Quote:
Originally Posted by Orlando 
The early Android tablets weren't any good and neither were the early Android phones, but it didn't take long for Android phones to improve and to start properly competing with the iPhone and it probably won't take long for the major flaws with Android tablets to be fixed either. Don't just look at the current state of non-iPad tablets.

The early Android tablets weren't any good and neither were the early Android phones, but it didn't take long for Android phones to improve and to start properly competing with the iPhone and it probably won't take long for the major flaws with Android tablets to be fixed either. Don't just look at the current state of non-iPad tablets.
Actually the early Android phones weren't bad and a damn sight better than most feature phones. The primary problem is not with Android as with the retail model. Android phones were fed primarily and marketed by the cell carriers - a logical and proven choice. Those same carriers are not stepping up to deploy tablet devices as willingly because they don't get as much return from them vis a vis data plans and certainly not voice plans.
So that leaves the big box and business retailers. At this point you now have the Android tabbies all sitting side by side competing with each other, and the Apple iPad off on its own in its own display (depending on the retailer of course). But Apple has a dedicated retail stream of its own devising, globally. So you don't have anywhere near the leverage to sell thru that you had with the Android phones. People don't view tabbies in the same light as smartphones - so to expect that the same process that advanced the Android smartphone unit share to dominance is not the same process that drives the tabbies.
The rest of the problem is that "Android" is not marketed to the masses. "Android" is not a consumer-friendly moniker and if you ask the average consumer what Android is, the best you can expect outside of our little coterie here of tech geeks, is "it's an operating system for phones isn't it?"
The average consumer doesn't immediately associate Android with ease of use - they think of the goofy robotic commercials targeted for that small subset of tech geeks who love turning into a robot. Or they associate it with a funny looking trash-can zippy cartoon of a robot. Google and the hardware companies have been hugely challenged in marketing the Android tablet and they simply don't have the same level of perceived value with the average consumer as the iPad does. Unless they redress their marketing issues with the tablets they are not going to be able to catch-up and the individual platforms will be shipping in the hundreds of thousands, with perhaps millions being sold eventually. Contrasted to the tens of millions of iPads being sold by Apple to the majority of consumers. The only limit or challenge Apple has right now with the iPad is simply making enough.
Now this is not to say that the Android tabbies suck - they don't. I've played with several and they are nice, if just a tad glitchy. But as you say *eventually* Android will clean-up and look and perform nicely and consistently on all hardware. The key here is to get Google and the hardware guys to stop focussing on features and start focussing on ease of use and the consumer experience - beyond saying it's just like an iPad.
If you are going to insist on being an ass, at least demonstrate the intelligence to be a smart one
If you are going to insist on being an ass, at least demonstrate the intelligence to be a smart one





