Doubts cast on success of Amazon tablet, Android Ice Cream Sandwich vs. iPad - Page 3

oh never mind...

Indeed, Amazon has the ecosystem (music, books, apps, videos) to rival Apple. The interesting thing is that their ecosystem overlaps with iOS (and Mac OS). I don't see Apple developing iTunes apps for Android. So, effectively, Amazon remains a contents-centric company, while Apple is a hardware-centric company. Amazon is now selling hardware to ensure control over distribution of its contents. Apple distributes contents to ensure interesting and relevant contents for its hardware.

Very interesting competition.

How many different 3GS models does Apple currently manufacture?

Does Apple make additional SKUs for non-USA carriers too?

See Maylong tablet.
And yeah, OS makes a difference. Unless of course the "average consumer" sees tablets as a bag of hardware specs to be touted to their friends to prop up their self esteem

I certainly like and use my iPad. However, I am also hopeful for the success of the upcoming Amazon tablets.

I believe competition is good for the marketplace - and will keep Apple moving at a faster rate for all of us. Furthermore, I believe Amazon's focus will be somewhat similar to Apple's - a focus on the overall experience - and not just on the raw technology. Unlike the tech only Android providers, Amazon also has a tremendous amount of content to offer. As for actual pricing, it might chose to follow the razor/razor blade model - giving it a leg up on price.

Of course, the tablet would have to be up to its part of the experience. We shall soon see.

Actually with regard to app usage, I would have assumed that the average iPhone user consumes data via an app at a higher percentage than Android users. One has to consider though whether or not we're talking raw bits or web traffic. One streamed video from a viewer (e.g. iPhones Youtube app) can easily outweigh weeks of casual surfing from a data usage POV. As well, if Android users are more likely to utilize streaming music services since iPhone users will tend to have more music loaded on their phones, then that would show up as more data usage. Now in the end, the bigger question is "what does it mean", and in reality the answer is nothing from a broader perspective, though the numbers do have meanings when you're looking at very specific trends.

Which Android phone regularly outsells the iPhone 4?
And don't say "all of them added together". That's like saying "all minivans outsell black Corvettes."

You may be right, and the smartphone market, if it is of any use as a predictor, bolsters your viewpoint.

I've only heard of one, the Samsung Galaxy S II, and only in one market.

How low can you go? Your reputation is so poor that now you can only be considered a poor excuse for a troll.

Yes - but the point here is that they still charge for the handset up front, and then if you spend enough they give you some kind of discount that is supposed to add up to some fraction of the cost of the phone over time. This promotion appears to be a way to hook customers on more expensive plans. That's different to giving you a free handset and then hiding the cost of it in the monthly charges.

It's hard to keep up with all of Parttimer's iterations, isn't it? We know of four (all banned now), but it's entirely possible there are/were more.

I think his comment was meant as a joke - a rephrasing of a previous poster's comment about Android users.

Dude, that was sarcasm, note the wink at the end. Chill a bit. . .

That could be how they're actually doing the transaction. I dunno. The provider apparently marketed the iPhone as free, thus the news articles.

But in any case, it's plainly obvious the iPhones are great devices and have had phenomenal sales. My initial post was pointing out that the iPhone is also offered free in other markets, something a poster wasn't aware of, and purchase decisions are based on more than just the price as evidenced by Japan's consumer's. No dissing of Apple's product intended.

Gatorguy and I like to wink at each other. After all... it is the end of DADT.

It all depends on what you're doing.

If you're a developer selling an app, then adding in ALL iOS devices compared to ALL Android devices might make sense.

If you're a phone manufacturer, then the number of phones sold by platform probably makes the most sense (but this would be meaningless since a phone manufacturer would not have the ability to choose iOS, anyway).

If you're a handset case manufacturer, then the number of phones from each vendor is what matters - with no regard to the OS.

If you're a developer of software that is only meaningful on phones, then the number of phones by OS matters.

If you're an investor, you might look at PROFITS from handset sales - where the iPhone wins handily.


You're 3 for 4. The bolded portion is wrong. Since the iPad and iPod touch use the iPhone OS, the number of devices running iPhone OS is greater than the number of devices running Android OS.


Clickbait headline (not surprising that your comprehension never got past the large letters at the top of the page. If you actually read the article, iPhone market share is flat or increasing, depending on how it's measured. There's certainly nothing that suggests that the iPhone is dead in the water.

So what does that mean? Is Android better than iOS because it sells more?

By that metric... the iPod was the best MP3 player ever... because it sold more than any other MP3 player.

What everyone seems to be ignoring is that Amazon is very intentionally not trying to compete with the iPad.

It's blindingly obvious that the NookColor -- the tablet/reader marketed by what is, after all, Amazon's actual chief competitor, and which is the second best-selling tablet after the iPad -- is the target of the Amazon tablet.

The AmaTab has little memory. No cameras. A 7" screen and a $249 pricetag. These are exactly the same specs as a NC.

The NC comes from a bookstore, and is marketed as "the reader's tablet." Its UI is designed to be a front end for B&N's online retail operation, and (without rooting) it is limited to apps available from B&N.

Similarly, the Amazon product simply leverages its own digital offerings -- which are of course much richer and more varied than B&N's -- into a device. Prime streaming video. Cloud-based music and storage. A custom storefront. The Kindle Store. The Amazon App Store.

All of the hype surrounding the AmaTab lately has been generated by Internet tech writers who have managed to completely misunderstand the marketing thrust of the device, its capabilities, and who it's for. It's for people who would have bought a NookColor, and for Amazon fanpeeps.

The rumored 10" Amazon tablet might target the iPad, but there's no evidence that's actually going forward.

You know this for sure? We've seen one?

I agree, with the exception of the iPad and iPhone. By that, I mean that I think consumers view all tablets as copies of iPads. To a lesser extent they feel like that about iPhones, too.

They have:

http://techcrunch.com/2011/09/02/amazon-kindle-tablet/

That has as much credibility to me as this website.

If you're unfamiliar with these whores, I'll give you a little backstory. These are the guys who claimed they had seen a completely redesigned Mac Pro before the Nehalem line was released.

Black metal, entirely new case, new internals (larger, more SATA, PCIe, and 12 RAM slots), and all new ports on the outside. Huge article about how they had seen one.

And then the second it was released, they took all that out of the article (which was months old by that time) except for one paragraph stating that they had seen one before launch and it matched what Apple released exactly.

Also, their pages refreshed every 30 seconds automatically for more ad views.

Don't get me wrong: I have nothing against TechCrunch at all. But when someone claims to have seen something before release, writes about it, and doesn't bother to post any spy shots, I immediately have a PTSD-style flashback to MacOSRumors' article and instantly ignore anything they say.

Of course it took 200+ devices and one out every other week to overtake

1 DEVICE!! One!

Heck my android friends are constantly changing phones..

Droidfanboi's love using misleading numbers dont they?

I'm no fan boi btw, I own a bunch of android devices, a hp touchpad

This isn't 1989 and Windows 3.1.

Given that we haven't actually seen the UI for Amazons tablet I'd say it's to soon to decide if it will fail or not.

Kindle is a success and there marketing has been good enough to turn it into a device you want despite not knowing why. If the UI is good and they can match it with marketing then it could work. Every other tablet has awful marketing, most of the population don't even know they exist.

You recall reading that he smashed them right?

Exactly what I thought when I read that. Netbook market fell down because:
a) netbooks are near useless and;
b) tablets (more specifically, iPad) provided a more portable and better performing alternative for the same price point.

The only reason netbooks got any lead was because they were cheap as hell and nothing at that price point was available in such a small, easy to carry package at the time.

Yeah I noticed that too.

'Oh you got a new phone?'

'Yeah my old one broke.'

Either they are careless with them since they aren't that precious or they are not very durable, or maybe it is because they can't update them, probably easier to get a new phone than try to upgrade the OS.

good lord, someone who pays attention to what is actually happening! rare indeed ... welcome.

i expect the Amazon tab will sell decently, if it is easy to use. they will certainly push it hard and the price is within reach of more people. but it's still just a 7" Amazon appliance - a niche product. the total of potential tablet buyers who are heavily focused on Amazon as their media source (other than books) is modest. it won't offer the Google cloud services that draw buyers to other Android tablets. its screen is too small to be a great shopping tablet, or anything browser-dependent. you'll still use your computer for that.

i'm one of those who believe the tweener 7" tablet size is inherently a niche market. either too big or too small for most uses and most users. if you can only afford one gadget, it's going to be a smartphone and you just cope with the small screen size. but it's all-in-one for all uses and easily portable. if you can afford two gadgets, the second one is going to target something it does a lot better for you than your phone. and for most people, a signficantly larger screen size is the first obvious advantage in that regard.

so i think Amazon would be foolish to make 4 million 7" Kindle tabs, especially a v.1 model. look what happened to Samsung's 2 million 7" v.1 Galaxy tabs a year ago - a huge flop (launched at $600, now $283 at Amazon with plenty of stock left). but it can actually do quite a bit more than the Amazon tab will. Amazon should start with a small run and learn from that before scaling up production with the improved - maybe bigger - v.2 model.

Measuring HTTP traffic measures the time spent surfing the web via WebApps and other apps for HTTP related content.

It shows nothing wrt productivity on your device or entertainment on your device(s) for non-web related work.

oh come on. Amazon itself gave Siegler a hands-on quick look, to boost some hype of course (and boy did he ever gush). he didn't make it up and it's not a fake.

Can't tell if trolling or just stupid

Android SOFTWARE has a larger market share than iOS, but only in Smartphones.
iPhone HARDWARE outsells every device on the market and by a considerable margin.

Here is some food for thought
Laptops are a different class of device to a desktop computer, professional workstation and dedicated server, yet are still factored in when calculating the market share of OSX, Windows, Linux et al. So why not factor tablets into the iOS and Android market share? Both are portable media consumption and communication devices running the same operating systems. Differentiating between the two is useless. Throw iPads into the mix and it is a very likely that Android would slip into second place within the quarter, if it hasn't already given the number of iPads being sold.

That must be what experts do.

Now, that is a fact!

Throwing iPads in the mix would help, but those numbers don't even come close to the volume of smartphone activations. With Google claiming upwards of 600K activations per day, you'd have to see iPad sales in the 10's of millions every month to get in striking range.

I have no reason to doubt that specific writer, or to accuse him of lying. Some of his biases are well known, but this piece was presented as straight reporting.

The timing of it -- in the wake of the hysteria over the Forrester forecast of 3-5 million AmaTabs selling in 4Q, with absolutely no sense of what the product would actually be -- had all the earmarks of an intentional unofficial leak by Amazon for purposes of expectation control. The rumor mill was affecting their stock price and setting them up for a crash; reigning back expectations to a more realistic scale seems like a smart strategy, and giving one credible but unconnected writer a look at a prototype and permission to write about it seems like the sort of thing notoriously tight-lipped Amazon would do.

But believe it or don't, of course. It makes sense to me.

wtf?

An amateur blogger from Pakistan compiles a wish list of android phones, so where is the source of real sales figures to back up his list?

Microsoft reports on licenses sold, this is how they get 95% market share.

Not IMO.