or Connect
AppleInsider › Forums › Other Discussion › AppleOutsider › PoliticalOutsider › Rick Perry
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Rick Perry - Page 4

post #121 of 178
Quote:
Originally Posted by john galt View Post

Rick Perry hates women, children, minorities, teachers, and little puppy dogs. He wants to kill old people and throw Granny out on the street. He kills! He executes! Then he prays! To God!



That's it. A D in veterinary anatomy. Clearly this guy can't be President.

Besides, if you close your eyes, he sounds just like George Bush!



You know it's going to happen... bring it on...

I know I'm new here. But it just makes me so angry when I see a vicious untruth printed about the fine Mr. Rick Perry!

*clears throat*

He has never said the first cross word against puppy dogs.
If two people always agree, then one of them is redundant.
Reply
If two people always agree, then one of them is redundant.
Reply
post #122 of 178
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jag_Warrior View Post

I know I'm new here. But it just makes me so angry when I see a vicious untruth printed about the fine Mr. Rick Perry!

*clears throat*

He has never said the first cross word against puppy dogs.

Perry has a big ego and to boot lies a lot also. Texas has the next to lowest wages in the states to Arkansas.I pray this character never gets to be president.
post #123 of 178
Quote:
Originally Posted by marvfox View Post

Perry has a big ego and to boot lies a lot also. Texas has the next to lowest wages in the states to Arkansas.I pray this character never gets to be president.

Personally, I'm pulling for Michele Bachmann. But that's mainly (only!) because I have a twisted sense of humor.
If two people always agree, then one of them is redundant.
Reply
If two people always agree, then one of them is redundant.
Reply
post #124 of 178
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jag_Warrior View Post

Personally, I'm pulling for Michele Bachmann. But that's mainly (only!) because I have a twisted sense of humor.

No one really decent running in 2012 in the GOP Party.
post #125 of 178
More on Dick Perry aka King Cowboy of Debt, by a real TeaBagger, Bachmann- http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0..._n_945622.html
We are nurturing a nightmare that will haunt our children, and kill theirs.
Reply
We are nurturing a nightmare that will haunt our children, and kill theirs.
Reply
post #126 of 178
PERRY IS A SOCIALIST SCUMBAG-

"Someone warn the tea party: Texas Gov. Dick Perry, the Republican Party’s frontrunner for the 2012 presidential nomination, didn’t always believe publicly-run health care programs run contrary to America’s founding document.

In a mostly forgotten 2001 speech, the Texas governor had kind words for Medicaid and the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP), and even promised to study a proposal for “bi-national health insurance” that would cover Mexicans and Americans alike.

That’s a very different tune than what Perry’s campaign has been playing since he announced plans to seek the nation’s presidency. In an interview last month, Dick Perry called the nation’s most beloved social programs — Medicare and Social Security — unconstitutional.
"
~ http://www.infowars.com/in-2001-spee...e-to-mexicans/
We are nurturing a nightmare that will haunt our children, and kill theirs.
Reply
We are nurturing a nightmare that will haunt our children, and kill theirs.
Reply
post #127 of 178
Ron Paul exposes Dick Perry for the Globalist Elite he is-

“The people have to realize when they look at his record… that he is a flip-flopper,” Paul said, pointing out the fact that Rick Perry supported Hillarycare in 1993.

Paul said Perry may “walk off” with the presidency if the American people do not wake up!

Since declaring his candidacy last month, Perry has attacked both Obama and fellow challenger Mitt Romney on universal healthcare.

A letter heaping praise on Clinton’s proposal surfaced in 2005 when Perry was running against Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison for Texas governor. “I think your efforts in trying to reform the nation’s health care system are most commendable,” Perry told Clinton.


Perry also pushed through the property rights shredding SB 1048, a bill implementing public private partnerships, or P3s, that “are part and parcel of the United Nations’ Agenda 21,” Terri Hall wrote for San Antonio Transportation Policy Examiner on August 15. “Two of the purposes of Agenda 21 are to abolish private property and restrict mobility and P3s act as the vehicle to do it. Perry made P3s a centerpiece of his transportation policy since he stepped in as governor.
~ http://www.infowars.com/rick-perry-g...riot-clothing/
We are nurturing a nightmare that will haunt our children, and kill theirs.
Reply
We are nurturing a nightmare that will haunt our children, and kill theirs.
Reply
post #128 of 178
Hands, have you suddenly become a constitutionalist?!?!

The state is nothing more than a criminal gang writ large.

Reply

The state is nothing more than a criminal gang writ large.

Reply
post #129 of 178
Quote:
Originally Posted by MJ1970 View Post

Hands, have you suddenly become a constitutionalist?!?!

I'm a big fan of the US constitution, especially for the Native American's, but John Galt, being a blind Perry worshipper, clearly isn't as Ron Paul so accurately points out. But hey, 90.2% of the Republican party would like wealth to be distributed as equally as it is in Sweden!

John Galt though is staying silent on Perry's massive debt building and his HillaryCare affair, and also his love of the Global Elitist UN policies of abolishing private property rights et al.
We are nurturing a nightmare that will haunt our children, and kill theirs.
Reply
We are nurturing a nightmare that will haunt our children, and kill theirs.
Reply
post #130 of 178
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hands Sandon View Post

PERRY IS A SOCIALIST SCUMBAG-

"Someone warn the tea party: Texas Gov. Dick Perry, the Republican Partys frontrunner for the 2012 presidential nomination, didnt always believe publicly-run health care programs run contrary to Americas founding document.

In a mostly forgotten 2001 speech, the Texas governor had kind words for Medicaid and the Childrens Health Insurance Program (CHIP), and even promised to study a proposal for bi-national health insurance that would cover Mexicans and Americans alike.

Thats a very different tune than what Perrys campaign has been playing since he announced plans to seek the nations presidency. In an interview last month, Dick Perry called the nations most beloved social programs Medicare and Social Security unconstitutional.
"
~ http://www.infowars.com/in-2001-spee...e-to-mexicans/

Perry is an idiot which belongs with palin and Bachman.They all have no common sense!
post #131 of 178
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hands Sandon View Post

I'm a big fan of the US constitution, especially for the Native American's, but John Galt, being a blind Perry worshipper, clearly isn't as Ron Paul so accurately points out. But hey, 90.2% of the Republican party would like wealth to be distributed as equally as it is in Sweden!

John Galt though is staying silent on Perry's massive debt building and his HillaryCare affair, and also his love of the Global Elitist UN policies of abolishing private property rights et al.

So-called "Constitutionalists" are constitutionalists when it serves their bottom line. But as soon as the Supreme Court or even Congress uses powers granted to them by the Constitution, they are against it.

Bottom line is, it's the bottom line. Whatever makes the rich richer (with no regard for the poor, or with some disproved voodoo "trickle down" ideals) or whatever gives them more "guns, god and (anti-) gay" is what's "constitutional" to them. If Congress were to pass an amendment clarifying the 2nd amendment and restricting personal ownership of anything more powerful than an 18th Century musket, a power Congress has every right to do, you can bet your bottom dollar the "Constitutionalists" will suddenly oppose the constitution.
post #132 of 178
Quote:
Originally Posted by tonton View Post

If Congress were to pass an amendment...a power Congress has every right to do...

Actually, not quite. Amending the constitution is much more challenging than that and the Congress is only one player in it:

Quote:
To Propose Amendments
  • Two-thirds of both houses of Congress vote to propose an amendment, or
  • Two-thirds of the state legislatures ask Congress to call a national convention to propose amendments. (This method has never been used.

Quote:
To Ratify Amendments
  • Three-fourths of the state legislatures approve it, or
  • Ratifying conventions in three-fourths of the states approve it. This method has been used only once -- to ratify the 21st Amendment -- repealing Prohibition.

Quote:
Of the thousands of proposals that have been made to amend the Constitution, only 33 obtained the necessary two-thirds vote in Congress. Of those 33, only 27 amendments (including the Bill of Rights) have been ratified.

The state is nothing more than a criminal gang writ large.

Reply

The state is nothing more than a criminal gang writ large.

Reply
post #133 of 178
Quote:
Originally Posted by MJ1970 View Post

Actually, not quite. Amending the constitution is much more challenging than that and the Congress is only one player in it:

Yet Congress (and the States, through the ratification process) successfully used that power to clarify the legality of an income tax. Go figure.
post #134 of 178
Quote:
Originally Posted by tonton View Post

Yet Congress (and the States, through the ratification process) successfully used that power to clarify the legality of an income tax. Go figure.

Unless I recall incorrectly, and I might, the income tax was supposed to pay for the war and then be rescinded. Go figure, it never was.
NoahJ
"It is unwise to be too sure of one's own wisdom. It is healthy to be reminded that the strongest might weaken and the wisest might err." - Mahatma Gandhi
Reply
NoahJ
"It is unwise to be too sure of one's own wisdom. It is healthy to be reminded that the strongest might weaken and the wisest might err." - Mahatma Gandhi
Reply
post #135 of 178
You are correct, NoahJ. The first income tax was instituted to fund the Civil War but it was temporary and had a specified termination date.

But as the following quote so aptly notes:

"When men get in the habit of helping themselves to the property of others, they cannot easily be cured of it."
-- The New York Times, in a 1909 editorial opposing the very first permanent income tax

Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem.

(I prefer the tumult of liberty to the quiet of servitude.)

Reply

Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem.

(I prefer the tumult of liberty to the quiet of servitude.)

Reply
post #136 of 178
Quote:
Originally Posted by tonton View Post

Yet Congress (and the States, through the ratification process) successfully used that power to clarify the legality of an income tax. Go figure.

Yes, the threat of a war and the fear it generates among the populace was used to rapidly change laws and build up a government bureaucracy that refuses to be dismantled.

Way back in the days of GWB, liberals like you and Sammi used to be against that sort of thing.
The evil that we fight is but the shadow of the evil that we do.
Reply
The evil that we fight is but the shadow of the evil that we do.
Reply
post #137 of 178
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank777 View Post

Yes, the threat of a war and the fear it generates among the populace was used to rapidly change laws and build up a government bureaucracy that refuses to be dismantled.

Way back in the days of GWB, liberals like you and Sammi used to be against that sort of thing.

Who says we're not against it now?

Let us get one thing straight. Barack Obama is not a "Liberal like us". In fact, he's not a Liberal at all.
post #138 of 178
Quote:
Originally Posted by tonton View Post

So-called "Constitutionalists" are constitutionalists when it serves their bottom line. But as soon as the Supreme Court or even Congress uses powers granted to them by the Constitution, they are against it.

Bottom line is, it's the bottom line. Whatever makes the rich richer (with no regard for the poor, or with some disproved voodoo "trickle down" ideals) or whatever gives them more "guns, god and (anti-) gay" is what's "constitutional" to them. If Congress were to pass an amendment clarifying the 2nd amendment and restricting personal ownership of anything more powerful than an 18th Century musket, a power Congress has every right to do, you can bet your bottom dollar the "Constitutionalists" will suddenly oppose the constitution.

Very true and really well put.
We are nurturing a nightmare that will haunt our children, and kill theirs.
Reply
We are nurturing a nightmare that will haunt our children, and kill theirs.
Reply
post #139 of 178
Whenever government "clarifies" its own powers, it usually adds to them.

Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem.

(I prefer the tumult of liberty to the quiet of servitude.)

Reply

Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem.

(I prefer the tumult of liberty to the quiet of servitude.)

Reply
post #140 of 178
Quote:
Originally Posted by jazzguru View Post

Whenever government "clarifies" its own powers, it usually adds to them.

And it's completely constitutional to do so. It would also be Constitutional to further restrict powers through clarification. But claiming that using the Commerce Clause to justify regulation of commerce is 'unconstitutional' shows a complete ignorance of the concept of constitutionality.
post #141 of 178
Have you ever wondered why the amendment process has been abandoned?

Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem.

(I prefer the tumult of liberty to the quiet of servitude.)

Reply

Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem.

(I prefer the tumult of liberty to the quiet of servitude.)

Reply
post #142 of 178
Quote:
Originally Posted by jazzguru View Post

Have you ever wondered why the amendment process has been abandoned?

Nope. I know why it has. Blind, arrogant, polarized partisanship.
post #143 of 178
Quote:
Originally Posted by tonton View Post

And it's completely constitutional to do so. It would also be Constitutional to further restrict powers through clarification. But claiming that using the Commerce Clause to justify regulation of commerce is 'unconstitutional' shows a complete ignorance of the concept of constitutionality.

That is not the point at issue here. He realizes that it is constitutional to do so. He realizes that currently income taxes are constitutional due to the amendment process. What you do not seem to be understanding is that they were not before the amendment. If it was not specifically granted, then by default it was left to the states only. The constitution was intentionally written to be only inclusive if it was in there. Not if it was not expressly forbidden it was ok. That way the powers were limited out of the gate and as thoroughly as possible. That is why every judge has to go through contortions of word meaning to make something mean something else that is already allowed in the constitution. Because if it is not in there, it is not allowed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by tonton View Post

Nope. I know why it has. Blind, arrogant, polarized partisanship.

Yes. And you don't see the irony of that statement. Forget Obama, Bush, Clinton, and look at the overall picture. Look at your posts, look at others on the boards. Who is calling for constitutional amendments, and who is calling for simple reinterpretation because "the founding fathers could never have foreseen..."

Blind, arrogant, polarized partisanship.
NoahJ
"It is unwise to be too sure of one's own wisdom. It is healthy to be reminded that the strongest might weaken and the wisest might err." - Mahatma Gandhi
Reply
NoahJ
"It is unwise to be too sure of one's own wisdom. It is healthy to be reminded that the strongest might weaken and the wisest might err." - Mahatma Gandhi
Reply
post #144 of 178
Quote:
Originally Posted by tonton View Post

Let us get one thing straight. Barack Obama is not a "Liberal like us". In fact, he's not a Liberal at all.

Sorry, there are no takebacks. You elect him, you own him - and his policies.
The evil that we fight is but the shadow of the evil that we do.
Reply
The evil that we fight is but the shadow of the evil that we do.
Reply
post #145 of 178
Next week on Childish Musings from the Great White North...

 

“The nitrogen in our DNA, the calcium in our teeth, the iron in our blood, the carbon in our apple pies were made in the interiors of collapsing stars. We are made of starstuff.” 
-Sagan
Reply

 

“The nitrogen in our DNA, the calcium in our teeth, the iron in our blood, the carbon in our apple pies were made in the interiors of collapsing stars. We are made of starstuff.” 
-Sagan
Reply
post #146 of 178
Quote:
Originally Posted by NoahJ View Post

That is not the point at issue here. He realizes that it is constitutional to do so. He realizes that currently income taxes are constitutional due to the amendment process. What you do not seem to be understanding is that they were not before the amendment. If it was not specifically granted, then by default it was left to the states only. The constitution was intentionally written to be only inclusive if it was in there. Not if it was not expressly forbidden it was ok. That way the powers were limited out of the gate and as thoroughly as possible. That is why every judge has to go through contortions of word meaning to make something mean something else that is already allowed in the constitution. Because if it is not in there, it is not allowed.

Yes. And you don't see the irony of that statement. Forget Obama, Bush, Clinton, and look at the overall picture. Look at your posts, look at others on the boards. Who is calling for constitutional amendments, and who is calling for simple reinterpretation because "the founding fathers could never have foreseen..."

Blind, arrogant, polarized partisanship.

Do me a favor. Search under my name for 'amendment' on this board. Then answer your question yourself. Who, indeed.
post #147 of 178
Quote:
Originally Posted by tonton View Post

Do me a favor. Search under my name for 'amendment' on this board. Then answer your question yourself. Who, indeed.

And who else?
NoahJ
"It is unwise to be too sure of one's own wisdom. It is healthy to be reminded that the strongest might weaken and the wisest might err." - Mahatma Gandhi
Reply
NoahJ
"It is unwise to be too sure of one's own wisdom. It is healthy to be reminded that the strongest might weaken and the wisest might err." - Mahatma Gandhi
Reply
post #148 of 178
Quote:
Originally Posted by tonton View Post

So-called "Constitutionalists" are constitutionalists when it serves their bottom line. But as soon as the Supreme Court or even Congress uses powers granted to them by the Constitution, they are against it.

Bottom line is, it's the bottom line. Whatever makes the rich richer (with no regard for the poor, or with some disproved voodoo "trickle down" ideals) or whatever gives them more "guns, god and (anti-) gay" is what's "constitutional" to them. If Congress were to pass an amendment clarifying the 2nd amendment and restricting personal ownership of anything more powerful than an 18th Century musket, a power Congress has every right to do, you can bet your bottom dollar the "Constitutionalists" will suddenly oppose the constitution.

Nonsense.
I can only please one person per day.  Today is not your day.  Tomorrow doesn't look good either.  
Reply
I can only please one person per day.  Today is not your day.  Tomorrow doesn't look good either.  
Reply
post #149 of 178
Hands, you realize you look ridiculous when you call Perry a "flip flopper" and a supporter of Hillarycare? The Hillarycare thing has already been proven false. He's thoroughly explained his support for Gore at one point..some 25 years ago when he (Perry) was a Democrat.
I can only please one person per day.  Today is not your day.  Tomorrow doesn't look good either.  
Reply
I can only please one person per day.  Today is not your day.  Tomorrow doesn't look good either.  
Reply
post #150 of 178
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hands Sandon View Post

More on Dick Perry aka King Cowboy of Debt, by a real TeaBagger, Bachmann- http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0..._n_945622.html

Ask the people of Texas where he is the governor now what he really did for his state.He is nothing but a loud mouth hypocritical politician.
post #151 of 178
Quote:
Originally Posted by SDW2001 View Post

Hands, you realize you look ridiculous when you call Perry a "flip flopper" and a supporter of Hillarycare? The Hillarycare thing has already been proven false. He's thoroughly explained his support for Gore at one point..some 25 years ago when he (Perry) was a Democrat.

It's important to note that guys like Al Gore changed when they ran for president. They changed their views away from those of their constituents and to those of the national Democratic party.

25 years ago....Al Gore was a blue dog Democrat.

Al Gore was pro-life.
His wife was helping censor music due to explicit lyrics.

"During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act." -George Orwell

Reply

"During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act." -George Orwell

Reply
post #152 of 178
The Ron Paul campaign is going on the offensive against Perry:

http://youtu.be/CtDBp1OrCwI

Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem.

(I prefer the tumult of liberty to the quiet of servitude.)

Reply

Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem.

(I prefer the tumult of liberty to the quiet of servitude.)

Reply
post #153 of 178
Quote:
Originally Posted by jazzguru View Post

The Ron Paul campaign is going on the offensive against Perry:

http://youtu.be/CtDBp1OrCwI

Kudos jazzguru!!

He's a socialist scumbag who's anti American and pro globalist elite. Keep at it!!! Don't let the PERRY WORSHIPPERS WIN.
We are nurturing a nightmare that will haunt our children, and kill theirs.
Reply
We are nurturing a nightmare that will haunt our children, and kill theirs.
Reply
post #154 of 178
Quote:
Originally Posted by SDW2001 View Post

Hands, you realize you look ridiculous when you call Perry a "flip flopper" and a supporter of Hillarycare? The Hillarycare thing has already been proven false. He's thoroughly explained his support for Gore at one point..some 25 years ago when he (Perry) was a Democrat.

I think it was Ron Paul who called him a "flipping flopper".

I'm fine with that he changed from Dem to Repub. I do wonder though about what motivates him. Like I posted above he does seem to be in on this whole globalist schtick, denying property rights et al. Indeed he only recently attended Bilderberg, which is likely illegal according to the US constitution, as Ron Paul has said-


"Texas Congressman and presidential candidate Ron Paul has added his voice to those who believe Texas Governor Rick Perry should be investigated for a criminal violation of the Logan Act after he jetted off to meet with foreign elites yesterday at the Bilderberg Group conference in Istanbul.

Speaking on the Alex Jones Show yesterday, Congressman and presidential candidate Ron Paul agreed that Perry should be investigated for a potential violation of the Logan Act.

"This information about him going over there and violating the Logan Act and getting involved - I'm just impressed that that's in the ordinary media - I think that's encouraging too," said the Congressman.

Paul said that Perry's attendance was "A sign that he's involved in the international conspiracy."

Perry's press secretary declined to give a statement when we called and denied any knowledge of the Logan Act, yet seemed to be fully aware of it in claiming Bilderberg was a private meeting. Since the Logan Act also bars private citizens from negotiating with foreign officials, Perry is still violating the law."
~ http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles...piracy.htmDoes

Does the Republican Party, yourself included, really want a Globalist Elite as POTUS?
We are nurturing a nightmare that will haunt our children, and kill theirs.
Reply
We are nurturing a nightmare that will haunt our children, and kill theirs.
Reply
post #155 of 178
"Under Perrys governorship, Texas soaked up $22 billion in stimulus money from the federal governments bailout package.

During his 11 year tenure, Texas has run up a $13.4 billion deficit, which is 31.5% of the 2011 budget. The Lone Star state has the 3rd highest deficit in the entire country behind only California and Illinois."

~ http://www.infowars.com/paul-slams-p...s-cheerleader/
We are nurturing a nightmare that will haunt our children, and kill theirs.
Reply
We are nurturing a nightmare that will haunt our children, and kill theirs.
Reply
post #156 of 178
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hands Sandon View Post

"Under Perry’s governorship, Texas soaked up $22 billion in stimulus money from the federal government’s bailout package.

During his 11 year tenure, Texas has run up a $13.4 billion deficit, which is 31.5% of the 2011 budget. The Lone Star state has the 3rd highest deficit in the entire country behind only California and Illinois."

~ http://www.infowars.com/paul-slams-p...s-cheerleader/

Obviously you're not interested in discussing Perry. You're here for your version of Operation Chaos.

Edit: Oh, and please knock off the the fonts font sizes. It looks retarded.
I can only please one person per day.  Today is not your day.  Tomorrow doesn't look good either.  
Reply
I can only please one person per day.  Today is not your day.  Tomorrow doesn't look good either.  
Reply
post #157 of 178
Quote:
Originally Posted by SDW2001 View Post

Obviously you're not interested in discussing Perry. You're here for your version of Operation Chaos.

Edit: Oh, and please knock off the the fonts font sizes. It looks retarded.

That's not true. I've brought up some serious points and am genuinely interested in discovering more about Perry.

Perhaps you'd respond to this-

"Although he campaigned in 2010 on the premise that, as he told the Associated Press, Texas is better off than practically any state in the country, Perry, along with the rest of the state, soon discovered that Texass budget gap$27 billion short of what it would need to maintain its already lean services in the next bienniumwas among the worst in the nation. Luckily, Texas did have a rainy day fundover $9 billion saved up for economic stabilization. Some lawmakers, including many Republicans in the state Senate, advocated using the fund to prevent or at least soften cuts to education and health care. But Perry, who had turned preserving the rainy day fund into an applause line, stood firm in refusing to use it to plug holes in the budget for 2012-13. As a result, the budget cuts were draconianinitial proposals cut almost 20 percent from public schools and proposed 30 percent cuts to Medicaid providers. According to estimates from the nonpartisan state Legislative Budget Board, the initial proposal would have cost the state over 300,000 future jobs.

In the face of Perrys promise to veto any use of the rainy day fund, lawmakers turned to accounting tricks like deferred payments to soften the blows to state programs. Fees, too, on everything from getting help collecting child support to registering as a lobbyist, are going up all over the state, and almost nowhere does the budget account for normal growth in social services enrollment. The final budget short-funds Medicaid by almost $5 billion. Legislators had to return for a special session to hammer out the cuts to education, which will likely end up around $4 billion. It will mark the first time Texas has cut funding for public schools since 1949, when the state first took a prominent role in financing them. Even the Texas Association of Business, a conservative, pro-business coalition if ever there was one, has expressed concerns over some of the cuts to schools and early childhood education. Our state runs the risk of falling short on our commitment to Texas school children and businesses that rely on a well-educated workforce, the group proclaimed in one March press release.

Of course, many lawmakers didnt want to use the rainy day fund in the first place, but thats because they know a dirty little secret: Even after this two year budget period, the states fiscal woes are far from over. The Lone Star State has a standing $10 billion shortfall every two-year budget cycle, thanks to a faulty tax system pushed by Perry that fails to balance the budget."
~ http://www.tnr.com/node/90370
We are nurturing a nightmare that will haunt our children, and kill theirs.
Reply
We are nurturing a nightmare that will haunt our children, and kill theirs.
Reply
post #158 of 178
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hands Sandon View Post

That's not true. I've brought up some serious points and am genuinely interested in discovering more about Perry.

Just stop. No one believes this. You're interested in finding out on which points you can attack him. You might as well be a Democratic strategist and/or opposition researcher. It's the same philosophy that Dems have now: Attack. Destroy. Obama is an unmitigated failure, and everyone knows it. They can't run on their record, and you cannot defend his record. So, let's go after the frontrunner in the GOP field. Imagine that.

Quote:


Perhaps you'd respond to this-

"Although he campaigned in 2010 on the premise that, as he told the Associated Press, Texas is better off than practically any state in the country, Perry, along with the rest of the state, soon discovered that Texass budget gap$27 billion short of what it would need to maintain its already lean services in the next bienniumwas among the worst in the nation. Luckily, Texas did have a rainy day fundover $9 billion saved up for economic stabilization. Some lawmakers, including many Republicans in the state Senate, advocated using the fund to prevent or at least soften cuts to education and health care. But Perry, who had turned preserving the rainy day fund into an applause line, stood firm in refusing to use it to plug holes in the budget for 2012-13. As a result, the budget cuts were draconianinitial proposals cut almost 20 percent from public schools and proposed 30 percent cuts to Medicaid providers. According to estimates from the nonpartisan state Legislative Budget Board, the initial proposal would have cost the state over 300,000 future jobs.

In the face of Perrys promise to veto any use of the rainy day fund, lawmakers turned to accounting tricks like deferred payments to soften the blows to state programs. Fees, too, on everything from getting help collecting child support to registering as a lobbyist, are going up all over the state, and almost nowhere does the budget account for normal growth in social services enrollment. The final budget short-funds Medicaid by almost $5 billion. Legislators had to return for a special session to hammer out the cuts to education, which will likely end up around $4 billion. It will mark the first time Texas has cut funding for public schools since 1949, when the state first took a prominent role in financing them. Even the Texas Association of Business, a conservative, pro-business coalition if ever there was one, has expressed concerns over some of the cuts to schools and early childhood education. Our state runs the risk of falling short on our commitment to Texas school children and businesses that rely on a well-educated workforce, the group proclaimed in one March press release.

Of course, many lawmakers didnt want to use the rainy day fund in the first place, but thats because they know a dirty little secret: Even after this two year budget period, the states fiscal woes are far from over. The Lone Star State has a standing $10 billion shortfall every two-year budget cycle, thanks to a faulty tax system pushed by Perry that fails to balance the budget."
~ http://www.tnr.com/node/90370

Sure, I'll respond: It's from the New Republic. It's biased. It's a hit piece. It takes one aspect of one part of his record and ignores the rest, which is quite positive...especially when compared with other states.
I can only please one person per day.  Today is not your day.  Tomorrow doesn't look good either.  
Reply
I can only please one person per day.  Today is not your day.  Tomorrow doesn't look good either.  
Reply
post #159 of 178
Perry needs to stop wearing his religion on his sleeve.
post #160 of 178
Quote:
Originally Posted by FloorJack View Post

Perry needs to stop wearing his religion on his sleeve.

If it is really part of his identity then he should wear it however it suits him to. If it is an act he should not.

If you are simply worried about his appearances or the public perception of him in a strategical way, you are probably right.
NoahJ
"It is unwise to be too sure of one's own wisdom. It is healthy to be reminded that the strongest might weaken and the wisest might err." - Mahatma Gandhi
Reply
NoahJ
"It is unwise to be too sure of one's own wisdom. It is healthy to be reminded that the strongest might weaken and the wisest might err." - Mahatma Gandhi
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: PoliticalOutsider
AppleInsider › Forums › Other Discussion › AppleOutsider › PoliticalOutsider › Rick Perry