Originally Posted by Dr Millmoss
I hope you didn't say exactly what you meant here.
Anyway, my last two encounters with this poster, including this one, were entirely negative. They involve his offering caustic remarks about subjects he knows absolutely nothing about, and he added nothing to the discussion but antagonism. That is why I suggested that he stick to commenting on subjects he does know something about rather than reflexively responding to every topic.
You are the fellow who is resorting to ad hominems
You are the one who has made false claims regarding what cupertino city council said
You are the one making 'helpful suggestions about what I should or shoudn't post
Your posts were regarding what Cupertino city council had said, so by your own argument you should be a person who knows what they said yet oddly you were in complete error on that subject. It would appear that you believe that a person should only speak on subjects at which they are expert and it would further appear that you are unable to determine accurately which subjects you are expert at or not - so by your own argument you shouldn't post at all.
That's not my position though, I just think you should try to post with a little more graciousness, a little more care in checking your sources and a willingness to acknowledge that even in areas in which you believe you are expert you are still capable of error, just like everybody else.