Quote:
Originally Posted by Firefly7475 
Why are you having such a massive sook about this?
I'm not saying "the sky is falling", I'm just saying either:
I don't understand why you are whinging about what I said when two posts down you essentially say the exact same fucking thing... "the chassis will have to be thicker than the MBA's chassis"
Since you begged for some numbers here they are.
That means the 2012 MBP would need to drop in volume by 48% to fit the up-sized MBA profile.
Ditching the ODD will get around 20%. If they solder the flash and RAM Apple might get another 10%. The relative internal space compared to the chassis width... maybe another 1-2%.
The only way to shave that much space is to shrink the battery, and the only way to shrink the battery and maintain an 8 hour battery life is to use lower TDP CPU's.
If Apple stick with the current 45W TDP I think the dimensions will be more like:
Height: 0.33-0.95 inch
Width: 14.8 inches
Depth: 9.82 inches
That is, the same height at the back as a 2011 MBP in a wedge down to three times the height of the front of a current MBA. The width can be pushed out a little but the depth stays the same as a 2011 MBP.

Why are you having such a massive sook about this?
I'm not saying "the sky is falling", I'm just saying either:
- Apple can't use the same 45W TDP as the current MacBook Pro --> OR <--
- The new MacBook Pro can't be a 15" version of the MacBook Air as stated in this article, it has to be thicker.
I don't understand why you are whinging about what I said when two posts down you essentially say the exact same fucking thing... "the chassis will have to be thicker than the MBA's chassis"
Since you begged for some numbers here they are.
- 2011 MBA 45cui
- 2011 MBP 134cui
- 2012 MBP 70cui
That means the 2012 MBP would need to drop in volume by 48% to fit the up-sized MBA profile.
Ditching the ODD will get around 20%. If they solder the flash and RAM Apple might get another 10%. The relative internal space compared to the chassis width... maybe another 1-2%.
The only way to shave that much space is to shrink the battery, and the only way to shrink the battery and maintain an 8 hour battery life is to use lower TDP CPU's.
If Apple stick with the current 45W TDP I think the dimensions will be more like:
Height: 0.33-0.95 inch
Width: 14.8 inches
Depth: 9.82 inches
That is, the same height at the back as a 2011 MBP in a wedge down to three times the height of the front of a current MBA. The width can be pushed out a little but the depth stays the same as a 2011 MBP.
Then I must have misread your intent.
As for thickness, it can be less than 0.95" in the back and still have the same internal height space for the CPU. Remember that the lid of the new MBA are thinner than the MBPs because they are milled, not pressed.
"Blank! BLANK! You're not looking at the big picture!"
"Blank! BLANK! You're not looking at the big picture!"







.