or Connect
AppleInsider › Forums › Software › Mac Software › Adobe continues assault on Apple's Final Cut Pro X with 'switcher program'
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Adobe continues assault on Apple's Final Cut Pro X with 'switcher program'

post #1 of 151
Thread Starter 
Adobe has continued its attempt to capitalize on discontent over Apple's new Final Cut Pro X, courting video professionals to convert to its competing Premiere Pro with 50 percent savings.

Through Sept. 30, anyone who has purchased any version of Final Cut Pro, or even Avid Media Composer, will be able to switch to Adobe's Creative Suite 5.5 Production Premium or Premiere Pro CS5.5 with a 50 percent discount. Both CS5.5 Production Premium and Adobe Premiere Pro CS5.5 launched in April of 2011.

"Were hearing from video professionals that they want pro level tools that address cutting edge work but also allow them to use legacy footage and workflows," said Jim Guerard, general manager and vice president of professional video and audio, Adobe. "At Adobe weve been in the trenches with video pros for years and with Adobe Premiere Pro CS5.5 and CS5.5 Production Premium weve delivered professional-grade tools that are already being battle-tested by some of the most innovative filmmakers, broadcasters and video pros."

Adobe highlighted the features of Premiere Pro CS5.5, including the fact that it is compatible with the latest Mac hardware, namely Thunderbolt ports, 64-bit processors and multicore CPUs. Premiere Pro CS 5.5 is native 64-bit, and provides graphics processor unit acceleration for real-time effects, color correction/grading, and accelerated rendering.

The aggressive discount from Adobe is the latest attempt from the software company to capitalize on the unhappiness some video professionals have expressed over Apple's new Final Cut Pro X.

Earlier this week, Adobe launched a public relations offensive attempting to drum up support for Premiere Pro. PR representatives for Adobe have called attention to documents in assisting users in switching from Final Cut Pro to Premiere Pro.

Adobe now has a dedicated website on switching to Premiere Pro. The main graphic on the page even reads "You're a pro. Make sure your toolset is too," perhaps a reference to some outspoken critics of Final Cut Pro X who have suggested the latest update is not a "pro" application.



Last May, AppleInsider was first to report that Apple was scaling its Final Cut Pro software to better fit the "prosumer" market, rather than high-end professionals. Final Cut Pro X was eventually released earlier this month.

The new software was quickly met with condemnation from some video professionals who believe Apple's new product is vastly inferior to its predecessor. They have also expressed discontent that Final Cut Pro 7 and Final Cut Pro are no longer available for purchase, having been declared "end of life" with the launch of Final Cut Pro X on June 21.

Apple has even been providing refunds to dissatisfied customers who purchased Final Cut Pro X from the Mac App Store. Product managers have also spoken publicly on the matter, revealing that some important features like multicam editing will be added in a future release.

This week, Apple also posted a series of questions and answers on its website, in which it explained that drastic changes to Final Cu Pro X made it impossible to "translate" old projects from Final Cut Pro 7 without changing or losing data. As a result, the ability to import projects from older versions of Final Cut will not be coming to the latest release.
post #2 of 151
And Adobe falls all over themselves to try and take advantage. This speaks volumes about the culture at Adobe I think...

Why can't they produce a version of Flash that is truly mobile ready? Probably because they spend more on marketing and executive salaries than they do on development.

If you are going to insist on being an ass, at least demonstrate the intelligence to be a smart one
Reply
If you are going to insist on being an ass, at least demonstrate the intelligence to be a smart one
Reply
post #3 of 151
Quote:
Originally Posted by fecklesstechguy View Post

And Adobe falls all over themselves to try and take advantage. This speaks volumes about the culture at Adobe I think...

Yeah, because Apple didn't spend years doing the same crap with the "I'm a Mac" commercials.
post #4 of 151
Quote:
Originally Posted by caliminius View Post

Yeah, because Apple didn't spend years doing the same crap with the "I'm a Mac" commercials.

Implying that's the same in any way.

Originally posted by Marvin

Even if [the 5.5” iPhone] exists, it doesn’t deserve to.
Reply

Originally posted by Marvin

Even if [the 5.5” iPhone] exists, it doesn’t deserve to.
Reply
post #5 of 151
Quote:
Originally Posted by fecklesstechguy View Post

And Adobe falls all over themselves to try and take advantage. This speaks volumes about the culture at Adobe I think...

Why can't they produce a version of Flash that is truly mobile ready? Probably because they spend more on marketing and executive salaries than they do on development.


They would be extremely stupid not to take advantage of the situation as ANY company would....
post #6 of 151
Quote:
Originally Posted by fecklesstechguy View Post

And Adobe falls all over themselves to try and take advantage. This speaks volumes about the culture at Adobe I think...

Why can't they produce a version of Flash that is truly mobile ready? Probably because they spend more on marketing and executive salaries than they do on development.


So Apple deliberately blocking Flash in iPhones and iPads is a better culture? People should be able to choose whatever they want, no what one person wants.
post #7 of 151
Quote:
Originally Posted by fecklesstechguy View Post

And Adobe falls all over themselves to try and take advantage. This speaks volumes about the culture at Adobe I think...

Why can't they produce a version of Flash that is truly mobile ready? Probably because they spend more on marketing and executive salaries than they do on development.


This is exactly what they should do. They are acting like a well run company with this move. As both a capitalist and opportunist I applaud them.
Dick Applebaum on whether the iPad is a personal computer: "BTW, I am posting this from my iPad pc while sitting on the throne... personal enough for you?"
Reply
Dick Applebaum on whether the iPad is a personal computer: "BTW, I am posting this from my iPad pc while sitting on the throne... personal enough for you?"
Reply
post #8 of 151
Quote:
Originally Posted by fecklesstechguy View Post

And Adobe falls all over themselves to try and take advantage. This speaks volumes about the culture at Adobe I think...

Why can't they produce a version of Flash that is truly mobile ready? Probably because they spend more on marketing and executive salaries than they do on development.


It's a brilliant opportunity for Adobe and one they're really taking seriously. It is indeed exactly like the "I'm a Mac" campaign - as soon as Vista came out and was trashed those ads attacked it and gave users an alternative: to upgrade to a Mac. It's fair marketing on Adobe's part and I think Apple's attacks on its products such as Flash over the year warrant it even further.

I don't like that Apple is falling victim to Adobe for inferior software because it's not true to Apple's form but it's an opportunity Adobe have taken and who could blame them. Plus 50% is great for competition and hence consumers.

Side note: Can't wait to see Steve Jobs mention this whole debacle publicly for the first time. Should be like MobileMe all over again, or perhaps his "Stop me if you've seen it" remark at the iPhone 4 keynote when unveiling the design - always a good laugh.
post #9 of 151
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alien987 View Post

So Apple deliberately blocking Flash in iPhones and iPads is a better culture? People should be able to choose whatever they want, no what one person wants.

Yes, it's better--for most. We pay Apple to do the research and decision making for us in creating a great product; and because we like their work, we purchase their products.

Many Android fans love the fact that Google and (most) handset makers let them make the phone into what they want. That is their advantage; and because they like that culture, they purchase those products.

Your choice is in what you choose to buy--not how the companies choose to implement their respective operating systems and handset strategy.
GIGO. The truth in all of life.
Reply
GIGO. The truth in all of life.
Reply
post #10 of 151
Quote:
Originally Posted by fecklesstechguy View Post

And Adobe falls all over themselves to try and take advantage. This speaks volumes about the culture at Adobe I think...

They are are business who sees an opening to bring in disgruntled users of a competitor product make money. Apple would be doing the same under similar circumstances.
post #11 of 151
I wouldn't even consider this as news or site worthy. Corporations really do a great circus and full of themselves all the time. And I think a "pro" might be full of it too if he/she falls for these marketing tricks.
Apple had me at scrolling
Reply
Apple had me at scrolling
Reply
post #12 of 151
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alien987 View Post

So Apple deliberately blocking Flash in iPhones and iPads is a better culture? People should be able to choose whatever they want, no what one person wants.

OK, troll. Flash does not work properly on any mobile platform. So I guess Apple is so evil that it fouled-up Flash for its competitors as well as its own platform? Is that your position?
post #13 of 151
One of the advantages Adobe is extolling is the ability to open FCP7 XML and import sequences in Premiere -- actually as a best effort with a log of any problems. It looks good!

I found an article that says the FCP7 import is already built into FCPX -- just not activated. Here's the translation from Mac Magazine Brazil (scroll down to the second article):

http://translate.google.com/translat...%26prmd%3Divns

ping
"...The calm is on the water and part of us would linger by the shore, For ships are safe in harbor, but that's not what ships are for."
- Michael Lille -
Reply
"...The calm is on the water and part of us would linger by the shore, For ships are safe in harbor, but that's not what ships are for."
- Michael Lille -
Reply
post #14 of 151
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smiles77 View Post

Your choice is in what you choose to buy--not how the companies choose to implement their respective operating systems and handset strategy.

Very true! And I will gladly support any company that is trying to rid the internet of Flash and encourages the development of HTML5 alternatives.

The internet is a place for open standards that can used by everyone. Even If I did have an Android device, I shouldn't have to wait for Adobe to make a stable version of Flash Player to visit a website! I should just be able to open a browser!
Check out my Apple Tech Podcast: Cidercast
Reply
Check out my Apple Tech Podcast: Cidercast
Reply
post #15 of 151
Quote:
Originally Posted by fecklesstechguy View Post

And Adobe falls all over themselves to try and take advantage. This speaks volumes about the culture at Adobe I think...

Why can't they produce a version of Flash that is truly mobile ready? Probably because they spend more on marketing and executive salaries than they do on development.


You really should be heeding your own signature.
post #16 of 151
Quote:
Originally Posted by AppleInsider View Post

This week, Apple also posted a series of questions and answers on its website, in which it explained that drastic changes to Final Cu Pro X made it impossible to "translate" old projects from Final Cut Pro 7 without changing or losing data. As a result, the ability to import projects from older versions of Final Cut will not be coming to the latest release.

Yeah this little item right here is what Abobe will make the most of. Premiere reads FCP 7 projects and FCP X does not. And Apple says they are not going to bother with it. All most editors would want is a way to import an EDL or XML of their timeline with cuts and dissolves and maybe layers without effects. If Apple could manage to offer this simple path a lot of people would be more open to X.
post #17 of 151
I wonder if Apple would have been better off if they just said from the start that it was a paid preview of some sort.
post #18 of 151
Quote:
Originally Posted by jakevin. View Post

It's a brilliant opportunity for Adobe and one they're really taking seriously. It is indeed exactly like the "I'm a Mac" campaign - as soon as Vista came out and was trashed those ads attacked it and gave users an alternative: to upgrade to a Mac. It's fair marketing on Adobe's part and I think Apple's attacks on its products such as Flash over the year warrant it even further.

I don't like that Apple is falling victim to Adobe for inferior software because it's not true to Apple's form but it's an opportunity Adobe have taken and who could blame them. Plus 50% is great for competition and hence consumers.

Side note: Can't wait to see Steve Jobs mention this whole debacle publicly for the first time. Should be like MobileMe all over again, or perhaps his "Stop me if you've seen it" remark at the iPhone 4 keynote when unveiling the design - always a good laugh.

It is a ridiculous notion to suggest Apple has been attacking Adobe. Since when does opting not to support an inferior product count as an attack? And yes Steve has made public statements including his open letter regarding flash, but this is not an attack either. Tech journalists and consumers wanted to know the situation, so of course Steve is going to give Apple's answer to the situation. Saying that Flash is inefficient and obsolete and crash-happy is not a lie, nor an attack. It is simply the truth. He didn't spew venom at Adobe, and has given them so many opportunities to fix their product. But for some reason they refuse to spend time improving this product. I think they probably could improve it if they wanted to. So either they do not want to, or they cannot. Either way, who would want this on their iPad or iPhone. Not me. I am extremely happy in my flashless mobile existence. Good riddance.
post #19 of 151
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dick Applebaum View Post

One of the advantages Adobe is extolling is the ability to open FCP7 XML and import sequences in Premiere -- actually as a best effort with a log of any problems. It looks good!

I found an article that says the FCP7 import is already built into FCPX -- just not activated. Here's the translation from Mac Magazine Brazil (scroll down to the second article):

http://translate.google.com/translat...%26prmd%3Divns

ping

This is excellent news. Apple really need to get their PR act in order on this one as well as remove the EOL on 7 for now at least.
Been using Apple since Apple ][ - Long on AAPL so biased
nMac Pro 6 Core, MacBookPro i7, MacBookPro i5, iPhones 5 and 5s, iPad Air, 2013 Mac mini, SE30, IIFx, Towers; G4 & G3.
Reply
Been using Apple since Apple ][ - Long on AAPL so biased
nMac Pro 6 Core, MacBookPro i7, MacBookPro i5, iPhones 5 and 5s, iPad Air, 2013 Mac mini, SE30, IIFx, Towers; G4 & G3.
Reply
post #20 of 151
The discounted price for the Production suite is $150 cheaper than the retail price for either After Effects or Photoshop. Even if you're staying with FCP 7 or are completely thrilled with FCP X, this is a great deal.
post #21 of 151
Damn! I'm definitely taking them up on it. As long as I can keep all the FCP software I'm going to get a bunch of CS5.5 for 50% off!. Whatever, about Premiere, it is useful to have I guess but the rest of the suite is a total bargain at that price.

EDIT: Actually maybe not. I just reread that it is the Production Premium version which is not what I want after all

Life is too short to drink bad coffee.

Reply

Life is too short to drink bad coffee.

Reply
post #22 of 151
Quote:
Originally Posted by WelshDog View Post

Yeah this little item right here is what Abobe will make the most of. Premiere reads FCP 7 projects and FCP X does not. And Apple says they are not going to bother with it. All most editors would want is a way to import an EDL or XML of their timeline with cuts and dissolves and maybe layers without effects. If Apple could manage to offer this simple path a lot of people would be more open to X.

Apple said " As a result, the ability to import projects from older versions of Final Cut will not be coming to the latest release."

The latest release is the first release of FCPX or the current release of FCP7 -- if export changes are needed.

Apple did not say they are not working on it!

See my prior post about the findings published in Mac Magazine Brazil.

Also, a new plugin SDK has been published and there is a lot of activity among developers rewriting their effects plugins for 64-bit OCL/GCD for FCPX.

So, it is possible that what you are asking for -- will appear within months.
"...The calm is on the water and part of us would linger by the shore, For ships are safe in harbor, but that's not what ships are for."
- Michael Lille -
Reply
"...The calm is on the water and part of us would linger by the shore, For ships are safe in harbor, but that's not what ships are for."
- Michael Lille -
Reply
post #23 of 151
Look folks -- I love Apple. But Apple doesn't handle pro/business users well at all and this FCPX situation is a prime example. It's not that Apple "doesn't care" about pro users. If they didn't care about pro users, then they wouldn't have bothered making FCPX 64-bit, nor would they have invested in technologies like GCD and Thunderbolt (which really are only relevant to pro users).

The issue is that Apple's (more specifically, Steve Jobs) approach to communication with customers and dealing with transitions from old to new technology cause real problems for pro and business users. And the funny thing is that it wouldn't take very much at all to fix this. All Apple had to do was provide clarity about what this new product is and what it will become over time, while continuing to sell and support version 7. If they had simply handled this transition in the same way that they handled the transition from OS9 to OSX, they wouldn't be facing this sh!tstorm.

When Jobs finally retires from Apple, there are many great things about him that will be missed. But there will also be some things that won't be missed, and his handling of pro/business users is one of those things.
post #24 of 151
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dick Applebaum View Post


So, it is possible that what you are asking for -- will appear within months.

That would be outstanding.
post #25 of 151
Quote:
Originally Posted by sranger View Post

They would be extremely stupid not to take advantage of the situation as ANY company would....

of course. I recall getting fc in a similar promotion from apple, sending them my premier cd and serial number and getting fc.

It comes full circle!
What I got... 15" i7 w/8 gigs ram,iPad2 64gig wifi, 2.0 mac mini, 2.0 17" imac, appleTv, Still running my old G4 466 upgraded to 1.2GHz maxed ram as a pro tools machine, and 2 iphones.
Reply
What I got... 15" i7 w/8 gigs ram,iPad2 64gig wifi, 2.0 mac mini, 2.0 17" imac, appleTv, Still running my old G4 466 upgraded to 1.2GHz maxed ram as a pro tools machine, and 2 iphones.
Reply
post #26 of 151
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alien987 View Post

So Apple deliberately blocking Flash in iPhones and iPads is a better culture? People should be able to choose whatever they want, no what one person wants.

My Adobe plugins STILL crash. Apple did the world a favor.

They saw that Adobe Flash didn't meet their standards of performance and they saw that plugins were the cause of most web browser crashing on Mac desktops, and saw HTML5 as the future.

I'm glad Apple blocked Adobe from placing Flash on the iPhone, because I have an Android phone that can never support flash due to the processor.

By making HTML5 and MP4 the standard I can enjoy mobile videos with minimal overhead and load and view web pages quickly without my browser crashing.

I can only imagine if I had to watch online videos using mobile flash. My battery life would be horrible!

Apple was the first to leave behind the floppy drive, serial/parallel ports, and they routinely leave behind software that's old and shouldn't be used any longer.

The problem with letting the end users decide what they want is because they are like you and don't like change. Remember how many people got mad about the Windows XP start menu being different? Nobody else in the PC industry is as daring as Apple to make leaps of faith. Apple took the risk by not including Flash but the market also realized that it didn't need flash. The iPhone beat all the odds, Apple changed the way cell phone companies treat phone makers completely, while providing a phone that didn't have many features of a traditional phone or smartphone. They ditched the keyboard and even the stylus.

The typical anti-Apple complaint is "Apple doesn't give me a choice." That's not true. Apple makes a choice, takes a bigger risk than the rest of the industry, and then the customer chooses whether he/she wants to go in the same direction. Another example, iPhones and iPods don't have removable storage. Almost EVERY other competitor does. Obviously, the consumer doesn't really care! Has my micro-SD card ever left my Android phone? NO! So that's an extra mechanism that I paid for that I don't need. It was almost like Apple has a crystal ball and figured out that I was going to be getting and storing most of my information online!! What a concept.

The iPhone didn't succeed because Apple is cool and trendy and iPods were already all the rage. To beat all those odds I mentioned above it had to be great, and it was. It was nearly the best consumer device ever made.

Apple's approach can yield failures, but those can always be corrected. FCPX is a great example of one of these (short term) failures, and Apple has many times released products that are essentially a re-imagination of a great idea they had previously (G4 cube -> mac mini, newton -> iphone, current iMac form factor -> 20th anniversary mac, macintosh -> imac)

Adobe themselves are developing ways to convert flash to HTML5 because they know flash is 100% dead within 5 years. Go here and tell me you still think Flash is worth a damn.

http://chrysaora.com/ This is one of my favorite chrome experiments. This runs at 50FPS on my system...you think Flash could do that?

Another great one
post #27 of 151
Quote:
Originally Posted by digitalclips View Post

This is excellent news. Apple really need to get their PR act in order on this one as well as remove the EOL on 7 for now at least.

Yeah!

But, by making THE FCPX announcement the way the did, Apple got everyone's attention! you either need to move ahead with Apple or move away -- You can't stay with FCP7 forever!

Now, gracious and attentive Apple can say:

"We listened to our customers and have:

1) Added features to allow you to import FCP7 projects into FCPX

2) Given additional transition time by extending FCP7 support

Sound Familiar?
"...The calm is on the water and part of us would linger by the shore, For ships are safe in harbor, but that's not what ships are for."
- Michael Lille -
Reply
"...The calm is on the water and part of us would linger by the shore, For ships are safe in harbor, but that's not what ships are for."
- Michael Lille -
Reply
post #28 of 151
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dick Applebaum View Post

Yeah!

But, by making THE FCPX announcement the way the did, Apple got everyone's attention! you either need to move ahead with Apple or move away -- You can't stay with FCP7 forever!

Now, gracious and attentive Apple can say:

"We listened to our customers and have:

1) Added features to allow you to import FCP7 projects into FCPX

2) Given additional transition time by extending FCP7 support

Sound Familiar?

Well said. It is an easy fix you'd think from a PR stance. I'd even add maybe Apple look at updating 7 as an alternative to the "most stuff is done for you" paradigm as in X. This all assuming Apple want the pros. I have to wonder. BTW I have now spent the last week working around the clock in X and watching every training video there is. It is great but frustratingly automated at times. Of course I have many thousands of hours in FCP versions prior to this so it will take longer to truly get to grips.
Been using Apple since Apple ][ - Long on AAPL so biased
nMac Pro 6 Core, MacBookPro i7, MacBookPro i5, iPhones 5 and 5s, iPad Air, 2013 Mac mini, SE30, IIFx, Towers; G4 & G3.
Reply
Been using Apple since Apple ][ - Long on AAPL so biased
nMac Pro 6 Core, MacBookPro i7, MacBookPro i5, iPhones 5 and 5s, iPad Air, 2013 Mac mini, SE30, IIFx, Towers; G4 & G3.
Reply
post #29 of 151
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alien987 View Post

So Apple deliberately blocking Flash in iPhones and iPads is a better culture? People should be able to choose whatever they want, no what one person wants.



it is really funny that, even after 4 years, somebody still write something about Flash on mobile device... FORGET IT!

First, Daniel Eran Dilger, wrote about Flash on mobile devices, later Steve Jobs (more or less) wrote same thing about Flash in open letter... and some ppl still can not accept it:

"The first day we had the TouchPad, we were browsing the Internet with a few native and downloaded apps open: Facebook, Adobe Reader, Quell, Evernote, and a couple of browser windows. We clicked a Flash video to play it, but the browser appeared not to respond. Figuring it just needed a few seconds, we went back to the home screen and opened a browser window to visit an IRC chatroom. Nothing in that browser window would respond, and then a notification popped up: "Memory critical too many cards!""

http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/revie...d-review.ars/3

enjoy in your digital life !
post #30 of 151
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blastdoor View Post

Look folks -- I love Apple. But Apple doesn't handle pro/business users well at all and this FCPX situation is a prime example. It's not that Apple "doesn't care" about pro users. If they didn't care about pro users, then they wouldn't have bothered making FCPX 64-bit, nor would they have invested in technologies like GCD and Thunderbolt (which really are only relevant to pro users).

The issue is that Apple's (more specifically, Steve Jobs) approach to communication with customers and dealing with transitions from old to new technology cause real problems for pro and business users. And the funny thing is that it wouldn't take very much at all to fix this. All Apple had to do was provide clarity about what this new product is and what it will become over time, while continuing to sell and support version 7. If they had simply handled this transition in the same way that they handled the transition from OS9 to OSX, they wouldn't be facing this sh!tstorm.

When Jobs finally retires from Apple, there are many great things about him that will be missed. But there will also be some things that won't be missed, and his handling of pro/business users is one of those things.

Agreed - I'm sort of happy to see them get a bit of negative feedback on something like this. I have shares and don't want to see them get so ahead of themselves in telling people what they want that nobody actually wants it any more.

Oh, the ability to at least import your old projects? How about we just sell the new software cheaper. Huh? You could easily have an import tool with a disclaimer that because of differences in how media is handled, some items might not come across cleanly. Hell, open a 'here's stuff that didn't make it' list like in a Pages import.
post #31 of 151
Quote:
Originally Posted by fecklesstechguy View Post

And Adobe falls all over themselves to try and take advantage. This speaks volumes about the culture at Adobe I think...

Apple actually had the same campaign when they brought out final cut. I remember sending in my original Premier disc. Dont remember what the discount was, but it was huge.
post #32 of 151
Quote:
Originally Posted by kovacm View Post



it is really funny that, even after 4 years, somebody still write something about Flash on mobile device... FORGET IT!

First, Daniel Eran Dilger, wrote about Flash on mobile devices, later Steve Jobs (more or less) wrote same thing about Flash in open letter... and some ppl still can not accept it:

Hey Google accepted it apparently. The new Swiffy converter works surprisingly well if you want to convert a small Flash file into a large HTML5 file in order to view on iOS.

Life is too short to drink bad coffee.

Reply

Life is too short to drink bad coffee.

Reply
post #33 of 151
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alien987 View Post

So Apple deliberately blocking Flash in iPhones and iPads is a better culture? People should be able to choose whatever they want, no what one person wants.

If you put flash on an iPhone or iPad it will lose its battery power so fast people will say "the iPhone is useless it only lasts 2 hours or whatever" Apple do not want their reputation to be damaged by allowing an application that eats processor cycles and runs the battery flat.
Wll I have my G5 so I am off to get a life; apart from this post...
Reply
Wll I have my G5 so I am off to get a life; apart from this post...
Reply
post #34 of 151
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alien987 View Post

So Apple deliberately blocking Flash in iPhones and iPads is a better culture? People should be able to choose whatever they want, no what one person wants.

I'm sure you have your reasons when it comes to why you said what you did, but I'm running the latest version of Flash and it causes havoc on my Mac Pro, with 8-cores. There's not a snowballs chance in hell that I want flash on my 3GS that has only one.

When it comes to Adobe going after users pissed off at Apple due to Final Cut Pro X, I have no problem with it. Those people were on the fence to begin with. If anything, most people will simply return to their prior version of FCP and wait for Apple to address concerns. The one concern people are just going to have to get over is the legacy workflow thing. Technology advances, and always will. There are people legitimately disconcerted with their Carbon apps no longer being supported too because those apps are either the only thing that they can use, or they are too stuck with that program to try something new. It happens.

Hearing people complain about FCP X is similar to my listening my dad complain endlessly when "Regular" (leaded) fuel was discontinued. It's my personal belief that Apple releases software too soon. I know everyone always replies, "well if they didn't release it without some problems, they'd never release anything." I understand that, but I also think that if they are going to attach the word "Pro" to something, that they'd better take the extra time to really make sure that everything is addressed so that they don't have problems like they are currently dealing with. The software wasn't mature enough from what people are saying (because I don't use it) who use FCP day in and day out. Adobe saw their opportunity, and they are going for it. It's business, and business is brutal.
Fortes Fortuna Adiuvat
Reply
Fortes Fortuna Adiuvat
Reply
post #35 of 151
This is still a conversation about what Apple (unbidden) decided to do with Final Cut. It's their product and they can do what they want, but I think someone high on the ladder at Apple has become wholly disconnected with their Final Cut user base. To have one's hard-earned skills are blithely rendered worthless is certainly worth a pout. I've seen several ageist references in other threads to "old dogs" not wanting to learn new tricks. I don't think that's germane. We're still expected to keep our workflow at pace while learning "What's New" with each iteration of a software package. When "What's New" is every damned thing in the box it looks like someone at Apple has gone insane. It will be interesting to see how it plays out. I don't think a few third-party plugins will fix this farrago.
post #36 of 151
Quote:
Originally Posted by fecklesstechguy View Post

And Adobe falls all over themselves to try and take advantage. This speaks volumes about the culture at Adobe I think...

Okay, as your signature says, I'll document so I won't be a dumba$$ but rather a smart one...

It's not Adobe's culture. It's a business culture! The masses went with PC and Microsoft OS, which we all know has it's problems. What did Apple do? According to you, fall all over themselves to try and take advantage with their "Switcher" campaign. I'd like to think Apple was a company in the business of selling their great computers and a crappy PC OS presented them with an opportunity.

A little nostalgia never hurts either....

apple.com/switch

Apple's Switcher Promotion - Ellen Feis

Apple's Switcher Promotion - Jamie Porsche

Apple's Switcher Promotion - Andy the cop... Hey, you spell his last name!
/
/
/

Ten years ago, we had Steve Jobs, Bob Hope and Johnny Cash.  Today we have no Jobs, no Hope and no Cash.

Reply

Ten years ago, we had Steve Jobs, Bob Hope and Johnny Cash.  Today we have no Jobs, no Hope and no Cash.

Reply
post #37 of 151
Sounds great except for one tiny issue. Premiere has never been a decent video app itself, let alone a pro video app. Leave toy town for baby land, so what exactly is their point?

... cutting your current job, on target for the deadline, know your edit tools inside out? Change your entire edit suite mid job, don't worry, it'll import the file... cause you are a pro and that's what pro's do.

at 50% off you'll be able to afford to cop the late penalties from the client as you deal with the disclaimed bugs and unique scenarios we never thought of. After you finish just think of the down time that will come from being bad mouthed for delaying the project as quality time to learn your new software! That's right, built in training while you wait for people to forget what a dick you were.

Yah!
you only have freedom in choice when you know you have no choice
Reply
you only have freedom in choice when you know you have no choice
Reply
post #38 of 151
Quote:
Originally Posted by digitalclips View Post

BTW I have now spent the last week working around the clock in X and watching every training video there is. It is great but frustratingly automated at times. Of course I have many thousands of hours in FCP versions prior to this so it will take longer to truly get to grips.

That's what I plan to do over the holiday weekend. I have, likely, 1-2 thousand hours with FCP.

FCPX certainly is different -- things work differently (by default) and are in different places!

But there are some great new features too -- the "To Do Markers" for instance.

I love the shift-z shortcut to make the entire storyline fit the window.

I have found that you can do things the old way, kinda', -- for example drag (or lift) a clip above the storyline and have it not be attached to the story line. When the storyline length is changed, the unattached clips remain where they are (now, out of synch with the storyline) -- just like FCP7. I haven't figured out why you'd want to do this... but you can do it.


Just as a teaser:

I read some where that iOS has ProRes codecs built-in. Also, the AVFoundation framework that gives FCPX its performance was developed for iOS then ported back to Mac OS X.

You can edit h.264 clips, effortlessly, on the iPad or iPhone using iMove -- try that on FCP7 on a Mac.

A lot of the FCPX constructs are supersets of the corresponding iMovie constructs.

Here's one user's idea off a "StoryTelling Dream Tool"



StoryTelling Dream tool...


Is that the FCP timeline you see on the Wacom tablet?


Wouldn't it be great if you could multitouch edit in FCPX?


Probably gonna' need a bigger iPad, though, with ThunderBolt
"...The calm is on the water and part of us would linger by the shore, For ships are safe in harbor, but that's not what ships are for."
- Michael Lille -
Reply
"...The calm is on the water and part of us would linger by the shore, For ships are safe in harbor, but that's not what ships are for."
- Michael Lille -
Reply
post #39 of 151
Premiere is such a convoluted, mediocre program.

And CS 5.5 is such a weak update. It should have been a half price upgrade.

Adobe is reminding me of Quark these days. They too, sound desperate.
post #40 of 151
Quote:
Originally Posted by akhomerun View Post

The problem with letting the end users decide what they want is because they are like you and don't like change. Remember how many people got mad about the Windows XP start menu being different? Nobody else in the PC industry is as daring as Apple to make leaps of faith. Apple took the risk by not including Flash but the market also realized that it didn't need flash. The iPhone beat all the odds, Apple changed the way cell phone companies treat phone makers completely, while providing a phone that didn't have many features of a traditional phone or smartphone. They ditched the keyboard and even the stylus.

The typical anti-Apple complaint is "Apple doesn't give me a choice." That's not true. Apple makes a choice, takes a bigger risk than the rest of the industry, and then the customer chooses whether he/she wants to go in the same direction. Another example, iPhones and iPods don't have removable storage. Almost EVERY other competitor does. Obviously, the consumer doesn't really care! Has my micro-SD card ever left my Android phone? NO! So that's an extra mechanism that I paid for that I don't need. It was almost like Apple has a crystal ball and figured out that I was going to be getting and storing most of my information online!! What a concept.

The iPhone didn't succeed because Apple is cool and trendy and iPods were already all the rage. To beat all those odds I mentioned above it had to be great, and it was. It was nearly the best consumer device ever made.

Apple's approach can yield failures, but those can always be corrected. FCPX is a great example of one of these (short term) failures, and Apple has many times released products that are essentially a re-imagination of a great idea they had previously (G4 cube -> mac mini, newton -> iphone, current iMac form factor -> 20th anniversary mac, macintosh -> imac)

You really should read some of the criticisms regarding FCP X from the pro community before going off like this. The functionality loss in FCP is the equivalent of taking kerning and indenting out of Word. Doesn't make it non-functional, but can't perform tasks that are required for certain users, and the loss of these functions serves no logical purpose. It has nothing to do with fear of change or silly interface changes.

What's so hard to understand about this?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Mac Software
AppleInsider › Forums › Software › Mac Software › Adobe continues assault on Apple's Final Cut Pro X with 'switcher program'