or Connect
AppleInsider › Forums › Mobile › iPad › Amazon ramps up Kindle Fire production to 5 million units in 2011
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Amazon ramps up Kindle Fire production to 5 million units in 2011

post #1 of 89
Thread Starter 
Faced with greater than expected demand, Amazon has increased orders for its Kindle Fire tablet to a total of five million by the end of the year, according to a new report out of the Far East.

Taiwanese publication DigiTimes noted the figures on Thursday, citing sources within "upstream component suppliers." Based on recent tablet estimates from research group Gartner, Amazon would pickup roughly 8 percent of the 2011 tablet market if it were to sell all five million units.

The report suggested that Amazon had raised its order volume from 3.5 million to four million in the middle of the third quarter before raising orders again. The significant pre-release interest has come as a bit of a surprise to the company.

Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos said in a press release last month that his company was increasing production capacity for the Fire in order to build "millions more" than originally planned.

But, high demand for the tablet could hurt the company's profit margins in the short term. Amazon has guided for as low as a $200 million loss next quarter.



For its part, Apple has rejected concerns that the Fire will hurt sales of its iPad. High-level executives from the company recently indicated to an analyst that they view the competing tablet as good for Apple because it will further fragment the tablet market.

However, if a recent survey is to be believed, 26 percent of Kindle Fire buyers delayed or put on hold an iPad purchase. Among 2,600 respondents, 5 percent said that they had already preordered or were "very likely" to purchase soon the Amazon tablet.



Announced in September, the 7-inch Kindle Fire will undercut the iPad with its $199 price when it goes on sale next week.

The Fire is said to be kindling for Amazon's broader tablet strategy. Recent reports have suggested that the online retailer will release an 8.9-inch second-generation model next year. According to Concord Securities analyst Ming-Chi Kuo, that device will have an "amazing form factor," though manufacturers may be having a hard time meeting Amazon's requirements for the tablet.
post #2 of 89
This is good news? Amazon loses money on each unit sold. The old I can't make money on each unit sold but I'll make up for that with volume.

"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." Douglas Adams

Reply

"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." Douglas Adams

Reply
post #3 of 89
Amazon is going to lose $300MM this quarter. The holiday shopping season. Apple will earn $10 billion.

Amazon is winning

Windows survivor - after a long, epic and painful struggle. Very long AAPL

Reply

Windows survivor - after a long, epic and painful struggle. Very long AAPL

Reply
post #4 of 89
I bet Amazon are kicking themselves in the back for not announcing the Kindle Fire at $250. They would have broken even on the production costs and still sold a couple million Kindles without breaking a sweat.
post #5 of 89
I have to admit to being tempted by the Kindle Fire myself.

I love my iPad but mostly use it for music, books/newspapers and the odd game of Angry Birds, rather than getting an iPad 3 next year I might trade down to one of these.

Will wait for actual reviews of the device first.
iPad, Macbook Pro, iPhone, heck I even have iLife! :-)
Reply
iPad, Macbook Pro, iPhone, heck I even have iLife! :-)
Reply
post #6 of 89
I mostly like the new kindle lineup. It's not a Jony Ive standard of design but they're not as fugly as some of their competitors either. Time will tell if the quality of the content is going to justify the investment in the ecosystem. They are definitely getting a leg up from the success of the App Store though. You only have to look at the apps they are showcasing in their promotional materials. The want you to think you can have the app store experience for half the price.

$200 is A pretty compelling price point, but if they're losing that much per device it's going to be a bumpy ride for the next few months. I can see alot of people spending $200 for the web browser, 99c for handful of apps and then shafting the rest of the paid services.
post #7 of 89
26% of Amazons customers, when asked, said they were considering purchasing the Fire over the iPad.

26% of Ford's Customers, when asked, (just ask Mike Rowe) said they were considering purchasing a new Ford over the new Rolls Royce

Folks can skew numbers, and make people think all kinds of things. Heck, maybe he see's this as his opportunity to become the next Steve Jobs, and convince folks of this, but in the end, folks will buy, what works best for them, and for this, iPad will win out.

Will they sell some, hell yes. There are MILLIONS of folks out there on a budget and this will fit them very well. This does mean of the other hand, that there will be MILLIONS of unhappy campers this christmas, when the open there gifts, only to find a Fire in the box, and not an iPad

IMO

Skip
post #8 of 89
For those considering the Fire...

1) What are the top 3 reasons/attractions?

2) How does this compare with the new Nook Tablet?
"...The calm is on the water and part of us would linger by the shore, For ships are safe in harbor, but that's not what ships are for."
- Michael Lille -
Reply
"...The calm is on the water and part of us would linger by the shore, For ships are safe in harbor, but that's not what ships are for."
- Michael Lille -
Reply
post #9 of 89
Quote:
Originally Posted by Red Oak View Post

Amazon is going to lose $300MM this quarter. The holiday shopping season. Apple will earn $10 billion.

Amazon is winning

At the end of the day, nobody wins.
post #10 of 89
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dick Applebaum View Post

For those considering the Fire...

1) What are the top 3 reasons/attractions?

2) How does this compare with the new Nook Tablet?


1:
  1. Form factor (lighter, easier to hold for long periods)
  2. I'm an Amazon Prime member already for the shipping benefit, so tight integration w/their instant videos is a plus
  3. Amazon's liberal return policy: I'm confident if it doesn't live up to the hoopla then I can return it for a full refund no questions asked

2:

I think the nook tablet looks like a nice device, and the boost in specs justifies the slight extra in price. BUT, I don't need that slight extra so I'm sticking with the fire. I say I don't need the extra because I think the kindle fire will do all its basic tasks (at least the ones I'm interested in) very well: read e-books, play video, etc.

I could see the boost mattering for casual web browsing, but I think Amazon's Silk browser will potentially help that more than the extra memory the nook will have. As far as storage space, I have unlimited 4G mobile hotspot on my phone so my wifi devices can always connect through that and I can comfortably "live" in the cloud and don't require lots of local storage.
post #11 of 89
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dunks View Post

I can see alot of people spending $200 for the web browser, 99c for handful of apps and then shafting the rest of the paid services.

I think this will be the common case.
Scary when you think that apple makes a profit on each iPad and then profits on apps/music/video/book/magazines. Amazon will lose on each unit then hopes to make it up on content. The break even point in content purchases is probably close to the price of the Fire.
post #12 of 89
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dick Applebaum View Post

For those considering the Fire...

1) What are the top 3 reasons/attractions?

2) How does this compare with the new Nook Tablet?

I am considering it, here are my top reasons:
  1. Form factor. Similar to a paperback, only slightly larger than the original Kindle's 6" screen. Light. Decent ppi (128% of iPad2). Suitable for movies (widescreen).
  2. Ecosystem. Amazon has my trust to 100%. Excellent customer support, great return policies, unmatched range of offerings. The Amazon App Store is more than sufficient for what one would run on the Kindle Fire, and is only getting better.
  3. Price (not going to ignore the elephant in the room). At this price point I am easily considering two or three devices.

As to how it compares to the Nook, I expect the devices to offer similar experience. I was not impressed with the previous Nooks the I tried at B&N, but I assume the build of the new one is good. As to Kindle, my wife has the e-ink one which is built great, and I expect the Fire to match it. Overall, because of the better ecosystem of the Kindle, the expectedly better build and the lower price, I would prefer it to the Nook today.

Edit: karmamule posted a very similar list before me that I had not read as I was busy composing my own post. I hope I don't get an injunction over being a copyist.
post #13 of 89
Quote:
Originally Posted by Firefly7475 View Post

At the end of the day, nobody wins.

For each 4 Kindle Fires sold:
  • Amazon loses the difference between what it cost them and the price they sell at, let's say 4x25$=100$.
  • Apple loses the profit from an iPad sale that doesn't materialize (using the survey from yesterday as a predictor in lieu of better info), or roughly $200.
  • Four happy buyers win.
post #14 of 89
It is very clear that the FIre will be a hit this holiday season. It's a great gift at a good price. Ultimately, though, I can't imagine that the 7 inch form factor will ultimately be the thing that undoes the iPad. This thing is hot right now for one reason and one reason only - an unsustainable price point timed perfectly to the holiday shopping season. How many books or movies will Amazon have to sell in order to offset this loss? And what happens when they have to re-price the item to keep it inline with the cost of making it (see recent Netflix disaster.) Eventually, this item will be a $250 item, or more, and the full size tablet will come out and will be about $400 and suddenly these things won't be offering the same kind of competition to the iPad that they seem to be now.

Also, see this article in PC World, questioning the validity of the study:
http://www.pcworld.com/article/24352...r_does_it.html
post #15 of 89

There is something going on here... just not sure what.

No reason to disbelieve these estimates vis a vis any similar estimates for other tablets,

Amazon is expected to sell 5 million Fires by the end of December.

Last quarter Apple sold 11.12 million iPads

Here is a chart that shows Apple's reported iPad sales with estimates for the just ended quarter (Note Apple's 4th Quarter ended September.



iPad sales estimates...

I can't find a recent estimate for iPad sales for the quarter ending December. So, I'll SWAG it:

-- Apple will have an extra week in the December quarter
-- Apple has very bullish guidance for the December Quarter
-- In a similar period last year, there was a ~90% QoQ growth.

Lets assume that Apple will sell 18 million iPads by end of the December quarter.


For purposes of comparison:

So, in 1/2 quarter or 6 1/2 weeks Amazon will sell 5 million Fires.

In a similar period of time (last quarter) Apple sold 5.6 million iPads.

In a similar period of time (this quarter) Apple will sell 9 million iPads.


Really?

"...The calm is on the water and part of us would linger by the shore, For ships are safe in harbor, but that's not what ships are for."
- Michael Lille -
Reply
"...The calm is on the water and part of us would linger by the shore, For ships are safe in harbor, but that's not what ships are for."
- Michael Lille -
Reply
post #16 of 89
Forgetting the iPad v the rest discussion for the moment, this is simply accelerating the end of the Windows PC. Many, many folks in this buying category (i.e. low cost) won't bother buying a replacement PC like they normally do because theirs is f***d up and the cost of repair is more than a new one (the main reason people buy PCs). The Tablet revolution is unstoppable and as with the computer market, Apple will have 80% of the high end tablet market and most of the profits and others will share the low end and earn scraps or make losses. I stress I said Winblows PCs era, Macs will continue to sell in ever increasing numbers.
Been using Apple since Apple ][ - Long on AAPL so biased
nMac Pro 6 Core, MacBookPro i7, MacBookPro i5, iPhones 5 and 5s, iPad Air, 2013 Mac mini, SE30, IIFx, Towers; G4 & G3.
Reply
Been using Apple since Apple ][ - Long on AAPL so biased
nMac Pro 6 Core, MacBookPro i7, MacBookPro i5, iPhones 5 and 5s, iPad Air, 2013 Mac mini, SE30, IIFx, Towers; G4 & G3.
Reply
post #17 of 89
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dunks View Post

$200 is A pretty compelling price point, but if they're losing that much per device it's going to be a bumpy ride for the next few months. I can see alot of people spending $200 for the web browser, 99c for handful of apps and then shafting the rest of the paid services.

I can also see a lot of people get into the habit of streaming movies and buying books and music and lots of other Amazon products, even those that they might have schlepped to the mall for previously. Convenience wins in modern America.

Me, I'd snap one up if it could be rooted in order to install ICS. As of now, I'm waiting for a less locked-down tablet with better specs for cheaper.
post #18 of 89
The touchscreen is not gorilla glass - Amazon claims it is a durable new technology. It's okay as an e-reader I guess but I'll stick with an iPad.

I've had an iPad since May 2010 and it's worked perfectly every day. My brother got a kindle in Feb 2010 and cracked his screen 5 months later. He's not even sure how it happened.
post #19 of 89
Quote:
Originally Posted by ncee View Post

26% of Amazons customers, when asked, said they were considering purchasing the Fire over the iPad.


Ummm.....no.


26% of the people who either bought a Fire or who are going to buy one had previously planned to buy an iPad, but will instead delay their purchase of an iPad. J-Rag doesn't get it, but I think it is clear enough for most normal people to understand.

26% of the 5,000,000 Fires to be sold means that somewhere around one or one and a half million fewer iPads will be sold in the near term.


This stuff is not so hard to figure out. It may, however, be hard for some to deal with it.
post #20 of 89
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrDoppio View Post

For each 4 Kindle Fires sold:
  • Amazon loses the difference between what it cost them and the price they sell at, let's say 4x25$=100$.
  • Apple loses the profit from an iPad sale that doesn't materialize (using the survey from yesterday as a predictor in lieu of better info), or roughly $200.
  • Four happy buyers win.

Other than the fact that your math is wrong.

The survey (even if you believe it) says that 26% of early adopters who have bought a Fire or plan to buy one soon will delay or cancel their purchase of an iPad. There are a lot of problems getting from that to your "for every 4 Fires sold, Apple loses an iPad sale" conclusion:

1. Apple is selling them as fast as they can make them. Even if someone else doesn't buy, Apple won't lose a sale - someone else is waiting in line.
2. There's absolutely no reason to believe that all of the people who were considering an iPad would actually have bought one.
3. In fact, these are alleged 'early adopters'. We're now 2 years into the iPad era. 'Early adopters' who don't have an iPad are either lying about being early adopters or have something against Apple - and wouldn't have bought an iPad, anyway.
4. The number of people who allegedly delayed their iPad purchase is about 1% of the total sample - well within the margin of error. There's no way to extrapolate such a small number.

That said, I expect the Fire to sell well. It's a cheaper alternative ($200 vs $500-800) and it wouldn't be surprising to see lots of people buy them. I just don't think that very many people will buy them instead of an iPad. In addition to, maybe.
"I'm way over my head when it comes to technical issues like this"
Gatorguy 5/31/13
Reply
"I'm way over my head when it comes to technical issues like this"
Gatorguy 5/31/13
Reply
post #21 of 89
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dick Applebaum View Post

For those considering the Fire...

1) What are the top 3 reasons/attractions?

2) How does this compare with the new Nook Tablet?


1. Great price.
2. I would use it to surf the web (with WIFI) and watch TV/Movies anywhere anytime.
3. Apps?


1. It is $50 cheaper for similar utility.
2. The Nook has an SD card, so it has a good amount of storage for Movies and Music.
3. Fewer Apps?

And the all-important No. 4: Which one can be rooted and have ICS installed?
post #22 of 89
Quote:
Originally Posted by digitalclips View Post

Forgetting the iPad v the rest discussion for the moment, this is simply accelerating the end of the Windows PC. Many, many folks in this buying category (i.e. low cost) won't bother buying a replacement PC like they normally do because theirs is f***d up and the cost of repair is more than a new one (the main reason people buy PCs). The Tablet revolution is unstoppable and as with the computer market, Apple will have 80% of the high end tablet market and most of the profits and others will share the low end and earn scraps or make losses. I stress I said Winblows PCs era, Macs will continue to sell in ever increasing numbers.

Really?

Do you believe a device like the Fire is robust enough to replace a computer in the home?

The Fire has WiFi and USB to interface the world-- no cameras, no expandable SSD storage, no BT...

AFAICT, there is no way to print anything or cross-load any pictures, music documents...

So the Fire household will consist of a WiFi router and one or more Fire tablets -- that's it?
"...The calm is on the water and part of us would linger by the shore, For ships are safe in harbor, but that's not what ships are for."
- Michael Lille -
Reply
"...The calm is on the water and part of us would linger by the shore, For ships are safe in harbor, but that's not what ships are for."
- Michael Lille -
Reply
post #23 of 89
Quote:
Originally Posted by uplate View Post

I think this will be the common case.
Scary when you think that apple makes a profit on each iPad and then profits on apps/music/video/book/magazines. Amazon will lose on each unit then hopes to make it up on content. The break even point in content purchases is probably close to the price of the Fire.


Don't forget that the device will be a portal to everything Amazon has for sale. And all of it is available to couch potatoes with patented "One Click" purchasing.

I think that this will be a home run of Amazon. Their eBook selection dwarfs iBooks. Their streaming selections are (at least) very competitive. Music, movies, TV series, they have it all.

And the one-click couch potato purchasing decisions will be easy as pie.
post #24 of 89
Quote:
Originally Posted by jragosta View Post

Other than the fact that your math is wrong.

The survey (even if you believe it) says that 26% of early adopters who have bought a Fire or plan to buy one soon will delay or cancel their purchase of an iPad. There are a lot of problems getting from that to your "for every 4 Fires sold, Apple loses an iPad sale" conclusion:

The actual wording was "delay or put on hold." There was not an option for canceling. I wouldn't call this survey misleading but I would say that it is in and of itself not a great statistical indicator. Once you begin to delve this deeply into the sub-groups of a survey, the margin of error grows exponentially. 26% of 5% of 2600 people is a very small sample size. Throw in the confusing nature of the question, which PC Magazine seems to think implies that an iPad purchase is inevitable, and you have not much to go on. The survey found 130 people who had pre-ordered or planned to pre-order a Fire. I am not a statistician but I think the margin of error is fairly high in a group this small.

That said, the questionnaire ha had it's intended effect - it has stoked interest in the Fire and built up media coverage. But, since the Fire is one of those devices that creates inevitable puns, it can't be sold at fire sale prices forever without burning down the factory. Amazon was clearly caught off guard by demand and should have made it extremely clear that this was a limited introductory price. Walmart only offers just so many $49 microwaves. People line up, stampede to the aisle and then buy something else if the sale item is gone.

As an Apple shareholder, of course it is troubling to see a report like this, even more troubling to see the expected 5 million sales figure. But I think that the net effect will actually be minimal on iPad sales and the price point, the main attraction here, can't hold, so as a long term threat this is not really an issue for the iPad, in my opinion.
post #25 of 89
Quote:
Originally Posted by ConradJoe View Post

Don't forget that the device will be a portal to everything Amazon has for sale. And all of it is available to couch potatoes with patented "One Click" purchasing.

Oh, I get it! Amazon is selling a $200 point-of-sale terminal.
post #26 of 89
Quote:
Originally Posted by saarek View Post

I have to admit to being tempted by the Kindle Fire myself.

I love my iPad but mostly use it for music, books/newspapers and the odd game of Angry Birds, rather than getting an iPad 3 next year I might trade down to one of these.

Will wait for actual reviews of the device first.

What? You must be kidding. Even your old iPad is better than than the Fire. More content and apps, bigger screen, better build quality, and will do more than the fire, including movies, music, iTunes U, integration with all your other Apple devices. Your comment makes no sense whatsoever.
post #27 of 89
Quote:
Originally Posted by FreeRange View Post

What? You must be kidding. Even your old iPad is better than than the Fire. More content and apps, bigger screen, better build quality, and will do more than the fire, including movies, music, iTunes U, integration with all your other Apple devices. Your comment makes no sense whatsoever.

There's no questioning the logic of Spock's father. That said, I'm eagerly awaiting the iPad 3.
post #28 of 89
Quote:
Originally Posted by ConradJoe View Post

Ummm.....no.


26% of the people who either bought a Fire or who are going to buy one had previously planned to buy an iPad, but will instead delay their purchase of an iPad. J-Rag doesn't get it, but I think it is clear enough for most normal people to understand.

26% of the 5,000,000 Fires to be sold means that somewhere around one or one and a half million fewer iPads will be sold in the near term.


This stuff is not so hard to figure out. It may, however, be hard for some to deal with it.

The130 people of whom 26% said they might delay or put on hold the purchase of an iPad had either purchased a Fire or were very likely to. Going to and very likely to are not the same things. Close, but if we are calling folks out on semantics, let's be accurate.

I am more interested, now that there are some real sales racking up for the Fire where those numbers are coming from. I would think that as the numbers go up, there will be more cannibalizing of other Kindles and of other 7 inch tablets and e-readers.
post #29 of 89
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dick Applebaum View Post

Really?

Do you believe a device like the Fire is robust enough to replace a computer in the home?

The Fire has WiFi and USB to interface the world-- no cameras, no expandable SSD storage, no BT...

AFAICT, there is no way to print anything or cross-load any pictures, music documents...

So the Fire household will consist of a WiFi router and one or more Fire tablets -- that's it?

Read again what i said slowly. Stop being so centric minded. Of course they won't replace computers for me or you (in the near term) but have you any idea how little many PC users know about how to use their PCs? Any gadget that gives minimal functions would be better for many of them. Many of the tablets out their will suffice for large numbers of people that can't find a file they have saved or even know how to save. This is the start, soon printing from tablets will be common place. Try to have a little forward thinking imagination
Been using Apple since Apple ][ - Long on AAPL so biased
nMac Pro 6 Core, MacBookPro i7, MacBookPro i5, iPhones 5 and 5s, iPad Air, 2013 Mac mini, SE30, IIFx, Towers; G4 & G3.
Reply
Been using Apple since Apple ][ - Long on AAPL so biased
nMac Pro 6 Core, MacBookPro i7, MacBookPro i5, iPhones 5 and 5s, iPad Air, 2013 Mac mini, SE30, IIFx, Towers; G4 & G3.
Reply
post #30 of 89
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dick Applebaum View Post

For those considering the Fire...

1) What are the top 3 reasons/attractions?

2) How does this compare with the new Nook Tablet?

1- Form factor.
I`ve been waiting for a 7 inch tablet as an iPad is simply to bulky for my needs.
2- Amazon ecosystem.
Amazon Prime, Borrowing Library, and fantastic customer service
3- Price is unbeatable

I`m unfamiliar with the Nook but B&N aren`t doing so hot, have no faith they`ll be around and they can`t compete with Amazons ecosystem
post #31 of 89
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob55 View Post

Oh, I get it! Amazon is selling a $200 point-of-sale terminal.

Bingo.
post #32 of 89
Kindle fire looks like a great product sold at the wrong price. Amazon could easily charge $300 for it and I bet it would still sell. As it is, they are shooting themselves in the foot.

This won't last long, I predict a price increase next year after they sell a zillion Fires for Xmas and then realize they've tanked themselves.
post #33 of 89
Quote:
Originally Posted by strask View Post


I am more interested, now that there are some real sales racking up for the Fire where those numbers are coming from. I would think that as the numbers go up, there will be more cannibalizing of other Kindles and of other 7 inch tablets and e-readers.


Likely you are correct. 74% of the FireBuyers had no plans to buy an iPad.

Likely some of them were potential customers of the other tablets you mentioned.
post #34 of 89
Quote:
Originally Posted by digitalclips View Post

Read again what i said slowly. Stop being so centric minded. Of course they won't replace computers for me or you (in the near term) but have you any idea how little many PC users know about how to use their PCs? Any gadget that gives minimal functions would be better for many of them. Many of the tablets out their will suffice for large numbers of people that can't find a file they have saved or even know how to save. This is the start, soon printing from tablets will be common place. Try to have a little forward thinking imagination

I fully agree with the longer term prospects of the past-pc tablets -- we have 6 iPads in our household -- one for each family member plus 1.

We already enjoy wireless streaming of content, printing, TV playing, content purchase, software updates... and all that.

Today, a few iPads, iCloud, a WiFi router, a printer and AppleTV could fulfill the needs of many of the homes you described... with no computer on site.

I just disagree that the Fire is robust enough to meet these same needs.

Again, today, do you believe that a few Fires and a WiFi router is enough?
"...The calm is on the water and part of us would linger by the shore, For ships are safe in harbor, but that's not what ships are for."
- Michael Lille -
Reply
"...The calm is on the water and part of us would linger by the shore, For ships are safe in harbor, but that's not what ships are for."
- Michael Lille -
Reply
post #35 of 89
Quote:
Originally Posted by jragosta View Post

Other than the fact that your math is wrong.
...

My assumptions may be wrong, my math never is.

Quote:
1. Apple is selling them as fast as they can make them. Even if someone else doesn't buy, Apple won't lose a sale - someone else is waiting in line.

I thought of this as well and it is hard to deny it. Hypothetically, the availability of an alternative more desirable product will decrease the demand on iPads to a degree where Apple can make them fatser than sell them.

Quote:
2. There's absolutely no reason to believe that all of the people who were considering an iPad would actually have bought one.
3. In fact, these are alleged 'early adopters'. We're now 2 years into the iPad era. 'Early adopters' who don't have an iPad are either lying about being early adopters or have something against Apple - and wouldn't have bought an iPad, anyway.

In the eye of the general public, Amazon has produced several Kindles before, and Android-based tablets are nothing new. The expected 5 million are not "early adopters", they are regular customers.

Quote:
4. The number of people who allegedly delayed their iPad purchase is about 1% of the total sample - well within the margin of error. There's no way to extrapolate such a small number.

You have no estimate of the error in this study.

Quote:
That said, I expect the Fire to sell well. It's a cheaper alternative ($200 vs $500-800) and it wouldn't be surprising to see lots of people buy them. I just don't think that very many people will buy them instead of an iPad. In addition to, maybe.

The market is constantly growing. The question is what part of the growth will be due to the iPad and what to the newcomers.
post #36 of 89
Quote:
Originally Posted by Red Oak View Post

Amazon is going to lose $300MM this quarter. The holiday shopping season. Apple will earn $10 billion.

Amazon is winning

LOL... makes so much sense now.
post #37 of 89
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dick Applebaum View Post

Really?

Do you believe a device like the Fire is robust enough to replace a computer in the home?

The Fire has WiFi and USB to interface the world-- no cameras, no expandable SSD storage, no BT...

AFAICT, there is no way to print anything or cross-load any pictures, music documents...

So the Fire household will consist of a WiFi router and one or more Fire tablets -- that's it?

Good points. I think there will be some families with ONE spare $200 who will spend it on the Fire in a blind cheap hope that it will 'do' for their household. Like someone else pointed out, their PC is, ah, slow. They aren't using it much anyway. They hope they can surf the net a little bit on the new thing.

What I'm afraid of is they will hate it so much for it's limitations that they may not even look much further at the iPad. I hope they dont come to view it as an 'overpriced' version of the fire !

It's sad to see so many young families literally falling behind because their PC won't work anymore. They've fixed it twice, there's no more money for that, so they get on and just do the barest minimum, kids homework, one email, and it takes them a long time just to do that much. Whole families of people falling right out of tech because Microsoft can't get their act together and fix the virus problem. Young kids who don't even know much about digital technology because their home pC doesn't work.

I know this because we have two kids with families like this. We bought each of them an iPad.
What is really factored into the price is a kind of perpetual sense of disbelief that any company could be as good as Apple is. ~Retrogusto
Reply
What is really factored into the price is a kind of perpetual sense of disbelief that any company could be as good as Apple is. ~Retrogusto
Reply
post #38 of 89
Quote:
Originally Posted by ConradJoe View Post

Likely you are correct. 74% of the FireBuyers had no plans to buy an iPad.

Likely some of them were potential customers of the other tablets you mentioned.

No doubt the Fire will have a ripple effect. iPad sales may be impacted, but then again over a longer time frame the impact may be positive.

I think the tablet manufacturers that can't back up with extensive content will be the ones most badly affected. Nobody can compete against a loss leader unless they have something else to sell.

As tablets become more common as PC replacements the iPad will be more attractive to more people. People opting for the Fire (or similar) in this context will discover what millions of netbook customers discovered... you get what you pay for.
post #39 of 89
Quote:
Originally Posted by palomine View Post

...What I'm afraid of is they will hate it so much for it's limitations that they may not even look much further at the iPad. I hope they dont come to view it as an 'overpriced' version of the fire !

I don't think you really need to worry about that. The iPad has been out for almost 2 years and it's got a fantastic rep. I think, if they end up hating their Fires, they'll quickly realize that they got what they paid for and have the answer to, "how can Amazon sell it for so little?"
post #40 of 89
Quote:
Originally Posted by Springer9999 View Post

The touchscreen is not gorilla glass - Amazon claims it is a durable new technology. It's okay as an e-reader I guess but I'll stick with an iPad.

I've had an iPad since May 2010 and it's worked perfectly every day. My brother got a kindle in Feb 2010 and cracked his screen 5 months later. He's not even sure how it happened.

Wrong! The Kindle Fire does use gorilla glass for the touchscreen.

Don't confuse the Kindle Fire with Amazon's Kindle e-reader devices. They're completely different products. The Kindle Fire is their "tablet" whereas the other Kindle devices have e-ink screens and are designed almost exclusively for "reading."
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: iPad
  • Amazon ramps up Kindle Fire production to 5 million units in 2011
AppleInsider › Forums › Mobile › iPad › Amazon ramps up Kindle Fire production to 5 million units in 2011