or Connect
AppleInsider › Forums › Mobile › iPad › Microsoft again clarifies that Windows 8 tablets won't actually run Windows apps
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Microsoft again clarifies that Windows 8 tablets won't actually run Windows apps - Page 3

post #81 of 136
Quote:
Originally Posted by nvidia2008 View Post

The first thing people will want to run is some version of Office and Flash. Without these, I don't see how it is a real alternative to iPad or Android tablets.

If Microsoft wanted to kick ass they could have engaged, I dunno, some of the top engineers in the world working for them to enable some sort of x86 compatibility or some sort of better plan on transitioning x86 apps to ARM. They would have marched into Adobe's offices and said, let's get Flash on Windows8 tablets 100% sorted.

At the very least they should have come up with a bold plan to make Office for tablets. Why they are not doing this is a mystery. A massive percentage of people buying iPads have "Can I do Office on this?" as one of their first questions. Yes there are apps that do that for iOS and Android but surely it would pale in comparison to Microsoft Office for Windows 8 tablets... right? *Sigh*

What that tells me is that Ballmer sees it I the same way Jobs does, that the tablet is mostly for consuming content, not creating it and good battery life is paramount.

It also tells me that M$ is probably scared that they may cannibalize their core market which is desktops if they were to make them fully compatible.. They can't possibly make as much on the tablet by selling the whole office suite for $30, like apple's similar offering.

Unlike other wannabes they are showing restraint, waiting for others to fall flat and they learn from it.
post #82 of 136
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrstep View Post

1) I guess that's why Microsoft fans are on AI explaining why a news headline on an Apple site is really wrong.

Sorry to mess with your reality, but I'm an Apple fan, lurking AI since 2005. And it's not just the headline, the whole crux of the story is based on misrepresenting someone's words and a bad assumption.

All the Apple rumour sites report the same stories, and none of the others have written about this. That's because if you stick to what was said, there's no story.
post #83 of 136
Then what would be the point of Windows8 then? I mean really...

... at night.

Reply

... at night.

Reply
post #84 of 136
Quote:
Originally Posted by KevinN206 View Post

MS has already demoed Office 2010 on Windows 8 SoC ARM during CES 2011 in June 2011. By the time Windows 8 is released in 2012, they'll have a fully functional Office suite for ARM. The big question is whether it'll be a desktop app or Metro app. I think it's the former.

Got a link?

The only "demo" of MS Office running on ARM -- that I could find is:

Windows 8: Watch Microsofts full ARM tablet demo [video]

At 22:45-23:45 in, it showed:

-- A Quad Core ARM Chip
-- A laptop with a full physical keyboard and touch pad
-- A document already open on the display with what appeared to be standard Word
-- The content was already entered

The "demo" consisted of hitting a key on the physical keyboard and printing the document on a printer -- and saying: this is running full word. Then he exited to the Metro shell.

That was not really much of a demo.

Also, I suspect that to most people "Running Office on ARM" means running Office on a touch tablet without a physical kb or stylus. *

This is important! The UI/UX of Office depends on very precise, granular positioning of a cursor, along with mouseover hints, kb shortcuts, etc. Because of the 16x9 form factor a usable popup keyboard will obliterate most of the document on a useable-size tablet. This will just not work well on a touch screen tablet -- even with a stylus.

In order provide an acceptable UX on a touch tablet (without a physical kb), MS will have to rework Office apps especially for a touch UI, If they are successful doing this, it will be a different "Office" than the "Real Office" that runs on a non-touch system -- be it ARM or x86.

* for the last decade, or so, there have been MS tablets running Office using a stylus. These have had minimal acceptance.
"...The calm is on the water and part of us would linger by the shore, For ships are safe in harbor, but that's not what ships are for."
- Michael Lille -
Reply
"...The calm is on the water and part of us would linger by the shore, For ships are safe in harbor, but that's not what ships are for."
- Michael Lille -
Reply
post #85 of 136
Quote:
Originally Posted by Firefly7475 View Post

Was that serious or were you joking?

If you're serious I'm happy to have a 12 month signature bet with you!

If we don't see an x86 based tablet running Windows 8 within 12 months of the release of Windows 8 you get to set a line in my signature for 12 months.

If we do see an x86 based tablet running Windows 8 within 12 months of the release of Windows 8 I get to set a line in your signature for 12 months.

Does it matter?

How is an x86 based tablet running Windows 8 any different * than the windows tablets of the last decade -- the x86 apps are unusable without a physical kb and mouse/touchpad?

If you need a physical kb -- why not just buy a laptop?

* other than the Metro UI and Widget apps
"...The calm is on the water and part of us would linger by the shore, For ships are safe in harbor, but that's not what ships are for."
- Michael Lille -
Reply
"...The calm is on the water and part of us would linger by the shore, For ships are safe in harbor, but that's not what ships are for."
- Michael Lille -
Reply
post #86 of 136
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dick Applebaum View Post

Got a link?

The only "demo" of MS Office running on ARM -- that I could find is:

Windows 8: Watch Microsofts full ARM tablet demo [video]

At 22:45-23:45 in, it showed:

-- A Quad Core ARM Chip
-- A laptop with a full physical keyboard and touch pad
-- A document already open on the display with what appeared to be standard Word
-- The content was already entered

The "demo" consisted of hitting a key on the physical keyboard and printing the document on a printer -- and saying: this is running full word. Then he exited to the Metro shell.

That was not really much of a demo.

Also, I suspect that to most people "Running Office on ARM" means running Office on a touch tablet without a physical kb or stylus. *

This is important! The UI/UX of Office depends on very precise, granular positioning of a cursor, along with mouseover hints, kb shortcuts, etc. Because of the 16x9 form factor a usable popup keyboard will obliterate most of the document on a useable-size tablet. This will just not work well on a touch screen tablet -- even with a stylus.

In order provide an acceptable UX on a touch tablet (without a physical kb), MS will have to rework Office apps especially for a touch UI, If they are successful doing this, it will be a different "Office" than the "Real Office" that runs on a non-touch system -- be it ARM or x86.

* for the last decade, or so, there have been MS tablets running Office using a stylus. These have had minimal acceptance.

http://allthingsd.com/20110105/live-...ks-arm-at-ces/

"Next up is Office running on an ARM chip. This demo is on Microsoft Word and has it printing to an Epson printer. Microsoft shows demos of chips from Qualcomm, Nvidia and Texas Instruments."

That was back in Jan of 2011 so I am sure it is working even better now.
post #87 of 136
Quote:
Originally Posted by jd_in_sb View Post

I totally agree. When I saw the demo I thought that the ability to run native Windows applications was the one thing that would differentiate Windows 8 from all the other tablets ("A tablet and full Windows desktop - all in one!"). Without that ability it will be DOA - unless it costs $99.

Now I understand why the demo tablet had a fan. They crammed desktop hardware in there.

Their slogan has been "Windows 8 Everywhere Without Compromise." That's totally false. They need to name the tablet "Metro" and ditch the Windows name if it won't run Windows desktop applications. Maybe they should use Intel Atom and ditch ARM so they can run x86 apps.

why would anyone wish to run Windows in any form after all the years of misery/stealing/bullying/ and everything else that is MS Modus Operandi
?
post #88 of 136
Quote:
Originally Posted by AppleInsider View Post

With Windows XP, the company added support for both Intel's Itanium IA64 and the AMD-originated x64, a 64-bit extension of x86. However, both products require separate apps and separate versions of the operating system.

False.

The Itanium version of Windows XP included an emulation layer (similar to Rosetta) that allowed all existing 32-bit x86 Windows applications to run. It dropped support for 16-bit Windows and DOS applications. Only the OS and the device drivers needed special versions.

The x64 version of Windows XP, like the 64-bit versions of Vista and Windows 7, have full support to run 32-bit Windows applications without emulation, very similar to the way in which 32-bit OS X applications run in Lion's 64-bit kernel. Similarly, 16-bit Windows and 16-bit DOS application support is dropped. Only the OS and the device drivers need special versions.
post #89 of 136
Quote:
Originally Posted by bettieblue View Post

http://allthingsd.com/20110105/live-...ks-arm-at-ces/

"Next up is Office running on an ARM chip. This demo is on Microsoft Word and has it printing to an Epson printer. Microsoft shows demos of chips from Qualcomm, Nvidia and Texas Instruments."

That was back in Jan of 2011 so I am sure it is working even better now.

I didn't see a demo video -- just an explanation of what was presented! It sounds like the "Word demo" was the same non-demo shown in the video I linked to -- in June 2011, 6 months after your CES Link.
"...The calm is on the water and part of us would linger by the shore, For ships are safe in harbor, but that's not what ships are for."
- Michael Lille -
Reply
"...The calm is on the water and part of us would linger by the shore, For ships are safe in harbor, but that's not what ships are for."
- Michael Lille -
Reply
post #90 of 136
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dick Applebaum View Post

Does it matter?

Not really, it would be nice to win the bet though!


Quote:
Originally Posted by Dick Applebaum View Post

How is an x86 based tablet running Windows 8 any different * than the windows tablets of the last decade -- the x86 apps are unusable without a physical kb and mouse/touchpad?

If you need a physical kb -- why not just buy a laptop?

The use case for "legacy" Windows on a tablet is "dockable" devices. Examples are the ASUS Transformer and the Motorola Atrix).

I don't expect a user being required to enter the "legacy" Windows desktop whilst using a device in "touch mode".
post #91 of 136
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dick Applebaum View Post

...maybe Losedows

How about ButtDows

Or PoopyHeadDoze
post #92 of 136
Don't understand how this is news. Why would you want a tablet to run desktop apps?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tallest Skil View Post

"Architecture? You mean like a bridge?"

People with little computer knowledge don't give a flying frick about any of that. They don't have A SINGLE CLUE. People think iOS applications work on Android machines, for heaven's sake. They'll see the word "Windows" on their Windows 8 tablet and complain, "Why can't I put my games on this? It says 'Requires Windows 7 or later'. This is later!"

I've yet to hear of anyone trying to install PC games on their Windows phone. Don't see why it would be any different for a tablet.
post #93 of 136
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirty Smuggler View Post

You just beat me to it. Over 50 posts and no one mentions that the headline is false. Microsoft did not say "Windows 8 tablets won't actually run Windows apps". They said "ARM-based Windows 8 tablets won't run Windows apps". x86-based Windows8 Tablets will support them, as was demoed. What is DED's source that there won't be x86 tablets next year?

FUD is the intent of the headline. Neither clarification nor explication.

DED is little interested in stating the whole truth. He dissembles bits and pieces to bolster his opinions.
post #94 of 136
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrstep View Post

That's strange, because an application is a type of software. And software is run on your smartphone, tablet, and other mobile devices.

Software runs on my TV set too. And my car's computer which controls the engine, etc.


App, OTOH, is shorthand for "Apple". That is why it is called the AppStore - Short for "Apple Store".

Programs run only on Windows desktops and notebooks. Applications run only on OSX.

And "PC" does not include Macs. Otherwise, Jon Hodgman makes no sense when reading Apple's advertising scripts.
post #95 of 136
Quote:
Originally Posted by bettieblue View Post

Minimal traction on the cloud? Hotmail/Live/Skydrive 500 million users. Office 365 etc. Compared to what mobile me?

Well, compared to Gmail, Dropbox, and so on. Maybe I shouldn't have said minimal traction, I should have said minimal profits from the cloud.
post #96 of 136
Quote:
Originally Posted by Granmastak View Post

What that tells me is that Ballmer sees it I the same way Jobs does, that the tablet is mostly for consuming content, not creating it and good battery life is paramount.

It also tells me that M$ is probably scared that they may cannibalize their core market which is desktops if they were to make them fully compatible.. They can't possibly make as much on the tablet by selling the whole office suite for $30, like apple's similar offering...

To which may I quote another poster:

Quote:
Originally Posted by benanderson89

Then what would be the point of Windows8 then? I mean really...
post #97 of 136
Quote:
Originally Posted by screamingfist View Post

why would anyone wish to run Windows in any form after all the years of misery/stealing/bullying/ and everything else that is MS Modus Operandi
?

Because all the cool new software is always built for Windows first and best. Within any category there are almost always many fewer choices of software for Macs.
post #98 of 136
Quote:
Originally Posted by nvidia2008 View Post

Well, compared to Gmail, Dropbox, and so on. Maybe I shouldn't have said minimal traction, I should have said minimal profits from the cloud.

How much is Apple paying Microsoft to run iCloud?

Surely with their paid BPOS/Office 365 users and Apple's money Microsoft's cloud-based profit would be in front of what Dropbox or Gmail are pulling in?
post #99 of 136
Quote:
Originally Posted by willb2064 View Post

I've yet to hear of anyone trying to install PC games on their Windows phone. Don't see why it would be any different for a tablet.

Because you have the full Windows UI on Windows 8 tablets. You don't on Windows 7 phones.

Please tell me I didn't just have to post that. You're smart; you couldn't possibly have not known that.

Originally Posted by asdasd

This is Appleinsider. It's all there for you but we can't do it for you.
Reply

Originally Posted by asdasd

This is Appleinsider. It's all there for you but we can't do it for you.
Reply
post #100 of 136
Quote:
Originally Posted by timgriff84 View Post

I don't actually get if there is any new news here or if its another misunderstanding of what Microsoft is saying. The only crucial question is "Does ARM have the desktop mode?". We've known from the start apps will need recompiling and for the vast majority of apps that just means changing your compile settings.

Are we forgetting about the .net apps? They are not compiled to any specific cpu and will work on any platform as long as Microsoft ports the .net runtime - which of course they are doing.
post #101 of 136
I really don't like the type of people that need to use phrases like "value proposition" over and over, even if they don't really know how and/or when to use it.
Reeks of corporate BS.
post #102 of 136
Quote:
Originally Posted by majortom1981 View Post

I will get bashed for this BUT isnt this an apple website? Why is there a windows news story on the front page? Id rather go to a windows site to read windows news .

In order to laugh at M$

Microsoft should use this as a time to change how they do everything and set a platform for the future. Continuing along that same old path as the last 30 years, they will become obsolete after another 30 years.

Tom
post #103 of 136
Quote:
Originally Posted by Firefly7475 View Post

The use case for "legacy" Windows on a tablet is "dockable" devices. Examples are the ASUS Transformer and the Motorola Atrix).

I don't expect a user being required to enter the "legacy" Windows desktop whilst using a device in "touch mode".

Fair enough!

Couple of questions:

1) do you take the "dock" (essentially a setup containing a stand, a kb and mouse or touchpad) with you everywhere or do you have separate docks at strategic locations -- home, classroom or office, etc.?

2) at what point does the cost and inconvenience of multiple docks outweigh that of a self-contained clamshell laptop?

I can appreciate and understand the appeal of the Metro UI and widgets. What I don't understand is how developers can prevent piracy of their Windows 8 apps developed using HTML5, CSS, JavaScript...
"...The calm is on the water and part of us would linger by the shore, For ships are safe in harbor, but that's not what ships are for."
- Michael Lille -
Reply
"...The calm is on the water and part of us would linger by the shore, For ships are safe in harbor, but that's not what ships are for."
- Michael Lille -
Reply
post #104 of 136
The amount of misinformation in this article is mindblowing.

First, it's not "any" tablet, it's an ARM tablet.
Second, this is really only true for applications written in languages that are not hardware agnostic.

Managed code (.NET) does not have this problem. At the VERY most, you'll be required to recompile your project for an ARM architecture before you publish.

That would involve the following steps:
1. Open project in VS2011 (20sec on average - depending on project size)
2. Go to project properties and choose 'ARM' or 'Any CPU' and hit ctrl+shift+b (about 30 seconds including compiling)
3. Go to menu 'store' and choose 'publish' to upload to store (a minute at most?)

So all in all, you'ld get a win7 managed code project into an ARM format, including uploading to store, in under 5 minutes.

Did I mention that the vast majority of business applications are written in .NET? Well, they are.

And let's be serious here... nobody is gonna want to run Photoshop, 3d max or any other such application on a freaking 11inch screen (I say 'screen', because windows 8 tablets are actual computers not 'just' tablets).

I don't mind anyone critisizing anything. But at least get your facts straight.
post #105 of 136
Quote:
Originally Posted by ALUOp View Post

I don't understand why this is a news.
A person with little computer knowledge should know this from day 1.
It's two different architectures. That's also one of the reasons why Apple won't release MBA with a ARM CPU. You will start with 0 apps!

Very true, unless, Apple made a MacBook Air with both an INTEL and an ARM CPU. Imagine having the power of the intel chip, but the very low power usage of the ARM chip. You could surf the web, read email and do all of the iOS app things with the ARM chip, then if you need photoshop, or Excel, you can somehow invoke the Intel Chip. Sounds odd, but they have already done this exact thing with the GPUs. Remember Grand Central? The feature in Snow Leopard that Apple states " Grand Central Dispatch (GCD) provides a revolutionary new way for software to take advantage of multicore processors." Well, why not multiple processors? Apple is already morphing OS X and iOS. The MacBook Air could be the perfect hybrid device that would give us the advantages of both.

The A6 or A7 chip will be very tiny, sips on power and very low heat.
iOS takes up very little memory. And the apps and os are designed to free/release that memory as much as possible.
Lion already uses Launchpad. Gestures, etc.
Safari, Mail, iCal and so many other apps could run for DAYS with a large MPA battery if the default OS and CPU would be iOS/ARM .
In fact, make just about everything use the ARM chip, and have a Turbo mode available only for the programs that require the INTEL CPU.

Just my thoughts.
post #106 of 136
You didn't ask me, but I'ld like to answer your questions anyway.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dick Applebaum

Fair enough!

Couple of questions:

1) do you take the "dock" (essentially a setup containing a stand, a kb and mouse or touchpad) with you everywhere or do you have separate docks at strategic locations -- home, classroom or office, etc.?

That would depend on strategy. In an enterprise setting, I'ld say that there would be docks everywhere. Just like there are now. I know of quite some companies that use nothing but (identical) laptops. Every desk has a dock. I don't see how this would be any different.

Secondly, it's not just docks. It's also transformables like the Samsung Sliding 7 PC. I expect to see a lot more of such devices in the future. A transformable tablet/laptop with a quad core ARM CPU and SSD running win8? Hell yeah!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dick Applebaum

2) at what point does the cost and inconvenience of multiple docks outweigh that of a self-contained clamshell laptop?

Eum... all the time. Docks, keyboards and mice are very cheap. And they extend battery life (actual life... as in when you need to replace your battery since they loose quality over time).

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dick Applebaum

I can appreciate and understand the appeal of the Metro UI and widgets. What I don't understand is how developers can prevent piracy of their Windows 8 apps developed using HTML5, CSS, JavaScript...

Don't be fooled by the buzzwords of HTML5, CSS and Javascript. The metro applications written in those languages will be built upon the new WinRT framework. They will not work on other platforms. Not even on earlier windows versions.

Concerning piracy, if I understood correctly, metro applications will only be installable through the windows store. Although that's just an assumption. I have heared a msft official say this literally. It seemed to be implied a couple times.
Licensing will be handled by the store, tied to your account and synced on all your windows8 computers.
post #107 of 136
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dick Applebaum View Post

1) do you take the "dock" (essentially a setup containing a stand, a kb and mouse or touchpad) with you everywhere or do you have separate docks at strategic locations -- home, classroom or office, etc.?

2) at what point does the cost and inconvenience of multiple docks outweigh that of a self-contained clamshell laptop?

For the tablet I would only envision one dock. It might only be used occasionally when one needs to do the taxes, balance the budget or write a report. The kids might use it when assignment time comes around.

For the rest of the time the tablet would be detached and used for reading or playing Xbox Live whilst reclining on the lounge.

The phone is much more tricky. As it would need to be docked into a screen the use cases are far less. It might be something more suited to use by Nokia in emerging markets (e.g. docking a phone into a TV to create a less-than-ideal by cheap PC scenario)
post #108 of 136
Quote:
Originally Posted by timgriff84 View Post

Even stanger in visual studio I've been creating projects with application in the name of the project type even befoe smartphones and tablets existed.

Doubly stranger, I used essentially the same Project Builder (sorry, now Xcode) to build applications on the NeXT box before using it to create applications on OS X and now the iPhone and iPad. So it's as if both desktops and mobile devices can run applications.
post #109 of 136
Quote:
Originally Posted by ConradJoe View Post

Because all the cool new software is always built for Windows first and best. Within any category there are almost always many fewer choices of software for Macs.

I half agree - there are generally fewer choices, but they're typically much nicer. Having moved from Windows myself, there is ONE app that I still run in vmware for photo stitching, and every time I get into that awful Windows UI paradigm it makes me want to barf. But the stitched pictures turn out nicely.
post #110 of 136
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirty Smuggler View Post

Sorry to mess with your reality, but I'm an Apple fan, lurking AI since 2005. And it's not just the headline, the whole crux of the story is based on misrepresenting someone's words and a bad assumption.

All the Apple rumour sites report the same stories, and none of the others have written about this. That's because if you stick to what was said, there's no story.

The short headline on the front page says:

"Microsoft again clarifies that Windows 8 tablets won't actually run Windows apps
The president of Microsoft's Windows unit, Stephen Sinofsky, has again pointedly clarified that new ARM tablets running Windows 8 next year won't actually run existing Windows apps for PCs."

Bold is mine, the rest is from the front page. What in the world is so confusing about that?

There are 2 main items to break out in terms of Win8 hardware:

1) ARM tablets running Windows won't have access to legacy apps. That would seem to kill the 'Windows has more apps' advantage, particularly when faced with the more established iOS ecosystem.

2) x86 tablets are TabletPCs. Sure, run the old apps with a stylus or keyboard/mouse. Nobody has ever wanted to do that before either. So also not a seemingly strong business move.

Neither of these is a misrepresentation, though I'd argue that (for Microsoft) they are based on, as you put it, a bad assumption.
post #111 of 136
"Wintel opens door to new chipmakers" on CNN.

It takes you to an article that has the headline: "Windows 8 opens door to new chipmakers" and talks about breaking the long-held grip that Intel has had on Windows.

Now that's a goofy headline.
post #112 of 136
Quote:
Originally Posted by nvidia2008 View Post

At the very least they should have come up with a bold plan to make Office for tablets. Why they are not doing this is a mystery. A massive percentage of people buying iPads have "Can I do Office on this?" as one of their first questions. Yes there are apps that do that for iOS and Android but surely it would pale in comparison to Microsoft Office for Windows 8 tablets... right? *Sigh*

I'm actually with you all the way, I'd love to see Office for the iPad and Android.

I actually don't think they should stop there. Xbox Live, Messenger/Skype, Live Mesh, Lync and the Zune services should all be available on OSX, iOS and Android where possible.

Microsoft's own OS's should allow them to have the best version of each service. If it doesn't allow that then the OS guys aren't doing their job.

Alas I don't think we are ever going to see it. The Windows guys are in control at Microsoft and they use these services to drive customers toward Windows.

No doubt it will work to some extent. At Build Ballmer said "...you ought to expect that we are rethinking and working hard on what it would mean to do Office Metro style" pretty well confirming Metro Office was on its way (you can bet Microsoft PR guys are once again beating their heads against the wall).

So this time next year your hypothetical iPad customer asking "can I do Office on this?" might very well receive the answer "No, but all of these Windows 8 tablets can".
post #113 of 136
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirty Smuggler View Post

With readers like this, no wonder DED can pass his opinions and assumptions off as fact.

Running Windows applications on a tablet will be their only point of difference, so don't be surprised to see some hot and heavy hardware on sale, it hasn't stopped them before.
And that's how they'll clear up the confusion over what can run real Windows. The ads will say "Just look for the fat ones".

you mean, the fat, hot, and heavy ones that run for 4 hours. yeah sure, they will sell a zillion of those. dozens of OEM's will rush them to market. that's exactly what people want. not a thin, cool, light iPad, or even Droid, tablet that runs for 10 hours. not even the other MS ARM tablet models that are similar to the competition and can run a new generation of W8 software, starting with Office 2013 of course. because of course everyone wants to buy tablets to run their OLD stuff that was NEVER designed to work with a touch UI, not those new "app" things that are. the pent up demand is huge! and just imagine how much more it will grow by the time MS actually gets W8 finished a year behind schedule as usual in 2013!

i like that strategy, i like it a lot. Firefly can't wait to buy one.
post #114 of 136
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrstep View Post

The short headline on the front page says:

"Microsoft again clarifies that Windows 8 tablets won't actually run Windows apps
The president of Microsoft's Windows unit, Stephen Sinofsky, has again pointedly clarified that new ARM tablets running Windows 8 next year won't actually run existing Windows apps for PCs."

Bold is mine, the rest is from the front page. What in the world is so confusing about that?

There are 2 main items to break out in terms of Win8 hardware:

1) ARM tablets running Windows won't have access to legacy apps. That would seem to kill the 'Windows has more apps' advantage, particularly when faced with the more established iOS ecosystem.

2) x86 tablets are TabletPCs. Sure, run the old apps with a stylus or keyboard/mouse. Nobody has ever wanted to do that before either. So also not a seemingly strong business move.

Neither of these is a misrepresentation, though I'd argue that (for Microsoft) they are based on, as you put it, a bad assumption.

well said.
post #115 of 136
It's not confusing to me, at least I don't think so, and I'm not even a Window weenie...

Windows 8 will run "Metro" apps on x86 hardware, along with existing x86 based Windows apps.

Windows 8 will run only "Metro" apps on ARM hardware.

Did I miss anything?
post #116 of 136
Quote:
Originally Posted by Firefly7475 View Post

I'm actually with you all the way, I'd love to see Office for the iPad and Android.

I actually don't think they should stop there. Xbox Live, Messenger/Skype, Live Mesh, Lync and the Zune services should all be available on OSX, iOS and Android where possible.

Microsoft's own OS's should allow them to have the best version of each service. If it doesn't allow that then the OS guys aren't doing their job.

Alas I don't think we are ever going to see it. The Windows guys are in control at Microsoft and they use these services to drive customers toward Windows.

No doubt it will work to some extent. At Build Ballmer said "...you ought to expect that we are rethinking and working hard on what it would mean to do Office Metro style" pretty well confirming Metro Office was on its way (you can bet Microsoft PR guys are once again beating their heads against the wall).

So this time next year your hypothetical iPad customer asking "can I do Office on this?" might very well receive the answer "No, but all of these Windows 8 tablets can".

exactly.

Ballmer of course is the supreme "Windows guy." also being the "marketing guy" that he is at the core, he just simply slaps the "Windows" brand on every flavor of OS that MS puts into the market for licensing. even if they are totally different technically. NT 6 or 7, CE, whatever, who cares? it's all going to be Windows 8. his brilliant plan is to finally unify it all from a consumer perspective with a standard top level UI layer, Metro, across all devices.

but he must realize he will have to leave W7 in place for MS bread-and=butter enterprise customers. - who are finally just upgrading to it now and leaving XP behind. the business world is not going to switch to W8 and retrain all their employees just for the sake of Metro's pretty colors and a touch UI they don't need.

so basically, MS is "forking" Windows into two product lines - one for consumers with pretty colors, the other for enterprise with Exchange and all the other established MS services.

the risk of course is that they will lose a big chunk of their current consumer user base in the process to the very strong competition, being four years late getting to the party.
post #117 of 136
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScientificBob View Post

The amount of misinformation in this article is mindblowing.

First, it's not "any" tablet, it's an ARM tablet.
Second, this is really only true for applications written in languages that are not hardware agnostic.

Managed code (.NET) does not have this problem. At the VERY most, you'll be required to recompile your project for an ARM architecture before you publish.

That would involve the following steps:
1. Open project in VS2011 (20sec on average - depending on project size)
2. Go to project properties and choose 'ARM' or 'Any CPU' and hit ctrl+shift+b (about 30 seconds including compiling)
3. Go to menu 'store' and choose 'publish' to upload to store (a minute at most?)

So all in all, you'ld get a win7 managed code project into an ARM format, including uploading to store, in under 5 minutes.

I don't mind anyone critisizing anything. But at least get your facts straight.

While what you say may be technically true -- I do not think it is practical.

There are many more considerations when going from a pc to a tablet, to name a few:
-- screen real estate
-- sizes of controls, buttons, etc.
-- multi-window vs single window
-- multi-touch vs kb & mouse/touchpad
-- flexibility/clutter vs limited-option/focus
-- availability of attachable accessory devices vs lack of same
-- power & resource consumption

You really need to think about an application that runs [relatively] unrestricted on the desktop compared to the way it should run within the constraints of a tablet.

You will, likely, need to storyboard your application to assure that the flow and UX are acceptable -- say. when the virtual kb pops up and covers the part of the document that the user needs to type into.

Then you have another, different set of HIGs that you must conform to -- so your app plays well in the new environment -- there are no mouseover hints; the controls must be large enough to navigate with a finger; you should take advantage of pinch-zoom, location services, etc...

It actually. takes more redesign than you'd think to take even a simple iPhone app and make it into a an equivalent iPad app.

So yes, it may take only 5 minutes to recompile an app for a different platform -- but it often comes after days (weeks? months?) of redesigning/repurposing the app for the new environment.

Then, after all that, you have 2 different codebases to maintain.
"...The calm is on the water and part of us would linger by the shore, For ships are safe in harbor, but that's not what ships are for."
- Michael Lille -
Reply
"...The calm is on the water and part of us would linger by the shore, For ships are safe in harbor, but that's not what ships are for."
- Michael Lille -
Reply
post #118 of 136
Quote:
Originally Posted by mytdave View Post

It's not confusing to me, at least I don't think so, and I'm not even a Window weenie...

Windows 8 will run "Metro" apps on x86 hardware, along with existing x86 based Windows apps.

Windows 8 will run only "Metro" apps on ARM hardware.

Did I miss anything?

no, you got it.

the problem is that MS totally obfuscated this at the Big Demo a few days ago. the hype got in the way. to add to the confusion, there apparently will be two kinds of W8 apps - those like conventional desktop applications, and those like iPad/droid tablet apps. but both will work on anything running W8, take your pick. the Windows Phone apps, however, are still different! that's CE, oops ...

or maybe WinPhone will be converted to W8 OS too. that's ok, Nokia won't mind another big OS switch, nah. they'll belong to MS by then anyway.
post #119 of 136
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dick Applebaum View Post

But there is a difference! The day the iPad was announced there were hundreds of thousands of apps that would run in it (1x or 2x). AIR, when the iPad was first delivered, 3 months, later, there were 50,000 (or so) native iPad apps.

What can MS deliver, over a year from now, that can cause someone (or company) to buy a Windows 8 tablet over the then current iPad and all its apps?

Especially when you consider that each app a user buys gives him an additional reason to stay within the iPad ecosystem.

Android tablets don't seem to be able crack this nut after more than a year of trying -- what makes you think Windows 8 will be able to after another year or more delay.

Because you have nut-cases in business who won't buy anything unless "Windows" will run on it. The in-bred IT Admins and CIOs will spend millions of dollars and 10 years of effort to integrate the new "Windows" into their legacy "Windows" workflows. Whereas they could have purchased iPads now, and used the tools already available through Apple and 3rd parties to quickly integrate iPads into their organizations. But they're not that bright.

It's okay though, the young nimble businesses who are eager and aggressive will have jumped onto the iPad (and other non-standard products - like Linux) in the 1st year or two and will be running circles around these old, lumbering dinosaurs before they're ever able to get the new "Windows" platform stabilized.
post #120 of 136
Quote:
Originally Posted by AppleInsider View Post

With Windows XP, the company added support for both Intel's Itanium IA64 and the AMD-originated x64, a 64-bit extension of x86. However, both products require separate apps and separate versions of the operating system. In contrast, Apple has moved from 68k to PowerPC to Intel x86, each time offering robust backwards compatibility for existing apps.

In its move from x86 to 64-bit apps, Apple delivered a similarly smooth transition, allowing Universal Binary apps to work on either platform, and distribution one version of Mac OS X capable of running on either 32 or 64 bit hardware.

This isn't actually correct. The move from Power PC to Intel was good but not perfect, I for one had a few games that no longer worked. With each iteration of OS X there has always been software that no longer works. To the extent now with Lion 0 of the apps I bought for Panther and Tiger actually work on it. So to suggest is offering "robust backwards compatibility" is just wrong.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: iPad
  • Microsoft again clarifies that Windows 8 tablets won't actually run Windows apps
AppleInsider › Forums › Mobile › iPad › Microsoft again clarifies that Windows 8 tablets won't actually run Windows apps