or Connect
AppleInsider › Forums › General › General Discussion › Apple takes aim at copycat fake retail stores with new lawsuit
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Apple takes aim at copycat fake retail stores with new lawsuit

post #1 of 38
Thread Starter 
After a number of fake Apple retail stores in China gained publicity online, Apple appears to have taken legal action, undoubtedly looking to shut down the counterfeit locations designed to look like its own operations.

Apple has gone on the offensive against a number of defendants, including 50 John Does and unnamed businesses, in a new trademark infringement suit. The lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court in the Eastern District of New York remains under a court seal, so the specifics of the complaint are not known.

However, one of the defendants in the case is "Apple Story Inc.," matching the name of a retail outlet that mimics Apple's own highly successful retail operation. "Apple Story" is located in the neighborhood of Flushing in Queens, New York; Apple's lawsuit was filed in Brooklyn.

A photo of the "Apple Story" store, submitted to BirdAbroad, shows accessories for Apple products held in displays designed to look like Apple's iPhone and iPad.

Based on the photo, the New York store does not appear to go to the same great lengths taken by some highly elaborate fake stores in China. A handful of locations in the city of Kunming look nearly identical to Apple's legitimate stores, and employees at the fake locations even wear signature blue t-shirts.

AppleInsider attempted Thursday afternoon to contact Samuel Joseph Chuang, the attorney representing defendants Apple Story Inc., Fun Zone Inc., and Janic Po Chiang, to confirm the exact nature of Apple's lawsuit. A request for comment was not returned as of the time of publication.

Because the lawsuit is sealed, it is unknown whether this particular complaint, filed on July 25, also targets the elaborate overseas operations. It's possible that Apple does not yet know who runs those stores, and could be included in the 50 anonymous John Does that are named as defendants with no attorney listed.

"Apple Story" store in Flushing, New York. Credit Greg Autry via BirdAbroad.

Also named as a defendant in the case are generic "XYZ Businesses," with no total number given. Finally, a person named Jimmy Kwok is also listed as a defendant with no attorney.

Apple is represented by New York-based attorneys Mark N. Mutterperl and Todd Ryan Hambridge of the firm Fulbright & Jawardi LLP.

The case's docket report reveals that Apple's legal team spoke with defense attorney Chuang on Tuesday of this week, and both gave the court consent that the case be unsealed, which is how its existence was discovered by AppleInsider. However, the documents will remain sealed with access only to counsel and the court, leaving the exact details unknown.

Fake Apple store in China. Credit: BirdAbroad

After the fake Apple Stores in China garnered attention around the world, city officials in Kunming began investigating the retail locations. Outraged customers duped by the operations also reportedly returned, demanding proof that their purchases were genuine Apple products and not cheap knock-offs.

Two of the fake retail locations were ordered to close by the government because they did not have official businesses permits. But those stores were allegedly not found guilty of any copyright infringement in China.
post #2 of 38
It makes me laugh that every time AI bring up the story of the fake Apple shops they can't help but mention the blue shirts.

"even wear signature blue t-shirts."

I doubt even Apple can stop retailers wearing blue shirts. I can just imagine the scenario...

"Hey Steve, we've just found a fake Apple shop, take a look at these pictures"
"OH MY GOD! They have even managed to get hold of our blue shirt technology"



Jeez, even I can fake a blue shirt, the Chinese copycats are way ahead of copying clothing.
post #3 of 38
I have used Apple computers since 1985 and I have about had it with their strong-arm tactics the last few years. I am seriously considering giving up on Apple products entirely. That Apple Story store looks NOTHING like an Apple Store. Where do they get off on suing these guys. So no we need to add the word Apple (Not Apple Computers, not Apple, Inc.), just Apple...to the "hands-off" list. Disgusting. No, Apple is not loosing money, nor are the customers "confused" as to whether this is an official Apple Store or not. Nonetheless, I am sure that will be part of Apple's complaint.
post #4 of 38
Quote:
Originally Posted by lamewing View Post

I have used Apple computers since 1985 and I have about had it with their strong-arm tactics the last few years. I am seriously considering giving up on Apple products entirely. That Apple Story store looks NOTHING like an Apple Store. Where do they get off on suing these guys. So no we need to add the word Apple (Not Apple Computers, not Apple, Inc.), just Apple...to the "hands-off" list. Disgusting. No, Apple is not loosing money, nor are the customers "confused" as to whether this is an official Apple Store or not. Nonetheless, I am sure that will be part of Apple's complaint.

Should probably wait for full details of the lawsuit to come out before you get too worked up. Apple may be happy if 'Apple Story' simply changes the store name, but who knowswe'll see when we actually have some decent information to discuss.
The true measure of a man is how he treats someone that can do him absolutely no good.
  Samuel Johnson
Reply
The true measure of a man is how he treats someone that can do him absolutely no good.
  Samuel Johnson
Reply
post #5 of 38
Quote:
Originally Posted by lamewing View Post

I have used Apple computers since 1985 and I have about had it with their strong-arm tactics the last few years.

It's my understanding that if you hold a trademark on a given term, you must make some effort to defend the mark or you will risk losing the trademark protection, even if you "don't really care" that someone is using a similar name to your trademark. That may be why Apple is doing as they are in the case of the "Apple Story" business.

It should be interesting to see how the whole "fake store" thing plays out.
post #6 of 38
Quote:
Originally Posted by lamewing View Post

I have used Apple computers since 1985 and I have about had it with their strong-arm tactics the last few years. I am seriously considering giving up on Apple products entirely. That Apple Story store looks NOTHING like an Apple Store. Where do they get off on suing these guys. So no we need to add the word Apple (Not Apple Computers, not Apple, Inc.), just Apple...to the "hands-off" list. Disgusting. No, Apple is not loosing money, nor are the customers "confused" as to whether this is an official Apple Store or not. Nonetheless, I am sure that will be part of Apple's complaint.

To you it looks completely different to an Apple store, to the hapless customers who hadn't been in a real store though it would look entirely convincing. The fact that customers freaked out when they found out it was a fake indicates at least some of them were misled.
post #7 of 38
Quote:
Originally Posted by lamewing View Post

I have used Apple computers since 1985 and I have about had it with their strong-arm tactics the last few years. I am seriously considering giving up on Apple products entirely. That Apple Story store looks NOTHING like an Apple Store. Where do they get off on suing these guys. So no we need to add the word Apple (Not Apple Computers, not Apple, Inc.), just Apple...to the "hands-off" list. Disgusting. No, Apple is not loosing money, nor are the customers "confused" as to whether this is an official Apple Store or not. Nonetheless, I am sure that will be part of Apple's complaint.

It is the responsibility of companies who own trademarks to defend them or risk losing them. They are doing what they are obligated to do as a corporation. Please try to calm down as this is business.
post #8 of 38
Quote:
Originally Posted by Evilution View Post

It makes me laugh that every time AI bring up the story of the fake Apple shops they can't help but mention the blue shirts.

"even wear signature blue t-shirts."

I doubt even Apple can stop retailers wearing blue shirts. I can just imagine the scenario...

"Hey Steve, we've just found a fake Apple shop, take a look at these pictures"
"OH MY GOD! They have even managed to get hold of our blue shirt technology"



Jeez, even I can fake a blue shirt, the Chinese copycats are way ahead of copying clothing.

Apparently you didn't even bother to look at the photo of the "fake" blue shirt with a very prominent and realistic Apple Logo on the front. Now that you're armed with more accurate info ... do you still feel like laughing? Well, do you ?
See, in the record business, you can show someone your song, and they don’t copy it. In the tech business, you show somebody your idea, and they steal it. (Jimmy Iovine)
Reply
See, in the record business, you can show someone your song, and they don’t copy it. In the tech business, you show somebody your idea, and they steal it. (Jimmy Iovine)
Reply
post #9 of 38
Quote:
Originally Posted by lamewing View Post

I have used Apple computers since 1985 and I have about had it with their strong-arm tactics the last few years. I am seriously considering giving up on Apple products entirely. That Apple Story store looks NOTHING like an Apple Store. Where do they get off on suing these guys. So no we need to add the word Apple (Not Apple Computers, not Apple, Inc.), just Apple...to the "hands-off" list. Disgusting. No, Apple is not loosing money, nor are the customers "confused" as to whether this is an official Apple Store or not. Nonetheless, I am sure that will be part of Apple's complaint.

You're obviously not a lawyer or you would understand how trademark/copyright infringement works. If it was "your ox being gored" you might feel differently, I imagine.
See, in the record business, you can show someone your song, and they don’t copy it. In the tech business, you show somebody your idea, and they steal it. (Jimmy Iovine)
Reply
See, in the record business, you can show someone your song, and they don’t copy it. In the tech business, you show somebody your idea, and they steal it. (Jimmy Iovine)
Reply
post #10 of 38
Quote:
Originally Posted by newbee View Post

Apparently you didn't even bother to look at the photo of the "fake" blue shirt with a very prominent and realistic Apple Logo on the front. Now that you're armed with more accurate info ... do you still feel like laughing? Well, do you ?


The store with the blue shirts is not part of the lawsuit. They are in China. The Eastern District of New York has no more jurisdiction over the blue shirted store than the Chinese government has over Apple's United States stores.

Now that you are armed with more accurate info...
post #11 of 38
Quote:
Originally Posted by Evilution View Post

It makes me laugh that every time AI bring up the story of the fake Apple shops they can't help but mention the blue shirts.

"even wear signature blue t-shirts."

I doubt even Apple can stop retailers wearing blue shirts. I can just imagine the scenario...

"Hey Steve, we've just found a fake Apple shop, take a look at these pictures"
"OH MY GOD! They have even managed to get hold of our blue shirt technology"



Jeez, even I can fake a blue shirt, the Chinese copycats are way ahead of copying clothing.

I never thought of it in such a way, that is hilarious

My only problem with the fake stores is that they are not as good as the apple ones ie. they mentioned how some of the nock off iconic stuff shows flaws. That and the training is not the same. Not to mention that they do not say "official apple re-seller" because any mistakes these businesses make can have a negative impact on their clients. I'm positive no business would let a mistaken look alike potentially damage their image.
post #12 of 38
Quote:
Originally Posted by lamewing View Post

I have used Apple computers since 1985 and I have about had it with their strong-arm tactics the last few years. I am seriously considering giving up on Apple products entirely. That Apple Story store looks NOTHING like an Apple Store. Where do they get off on suing these guys. So no we need to add the word Apple (Not Apple Computers, not Apple, Inc.), just Apple...to the "hands-off" list. Disgusting. No, Apple is not loosing money, nor are the customers "confused" as to whether this is an official Apple Store or not. Nonetheless, I am sure that will be part of Apple's complaint.

You may think it lame but Apple does have a trademark for the name Apple when associated with this type of product. They also have a trade look and feel trademark on the store design.

Aside from these issues there is the preception that a store selling iPods etc with the term Apple in the name must be authorized. When in fact they might not. And things bought from a non authorized shop are not covered under warranty

A non tech's thoughts on Apple stuff 

(She's family so I'm a little biased)

Reply

A non tech's thoughts on Apple stuff 

(She's family so I'm a little biased)

Reply
post #13 of 38
Quote:
Originally Posted by AppleLover2 View Post

The store with the blue shirts is not part of the lawsuit. They are in China. The Eastern District of New York has no more jurisdiction over the blue shirted store than the Chinese government has over Apple's United States stores.

Now that you are armed with more accurate info...

Strawman argument.
post #14 of 38
Quote:
Originally Posted by charlituna View Post

You may think it lame but Apple does have a trademark for the name Apple when associated with this type of product. They also have a trade look and feel trademark on the store design.

Aside from these issues there is the preception that a store selling iPods etc with the term Apple in the name must be authorized. When in fact they might not. And things bought from a non authorized shop are not covered under warranty



It is perfectly legal to use the name Apple, even "associated with this type of product". For example, any retail store can put up a sign saying "Apple products for sale" if such a claim is truthful. Just like anybody can ask "Want to buy my used iPod?"

And if "Apple Country Farmstand" also sells iPods beside their produce, they should not have any problems.

Finally, if I buy a brand new unopened Apple product, it should be covered under warranty, even if Apple de-authorized the reseller the prior day.
post #15 of 38
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doctor David View Post

Strawman argument.

How so?
post #16 of 38
Quote:
Originally Posted by AppleLover2 View Post

The store with the blue shirts is not part of the lawsuit. They are in China. The Eastern District of New York has no more jurisdiction over the blue shirted store than the Chinese government has over Apple's United States stores.

Now that you are armed with more accurate info...

If you take the time to read all the lines .... you might find this:

Because the lawsuit is sealed, it is unknown whether this particular complaint, filed on July 25, also targets the elaborate overseas operations. It's possible that Apple does not yet know who runs those stores, and could be included in the 50 anonymous John Does that are named as defendants with no attorney listed.


Now that you are armed with more accurate info..
See, in the record business, you can show someone your song, and they don’t copy it. In the tech business, you show somebody your idea, and they steal it. (Jimmy Iovine)
Reply
See, in the record business, you can show someone your song, and they don’t copy it. In the tech business, you show somebody your idea, and they steal it. (Jimmy Iovine)
Reply
post #17 of 38
It was my understanding that the fake store in China was selling authentic Apple products.

The obvious questions that don't seem to be answered are:

1) Are they an Authorized Re-seller
2) If not, how do they obtain the products
3) Did I read somewhere that their prices match Apple's listed online prices?
4) If so, how do they obtain the products at a low enough cost to earn a profit?

5) If the answers above lead to buying and selling stolen goods, where is the investigation into criminal activity?

6) Let's assume you are an Authorized Re-seller. Would you be able to design your store any way you like? What requirements would Apple put on the appearance of your store? Beyond requiring a clear sign that says "Authorized Re-seller" - would Apple dictate that you not use wood tables, not display the products and encourage you to sell other things that Apple doesn't approve of?

7) Let's assume another Authorized Re-seller. Have a po-dunk small store as the official "Front" of your operations. Get enough product to stock 3 stores. Your other 2 stores you copy cat Apple and that's where you really sell your product, while the 1st and only official re-seller store is where you maintain your Apple relationship. Is that possible?
post #18 of 38
Quote:
Originally Posted by newbee View Post

If you take the time to read all the lines .... you might find this:

Because the lawsuit is sealed, it is unknown whether this particular complaint, filed on July 25, also targets the elaborate overseas operations. It's possible that Apple does not yet know who runs those stores, and could be included in the 50 anonymous John Does that are named as defendants with no attorney listed.


Now that you are armed with more accurate info..

In his job to get out 10 posts a day, he hardly has time to read the article or the thread. See his post in yesterday's thread on QuickTime for Windows and Leopard.
post #19 of 38
Quote:
Originally Posted by tlevier View Post

It was my understanding that the fake store in China was selling authentic Apple products.

The obvious questions that don't seem to be answered are:

1) Are they an Authorized Re-seller
2) If not, how do they obtain the products
3) Did I read somewhere that their prices match Apple's listed online prices?
4) If so, how do they obtain the products at a low enough cost to earn a profit?

5) If the answers above lead to buying and selling stolen goods, where is the investigation into criminal activity?

6) Let's assume you are an Authorized Re-seller. Would you be able to design your store any way you like? What requirements would Apple put on the appearance of your store? Beyond requiring a clear sign that says "Authorized Re-seller" - would Apple dictate that you not use wood tables, not display the products and encourage you to sell other things that Apple doesn't approve of?

7) Let's assume another Authorized Re-seller. Have a po-dunk small store as the official "Front" of your operations. Get enough product to stock 3 stores. Your other 2 stores you copy cat Apple and that's where you really sell your product, while the 1st and only official re-seller store is where you maintain your Apple relationship. Is that possible?

1. No, they are not authorized resellers.

2. They likely obtain their machines from another (or multiple other) resellers that will sell at a discount to them, risking their own authorizations

3. Most likely they would price their products similarly to Apple. If you priced higher, you wouldn't get many sales.

4. They either obtained products from another reseller at a slight discount. The other reseller is risking their authorization by doing so. They may also be obtaining 'grey market' products that are destined for other countries. Using exchange rates to their advantage, they could undercut Apple pricing depending on where they came from.

5. They very well might be dealing with stolen or counterfeit goods, especially on accessories. Accessories are way easier to counterfeit than computers.

6. Yes, Apple DOES dictate that resellers have their own designs. They are very clear that you cannot match the look and feel of an Apple store. Tables looking like Apple's are forbidden.

7. Apple exhibits amazing control of their reseller channel. If suddenly they saw you moving a ton of merchandise through some po-dunk store, you can be sure they would investigate. Any time there are sales anomalies, they will ask questions. If you don't have a legit answer, you can say goodbye to your authorization.
post #20 of 38
Steve believes in Eastern Mysticism and it looks like there may be something to it. The more wacky Apple gets the more he looks like death warmed over.


Steve, don't look now but it looks like Karma's catching up with ya. Keep it up and you will be pushing up daisies!
post #21 of 38
Under US Trademark/Competition law, a business can protect the aspects of their business that make it unique.

At the most basic level, the law comes down to a likelihood of confusion test, looking at whether a normal consumer would make an incorrect assumption about the source of the competing goods or service.

So, while it wouldn't be actionable for a business to sell Apple computers while wearing blue shirts, the overall look and feel of the store can be protected under US law.

Competition law differs a lot between countries, and in the US is covered by both state and federal laws, so what is protectable in one jurisdiction may not be in another.
post #22 of 38
Quote:
Originally Posted by kresh View Post

Steve believes in Eastern Mysticism and it looks like there may be something to it. The more wacky Apple gets the more he looks like death warmed over.

Steve, don't look now but it looks like Karma's catching up with ya. Keep it up and you will be pushing up daisies!

Very distasteful.
post #23 of 38
Quote:
Originally Posted by lamewing View Post

... That Apple Story store looks NOTHING like an Apple Store. Where do they get off on suing these guys. So no we need to add the word Apple (Not Apple Computers, not Apple, Inc.), just Apple...to the "hands-off" list. Disgusting. No, Apple is not loosing money, nor are the customers "confused" as to whether this is an official Apple Store or not. Nonetheless, I am sure that will be part of Apple's complaint.

The store knowingly plays on Apple's trademarks. The very fact that it has two large displays that look like iPhones and the name of the store differs by one letter (Apple Store vs. Apple Story) in that neighborhood is bound to confuse many. Hell, it made me do a double-take when I first saw it a few weeks ago. After spending just a few minutes inside, I'm pretty sure that much of their merchandise is gray market at best. And the one receipt I saw a customer receive after a small purchase gives me the impression that this may not even be a legitimate store: the receipt did not have a store name and did not have a telephone number printed on it. I don't recall seeing a written return policy or tax ID notice anywhere.

I suspect this store will be closed very, very soon or it will radically change its look.
post #24 of 38
Quote:
Originally Posted by lamewing View Post

I have used Apple computers since 1985 and I have about had it with their strong-arm tactics the last few years. I am seriously considering giving up on Apple products entirely. That Apple Story store looks NOTHING like an Apple Store. Where do they get off on suing these guys. So no we need to add the word Apple (Not Apple Computers, not Apple, Inc.), just Apple...to the "hands-off" list. Disgusting. No, Apple is not loosing money, nor are the customers "confused" as to whether this is an official Apple Store or not. Nonetheless, I am sure that will be part of Apple's complaint.

Yet, even the employees in the China knock-off stores thought they were working for Apple Inc.
http://www.ifoapplestore.com/db/2011...g-up-in-china/
"BirdAbroad says, We struck up a conversation with these salespeople who, hand to God, all genuinely think they work for Apple. As she tried to take some photos of the store, five employees approached and asked her to stop. However, after she implied she and a companion were Apple employees visiting from America, the staff turned friendly and allowed her to snap some photos. "
post #25 of 38
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flaneur View Post

In his job to get out 10 posts a day, he hardly has time to read the article or the thread. See his post in yesterday's thread on QuickTime for Windows and Leopard.

Thanks for that. I missed that thread altogether, but thanks to you I didn't miss that tidbit. You gotta hand it to AppleLover2 .... if you don't take him seriously, he's always good for a laugh ..... and laughter is the best medicine, don't cha know.
See, in the record business, you can show someone your song, and they don’t copy it. In the tech business, you show somebody your idea, and they steal it. (Jimmy Iovine)
Reply
See, in the record business, you can show someone your song, and they don’t copy it. In the tech business, you show somebody your idea, and they steal it. (Jimmy Iovine)
Reply
post #26 of 38
Quote:
Originally Posted by newbee View Post

Thanks for that. I missed that thread altogether, but thanks to you I didn't miss that tidbit. You gotta hand it to AppleLover2 .... if you don't take him seriously, he's always good for a laugh ..... and laughter is the best medicine, don't cha know.

I'll take your advice on that, thanks right back.
post #27 of 38
Quote:
Originally Posted by lamewing View Post

I have used Apple computers since 1985 and I have about had it with their strong-arm tactics the last few years. I am seriously considering giving up on Apple products entirely. That Apple Story store looks NOTHING like an Apple Store. Where do they get off on suing these guys. So no we need to add the word Apple (Not Apple Computers, not Apple, Inc.), just Apple...to the "hands-off" list. Disgusting. No, Apple is not loosing money, nor are the customers "confused" as to whether this is an official Apple Store or not. Nonetheless, I am sure that will be part of Apple's complaint.

What are you going to switch to? Windows? You do know that Microsoft is just as bad, if not worse than Apple, right? It's called business. Whenever reports come out about Apple having more than 50% of smartphone profits, people say that those who praise Apple are stupid since they seem to like getting ripped off. Essentially, they are arguing that profitability does not do anything for them as a consumer. The flip side should be true. How should Apple's "strong-arm tactics" affect you as a consumer?

Never mind that, though. Despite all your soapbox speeches, you would do the exact same thing in Apple's position and you know it.
post #28 of 38
OK. I've gone and done it. I've saved a pic of horizontal "Apple employee" from China. The pic just cracks me up. The guy looks so smug, so sure that he is an Apple employee and that we are all lesser humans! It's just too hilarious to pass.
post #29 of 38
Quote:
Originally Posted by UnexpectedBill View Post

It should be interesting to see how the whole "fake store" thing plays out.


A fake courtroom that doesn't even have any relevance in China seems oddly appropriate for this.
post #30 of 38
The salesman in the lower picture wearing the blue shirt is just too cool. How could Apple with a clear conscience want to put him out of work? Take another look at the salesman and you'll see what I mean.
post #31 of 38
Quote:
Originally Posted by tlevier View Post

It was my understanding that the fake store in China was selling authentic Apple products.

The obvious questions that don't seem to be answered are:

1) Are they an Authorized Re-seller
2) If not, how do they obtain the products
3) Did I read somewhere that their prices match Apple's listed online prices?
4) If so, how do they obtain the products at a low enough cost to earn a profit?

5) If the answers above lead to buying and selling stolen goods, where is the investigation into criminal activity?

6) Let's assume you are an Authorized Re-seller. Would you be able to design your store any way you like? What requirements would Apple put on the appearance of your store? Beyond requiring a clear sign that says "Authorized Re-seller" - would Apple dictate that you not use wood tables, not display the products and encourage you to sell other things that Apple doesn't approve of?

7) Let's assume another Authorized Re-seller. Have a po-dunk small store as the official "Front" of your operations. Get enough product to stock 3 stores. Your other 2 stores you copy cat Apple and that's where you really sell your product, while the 1st and only official re-seller store is where you maintain your Apple relationship. Is that possible?

Plenty of authorized resellers here in Australia have renovated their stores in recent years to make them look more like Apple Stores. This whole story is a fairly ridiculous media beat up.
15" uMacbook Pro 2.4Ghz 8GB 128GB SSD/500GB 7200rpm, iMac 27" i5 16GB 1TB, MacBook Air 8GB 256GB, iPhone 5s 64GB, iPhone 4 32GB, iPad 4 64GB, Apple TV2/3, iPod Nano 2nd gen, iPod Touch 4th gen,...
Reply
15" uMacbook Pro 2.4Ghz 8GB 128GB SSD/500GB 7200rpm, iMac 27" i5 16GB 1TB, MacBook Air 8GB 256GB, iPhone 5s 64GB, iPhone 4 32GB, iPad 4 64GB, Apple TV2/3, iPod Nano 2nd gen, iPod Touch 4th gen,...
Reply
post #32 of 38
Quote:
Originally Posted by newbee View Post

Apparently you didn't even bother to look at the photo of the "fake" blue shirt with a very prominent and realistic Apple Logo on the front. Now that you're armed with more accurate info ... do you still feel like laughing? Well, do you ?

Yes, I'm still laughing, more at you now though.
When you get to work later and they let you off the tills to tidy up, have a look down aisle 12 for a sense of humour.
post #33 of 38
Quote:
Originally Posted by ameldrum1 View Post

Plenty of authorized resellers here in Australia have renovated their stores in recent years to make them look more like Apple Stores. This whole story is a fairly ridiculous media beat up.

Agreed. I've been in many authorized resellers around the world that look just like an Apple Store. And in China (including Taiwan) there seems to be a store exclusively selling Apple products on every block. This story has been so blown out of proportion.
post #34 of 38
Quote:
Originally Posted by Evilution View Post

Yes, I'm still laughing, more at you now though.
When you get to work later and they let you off the tills to tidy up, have a look down aisle 12 for a sense of humour.

Oooh .... did you think that up by yourself .... or did your mom help you ... again?
See, in the record business, you can show someone your song, and they don’t copy it. In the tech business, you show somebody your idea, and they steal it. (Jimmy Iovine)
Reply
See, in the record business, you can show someone your song, and they don’t copy it. In the tech business, you show somebody your idea, and they steal it. (Jimmy Iovine)
Reply
post #35 of 38
Quote:
Originally Posted by tlevier View Post

It was my understanding that the fake store in China was selling authentic Apple products.

The obvious questions that don't seem to be answered are:

1) Are they an Authorized Re-seller
2) If not, how do they obtain the products
3) Did I read somewhere that their prices match Apple's listed online prices?
4) If so, how do they obtain the products at a low enough cost to earn a profit?

5) If the answers above lead to buying and selling stolen goods, where is the investigation into criminal activity?

6) Let's assume you are an Authorized Re-seller. Would you be able to design your store any way you like? What requirements would Apple put on the appearance of your store? Beyond requiring a clear sign that says "Authorized Re-seller" - would Apple dictate that you not use wood tables, not display the products and encourage you to sell other things that Apple doesn't approve of?

7) Let's assume another Authorized Re-seller. Have a po-dunk small store as the official "Front" of your operations. Get enough product to stock 3 stores. Your other 2 stores you copy cat Apple and that's where you really sell your product, while the 1st and only official re-seller store is where you maintain your Apple relationship. Is that possible?


Actually you are right on almost all counts. having just lost my Apple Warranty service provider contract i had with Apple Since 1999. All the shops have to fill out a form online by every Authorized shop asking for the shop to provide photos of the T Shirts the employees wear and to photos of the sales and repair areas. So if these guys are really resellers then they are doing nothing wrong and actually doing what Apple requires of them. the only think i know you can't use the word Apple or Mac as the name of your company. so you can't be Joe's mac shop but you can be Joe's Tech shop that is an Apple authorized reseller and repair shop.
post #36 of 38
Quote:
Originally Posted by Evilution View Post

It makes me laugh that every time AI bring up the story of the fake Apple shops they can't help but mention the blue shirts.

"even wear signature blue t-shirts."

I doubt even Apple can stop retailers wearing blue shirts. I can just imagine the scenario...

"Hey Steve, we've just found a fake Apple shop, take a look at these pictures"
"OH MY GOD! They have even managed to get hold of our blue shirt technology"



Jeez, even I can fake a blue shirt, the Chinese copycats are way ahead of copying clothing.

But the only reason they are making “fake” blue t-shirts with the Apple logo is because they want the public to think they are dealing with the real Apple, Inc.

The stores are not trying to look similar to an Apple Store.
They are trying to pass themselves off as an Apple Store.
post #37 of 38
Quote:
Originally Posted by nvidia2008 View Post

Very distasteful.

Agreed.

"Apple should pull the plug on the iPhone."

John C. Dvorak, 2007
Reply

"Apple should pull the plug on the iPhone."

John C. Dvorak, 2007
Reply
post #38 of 38
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris_CA View Post

But the only reason they are making fake blue t-shirts with the Apple logo is because they want the public to think they are dealing with the real Apple, Inc.

The stores are not trying to look similar to an Apple Store.
They are trying to pass themselves off as an Apple Store.


How can anyone not see this as the issue? I'd really hate to be on jury duty with the people here saying Apple is out of line. Some people are just incredibly dumb, I guess.


Take a deep breath, lamewing. Read that post fifty times.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: General Discussion
AppleInsider › Forums › General › General Discussion › Apple takes aim at copycat fake retail stores with new lawsuit