I am not in the USA. I used congressperson because it relates to most people reading the forum.
I'll let your ad hominem slide. Nice try assuming what I don't or do know about the world.
It is criminal conduct in my view, and Canadians will eventually have to foot the bill, if they haven't already, for these kinds of shenanigans.
Your call, Canadians. I suggest you press for this fiasco to be sorted out ASAP.
Maybe Canadians have more pressing matters, I of course won't sink to insulting Canadians, which is not my point anyway.
The case is clear. You have two Co-Chairmen, Co-CEOs that have presided over a failing company for four years. Now they are still on the Board, and one is "Chariman of Innovation". Next, you have a banker that has been sitting on the same Board for four years while everything went South and she's now independent Chair. You have a guy very closely related to their actual failing products, and he's now the CEO. This CEO is also "staying the course" ~ which obviously raises the point, why would he have been chosen if he's just going to "stay the course"? A puppet, perhaps?
What's wrong with this picture? I'll leave it to you all.