we'd dismiss it? I submit that because no one has found anything, everyone who has failed to find something is also blind.


1. You, of all people are talking about bias? You started a thread called "Romney's Embarrassing Announcement" and then "S@r@h P@lin's 24,000 Embarrassing Announcements," and YOU'RE talking about bias?

2. Oh, and since when did ONE poster "denying" evolution constitute the totality of opinion here?

3. Last...you do realize that supporters of evolutionary theory are not required to also believe in Global Warming, correct?


Discourse? You don't engage in discourse. You engage in inflammatory, partisan rhetoric. You didn't start a thread called "What's Palin Doing?" or "The Palin E-mails" or "Discuss Palin's Qualifications for President." You don't want discourse. To you, discourse is you posting your insane rhetoric, whilst every other Lefty Loony-Toon agrees with you.

Ummm...ok. I guess that's what emoticons are for. However in the context of the Left hating on Palin so much...



Frankly, that's all it really deserves.



So this is really all about your faith in that secular religion of Global Warming/Climate Change?!?!

Are you accusing me of hate and anger? On what grounds? For what should I be ashamed?

And the left's Sarah Palin fetish continues unabated. I'm thinking this might be a serious mental disorder at this point.

Yet another person who espouses the myth that Sarah Palin hurt McCain's chances.

Newly released mail: She complained that she was losing her inner circle within days of taking office in Alaska. Bodes very badly for a potential presidential hopeful and representative of the GOP.


leader.http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0..._n_892939.html

So when do we get to see Obama's emails?

Smoking gun! Smoking gun!