AppleInsider › Forums › General › General Discussion › Apple investigating flick, pour to send 'physics metaphor' gestures for iOS
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Apple investigating flick, pour to send 'physics metaphor' gestures for iOS

post #1 of 26
Thread Starter 
A recently uncovered Apple patent filing shows the company has looked into using more advanced "physics metaphors" in a mulitouch environment to replace the traditional virtual desktop.

Apple's filing, which was published by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office on Thursday, centers around using "intuitive, physical gestures" that resemble real world physical actions to communicate between devices, send files and broadcast to a network.

The invention sets out to solve an interface issue with modern applications for smartphones and tablets. According to the filing, some modern smartphone applications have discarded the desktop metaphor without finding substitute real world physical actions that provide the same level of intuitive controls. T application specifically addresses at length the issue of file storage and transfer.

Apple has been reluctant to add a fully developed method for easily storing and transferring files between iOS devices. Though some third-party applications have attempted to solve the issue, iOS lacks system-wide processes for sharing files.

Although, iOS 5's tight integration with the iCloud service could make progress when it arrives this fall. Apple plans to provide iCloud storage APIs that will allow applications to sync documents across devices.

Particular embodiments of the invention include physical metaphors such as pouring objects from one container to another, flicking files onto another device and sand flowing through an hour glass. Audible feedback, such as "the sound of liquid pouring, a tablet fizzing, gas through a valve, a sci-fi teleporter, or other sound that audibly represent the transfer of a material from one point to another" could enhance the metaphor.

The gestures in question could be configured to activate wireless communication protocols, including BlueTooth and Radio Frequency Identification, that would enable devices to interact.

In addition to multi-touch, the gestures rely heavily on motion sensors such as accelerometers gyroscopes and magnetometers. One example of the invention involves holding a mobile device over a tablet as file icons "pour" from one to the other. Apple describes the use of "gravity , friction or drag, momentums, torques, accelerations, centripetal forces or any other force found in a real-world physical environment" as cues to make the interface more intuitive.

Another example depicts a directional flick that would send drawn objects from a tablet to a smaller device. The angle of the flick would determine which device to send it to, in the case of multiple nearby devices.

Elements of the invention bear some resemblance to the AirDrop feature that Apple has built into Mac OS X 10.7 Lion. AirDrop is a drag and drop "ad hoc" networking feature that combines aspects of various networking protocols to simplify file transfers for users.

Apple filed the application on Jan. 5, 2010, just weeks before the unveiling of the original iPad. The invention is credited to Brett Bilbrey, Nicholas King and Todd Benjamin.

Last month, Apple was awarded a vital multitouch patent that was viewed as a "huge blow" to its rivals. Patent experts suggested the iPhone maker could use the patent to "bully" its competitors.
post #2 of 26
Simply brilliant...

Who knows? some derivative aspect of this could appear in could appear in iOS 5.

Time will tell.
post #3 of 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by AppleInsider View Post

iPhone maker could use the patent to "bully" its competitors.

or protecting IP is another way to look at it.
post #4 of 26
Accelerometer and proximity sensor controls could be programmed to enable a squeezing motion on a small mobile device to simulate the well-known "toothpaste tube" action.

Steve Ballmer will claim prior art on that one with the Zune, no doubt.
post #5 of 26
Haha! I like the idea of pouring a file from one iDevice to another. But how would the first iDevice know it is above another iDevice when the pour is initiated, and not above thin air? Perhaps it does an IP broadcast at that moment and everyone nearby sends their location, sort of like a location version of ARP.
post #6 of 26
Reminds me of the Microsoft Surface...

http://www.microsoft.com/surface/en/us/default.aspx

post #7 of 26
Mover was one of the first apps I got on my iPhone. It uses the "flick" motion to fling a file from one iPhone to another. I've only used it a few times but it was really cool.
post #8 of 26
Great, at this rate they'll turn iOS devices into ersatz theremins in no time. It's already a bit too easy to interact unintentionally with the touch interface; I don't really want a device where I have to worry about every movement and gesture.
post #9 of 26
Meanwhile, Microsoft investigates bash, pound and stomp in addition to the traditional curse, fume and reboot methods of interacting with their products.

Secret documents also reveal that Apple is using the data captured from the various sensors to determine when failures are likely caused by rough handling to deny warranty claims. Competitors denounce Apple for such tactics while secretly working on their own methods of doing exactly the same thing after the public outrage dies down.

post #10 of 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by aestival View Post

Great, at this rate they'll turn iOS devices into ersatz theremins in no time. It's already a bit too easy to interact unintentionally with the touch interface; I don't really want a device where I have to worry about every movement and gesture.

The AMA files a class action lawsuit against Apple on behalf of patients with various muscular or nervous disorders such as Parkinson's and Tourette Syndrome claiming that the input methods used on iOS devices is discriminatory.

In other news... the American Society for the Blind sues the US Department of Transportation for lack of Braille on roadsigns.

post #11 of 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by aestival View Post

Great, at this rate they'll turn iOS devices into ersatz theremins in no time. It's already a bit too easy to interact unintentionally with the touch interface; I don't really want a device where I have to worry about every movement and gesture.

I imagine it'll only be activated if you're inside a particular app to send the files. Much like how you have to navigate to use AirDrop in the Finder. Only "on" if you need it.
post #12 of 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by t2af View Post

or protecting IP is another way to look at it.


I suppose those people never had any experience with bullying at school otherwise they would know the difference between bullying and defending.

Eh?



Quote:
Originally Posted by ascii View Post

Haha! I like the idea of pouring a file from one iDevice to another. But how would the first iDevice know it is above another iDevice when the pour is initiated, and not above thin air? Perhaps ...

As the filing have mentioned, the angle of the sending device would determine that. I mean in real physics as they trying to emulate, the law of gravity would 'prevail'.
post #13 of 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by AppleInsider View Post

Audible feedback, such as "the sound of liquid pouring, a tablet fizzing, gas through a valve, a sci-fi teleporter, or other sound that audibly represent the transfer of a material from one point to another" could enhance the metaphor.

Gives whole new meaning to "fart apps."
A.k.a. AppleHead on other forums.
Reply
A.k.a. AppleHead on other forums.
Reply
post #14 of 26
Man, they must have a platoon of geeks working inside a dark, deep dungeon.
post #15 of 26
I just have to ask, what are they smoking in Cupertino?
post #16 of 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by aestival View Post

I don't really want a device where I have to worry about every movement and gesture.

Steering an SUV in traffic has similar worries
Been using Apples since 1978 and Macs since 1984
Long on AAPL so biased. Strong advocate for separation of technology and politics on AI.
Reply
Been using Apples since 1978 and Macs since 1984
Long on AAPL so biased. Strong advocate for separation of technology and politics on AI.
Reply
post #17 of 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by ilogic View Post

I just have to ask, what are they smoking in Cupertino?

It's medicinal...
post #18 of 26
deleted
"Surely it is possible to love Apple products and still respect what others have achieved?" - Stelligent
Reply
"Surely it is possible to love Apple products and still respect what others have achieved?" - Stelligent
Reply
post #19 of 26
Apple should license "Bump". The physical interaction is very intuitive.
post #20 of 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Mozzarella View Post

Apple should license "Bump". The physical interaction is very intuitive.

Except for the cracking of iPhone glass due to overly enthusiastic bumps.

Proud AAPL stock owner.

 

GOA

Reply

Proud AAPL stock owner.

 

GOA

Reply
post #21 of 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by ascii View Post

Haha! I like the idea of pouring a file from one iDevice to another. But how would the first iDevice know it is above another iDevice when the pour is initiated, and not above thin air? Perhaps it does an IP broadcast at that moment and everyone nearby sends their location, sort of like a location version of ARP.

Relatively simple spacial geometry, I think. Each iOS device would have its own <X,Y,Z> coordinate system, and maybe someone can help me out heredoes each device also know which way is "up" (based on actual gravity)? If iOS devices are gravity-aware, and not "floating in space", then "pouring" files from one device to another will be even easier.
"Don't be a dick!"Wil Wheaton
Reply
"Don't be a dick!"Wil Wheaton
Reply
post #22 of 26
Ah, Android will surely copy and come out with a better version. Android's version will be the most intuitive of all: You grip your Android phone, move your right or left hand in a back-and-forth motion several times below the level of your abdomen and a torrent of squirt will then splash all around your devices. Oh a bonus: a tremendous flow of release will surround your whole being.
post #23 of 26
Ugh.

What's with the obsession for mimicking the physical world? The appeal of computerized devices is exactly in NOT having to conform to the rules of physical reality.

What is more magical than typing in (or saying) a magical word that syncs/transfers/copies exactly the files you want, to exactly the place you want them, without you having to worry about manual selection, visual feedback, holding your device in the correct orientation, keeping the right distance from receiving device, audible cues, etc...

What a waste of technology...
post #24 of 26
But Anroid has few cotroverions functions, google can control your phone and uinstall or install software...
post #25 of 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrDoppio View Post

Ugh.

What's with the obsession for mimicking the physical world? The appeal of computerized devices is exactly in NOT having to conform to the rules of physical reality.

What is more magical than typing in (or saying) a magical word that syncs/transfers/copies exactly the files you want, to exactly the place you want them, without you having to worry about manual selection, visual feedback, holding your device in the correct orientation, keeping the right distance from receiving device, audible cues, etc...

What a waste of technology...

We inhabit a physical world - and as much usefulness as there may be in creating virtual realms that do not exist in or which augment our reality - I think you are missing the point here that making those virtual devices behave more like objects with which everyone is familiar and which interact with us in ways that our entire existence has trained us to expect can be a good thing.

Imagine if you were tying to pour water from a bottle to a glass and the laws of physics were suddenly null for the water and instead of gravity pulling it down to your glass it just sprayed all over. You would be very surprised because that is something you do not expect. So too with technology - having it behave in ways that can be related to by anyone - "pouring" your data from one device to another may seem odd to those of use who use technology evey day but it sure is more self evident than C:/copy *.* d:/ or even click and drag.
post #26 of 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by lilgto64 View Post

We inhabit a physical world - and as much usefulness as there may be in creating virtual realms that do not exist in or which augment our reality - I think you are missing the point here that making those virtual devices behave more like objects with which everyone is familiar and which interact with us in ways that our entire existence has trained us to expect can be a good thing.

Imagine if you were tying to pour water from a bottle to a glass and the laws of physics were suddenly null for the water and instead of gravity pulling it down to your glass it just sprayed all over. You would be very surprised because that is something you do not expect. So too with technology - having it behave in ways that can be related to by anyone - "pouring" your data from one device to another may seem odd to those of use who use technology evey day but it sure is more self evident than C:/copy *.* d:/ or even click and drag.

Here's a mild surprise that's making the news rounds in the past hour. Apple's trademark application for multi-touch? Denied!

http://9to5mac.com/2011/09/26/apple-...patent-office/

melior diabolus quem scies

"No theatrics and no more personal attacks, just stick to the logic and tell me why I don't have any argument ~ Jragosta/2012

Reply

melior diabolus quem scies

"No theatrics and no more personal attacks, just stick to the logic and tell me why I don't have any argument ~ Jragosta/2012

Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: General Discussion
AppleInsider › Forums › General › General Discussion › Apple investigating flick, pour to send 'physics metaphor' gestures for iOS