Quote:
Originally Posted by AppleLover2 
Wrong again.
The Stones were some of the early white boy blues musicians, while the early Beatles did rockabilly and rock ad roll covers.
Stones: R&B and blues cover songs dominated the Rolling Stones' early material, ... having been "rooted in traditional verities, in rhythm-and-blues and soul music",... primitive blues typified by Chess Records' artists such as Muddy Waters, who wrote the song "Rollin' Stone" after which the band is named... (From Wikipedia)
Beatles: Rooted in skiffle and 1950s rock and roll,... (again from wikipedia)
The early Beatles covered such artists as Little Richard and Carl Perkins, among others, while as pointed out above, the Stones were influenced much more by the artists on Chess.
And please don't claim that "it's really all just the same thing". It ain't.

Wrong again.
The Stones were some of the early white boy blues musicians, while the early Beatles did rockabilly and rock ad roll covers.
Stones: R&B and blues cover songs dominated the Rolling Stones' early material, ... having been "rooted in traditional verities, in rhythm-and-blues and soul music",... primitive blues typified by Chess Records' artists such as Muddy Waters, who wrote the song "Rollin' Stone" after which the band is named... (From Wikipedia)
Beatles: Rooted in skiffle and 1950s rock and roll,... (again from wikipedia)
The early Beatles covered such artists as Little Richard and Carl Perkins, among others, while as pointed out above, the Stones were influenced much more by the artists on Chess.
And please don't claim that "it's really all just the same thing". It ain't.
I probably shouldn't have said it as it just gets people riled up but you are wrong.
I was there. In England, as it happened.
Both groups started off doing a lot of covers but with some original songs. The Stones came to the Beatles to get them to write some original songs for them as they were having trouble selling their own even though they were already successful with the covers as you note. The Stones bought songs off of the Beatles when the Beatles already had copious amounts of original material.
I'm not claiming that the Stones were an outgrowth of the Beatles or were heavily influenced by them but the Beatles were definitely doing their own original material before the Stones and the Stones definitely bought some of their early material off of Lennon and McCartney before they got good at writing their own stuff. There's nothing wrong with that, it's how things were and it's how a group learns to write. But it did happen that way.










I'm sure jragosta will tell me.