Quote:
Originally Posted by
wizard69 
Slow? Not a bit from what I can see. As to aesthetics that is in the eye of the beholder. personally I like the browser to disappear when viewing a web sight. Sometimes I go into full screen mode to eliminate as much of the aesthetics as possible. Why? To see the web site without distractions and to fully utilize the screen on my MBP.
So from this guys point of view Safari has it right.
Well THAT is my opinion as well.
I've got Chrome and FireFox on my Mac, and as much as I like some of the geeked out goodness and have downloaded a bunch of extensions for Safari as well -- UNLESS I'm actively doing something geek with a website, I'm 99% of the time in Safari with NO extensions loaded but a basic "click to load extensions" like Flash. The LESS browser the better IMO.
However with the new "single process" in Safari, I can almost safely run Flash without it driving me crazy (and I develop projects for money in Flash).
However, I cannot wait for HTML5 to become the standard. I realized when using a "tweening library" for animation code in Flash's actionscript - and then having to debug messages to a server via javascript in a browser, and having to create a process to handle the script,... that I was pushing wet spaghetti into a Key Hole to open a lock. Flash requires too many moving parts and on a mobile platform like phones it was destined to die, as the THREE layers of junk become FOUR layers of battery sucking inefficiency ....
... OK, that isn't about the browser -- but I had to vent. It's just to point out that all the GEEK GOODNESS that FireFox and Chrome try to give me, and I find USEFUL when developing -- are in stark contrast to my sanity as a user of the web.
It is still nice to have the OPTION of a plugin to add functionality -- but when as a content developer should you depend on them? Never. The days of Proprietary on the web should be over -- a bad experiment that forced companies to hire programmers to "reinvent the wheel a million or more times" and users to hunt around for a way to "view the content."
I think Apple had the right paradigm of not having "virtual code" on top of Code. Safari is the best platform for HTML 5, CSS 3, and all the "standards" that don't require layers of Virtual Reality to make happen.
>> If Chrome takes the lead, you can bet it will have an economic model based on Google KNOWING ALL THERE IS ABOUT YOU. And if Microsoft wins, it's back to "embrace and extend" of standards.
As long as Apple LEADS but doesn't become a fat and comfortable monopoly, I LIKE how the Browser Wars are going. Everyone is now competing to render CSS faster, or run JavaScript code with less battery power and time -- Wow! 8 years ago, I would not have predicted a war on open standards and reliability.
>> No matter what your choice; Chrome, FireFox, Safari or something else -- it's GOOD to be a web user now. I just hope that HTML 5 developers don't make the mistake of abusing the User and make the equivalent of 50 endlessly lopping GIF animations and a MIDI song that cannot be turned off, coupled with a unclose-able Window that requires someone to disable Javascript or to quit the browser to get rid of. Ahh, who am I kidding,....