From question 10
"The doctrine protects third parties who have made decisions based on the scope of the original patent, only to find themselves infringing the reissued patent."
I'm not a patent lawyer but I'd think this means the patent has more value to Apple as protection and very little to go after Sumsung or Google.
Both 9 and 10 would be of particular interest. Going by those guidelines you may be correct that the reissued patent wouldn't affect products developed in the interim. I guess that's for lawyers to figure out if it comes up.