Quote:
Originally Posted by 'Apple
(1) It's fucking tiny, less than half the screen area of an iPad.
For movie content it's not much smaller and it's a 1024x600 IPS display. That's not bad. Web surfing is slightly degraded but its a usable aspect ratio for a tablet that also does portrait (vs a 1024x600 netbook that couldn't).
Quote:
(2) No microphone, no Skype, no calls, no communication, no voice commands etc.
Seems a like a reasonable trade. I can get a Kindle Fire and a iPod Touch for the price of an iPad. If I don't do much content creation beyond email this is a reasonable trade for skype.
Quote:
(3) Shorter battery life.
7-8 hours is reasonable. About the same as the iPod Touch.
Quote:
(4) No real multitouch, only dual touch. This one is pretty important in my view.
This is the only killer and only for some games.
Quote:
(5) Half the internal storage of even the lowest spec iPad.
Same as the $28 more expensive iPod Touch.
Quote:
(6) iOS > Amazon's skinned Android
Depends on the skinning. It seems extensive.
Quote:
(7) It's strictly a media consumption device. The iPad is that and more as it's also a productivity device being used and adopted by all sorts of businesses and enterprise and quite a few productivity apps do exist for the iPad in all different kinds of fields and areas.
Sure, so what? A large segment of the consumer market (Amazon's demographic) are just media consumers. Amazon could make 0 enterprise sales and be quite happy.
Quote:
(8) 3:4 aspect ratio > 16:9 aspect ratio for tablets. 16:9 is better for movies, it's worse for everything else, including reading books, surfing, games etc.
It's actually a 10:6 aspect ratio.
Quote:
If you want to buy an Amazon Kindle Fire, then go right ahead, nobody's stopping you. There is a certain market for such a tablet, but even an iPad 1 > Kindle Fire, don't kid yourself.
I would hope that an iPad 1 > Kindle Fire given it's more expensive. Even the refurb closeout was $100 more.