You must know more than me. I am just going from what I read in the AI article.
Recent Reviews
-
I was given the Ipod nano 6th generation for Christmas 2011. I was starting to take up running and needed something to track my run. since I just started I was only using my Ipod roughly 3 times...
-
I have had the iPad Verizon 4G LTE for a month now, and over all I couldn't be happier with the machine. The only issue I have found so far is when on wifi it has a slower speed in processing...
-
I have owned at least a dozen different Mac laptops over the years, starting with a Powerbook 1400 back in the day. The 13-inch Air is my absolute favorite of the bunch. It's the first laptop...
-
I spent quite a bit of time reading the setup manuals and various Apple articles about manually setting up this device since I have an unusual setup, and the setup manuals indicated I would have...
-
all i have to say is i love it its so much faster and i could just slip it into my purse p.s it has a ton of space for the 64gb
Apple accused of appropriating rejected 'Wi-Fi Sync' app - Page 2

Aside from whether Apple stole the idea, this highlights what I've always felt was a risk to anyone who wants to develop an app for iOS. Just how much time, effort, and money are you willing to invest in your program without knowing if at the end of the day Apple is going to reject it? Some of the guidelines are vague to begin with. And now you have to worry about being rejected even if you aren't breaking the rules!
- Joined: Jan 2007
- Location: methane seas of neptune
- Posts: 2,820
- offline
- Select All Posts By This User

While a job at Apple may interest a great number of people, it was well within his rights to not want to work there. Declining a job does not mean it's OK for him to get ripped off.
That said, I strongly suspect Apple did have this functionality in its long term plans. The longer I follow Apple the longer-term I realize their secret roadmaps are. So I'm not sure there's a case here. Countless other times 3rd party developers of both Apple and Microsoft OS's have found their add-ons getting implemented in the next versions out of Redmond and Cupertino. And odds are very good Apple will have planning documents to prove this function was on the drawing board before Hughes' app was submitted to the store.
I think wi fi sync is something we all would want
so his app was not so original
I feel apple was already on this kind of sync for years
but apple played this badly
yet this idiot ruined his own case by jail braking
tie score
9
beatles
beatles

You're kidding right?
He's probably upset since he made an app for the iPhone, it was rejected, and now the company that rejected it is using it. While I don't think he'll have a case against Apple (unless they used his code...which is doubtful), if you're throwing this away as some moron wanting attention, you're...well...idiotic.
I agree. Idiotic.
Apple can be rightfull pissed when Microsoft copies their OS, but then to turn around and be such a sleaze with a little guy.
Seriously not cool. Apple...sometimes you really SUCK!
AirSync?

The Android way: Our problems become your problems.
The Android way: Our problems become your problems.
Nice.
When Apple recycles a name - of course it was the only name that could possibly have made sense. When [Samsung / company of choice] recycles a name - "OMG, can't they get a brain!? The copying is so blattent, blah, blah blah!"
Anyway, it's starting to get very old.
You can also look at Apple's other icons to figure out the kid's icon was really a derivative work based on Apple's previous icons. I am not saying somebody at Apple didn't like what the kid did, just that the kid wouldn't' have a copyright claim as you can't make a derivative work off of somebody else's work.
Read up on Rocky Four (the one where Rocky goes to Russia). Some guy essentially wrote the screen play and sent it to Sylvester Stallone. Stallone loved it and used it without giving the guy a dime. The guy sued, and the Court ruled in favor of Stallone. The reasoning was the guy's screen play was essentially a derivative work based on Stallone's copyright protected characters. As such, the guy had no rights to screen play he wrote because it was based on Stallone's copyrighted work. Stallone made millions off the guy's screen play.
So because the guy here took a few of Apple's other ideas and threw them together, it wouldn't matter if Apple copied the guy's icon.
Finally, the guy's idea while useful isn't original. People have been asking Apple for wirelessly syncing for years, myself included.
So when he claims that his 'app technically didn't break the rules' I call bullshit. He was either using a non public API function or he had found some way to make a public API function break the intended security model.
Either way Apple are always going to reject Apps that do that - and for obvious reasons. If an app modifies the iTunes library it could easily corrupt it. One of the key points of an iPhone is that you can't break the phone by merely installing an app.
Many here are probably familiar with Konfabulator, the separated at birth twin of Apple's Dashboard. But you may not be as familiar with Watson and Sherlock2.
http://www.karelia.com/news/small_an...he_long_s.html
http://www.macnn.com/news/25252
No need to mention various other developer claims over the years with less worthy evidence of "borrowing". To be fair, it's now near impossible to release a feature or app without someone somewhere claiming to have done it first.
But copy claims about Apple go beyond just software. While Apple has had some of the most memorable advertising we've ever seen, some of that may not be original either.
http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/05/a...g-off-artists/
It doesn't mean any of the mentioned examples are illegal, nor deserve monetary compensation. But don't assume that Apple doesn't do a bit of copying themselves, just as they accuse others of doing. They've just become more aggressive when it comes to their own stuff.
http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2010/03/...man-aggrieved/
melior diabolus quem scies
"No theatrics and no more personal attacks, just stick to the logic and tell me why I don't have any argument ~ Jragosta/2012
melior diabolus quem scies
"No theatrics and no more personal attacks, just stick to the logic and tell me why I don't have any argument ~ Jragosta/2012

While a job at Apple may interest a great number of people, it was well within his rights to not want to work there. Declining a job does not mean it's OK for him to get ripped off.
That said, I strongly suspect Apple did have this functionality in its long term plans. The longer I follow Apple the longer-term I realize their secret roadmaps are. So I'm not sure there's a case here...
I think the case is that he got rejected because Apple had planned its own solution and they don't like competition. It's Apple's anti competitive behaviour that is the case.
The only thing I can see Apple doing uncool (but not illegal) was copy the guy's icon.
The kid should be careful how he plays this. If he goes down the sue Apple route, he probably will lose both the lawsuit and the chance to work there (assuming he'd want to do so).

I'm not sure about the icon part of the claim. Apple has been using the "two arrows" symbol for sync for years, iSync icon has it and was released in 2003. They have also had the "signal wave" symbol for WiFi in the OS X menu bar for years. And the icon is question is just a composite of those two things.
Unless he feels his specific code or unique UI was stolen everything about this screams post hoc, ergo proper hoc.
As far as Konfabulator goes, again while cool, Konfabulator was not an original idea. If anything, Apple ripped off its own Desk Accessories from itself, which way predated Konfabulator. Here is the alternate take on this matter.

IMO, Apple isn't above "appropriating" features or services it feels improves the Apple experience. This may not be akin to outright theft, but there's some history of Apple viewing small developers/inventors as a minor inconvenience if Apple wishes to incorporate an idea that might not actually be original.
Many here are probably familiar with Konfabulator, the separated at birth twin of Apple's Dashboard. But you may not be as familiar with Watson and Sherlock2.
http://www.karelia.com/news/small_an...he_long_s.html
http://www.macnn.com/news/25252
No need to mention various other developer claims over the years with less worthy evidence of "borrowing". To be fair, it's now near impossible to release a feature or app without someone somewhere claiming to have done it first.
But copy claims about Apple go beyond just software. While Apple has had some of the most memorable advertising we've ever seen, some of that may not be original either.
http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/05/a...g-off-artists/
It doesn't mean any of the mentioned examples are illegal, nor deserve monetary compensation. But don't assume that Apple doesn't do a bit of copying themselves, just as they accuse others of doing. They've just become more aggressive when it comes to their own stuff.
http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2010/03/...man-aggrieved/

How was Apple being seriously uncool? It rejected an app that violated the rules. It added a feature that likely was commonly requested. It asked the kid for a resume, probably knowing Apple was working on such feature and could use his talent.
The only thing I can see Apple doing uncool (but not illegal) was copy the guy's icon.
The kid should be careful how he plays this. If he goes down the sue Apple route, he probably will lose both the lawsuit and the chance to work there (assuming he'd want to do so).
There is too much prior art against the kid's icon as both already existed and the combining of both, used by Apple for years, makes sense for a service called WiFi sync. Plus, trademarks and copyrights aren't set from publish dates from when they were created. I don't think we should reasonably expect Apple to have been stumped by this icon and only whipped it up after they saw his.

If the courts say that Steve did something wrong, after all the appeals have run, then maybe, just maybe, I'll believe it.
As of now? Not so much.
I'm sick and tired of all these jailbreakers. They are ruining the Apple Community by stealing the work of Steve's developers. They have no excuse, except that they are cheapskates.
Maybe you should reduce your AAPL holdings if the latest stock action is making you uncomfortable. Seriously!? The jailbreakers are ruining the Apple Community? Stealing Steve's work?


As far as Konfabulator goes, again while cool, Konfabulator was not an original idea. If anything, Apple ripped off its own Desk Accessories from itself, which way predated Konfabulator. Here is the alternate take on this matter.
Thanks for the "alternate take" link.

melior diabolus quem scies
"No theatrics and no more personal attacks, just stick to the logic and tell me why I don't have any argument ~ Jragosta/2012
melior diabolus quem scies
"No theatrics and no more personal attacks, just stick to the logic and tell me why I don't have any argument ~ Jragosta/2012

There is too much prior art against the kid's icon as both already existed and the combining of both, used by Apple for years, makes sense for a service called WiFi sync. Plus, trademarks and copyrights aren't set from publish dates from when they were created. I don't think we should reasonably expect Apple to have been stumped by this icon and only whipped it up after they saw his.

Hey - The name and the Logo are both "generic"! So if Amazon can steal Apple's name, claiming it is generic, and if Microsoft can copyright Windows, even though it is generic, then Apple can use the name and the logo.
What's good for the goose is good for the gander. Sorry kid, you lose.
Are you bringing forth an argument for which you have little or no knowledge of the underlying laws it is based on? Is that what you are doing?
That's only what the kid claimed. Not necessarily what the Apple (the one who rejected) saw.
The Android way: Our problems become your problems.
The Android way: Our problems become your problems.
Actually Hughes said that Apple said that the App didn't break the rules, Apple themselves haven't made a public statement. However as three or four of us have said here it HAD to break the rules. There is no way for me as an independent iOS dev to modify the iPhone's iTunes DB without breaking the rules.
Either he broke the security rules or he used private functions or he did both.

I was just reading about this at Cult of Mac and according to their post the developer was asked for a resume. Wonder why he didn't hand one in and instead went to Cydia. You'd think that an Apple representative asking for your resume after Apple just rejected your app would clue you in.
It's also possible that that part of the story is a myth. As well as perhaps some of the details about what was said by Apple regarding the rejection. For example, here is the claim that Hughes didn't break any rules. Several other stories say that his app was rejected for using Private APIs. Some stories say he was called, some that he got a form letter email. But no details about which rep contacted him so the details can't be confimed.
Wifi syncing is something folks have been asking for since the iphone 1 and Apple has likely been working on it since practically that time. It is also something best achieved by the source since it would likely have to be baked deep into the system. Hughes would have to prove this was not the case to say they stole the 'idea' from him (which is also iffy cause in general ideas can't be protected under IP laws in any country). Also, he would have to prove they took his coding out of a myriad of ways to achieve the same result.
As for the icon. It's the sync icon Apple has used for years and the wifi icon everyone has used for years married together. It's not original in any sense even when Hughes did it. So he can get over that one.

Of the numerous ways in which this "article" is just plain wrong, let me catalog just a couple.
First, it shows an utter lack of understanding of the firmament in which claims like this exist. I wrote on an AppleLink forum in 1991 that I thought a color Mac Classic would be a great idea. Does that mean Apple can't do it?
No. As other commenters have pointed out, this douche did not invent wireless synching. Sigh. No context of the applicable intellectual property laws is given. It's just a claim that's thrown out there. Does this guy have a patent? Does he have anything other than a similar looking icon (is it that his is similar to Apple's or Apple's is similar to his) to prove this? Did Apple use his source code without permission? I've seen articles on this site that at least feign an understanding of these issues. Why aren't they even raised here?
"An Apple representative contacted Hughes to explain the rejection, saying the app didn't 'technically break the rules,' though it did 'encroach upon the boundaries' of what is allowed in the App Store." from Apple insider. So, are there Camera apps on the apple app store? are there any apps that let you text, or make calls. how about let you surf the web? how about calculators? He made a feature fully before Apple did, they rejected it for
"security concerns" (see below) than Apple put something that does THE SAME THING IN.
at leasts that how i see it.
"He sent it into Apple's App Store in May 2010 but was told that it was rejected for 'security concerns' and for doing things that Steve Jobs' says should not be done." here
PC means personal computer.
i have processing issues, mostly trying to get my ideas into speech and text.
if i say something confusing please tell me!
PC means personal computer.
i have processing issues, mostly trying to get my ideas into speech and text.
if i say something confusing please tell me!
-Kid knows that if syncing a device over WiFi was the job of an app store app, his wouldn't have been the first to the table. Its an OS thing, not an App thing.
-Kid develops a shotty and poorly functioning app. I myself paid $10 for his junk, that never ever once worked. He told me where to go, personally, when I asked for a refund.
-Kid put no thought or creativity into the name, he called it WiFi Sync, which is a description of what it does, not a name. Nothing proprietary about it.
-Did I mention his $%^& never worked?
-Kid obviously doesn't know that the Cydia storefront is illegitimate, and not somewhere where you get credit for your work. Its a public testing ground, and Apple keeps a close eye on it. Apple plucks many, many useful tweaks and features from this place, and uses the idea for a better implementation in the official OS.
-Wifi sync was never one of the features Apple "watched and stole". It was a common sense feature that had been held back for a while...and eventually rolled out as part of the overall iOS 5 catch-up-with-feature-requests release.
That about covers it. Hope this kid saved some of that $500,000 he made. He's going to need every penny of it if he's actually dumb enough to challenge Apple over this.
And thank you for this, end of story.

"He sent it into Apple's App Store in May 2010 but was told that it was rejected for 'security concerns' and for doing things that Steve Jobs' says should not be done." here
Exactly! And that is entirely appropriate. It is allowed for Apple to extend iOS in ways that directly modify the iTunes DB, it is NOT allowed for 3rd party developers to monkey around with the iTunes DB, except in read-only fashion via the open API calls. This is because if your iTunes DB becomes corrupt Apple will be blamed, so Apple keep it locked down tight.
Any App which modifies core iOS data, or even data belonging to other apps is going to get rejected for 'security concerns'. And so they should be.
Visit The Graphic Mac
Visit The Graphic Mac

I'm really disappointed with Apple Insider for pushing this trash.
Of the numerous ways in which this "article" is just plain wrong, let me catalog just a couple.
First, it shows an utter lack of understanding of the firmament in which claims like this exist. I wrote on an AppleLink forum in 1991 that I thought a color Mac Classic would be a great idea. Does that mean Apple can't do it? No. As other commenters have pointed out, this douche did not invent wireless synching. Sigh. No context of the applicable intellectual property laws is given. It's just a claim that's thrown out there. Does this guy have a patent? Does he have anything other than a similar looking icon (is it that his is similar to Apple's or Apple's is similar to his) to prove this? Did Apple use his source code without permission? I've seen articles on this site that at least feign an understanding of these issues. Why aren't they even raised here?
Second, no one else is quoted in this. There no reaction from Apple or a spokesman, not even a no comment or "Apple couldn't be reached in time." There's not even a quote from an IP lawyer who might have some insight into the viability of these claims. It's just stenographically reproduced rumor bullshit.
Naturally, this will just slide into a number of people's pre-baked image of Apple as "the borg" or the recycled narrative that they are just ripping people off. I still don't understand why people turn corporate software development into stories of good and evil in the first place.
The little guy is not always right, nor is he always wrong.
Little developers have been whining since at least SuperClock! that Apple "stole" their idea to include in the OS later. Well, if it's patentable, they should patent it. If it's not, they have no property to be stolen unless they seriously think that Apple ripped their source code or misappropriated their trade secrets, but somehow those claims never work out, do they?
If all of these guys had their way and every person that had a eureka moment in the bathtub was able to claim something as their own, there would be an even worse patent troll problem than there is now.
Oh, and you know, this blog ripped off its name from Apple.
I was so tired of this ridiculous story I wasn't going to comment, but I have to say I agree with this 100%.

You're kidding right?
He's probably upset since he made an app for the iPhone, it was rejected, and now the company that rejected it is using it. While I don't think he'll have a case against Apple (unless they used his code...which is doubtful), if you're throwing this away as some moron wanting attention, you're...well...idiotic.
Are you saying that the implementation in this application is the same as Apple's entire iCloud strategy?

Edit : this sums it up perfectly: http://chipotle.tumblr.com/post/6366...ious-questions
NIce find.
lol.
Your post is based on an idiotic assumption.
Yeah, especially since they already had this functionality on the original apple TV!
Face the facts people. Apples implementation of wireless syncing is way, way larger scale than what this guys app would have provided. There is absolutely NO way apple wasn't already working on this service for years before this guy made his app. The guy has absolutely no patent rights to any of the concepts used for this process. When the app was rejected, no one was surprised because a)apple clearly was going to offer a beyter solution themselves in the near future, b) it's a really bad idea to allow third party software to handle such delicate data and c) the app clearly disobeys a large number of the developer agreement with apple (no private APIs, limits to the ability for an app to access other application data, etc.)
As for the icon, it does look remarkably similar to a number of apple's icons (so if anyone is guilty of violating trademarks, it's him, not that I think he is), also, his app was never released so apple can't be violating any trade dress suits, and finally he's never made any attempt to get a trademark for the icon.
Finally, anyone thinking he would've made much money on this app has their head in the clouds
. The majority of power users wouldn't touch this app as the likelihood it'd ruin their device/data/iTunes library would be far to great. Any non-power user wouldn't download this as they probably would barely understand what's even valuable about the service. Ask most casual users how excited they are about wifi syncing in iOS 5 and they'll blankly stare back at you. In fact, this guys largest market was with the jail teaming crowd as their the exact combination of power users who take large risks necessary to desire this app.In other words, Cydia was a better platform for him, and he would've made far, far more money working with apple and being able to add official apple developer to his next resume.
the App along with the helper App installed on the computer...fooled the computer into thinking that iDevice was connected thru USB...and the App fooled the iDevice into thinking it was connected thru USB...
So therefore the App NEVER made any changes to either the iTunes DB nor the iDevice DB
iTunes and the iDevice just did what Apple set them up to do...just with the App installed and the helper App installed gave the devices the thought that they were connected
now with that being said...WiFi Sync on iOS 5 is probably doing the same thing...except it is built into both the desktop client iTunes and the device client iOS 5
it's very likely to me that something of the code has to be in alignment for them to both do the same thing
AND the comments about how buggy the kids App is or was, is inconsequential. If he was given the opportunity to place his App on the Apple App Store then he would have had the financial income to fix those bugs on a regular basis instead he was forced to move to the Jailbreak community (courts say not illegal) to bring his App to market and to make something from his time and effort
I remember this app coming out and I remember the hype and drama that ensued...and at no point do I remember Apple coming forth and saying that the App broke any rules of the App Store and I know I remember the discussion of this commentary from the Apple rep that gave him the bad news back then
so maybe Apple was working on it in the past before this guy brought his app to market...but it was not a working product and they should have allowed him to sell his app on the App Store...
he did the work and didnt break the rules so it should have been ok and maybe this guy would have made enough money to say..."hey I can retire and Apple can have my code"
I don't know how Apple didnt see any of this coming...I love you Apple but this was a douche thing to do without even giving the guy a bone...just wrong
FLAME ON guys
Whoa there chief, that's a completely subjective place you are arriving at.
The simplest explanation to me is that the app got jacked.

here is what I understand to be how the app worked and didnt work...
the App along with the helper App installed on the computer...fooled the computer into thinking that iDevice was connected thru USB...and the App fooled the iDevice into thinking it was connected thru USB...
There's two issues with that from Apple's perspective. First off, again he's clearly monkeying with unsupported features. There's no legitimate API call for 'spoof a USB connection over WIFI' in iOS. Second his app still introduced a considerable risk of iTunes corruption. WiFi isn't USB, it isn't as reliable and it doesn't carry power. Bugs in the app wouldn't have impacted him the app creator, they would have impacted Apple by making iPhones seem more flakey.
Apple's own wifi sync will certainly be working in a different way from that. For starters it requires that the device be getting power from an external source. Second it will almost certainly be more robust in the face of a sudden loss of wifi connectivity than the USB sync is to a sudden unplug.
So yes, he stomped and whined and got all the attention a little cry baby typically does. He'll be forgotten tomorrow though, like most cry babies are.
- Apple accused of appropriating rejected 'Wi-Fi Sync' app
Recent Discussions
- › Google's Chrome team developing app launcher for Mac 53 seconds ago
- › With spotlight on it & Apple, Ireland calls for worldwide tax... 1 minute ago
- › New Microsoft Windows 8 ad turns Apple's Siri against her maker 2 minutes ago
- › Corning touts Gorilla Glass 3's advantages over sapphire in... 7 minutes ago
- › Cook: US-built Mac will be refreshed version of existing product 8 minutes ago
- › Objective vs Subjective reporting -> Or, how to look like a tool 17 minutes ago
- › Apple tells reseller new Mac Pro coming in spring 2013 26 minutes ago
- › Google's new 3D Maps destroy Manhattan in the wake of Apple's Flyover 27 minutes ago
- › Like Apple, Google & Yahoo also avoid taxes by way of Ireland 50 minutes ago
- › Your ideas, hopes and links for green travel. 59 minutes ago
Recent Reviews
- › Apple iPod nano - 16GB, Silver MC526LL/A (6th Generation) by cc420
- › Apple iPad with Retina Display Wi-Fi + Verizon/Sprint 4G - 64GB,... by Aaron Krahn
- › 13.3-inch Apple MacBook Air MD231LL/A (Mid-2012) by ahilal
- › Apple Time Capsule - 2TB (MD032LL/A) by biyahero
- › Apple iPad Wi-Fi - 64GB, White (MD330LL/A) by raeganapril
- › Apple Magic Trackpad (MC380LL/A) by WisdomSeed
- › Aperture 3 by bcbcbroderick
- › 17-inch Apple MacBook Pro MD311LL/A (Late 2011) by bcbcbroderick
- › Apple iPod touch - 32GB, Black MC544LL/A (4th Generation) by bcbcbroderick
- › Apple iPod touch - 8 GB, White MD057LL/A (4th Generation) by bcbcbroderick
New Apple Wikis
- › 2013 'Modified' iPod touch by Mikeycampbell81
- › 2013 MacBook Pros by Mikeycampbell81
- › iPad mini 2 with Retina display by Mikeycampbell81
- › 2013 iPhone 5S by Mikeycampbell81
- › Trade in your old devices for holiday cash by Mikeycampbell81
- › How to sell your old iPad for cash by Mikeycampbell81
- › How to offset the cost of a new iPhone by... by Mikeycampbell81
- › How to save money on AppleCare extended... by Kasper
- › How to offset the cost of a new iPad mini by... by Mikeycampbell81
- › Apple Prototypes by Mikeycampbell81
About AppleInsider | Join the Community | Advertise
© 2013 AppleInsider is powered by Huddler Tech | FAQ | Support | Privacy/TOS | Site Map








