Originally Posted by GQB
Well that last statement certainly tells us where you're coming from.
Back under the bridge with you.
I don't think you understood what I wrote there. I was referencing the varying stages of issues during early reports of wrongdoings.
Take antennagate for example.
Initially I thought "damn, that's bad" when the story first hit
Then I thought "Apple are addressing it with free bumpers - cool
Eventually I learned that the masses had no issue at all, coming to a final conclusion that it was a non-issue.
During each stage of the story I was able to make different assesments of the situation without the need of "all the facts" that charlituna thinks is a requirement to have an initial opinion on something.