It's of every consequence SDW. It undermines the case for GW not being real!
The burden of proof is on those claiming Global Warming exists. Secondly, it's of no consequence because the issue is that you presented a narrative rebuttal as DATA. You don't know what data is.
I'm not moving any goal posts! I'm staying within them with respect to the topic ( set by you ). You on the other hand are all over the place deperately trying to avoid the issue! Jesus you're a riot!
Yes, you are. You claimed that my belief that Saddam had WMD was partisan. I showed several examples of Democratic politicians claiming the same exact thing, thereby proving your claim false. You then shifted the claim to the UN not finding WMD before the invasion, nor stating there was a justification for war (as if they had the final word on that). This is a textbook example of moving the goalposts in a debate.
And psst! SDW the argument about WMD has been over for a long time.
Apparently you don't know that, because you bring it up in every thread. It was nearly a decade ago, and yet you still cling to it desperately.
There were none. Just like the inspectors and people with at least half a brain were saying!
Ah, yes. I see that you still believe the point of the inspections was to find hidden weapons, as if it was some kind of scavenger hunt. The point, jimmac, was to ensure Iraq's verifiable disarmament. Iraq did not veritably disarm, as other countries had done under UN-led efforts (example: South Africa). As for others, I take it then that all the Democrats who claimed Saddam had weapons were less than half-brained? John Kerry? Bill Clinton? Hillary Clinton? Evan Bayh, et al? I suppose the Director of the CIA and those who formed the collective judgment of world intelligence (The British, The French, The Germans, The Israelis, etc) were all stupid? Man, since you are clearly smarter than all of these people, you have a quite a future ahead of you! :)
There was no justification ( based on that or any other stated reason before hand for the invasion ). Evidently you still won't accept that!
Once again, that is another topic. It's a topic you're wrong about, but another topic nonetheless.